Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

LS vs SBC comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2011 | 10:04 PM
  #1  
brodysZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 1
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Strange S60
LS vs SBC comparison

I wrote an essay for a college course comparing these two engines and giving examples of why I feel the LS based engines are superior to the SBC. Now I do not consider myself an expert, and would like to hear others opinions.

Some may find this interesting and some may find this useless, but I figured might as well try to contribute to the board in any way I can.

Document is attached.
Attached Files
File Type: doc
Ls vs sbc.doc (32.5 KB, 786 views)
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2011 | 10:16 PM
  #2  
tjtaylor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Car: 1991 Camaro RS ttops
Engine: 00 383
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 3.50
Re: LS vs SBC comparison

on page three you used the word suck instead of such i do believe hah but good paper
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #3  
bjankuski's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Glenbeulah, WI
Car: 1988 Firbird
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: LS vs SBC comparison

In stock form I agree. In modified form all bets are off!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 04:53 PM
  #4  
sailtexas186548's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 6
From: Kemah, Tx
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: LS vs SBC comparison

yeah once you look past the "oh stock LS parts are so much better" (they are newer, that's expected) they both have their up's and downs.

also not mentioned very ofter, is the SBC's 5 heads bolts per cylinder VS the 4 for LS. although LSx can have 6 bolts per cylinder, that gets pricy fast.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 05:27 PM
  #5  
Convoy25's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Somerset, New Jersey
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: LS vs SBC comparison

Originally Posted by bjankuski
In modified form all bets are off!

though mod for mod..

on another note, dont LS blocks have 6 bolt mains?




and then there is the fuel economy
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 09:15 PM
  #6  
brodysZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 1
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Strange S60
Re: LS vs SBC comparison

Yea I'm pretty sure all of the LS have 6 bolt mains.

Does extra head bolt per cylinder make a difference? What would happen, bolts stretch or even break?

What are some negative aspects of LS engines besides obviously cost? I know that the aluminum blocks aren't as strong as the same iron ones.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 09:28 PM
  #7  
Convoy25's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Somerset, New Jersey
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: LS vs SBC comparison

Originally Posted by brodysZ28
What are some negative aspects of LS engines besides obviously cost?
the looks of them

and they sound nice, but they dont have that Small block/Big Block sound
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 12:02 AM
  #8  
sailtexas186548's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 6
From: Kemah, Tx
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: LS vs SBC comparison

i believe a majority of ls motors have 4 head bolts per cylinder. i know the LSX block and maybe the higher performance stock motors have 6 head bolts per cylinder but certainly not all of them. When you start getting into really high HP build (forced induction especially) the 4 bolts are not enough to keep the heads from lifting
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 07:11 PM
  #9  
brodysZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 1
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Strange S60
Re: LS vs SBC comparison

Originally Posted by sailtexas186548
i believe a majority of ls motors have 4 head bolts per cylinder. i know the LSX block and maybe the higher performance stock motors have 6 head bolts per cylinder but certainly not all of them. When you start getting into really high HP build (forced induction especially) the 4 bolts are not enough to keep the heads from lifting
And when they lift does it just blow the headgasket and lose compression or worse?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 07:21 PM
  #10  
whatever84's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 374
Likes: 2
From: Ankeny Iowa
Car: 84 Camaro
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's / Strange LSD
Re: LS vs SBC comparison

What are some negative aspects of LS engines besides obviously cost? I know that the aluminum blocks aren't as strong as the same iron ones.[/quote]

The only thing I dont like about an LS engine is there is no one to tune it close to me, When you do mods to it it needs to be retuned and that gets pricey if you can find someone close to do it. The LS is a great motor but an ugly one. my 2 cents.

Mark.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gixxer92
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
9
May 18, 2017 11:20 AM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
92rsvortec350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
19
Oct 9, 2015 09:39 AM
Bradsaundry
Exhaust
5
Oct 7, 2015 04:35 PM
oil pan 4
Fabrication
2
Oct 6, 2015 11:56 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.