mopar goes down hard
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: boone grove
Car: 1991 pontiac GTA, and a1992 pontiac firebird
Engine: 5.7 l98, and a 3.1 for now
Transmission: 700-r4s
mopar goes down hard
i did it i beat mopar, ok so it was a dakota......and a 3.9 at that, but with a 3.1 thats respectable. the guy i beat is a friend i work with, he is always talking about roastin' his tires and runnin with people on us 30, so one day when we happened to be linned up at a light, i gave him the nod, i beat him of the line and down the stretch. since then he has been begging for a rematch. so the other night we lined 'em up and..........got him off the line and down the stretch. now he has no reason for a rematch.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by stu
Isn't it a 5.7?
Isn't it a 5.7?
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: mopar goes down hard
Originally posted by mustbeatmopar.i did it i beat mopar, ok so it was a dakota......and a 3.9 at that, but with a 3.1 thats respectable.
You soon better drop a V8 in that thing though, as the new Chargers will be out before you know it, and from what I'm reading, they won't be foolin around...
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Air_Adam
Move Over People Are Racing
Move Over People Are Racing
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Valparaiso, IN
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
Made Of Plastic And Rubber
Most Often Passed At Races
Most Often Proven At the Racetrack
Most OverPowered And Respected
Massively OverPowered And Respected
Mostly Old Parts And Rust
Mostly Old Paint And Rust
Mounds Of Power And Revs
Move Over, Pentastar Approaching Rapidly
MOst Perfect Automobiles for Racing
Masters Or Performance and Racing
Mitsubishi's Over Priced American Replicars
My Old Pig Ain't Running
My Old Pig Always Roars
My Old Plymouth Ain't Runnin.
More Overall Performance And Reliability
Mostly Obsolete Parts Assembled Randomly
Miscellaneous Oddball Parts Assembled Ridiculously
Most Often Passed At Races
My Only Problems Are Repairs
Move Over People Are Racing
i know some were said before but.....
Most Often Passed At Races
Most Often Proven At the Racetrack
Most OverPowered And Respected
Massively OverPowered And Respected
Mostly Old Parts And Rust
Mostly Old Paint And Rust
Mounds Of Power And Revs
Move Over, Pentastar Approaching Rapidly
MOst Perfect Automobiles for Racing
Masters Or Performance and Racing
Mitsubishi's Over Priced American Replicars
My Old Pig Ain't Running
My Old Pig Always Roars
My Old Plymouth Ain't Runnin.
More Overall Performance And Reliability
Mostly Obsolete Parts Assembled Randomly
Miscellaneous Oddball Parts Assembled Ridiculously
Most Often Passed At Races
My Only Problems Are Repairs
Move Over People Are Racing
i know some were said before but.....
Banned
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 2
From: Glendale, AZ
Car: 4 Mopars total
Engine: Pentastar power
Transmission: T/F and New Process
Axle/Gears: Three 8 3/4's & one 9 1/4
I have an "old" MOPAR ill run ya with. Also, they dropped the 318 in favor of the 4.7....they were still using the 360's in the R/T's amd Rams. An early 90's 318/5-speed Dakota is a low-15 sec truck, stock. Still a dog, but enough to beat the hell out of most stock thirdgens. "Mustbeatmopar": Do yourself a favor, get a real motor in your car, race something respectable and worth racing, and then brag about it.
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Valparaiso, IN
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 84L69TA
[B "Mustbeatmopar": Do yourself a favor, get a real motor in your car, race something respectable and worth racing, and then brag about it.
[/B]
[B "Mustbeatmopar": Do yourself a favor, get a real motor in your car, race something respectable and worth racing, and then brag about it.
[/B]
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Ok children lets not get carried away. Lets go easy on the Mopar guys. Just because they had some slow cars doesn't take away their dominate old school legacy.
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Valparaiso, IN
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
Their old school stuff is great, but 80 and up.... What happen? they turned the Charger in to a joke.... same goes for the daytona...
..they are trying to solve all their problems with a hemi!! i got a feeling we might hear of a hemi neon one day! THey gone crazy
..they are trying to solve all their problems with a hemi!! i got a feeling we might hear of a hemi neon one day! THey gone crazy
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Coult_91
Their old school stuff is great, but 80 and up.... What happen? they turned the Charger in to a joke.... same goes for the daytona...
..they are trying to solve all their problems with a hemi!! i got a feeling we might hear of a hemi neon one day! THey gone crazy
Their old school stuff is great, but 80 and up.... What happen? they turned the Charger in to a joke.... same goes for the daytona...
..they are trying to solve all their problems with a hemi!! i got a feeling we might hear of a hemi neon one day! THey gone crazy
Banned
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 2
From: Glendale, AZ
Car: 4 Mopars total
Engine: Pentastar power
Transmission: T/F and New Process
Axle/Gears: Three 8 3/4's & one 9 1/4
Originally posted by Coult_91
Their old school stuff is great, but 80 and up.... What happen? they turned the Charger in to a joke.... same goes for the daytona...
Their old school stuff is great, but 80 and up.... What happen? they turned the Charger in to a joke.... same goes for the daytona...
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Valparaiso, IN
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
i hate most of those cars and i have been around alot of those cars with2.6, 2.5 and 2.2 turbos those are the wrost engines ever... not to mention any tranny they got they all suck... 2.6 have horrible carbs that go bad quick not to mention the timing chain that falls into the oil pan... 2.5 heads that crack O every lets 10,000 miles then at about 60,000 miles they like to blow oil...2.2 turbos are decent fast, but crap the heads crack on thoses as well!
O the Iroc daytona was in like 91, there v6 were ok but TRansmission suck!
i dont care how fast they were their durablity was what made them crappy.
O the Iroc daytona was in like 91, there v6 were ok but TRansmission suck!
i dont care how fast they were their durablity was what made them crappy.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: boone grove
Car: 1991 pontiac GTA, and a1992 pontiac firebird
Engine: 5.7 l98, and a 3.1 for now
Transmission: 700-r4s
for referance........ im only down on one mopar. thats my friends 73 plymoth satilite. it runs a low 15 maybe high 14 and he thinks its the fastset car on the road. my goal is to beat him i.e. "mustbeatmopar" my old man has an awsome 5.9 powerd ram, i think its an awsome truck (even though transram88 smoked it
) sooooooo......... in conclusion dont get your feelings hurt about your mopar, and as far as i am concerned a 3.1 beating a 3.9 is pretty good.
) sooooooo......... in conclusion dont get your feelings hurt about your mopar, and as far as i am concerned a 3.1 beating a 3.9 is pretty good. Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5
I've got a 5.9 R/T. I've been told from other R/T owners that it may be a freak truck. I would bet money that I could get it into the 14's easily.
Other than the few thirdgens modified around here, the few I've come across on morning jaunts to work, they seem stock and have been walked seriously bad.
Other than being pigs on gas, it's a good truck.
Other than the few thirdgens modified around here, the few I've come across on morning jaunts to work, they seem stock and have been walked seriously bad.
Other than being pigs on gas, it's a good truck.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by Coult_91
i hate most of those cars and i have been around alot of those cars with2.6, 2.5 and 2.2 turbos those are the wrost engines ever... not to mention any tranny they got they all suck... 2.6 have horrible carbs that go bad quick not to mention the timing chain that falls into the oil pan... 2.5 heads that crack O every lets 10,000 miles then at about 60,000 miles they like to blow oil...2.2 turbos are decent fast, but crap the heads crack on thoses as well!
O the Iroc daytona was in like 91, there v6 were ok but TRansmission suck!
i dont care how fast they were their durablity was what made them crappy.
i hate most of those cars and i have been around alot of those cars with2.6, 2.5 and 2.2 turbos those are the wrost engines ever... not to mention any tranny they got they all suck... 2.6 have horrible carbs that go bad quick not to mention the timing chain that falls into the oil pan... 2.5 heads that crack O every lets 10,000 miles then at about 60,000 miles they like to blow oil...2.2 turbos are decent fast, but crap the heads crack on thoses as well!
O the Iroc daytona was in like 91, there v6 were ok but TRansmission suck!
i dont care how fast they were their durablity was what made them crappy.
Beating a 3.9L V6 dakota even with a 3.1L is like beating an original Hummer. Sure it has a huge engine and 750ft-lb torque, but its slow as hell. The 318/auto Dakotas were slow enough, couldn't imagine one with a 6. Even my uncle was disappointed in his '91 and he's not one for speed much these days.
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Bristol Va
Car: 91 Camaro RS...GONE 87 SC (84 Z/28 clone)
Engine: 305 TBI LO3....GONE....305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 with shift kit
i dont know much about Mopars after the early 70's....so i cant say anything about those turbo'd Daytona's and such....but i know those SRT-4 Neons are nothing to fool around with....i rode in one that just had exhaust work done (sounded evil i tell ya!) and i was amazed by it...i would LOVE to have one of those...
Originally posted by Catfootball62
i dont know much about Mopars after the early 70's....so i cant say anything about those turbo'd Daytona's and such....but i know those SRT-4 Neons are nothing to fool around with....i rode in one that just had exhaust work done (sounded evil i tell ya!) and i was amazed by it...i would LOVE to have one of those...
i dont know much about Mopars after the early 70's....so i cant say anything about those turbo'd Daytona's and such....but i know those SRT-4 Neons are nothing to fool around with....i rode in one that just had exhaust work done (sounded evil i tell ya!) and i was amazed by it...i would LOVE to have one of those...
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Bristol Va
Car: 91 Camaro RS...GONE 87 SC (84 Z/28 clone)
Engine: 305 TBI LO3....GONE....305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 with shift kit
well the guy told me it just had exhaust work done...i didnt really know him that well...but it sounded something fierce...it had something done...cause ive heard stock ones...and this one just had a different rumble all together *shivers* haha thats the only one ive ever rode in though...and i was amazed
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Valparaiso, IN
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by DuronClocker
Get your stuff straight before you post. The 2.6L was a Mitsubishi motor, and yes, it wasn't good. The TBI 2.2s and 2.5s were one of the most reliable 4cyls of the time. The stroker 2.5s were susceptible to piston slap in the bores(I had one), but there were never issues with heads cracking as far as I ever knew. Mine got warped from over-heating (lack of maintenence of previous owner and getting the crap beat out of it). All turbos were MPFI. There was a 2.2L Turbo III motor that was had a 16V DOHC head that was designed by Lotus. That car had 224hp, stock. Not many were made, and they weren't the most reliable though (needed timing belt replacements fairly often), but 224hp in a 2700lb car with a strong 5spd would probably beat most stock V8 thirdgens...hell probably many minorly modified ones too. Yes...strong 5spds, as in a Getrag A555. I want to say some came with a Getrag A568, but I can't verify that.
Get your stuff straight before you post. The 2.6L was a Mitsubishi motor, and yes, it wasn't good. The TBI 2.2s and 2.5s were one of the most reliable 4cyls of the time. The stroker 2.5s were susceptible to piston slap in the bores(I had one), but there were never issues with heads cracking as far as I ever knew. Mine got warped from over-heating (lack of maintenence of previous owner and getting the crap beat out of it). All turbos were MPFI. There was a 2.2L Turbo III motor that was had a 16V DOHC head that was designed by Lotus. That car had 224hp, stock. Not many were made, and they weren't the most reliable though (needed timing belt replacements fairly often), but 224hp in a 2700lb car with a strong 5spd would probably beat most stock V8 thirdgens...hell probably many minorly modified ones too. Yes...strong 5spds, as in a Getrag A555. I want to say some came with a Getrag A568, but I can't verify that.
Last edited by Coult_91; May 10, 2005 at 02:53 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM









