Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

5.3L Vs. 6.0L Vs. Sc 355???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
Blownz28man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Elk City OK
Car: 92 25th anv z28
Engine: 346 TC78 Turbo
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.25 9"Nodular, Strange axles
5.3L Vs. 6.0L Vs. Sc 355???

Ok heres my problem. I just got a new car to mess with. I know its not an f-body.. but will be using a f-body power plant. Its a 86 Monte ss. Motors gone in it. What engine should i use. Cost is a little factor here. First.. a 6.0l. those cost around 2000.00 for a good one. 2nd.. a 5.3L. those are around 1000.00 for a low milage one. Or i have all most all the parts sitting around to build a l98 with a ati procharger. Dont have the intake or serp setup though. Should i build a stout 355 with a supercharger or have full drivabilty with a ls based motor?? Help. Oh yea.. anyone want a 305 with a rod knock>>75k miles!! Thanks!!!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 06:42 PM
  #2  
matt_p's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, BC
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi
A supercharged 355 will have full drivibility and have much more power than the LS based motor.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #3  
92lt1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Frankenmuth, MI
Car: 91z
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 373
I believe chevyhiperformance did a build up of a 6.0 and made some serious stump pulling numbers with it...Throw the supercharger on it and you'lll have some serious power. Just my opinion.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #4  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
The 6.0 and 5.3 motors you are refering to are Gen III mills. They are not a direct swap into these cars (or your monte) and do require some special work/parts/set-up.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #5  
FlamedROC's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
From: Faribault, Minnesota
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Re: 5.3L Vs. 6.0L Vs. Sc 355???

Originally Posted by matt_p
A supercharged 355 will have full drivibility and have much more power than the LS based motor.
I disagree, LSX motors are far superior in every way. Add boost and they still have better drivablity than gen I or II motor.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 02:03 AM
  #6  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
And, two years after the fact, you point would be. . .

????
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
codeysabatini
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Nov 10, 2015 04:07 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
BLK87Z
TBI
2
Sep 18, 2015 11:29 PM
anesthes
Power Adders
3
Sep 18, 2015 12:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 AM.