Rocker arms (?)
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 39.84N 105.11W
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Rocker arms (?)
Hey guys, just a quick post to make sure that my understanding of this is correct:
When I bought my heads, I specified 7/16" studs, (since they were a no-cost option) for the added valvetrain stability. I started looking for full-roller rocker arms that met all of the following criteria, & so far, no-one has been able to tell me that they exist.
* 1.5 ratio
* narrow-body
* fit 7/16"studs
* made from steel
I'm pretty sure that I could get all of this if I was willing to forgo the use of centerbolt valve covers, but my experience has been that (over the long term) they seal a hell of a lot better than perimeter-bolt covers do. On top of that, I've already found a set of centerbolt valve covers that I like pretty well (see my vBGarage), & I'd prefer not to sell them if there's a way around it.
Now the 7/16" studs are somewhat more important to me than the centerbolt valve covers, so if I have to make a choice, that's the direction I'd probably go - but if there's any way, I'd sure like to have both...
Whaddya think, guys??
When I bought my heads, I specified 7/16" studs, (since they were a no-cost option) for the added valvetrain stability. I started looking for full-roller rocker arms that met all of the following criteria, & so far, no-one has been able to tell me that they exist.
* 1.5 ratio
* narrow-body
* fit 7/16"studs
* made from steel
I'm pretty sure that I could get all of this if I was willing to forgo the use of centerbolt valve covers, but my experience has been that (over the long term) they seal a hell of a lot better than perimeter-bolt covers do. On top of that, I've already found a set of centerbolt valve covers that I like pretty well (see my vBGarage), & I'd prefer not to sell them if there's a way around it.
Now the 7/16" studs are somewhat more important to me than the centerbolt valve covers, so if I have to make a choice, that's the direction I'd probably go - but if there's any way, I'd sure like to have both...
Whaddya think, guys??
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bonner Springs, KS
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1995 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 6 spd Manual
Axle/Gears: Dana 44, 3:45:1
The only real full-roller steel rocker arm that I know of are the Comp Pro-Magnums... You can get those for 7/16" stud in 1.5 ratio... Not sure about centerbolt clearance though...
#3
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 39.84N 105.11W
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Thanks thirdgen88, I appreciate the response.
Anyone else have any thoughts, ideas, suggestions?? I really didn't expect that it would have people baffled(?) like this...
Anyone else have any thoughts, ideas, suggestions?? I really didn't expect that it would have people baffled(?) like this...
#4
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 39.84N 105.11W
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Rocker arms (?)
Hmm. I'd really be grateful if someone had some good, solid info on this. Maybe I can get better responses with more-simplified questions...
Am I correct in my understanding that centerbolt valve covers require narrow-body rocker arms?
I figure that the combination of 7/16" studs & "narrow body" rocker arms more than likely means that there's just not enough room to create a roller rocker arm with enough strength to last any reasonable amount of time - anyone know for sure???
Thanks all...
Am I correct in my understanding that centerbolt valve covers require narrow-body rocker arms?
I figure that the combination of 7/16" studs & "narrow body" rocker arms more than likely means that there's just not enough room to create a roller rocker arm with enough strength to last any reasonable amount of time - anyone know for sure???
Thanks all...
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 3,461
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
Re: Rocker arms (?)
Yes. Otherwise the inside supports and baffles don't clear the rockers.
Makes sense on the 7/16 option.
I had to go perimeter because my rockers wouldn't clear the inside supports on my centerbolts.
Makes sense on the 7/16 option.
I had to go perimeter because my rockers wouldn't clear the inside supports on my centerbolts.
#6
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 39.84N 105.11W
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Rocker arms (?)
OK, thanks Viprklr. That's what I suspected, but I really wanted to be proven wrong...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92rsvortec350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
19
10-09-2015 09:39 AM