Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

355 Build and Compression ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #1  
xyzman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
355 Build and Compression ?

I will be putting a 355 together to put in my 85 Camaro former little old lady driven to church on sunday car. The 355 short block will be assembled with stock crank and reworked rods with speed pro dome forged pistons and a comp cam 501/244 hyd cam & 1.6 rockers. This vehicle will see limited street and an occasional trip to the track, what i am asking for is what compression ratio will work best with this combination my choices being 12.94 11.87 11.26 10.71 and 10.22 compression the rest of the engine consists of torque II manifold (Hood Clearance) not my first choice and a 750 holley dp carb thanks
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #2  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,916
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 355 Build and Compression ?

speed pro dome forged pistons
501/244 hyd cam
torque II manifold
Wow...

I hate to be such a buzz-killer, but that's EVERY SINGLE 70s-80s smogger mistake you can make, all balled up into one.

I'm guessing this is going to have the "stock" heads? 882, 993, or 624, perhaps?

Dome pistons and big-chamber heads are a GUARANTEED inefficient, detonation-*****, fuel-finnicky, VERY EXPENSIVE to operate slug. There is no worse combo you can create in that area.

501/244 is lame. Even the "RPM cam", with the same .050" duration on the exhaust, has more lift than that. What you'll end up with is a motor that has no top end whatsoever, because of the smogger heads; and no low end whatsoever, because of the long-duration cam. An all-around slug.

The T2 manifold was one of Edelbrock's first attempts to combine a single and a dual plane intake. Didn't work. What they got was all the disadvantages of both, and the advantages of neither. It will AMPLIFY the poor cam choice problem.

That's just not a good plan. A flat-top motor with 64cc heads will KILL an otherwise identical (cam, intake, exhaust) dome-piston 76cc head motor of the same static CR, EVERY TIME, no questions asked, no other outcome possible, case closed, period. Given the proper machine work (zero-decking the block to the pistons), the disparity gets even greater.

Ditch the smogger heads. Get a set of 64cc heads, Vortecs maybe even. Pick a different cam: for a 350 on the street, a Comp XE268 is GREAT. Ditch the T2. Get a Performer RPM for Vortecs.

{edit} I almost forgot... for the street, you want NO MORE THAN low 10s CR with iron heads, and that IF AND ONLY IF the block has been zero-decked to the rotating assembly. If the block is not zero-decked, you want NO MORE THAN mid 9s. So really, none of those pistons is a good choice.

Last edited by sofakingdom; Jan 15, 2008 at 10:41 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
codeysabatini
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Nov 10, 2015 04:07 PM
BLK87Z
TBI
2
Sep 18, 2015 11:29 PM
Billy Decker
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
Sep 4, 2015 03:46 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.