Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Got a race set up for when I get my engine finished

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 09:26 AM
  #51  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
As the posts continue it gets deeper. I dont think you can make 450 period on 882 heads.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 11:34 AM
  #52  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
omg

I thought you were making 456hp (now I'm not so sure), but I didn't think it was at 3500... And you shouldn't be comparing your 383 to a factory motor. It's essentially a built engine, not a bolt on engine, so you shouldn't use that logic to prove its power level. Stroking your engine does not add as much power as you think. Adding 33 cubes will not give you 100 hp; because in order to do so you would have had to have been making 3.3 hp/cubic inch in the first place, which you were not(you were in fact making less than 1hp/cube). So unless I see a dynograph I'm
it does make 456 my freind 383 with iron parts make 435 trie reading the post next time.dont tell me what it adds its not just 33c.i its a lot more then that.the motor my friend has is te iron 383 and makes 21 less hp thats just his motor that makes that power i have a good flowmaster set up with headers and much more its very easy to see my 383 makeing 456hp and 494ft.lbs. 882s are good heqads there are tons of cars at are car show pshing 400+ with 882s

Last edited by 1981z28; Sep 11, 2004 at 11:38 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 01:32 PM
  #53  
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
"As the posts continue it gets deeper."

__________________________________________

Just to name a few..........


"my heads stainless 2.02 1.60 valves close chamber"

ALL 882 heads are open chamber heads.

"11:1 flat top pistons $900 a set."

There's no way you have 11:1 compression with 882 heads and flat top pistons. My fathers motor needed milling and domed pistons to get anywhere near 11:1 with his 882's.

"FORGED H-BEAM RODS aluminum (they weight less takes less power to move and can move faster)"

All aluminum rods are I-beam designs. I've never heard of an H-beam aluminum rod.

I think it's official --->

Last edited by SOLID LIFTER; Sep 11, 2004 at 01:42 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 01:57 PM
  #54  
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Re: what

Originally posted by 1981z28
882s stock are good heads heavy but good . modded there awsome
Stock 882's SUCK BIGTIME! 882's are not heavy in fact they're known as lite castings because they are super thin and have little meat for porting.

Originally posted by 1981z28
the hell i could have just done the stroker kit and had 450hp. but i also have a lot of other modds.
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHaaa! You really think you could make 450hp JUST by stroking a motor with no other modifications at all ??? ummm.......... hell no!
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #55  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
no

u dont know what ur taling abou its not just strokeing when u use a 383 stroker kit. the kit says it will make between 400and 450 hp .dam go online and look at a kit. i dont care if u guys dont think it will make the power because i know for a fact it does


i got a kit alot like this one

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 02:20 PM
  #56  
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Re: no

Originally posted by 1981z28
u dont know what ur taling abou its not just strokeing when u....
jesus!
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 02:20 PM
  #57  
Cameron's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: East Texas
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
456hp@3500rpms
What? say that again? Switch that 3 and 5 around.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 02:35 PM
  #58  
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Re: no

Originally posted by 1981z28

i got a kit alot like this one

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW
It says "for street and strip performance to 550hp."

That means that the components in the kit will handle 550hp, not that they'll make 550hp.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 02:42 PM
  #59  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
well

i going to look for my dyno slip and when i find it all of u will have ur foot put in ur mouth
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 02:54 PM
  #60  
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Yep you go do that.
If you come up with a real dyno sheet of your motor I'll be the first one to admit that I was wrong.

Last edited by SOLID LIFTER; Sep 11, 2004 at 02:57 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #61  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
im looking

i have not found it yet i might justr go dyno it again.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 05:29 PM
  #62  
laiky's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
i believe 882's can make 450 hp with a very long duration cam, at very high rpm if all else is right. You will not be making 450 hp under 6000 rpm and you will not make anywhere near 500 ftlbs with that setup. Most likely you have a big cam that likes to rev, your heads are restrictive. If in fact they do flow due to 50 or so hours of porting you will have no port velocity, so 500 ftlbs is out of the question. From your posts you seem to have a "parts catalog" level of engine knowledge. You throw out gibberish that sounds like something real to your average 16 year old *****. I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt on peak HP not rpm or torque. State you engine combo, in detail, once and for all. What kind of DYNO, engine or chassis, what kind of cam roller of FT, what PN cam, what manufacturer, flow numbers on your heads and the valve lift they occour at. Piston PN, dome or dish cc, Head CC, advertised cam duration, duration at 0.050" etc. i could give a **** about what your crank is made from or your alluminum rods. Please stick to facts.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #63  
berlinetta85383's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: red deer, alberta
Car: 85 berlinetta
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700r4
hahahaha ohh my ***!! I havn't posted here in months but as I was reading the post I was just getting ready to call this one!!! Well folks first things first the scat stroker kit will give approx 76 hp while the eagle stroker kit is only good for 72 hp... he must have gotten the scat one. I don't even think it's possible to make that kinda of power under 3500 with the displacment he has... well n/a that is. And believing info you got off of ebay!!! lol someone who is trying to sell these things for a living, obviously there gonna spice **** up. Anyone ever seen those electric superchargers that make huuge power on any motor, I think in reality they make under 1/2 a pound of boost. If it sounds too good to be true it usually is!! (like your hp numbers) please post your dyno sheet to proove me wrong untill then you just look like a moron!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 04:03 PM
  #64  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Re: well

Originally posted by 1981z28
no its not

dyno 456hp@5200rpms 494ft.lbs4200 rpms
these are the dyno numbers 450 500 just sounds better.
I see you've changed your post to add more reasonable numbers... My post above shows the original posted numbers...
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #65  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
no

i changes it to the real mumbers. i been makeing up those low rpm gains sorry. i just took it u guys would think a car that made power like that super early would be cool.but everyone mknew to much and called the old flag on me good call by the way.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 06:18 PM
  #66  
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
i changes it to the real mumbers. i been makeing up those low rpm gains sorry. i just took it u guys would think a car that made power like that super early would be cool.but everyone mknew to much and called the old flag on me good call by the way.

OMFG!

Why don't you just tell the whole truth? Your motor doesn't make 456hp@3500 or @5200. Why don't you just admit that you don't have a clue as to how much hp your motor really makes?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #67  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
well

i could be be off on all off it like i said it was two years ago when i dynoed it.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 07:14 PM
  #68  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
I think this is his way of asking us what he's making (or what his envisioned engine setup would make) Add some heads to match that cam and dynotune and you should see some better results.

Last edited by anondude13; Sep 12, 2004 at 07:18 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #69  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
i

went and dynoed my car at my freinds shop.
456hp@4200rpms and 431ft.lbs@5200rpms
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #70  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Re: i

Originally posted by 1981z28
went and dynoed my car at my freinds shop.
456hp@4200rpms and 431ft.lbs@5200rpms
Looks like you f***ed up again buddy!

STOP PULLING NUMBERS OUT OFF YOUR A**!

456=trq(4200/5252)

trq = 570 ft lbs @ 4200 rpm

Pretty unusual having the torque peak 1000 rpm higher than the hp peak Get a hint... An NA 383 will not see 456 hp anywhere below around 5500. So next time you make up your numbers, be more precise. Here are some more realistic ones for a good high revving 383, (just so I've beaten you to the punch):

456 hp@ 6000 rpm
450 ft lbs @ 4500 rpm

EDIT: I take this back: David Vizard built a 14:1 CR 383 race motor that was making 525 at 5500, but I think my claim was reasonable given that this was not a race motor we were discussing.

Last edited by anondude13; Sep 16, 2004 at 04:14 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:30 PM
  #71  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
well

i got the sheet tell me how do post a pic
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #72  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Re: well

Originally posted by 1981z28
i got the sheet tell me how do post a pic
Host it on a webspace and provide a link.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:39 PM
  #73  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
i dont

understand how did u put that vtec just kicked in pic on here

ps. i could just email it to u
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #74  
laiky's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
I think there should be a new board for "Special" members.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 09:05 PM
  #75  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
hmmmmmmmm

I think there should be a new board for "Special" members.
yea im not good with computers how dare me
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 11:08 PM
  #76  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
I dont think that your computer skills are what he is referring to.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 11:46 PM
  #77  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
well

he can say all he wants .i will e-mail my dyno sheet to anyone who ask for it .
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:04 AM
  #78  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'd have you e-mail it to me right now, but my hosting site is messed up currently. Maybe tomorrow. You can e-mail it if you want. stu.adams@gmail.com
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:12 AM
  #79  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
hey

stu it would not send .but maybe u should try yahoo mail free and reliable.

Last edited by 1981z28; Sep 14, 2004 at 12:23 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:23 AM
  #80  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've got free hotmail. gmail is free and I get a full 1 gig of space for free.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:27 AM
  #81  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
well

i just sent it did u get it
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:35 AM
  #82  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Here is the dyno he sent me.


The day I dynoed my car, the guy who owns the shop had his race car and another companies race car. The Chevy had a chopy line like that, what's that mean?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:37 AM
  #83  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
i

the choppe line means its going like 337 345 333 345 367 its just jumpen a little bit
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:39 AM
  #84  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Originally posted by stu
Here is the dyno he sent me.


The day I dynoed my car, the guy who owns the shop had his race car and another companies race car. The Chevy had a chopy line like that, what's that mean?
You need a username/pass to access that. Same with your dyno on the other thread. Could you find a new hosting location (maybe yahoo or something)?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:40 AM
  #85  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
yea

i could not see ur slip i have no user name with them.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:44 AM
  #86  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh, sorry guys. Like I said in the other thread, my site has a gallery, but it's broken right now, so I'm forced to just post them in threads. I forgot that you couldn't see them without logging in. I'll see what I can do.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:48 AM
  #87  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
its cool

unlike some people i beleve u. im not going to pull out the everytime something does not work. so just let me know when its working or e-mail it to me a c10man350@yahoo.com
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:53 AM
  #88  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oops, never mind.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:54 AM
  #89  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Originally posted by stu
Try it now.
nope =/
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:12 AM
  #90  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
dam it

the dam thing is still to big. how do i make a pic smaller
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:20 AM
  #91  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh man, I didn't even see that.
Attached Thumbnails Got a race set up for when I get my engine finished-dyno3q.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:22 AM
  #92  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
how did u post that pic ????

sorry about the size


ps. i sent u a much bigger pic of the sheet.im sorry i sent u the one i was trying to make smaller so it would fit as a attachment.

Last edited by 1981z28; Sep 14, 2004 at 01:26 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:25 AM
  #93  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That's better.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:29 AM
  #94  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
thanks

stu now poeple will leave me alone and stop saying im full of ****.

Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:40 AM
  #95  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
The numbers are wrong on that. It should be 456 ftlbs @4300 and 431 hp @ 5400, if you look at the graph itself. I've got my sh** straight. It's my duty to raise an eyebrow when I'm provided with physically impossible numbers.

Last edited by anondude13; Sep 14, 2004 at 01:43 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:43 AM
  #96  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
well

the dark red is the hp and the light red is the ft.lbs whats the deal.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:45 AM
  #97  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Re: well

_

Last edited by anondude13; Feb 17, 2009 at 12:15 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:47 AM
  #98  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
o

well thanks for the heads up so i got 431hp@5300rpms and 456ft.lbs@4300rpms yea that does sound better
i will tellmy pal that his computer is putting them in the wrong spot his dyno is old.
i will redyno and get a good sheet or a new print out of this one after being corrrected

Last edited by 1981z28; Sep 14, 2004 at 01:51 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:54 AM
  #99  
stu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yeah, he's right, even on my wimpy torque Honda that is true. Very interesting, I've heard that before, but never really looked.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:57 AM
  #100  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
yea

my pal's crappy dyno machine put the numbers in the wrong spot now i fell like a ***.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.