Ws6/iroc/z28
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rico, AZ 85648
Car: 1989 IROC-1
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Ws6/iroc/z28
Well, this may be a touchy subject...but here goes.
I would like some perspective here.
I have an 84 Z28...fully loaded from the factory. T-Tops, tilt steering, cruise control, AC, power mirrors, windows and door locks, electric seat...the works.
I was helping someone the other day with a WS6. He was having a little trouble over-heating. In the trunk, there was no lid over the back compartment that drops behind the gas tank...didn't look like there was ever one. There was no shade that you could pull from behind the back seat to attach to the trunk lid to keep the sun or spying eyes off of whatever you are carrying.
It did have an attractive speedo, but the instrument cluster in my opinion was too long. I would think it would be easier to keep track of all of your gauges in a tighter set up like the Camaro's have.
From what I understand about the WS6 is that the handling is superior, but even then I don't think it had the subframe connector (the short one that goes underneath between the right and left side under the front of engine like in the IROC's)....which of course the IROC's came with.
I think the pop up headlights are kinda neat, but always break, and it has a nice looking hood. But other than that I think I like the Camaro's better.
What are your opinions?
I would like some perspective here.
I have an 84 Z28...fully loaded from the factory. T-Tops, tilt steering, cruise control, AC, power mirrors, windows and door locks, electric seat...the works.
I was helping someone the other day with a WS6. He was having a little trouble over-heating. In the trunk, there was no lid over the back compartment that drops behind the gas tank...didn't look like there was ever one. There was no shade that you could pull from behind the back seat to attach to the trunk lid to keep the sun or spying eyes off of whatever you are carrying.
It did have an attractive speedo, but the instrument cluster in my opinion was too long. I would think it would be easier to keep track of all of your gauges in a tighter set up like the Camaro's have.
From what I understand about the WS6 is that the handling is superior, but even then I don't think it had the subframe connector (the short one that goes underneath between the right and left side under the front of engine like in the IROC's)....which of course the IROC's came with.
I think the pop up headlights are kinda neat, but always break, and it has a nice looking hood. But other than that I think I like the Camaro's better.
What are your opinions?
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Trenton, NJ
Car: '89 TA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: M5
Instrument cluster: It's no big thing to get used to. Besides, your two "most" vital stats are right there anyway (tach and speedo)
Trunk: you could always do something to remedy the exposed space (tint,pull-down shade, hatch cover)
Headlights: Only speaking for the 4 3rd gen birds I've been around a LOT (my 2 and KZad's 2), we've never hadda any problems w/ the motors.
Just my 2 cents for you. Remember though, I'm quite biased towards birds
Trunk: you could always do something to remedy the exposed space (tint,pull-down shade, hatch cover)
Headlights: Only speaking for the 4 3rd gen birds I've been around a LOT (my 2 and KZad's 2), we've never hadda any problems w/ the motors.
Just my 2 cents for you. Remember though, I'm quite biased towards birds
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 564
Likes: 2
From: Cathlamet, Washington
Car: 87 Formula
Engine: 327
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
It took 220,000 miles of driving before our motors went out. Then it only took some JB Weld in mechanism to fix it. About 1 hour and 5 bucks. To me most pontiacs have more style. There are exceptions to both though.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
You want lateral G's and better handling, but has a tough ride over terrain, go with an IROC-Z. You want handling that is good and is smoother over terrain, get a WS6.
Last edited by IROCZTWENTYGR8; Apr 7, 2002 at 04:39 PM.
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Ormond Beach, Florida
Car: '88 Firebird Formula
Engine: 360hp/417ft. lb. 350
Transmission: Pro-Built Street/Strip 700R4
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
You want lateral G's and better handling, but has a tough ride over terrain, go with an IROC-Z. You want handling that is good and is smoother over terrain, get a WS6.
You want lateral G's and better handling, but has a tough ride over terrain, go with an IROC-Z. You want handling that is good and is smoother over terrain, get a WS6.
Used to be a guy at the garage that would work on it and said it was the best handling WS6 he'd driven though, and he owned one...
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Must be a reason for it. WS6 is easier over stuff than IROC suspension. Ususally the cars that aren't are the best handlers, but if you want handling, thats what you get, and some wouldn't have it any other way.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: San Rafael, CA
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI (L98)
Transmission: 700RJunk
Re: Ws6/iroc/z28
Originally posted by gruveb
It did have an attractive speedo, but the instrument cluster in my opinion was too long. I would think it would be easier to keep track of all of your gauges in a tighter set up like the Camaro's have.
From what I understand about the WS6 is that the handling is superior, but even then I don't think it had the subframe connector (the short one that goes underneath between the right and left side under the front of engine like in the IROC's)....which of course the IROC's came with.
I think the pop up headlights are kinda neat, but always break, and it has a nice looking hood. But other than that I think I like the Camaro's better.
What are your opinions?
It did have an attractive speedo, but the instrument cluster in my opinion was too long. I would think it would be easier to keep track of all of your gauges in a tighter set up like the Camaro's have.
From what I understand about the WS6 is that the handling is superior, but even then I don't think it had the subframe connector (the short one that goes underneath between the right and left side under the front of engine like in the IROC's)....which of course the IROC's came with.
I think the pop up headlights are kinda neat, but always break, and it has a nice looking hood. But other than that I think I like the Camaro's better.
What are your opinions?
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
I'm surprided to hear that. Every Firebird I drove was easier on the road than the Camaros. (Been in a few of both and driven a few of both) But I like the Camaros sharper cornering.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rico, AZ 85648
Car: 1989 IROC-1
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Having never driven a 3rd gen Firebird I can't compare the way they handle....but for some reason it was in my mind that the WS6 was superior in handling...but apparently I was mistaken. (That happens a lot to me!)
Kind of funny, but for 1st, 2 nd and 4th gens, I like the Pontiac version much better, just for looks if nothing else. However, in the 3rd gen's, I've always prefer the Camaros.
But to each his own. I would certainly NOT be ashamed to be sporting a formula 350 around, that's for sure.
Kind of funny, but for 1st, 2 nd and 4th gens, I like the Pontiac version much better, just for looks if nothing else. However, in the 3rd gen's, I've always prefer the Camaros.
But to each his own. I would certainly NOT be ashamed to be sporting a formula 350 around, that's for sure.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SCCAjunkie
Mid-Atlantic Region
2
Apr 25, 2012 07:16 AM








