Who Would win?

Subscribe
Jul 19, 2002 | 06:00 AM
  #1  
Who would win between these two?
A 1992 Chevy Camaro Z-28 with the 350 TPI and a 2002 Cavalier LS Sport, My buddy has the Camaro and I can almost gauruntee the Camaro will spank the Crapalier so bad
Jul 19, 2002 | 06:36 AM
  #2  
You have to ask?
Jul 19, 2002 | 06:39 AM
  #3  
I'm just wondering, What's your opinion
Jul 19, 2002 | 06:50 AM
  #4  
:sillylol: :sillylol: HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.......
Jul 19, 2002 | 07:18 AM
  #5  
Camaro tail lights all the way. Won't even be close. I'm assuming both vehicles are practically stock, ofcourse. And as far as I know, the Cavalier would need something like nitrous or forced induction.

There are very few front wheel drive GM models that would be able to challenge that Camaro in stock form (though I don't know if they'd beat it), and that's the Cadilac STS and ETC with the 300 hp Northstar and the Pontiac Grand Prix GTP and Buick Regal GS with the Supercharged 3800. Everything else is too heavy or underpowered.


Come to think of it, if the 1/4 times for your 2.8 V-6 Camaro are correct, you'd beat the Cavalier with that.
Jul 19, 2002 | 07:46 AM
  #6  
I figured I would post it, Just to see what other ppl thought, Aren't the 92 Z28's the fastest stock third gens? And yes the 1/4 times are right for my V6, I already beat a 2000 Z24 by about 4 or 5 car lengths
Jul 19, 2002 | 07:47 AM
  #7  
Oh the Cavalier that my buddy is facing has the 2.2 ECOTEC "Twin Cam" engine, I think that car has 140 hp, Either way, Cavy's are junk
Jul 19, 2002 | 11:20 AM
  #8  
Quote:
Originally posted by Camaro_1986_19
I figured I would post it, Just to see what other ppl thought, Aren't the 92 Z28's the fastest stock third gens?
nope the TTA or a Firehawk
Jul 19, 2002 | 11:34 AM
  #9  
15.5 with just a chip and exhaust? WTF???????
Jul 19, 2002 | 11:37 AM
  #10  
Quote:
Originally posted by fly89gta
15.5 with just a chip and exhaust? WTF???????
I thought it was a 15.1 in his last post.
Jul 19, 2002 | 11:38 AM
  #11  
Quote:
Originally posted by iroc22


I thought it was a 15.1 in his last post.
even better lol
Jul 19, 2002 | 11:39 AM
  #12  
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=119363
Jul 19, 2002 | 12:06 PM
  #13  
Quote:
Originally posted by iroc22
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=119363
ah yes, i remember that thread
Jul 19, 2002 | 02:14 PM
  #14  
Actually, I think the 300hp STS would kill a 92 Z. Don't bring up 1/4 times to argue, but I've seen it on the street. They're quite a machine. But, a cavalier. Your wasting webspace even asking.
Jul 19, 2002 | 07:38 PM
  #15  
Wait, it ran 16s in the rain!!!
Jul 19, 2002 | 07:47 PM
  #16  
Quote:
Originally posted by iroc22


I thought it was a 15.1 in his last post.
Hmm thats odd , if I didn't know better I'ld say he's a 'er.

I wonder what "daddys" camaros running in the 1/4 today? 12.1 maybe?
Jul 19, 2002 | 08:09 PM
  #17  
TTA or Firehawk, what are those? lol

15.1, yep, that's faster than me.
Jul 20, 2002 | 12:06 AM
  #18  
Quote:
I figured I would post it, Just to see what other ppl thought, Aren't the 92 Z28's the fastest stock third gens?
I wouldn't think so. The TTA and Firehawk's are faster, but that's been said. As far as I know, the engines (l98s) in the 90s and 91s were the same as the ones in 92. No hp or torque improvements were made during those years. So considering weight is the same on the cars the 90s, 91s, and 92s would be the same. Right?
Jul 20, 2002 | 12:40 AM
  #19  
Hey SOLID LIFTER ***, Go ride your mom in the quarter mile and see what u get ***, Quit questioning the performance of my car, I get different readings on different days slapnutz
Jul 20, 2002 | 02:31 AM
  #20  
please tell me how you got a 2.8 to run 15.5 w/o a Nos fogger system or something, i have a brand new 350 in my car and you would spank me, if i put just a chip and exhaust on my car i must be good for 12s huh?
Jul 20, 2002 | 02:56 AM
  #21  
I have made more mods since then, Performance Cam, Hooker headers, Accel 300 wires, Bosch Platinum 4 Plugs, Accel Super Coil, Hi Performance Cap And Rotor. I ran a 16.7 in the rain and the 15.1 was a nice clear day about 65 degrees out.
Jul 20, 2002 | 03:31 AM
  #22  
Quote:
Originally posted by Camaro_1986_19
Hey SOLID LIFTER ***, Go ride your mom in the quarter mile and see what u get ***, Quit questioning the performance of my car, I get different readings on different days slapnutz
Ohh I'm so hurt that alittle @$$ nugget, that has to tell everybody that his "daddy's" car is his own, thinks IM the ***.

Ride my mom through the 1/4 ?That was so LAME I didn't even crack a smile.

Your SO full of $#!+, that I can smell it on your breath.
Jul 20, 2002 | 08:52 AM
  #23  
Quote:
Originally posted by Camaro_1986_19
, Bosch Platinum 4 Plugs, .
I love when people list those as mods. First off, platinum doesn't conduct as well as copper, just lasts longer. Then that 4 spark thing is BS. You're just pissing your money away on those.
Jul 20, 2002 | 10:40 AM
  #24  
my engine would eat platinums for dinner, the suck in boosted applications...even N/A i wouldn't bother, AC Delco's for me..
Jul 20, 2002 | 11:06 AM
  #25  
cavys are junk??

no they arent junk, just not as fast as an iroc or gta.. in my 93 2.2l cavalier i was pumping out 190hp from the front wheels with a 14.2 sec 1/4 time..if i can find my race ticket ill show ya..but i lost my book to the cav when i smashed it(head on accident broad hit me like i wasnt even there) anyways here is the pic of her..

iroc2nv

by the way, the roc is now my 2nd show car!!

Who Would win?-cav.jpg  

Jul 20, 2002 | 11:08 AM
  #26  
Not only did he run 15.1 in the 1/4 but he did it with a rod nock,WOW!

MAJOR LEAGUE 'ER!

Click here!
Jul 20, 2002 | 01:14 PM
  #27  
No, Cav's are junk, and modding them is a waste of money.
Jul 20, 2002 | 01:59 PM
  #28  
Quote:
Originally posted by iroc2nv
cavys are junk??

no they arent junk, just not as fast as an iroc or gta.. in my 93 2.2l cavalier i was pumping out 190hp from the front wheels with a 14.2 sec 1/4 time..if i can find my race ticket ill show ya..but i lost my book to the cav when i smashed it(head on accident broad hit me like i wasnt even there) anyways here is the pic of her..

iroc2nv

by the way, the roc is now my 2nd show car!!

what mods did u have done to get 190 at the front wheels..
Jul 21, 2002 | 06:50 AM
  #29  
https://www.thirdgen.org/classifieds....tgo?adid=4413

WOW! Heres another one.
I wonder how the he(( runs 15.1 with a rod nock.

p.s. This link works and I fixed the other one .
p.p.s. The first ad he placed ( wich has now been deleted.Hmm I wonder what caused him to do that)was on the 7th, the day he placed all of his "mad, scary fast ( )" 1/4 times was the 14th, the day he posted this new ad was on the 20th.
Im sure hes going to argue that he got those 1/4 times before the 7th but its only been recently (as in the 15th of the month)that hes had the 15.1/15.5 1/4 times (as opposed to the 16.75)in his sig.
Jul 21, 2002 | 07:33 AM
  #30  
>Click here for more raw stupidity!<

He started this thread on 5-31-02 where he talks about his motor haveing a mojor rod nock.
Im sure he'll tell us that he ran his amazing 15.1 or 15.5 (or whatever the wheel of fortune is telling him today) before 5/31 but that still won't explain why it was only on july 15 that he changed his 1/4 time from 16.75 to 15.5. Or he'll spit out something truely dumb like " I ran 15.1/15.5 with the rod nock,you ***."


I'ld have to say for sure, in my own mind that this guy really is so full of $#!+ that he spits corn and nuts when he talks.

Jul 21, 2002 | 08:50 AM
  #31  
i think solidlifter pretty much nailed it. do we even have to call ? this is the guy saying his dodge shadow running a 15.9 could smoke my rsx
Jul 21, 2002 | 09:34 AM
  #32  
Though sad, you losers are just as sad researching all of his past posts just to trash, get a life.

And RSX's are slow, so get out of here.
Jul 21, 2002 | 09:47 AM
  #33  
Quote:
Originally posted by SOLID LIFTER
Or he'll spit out something truely dumb like " I ran 15.1/15.5 with the rod nock,you ***."


also in the rain while he was getting road head from a $5 hooker

Run my V6
Jul 21, 2002 | 09:50 AM
  #34  
if its still on the first page, it aint researched cruz. dont try and protect him. we called bs on him, now let HIM prove us wrong. i never claimed my rsx was fast, but it is quicker then some of the cars on here. i am here to stay, get over it
Jul 21, 2002 | 09:57 AM
  #35  
MOMMA'S BOY
Jul 21, 2002 | 09:57 AM
  #36  
Quote:
Originally posted by Cruz'N Bruz'R
Though sad, you losers are just as sad researching all of his past posts just to trash, get a life.
WOW, man YOU ARE just to cool for words I wish I could be a 90 lbs. 4'9" tooth pic who can only be a man when he's behind a key board just like you!

Im so hurt, All I did was surf through the classifieds I wasn't looking for $#!+ to post about him I just stumbled upon it, I figered it would be funny to post.
Ill admit I searched for the post that was on the V6 board, but it was hardly time consuming about a min. at the most, by hitting the search for posts by this user option.

I know all this info is just straining that pee brain locked in that cone head of of yours but it was really a pretty simple thing to do.
Jul 21, 2002 | 10:04 AM
  #37  
hey solid lifter, i guess we found out who camaro_1986_19's butt buddy is. aint too bright is he though? only two word posts... oh well, maybe if he thought about it for a week or so he could make a post worth replying to
Jul 21, 2002 | 10:40 AM
  #38  
Quote:
Originally posted by fly89gta

Run my V6
:rockon:
Jul 21, 2002 | 11:40 AM
  #39  
Quote:
Originally posted by rsxtcy
hey solid lifter, i guess we found out who camaro_1986_19's butt buddy is.
Wow, your making friends already. momma would be proud.

Ok this is lame.
Jul 21, 2002 | 12:21 PM
  #40  
yes it sure is. i dunno why you guys started it in the first place. i am real easy to get along with when you arent flaming me
Jul 21, 2002 | 02:40 PM
  #41  
Ok im all for being a toys R us kid but you guys are waayyyyy too childish, and those with 15 second barely modded 60* V6's need to pass the bong, someone's being stingy with the sticky icky.
Subscribe