Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Will This be Worth Racing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #1  
5.8L Camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 350 V-Eight
Transmission: T5
Will This be Worth Racing?

Im gonna put this in my 88: L98 bottom end, 52cc heads from no idea what, performer intake and 600 carb. 224/234, 465/469 cam. This car is gonna be only for the track and cruizin the strip, so Im gonna spend the extra $900 or so on a rebuilt TH350, 2500 stall convertor, mini spool for the 3.42 open rear, 1.6 roller tip rockers, and BFG D/R's. Can that get me mid 13's? I just need a cheap setup to give me respectable V8 times at the track. I know if I hook up some nitrous I should be able to get low 13's.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #2  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Getting into the 13's with a carbed 350 isn't hard at all. You should be able to do that with your mods. Whats with the 52cc heads?
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #3  
5.8L Camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 350 V-Eight
Transmission: T5
There just something I have laying around and there in excellent shape. All i did to them was put screw in studs in. This engine is just gonna be beat on so I dont want to put much money into it this time around. Next year the car will get a forged/supercharged engine.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #4  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by 5.8L Camaro
There just something I have laying around and there in excellent shape. All i did to them was put screw in studs in. This engine is just gonna be beat on so I dont want to put much money into it this time around. Next year the car will get a forged/supercharged engine.
Are these heads aluminum? If not you are going to have to watch your CR with stock pistons.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #5  
TBI92Camaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
52cc....that sounds like LO3 heads....DOnt use them if they are the horrible Swirl port heads....you'll never hit 13's with those.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #6  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by TBI92Camaro
52cc....that sounds like LO3 heads....DOnt use them if they are the horrible Swirl port heads....you'll never hit 13's with those.
I wouldn't say that. New light has been shed on ported swirl ports and they flow suprisingly well. I can say I am honestly shocked and have had to re-think my previous stance on these heads. Check out some of kdrolts posts on swirl port heads and the flow data that he has collected. Dewey should be in the 13's soon with his stock headed LO3.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #7  
Street Lethal's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone.Check out some of kdrolts posts on swirl port heads and the flow data that he has collected. Dewey should be in the 13's soon with his stock headed LO3.
I could only imagine the extensive port work that must have been done to obtain such numbers...
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #8  
5.8L Camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 350 V-Eight
Transmission: T5
52..58...somethin 5#...my only point is they are not performance heads. Im pretty sure they are not swirl ports. This should just be a fun car to race then. Hope it dosent break after just a few runs like my last one!
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 11:13 PM
  #9  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
58 cc aluminum sounds like L98 vette heads which ARE great heads. abit of easy porting can get them to flow enough to get 12's out of

that wouldnt be a bad setup for racing, although low 13's isnt much nowadays
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 06:26 AM
  #10  
5.8L Camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 350 V-Eight
Transmission: T5
I dont know if they're aluminum... If I can run a low13 at Quaker City Raceway here in Ohio, I can beat most Camaro's/Firebirds/Mustangs. Most 4.6 Mustangs here run high 14's. New GTOs cant even break into the 13's. It being an uphill track dosent help
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #11  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
go and get the casting numbers off the heads, then we can tell you what you have. if the last three numbers are 416, 081, or 601, you'll have a relatively good flowing head. i have some bonestock 416 heads on my 310 and i have gone 13.7@100mph.
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 09:00 AM
  #12  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Street Lethal
I could only imagine the extensive port work that must have been done to obtain such numbers...
The port work was not that extensive belive it or not. Siwrl port heads in stock form outflow 416, 081 and L98 heads on the exhaust side. They do not flow as well on the intake. They actually has the lesser of the two flaws. Port work on the intake side really improves things. However, it is better to flow more on the exhuast side because you will make better use of whatever intake flow you do have. I cannot even begin to explain how shocked I am at this recent data. I was too quick to jump on the bandwagon like everyone else. Just looking at eh heads make you shake your head. Once you get them on a flow bench and record some data and track times you really are forced to re-think your stance.
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #13  
Street Lethal's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone.Just looking at the heads makes you shake your head.
I must admit, this was my very reaction when I first pulled off the intake. I knew they could be worked, I just didn't think it would be that worth-while for me to do.

I've yet to purchase a set of heads for my 400-sbc though (unfortunately, funds are very tight at the moment). Would you honestly recommend going with the LO3 stocker's (after such modification)?
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 08:05 PM
  #14  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Street Lethal
I must admit, this was my very reaction when I first pulled off the intake. I knew they could be worked, I just didn't think it would be that worth-while for me to do.

I've yet to purchase a set of heads for my 400-sbc though (unfortunately, funds are very tight at the moment). Would you honestly recommend going with the LO3 stocker's (after such modification)?
For a 400 I would look at the 193's (350 TBI) or 083's unless you have huge power goals. I would go with a larger chamber for a motor that big. What are your power goals? L98 heads (083's) are basically equal with the 193's but they have a flaw on the intake rather than exhaust. Port work will make any head better. There is a limit though and if you have large power goals you will need to go vortec (ported) or aftermarket.
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #15  
Street Lethal's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
I honestly did not set my power goals too high for this one. If I could make between 350-400 FWHP, I'd be a happy camper. Mind you, 350-400 FWHP utilizing the stock TBI system... in which I decided to stick with.

The block is finished, with every other part (minus heads) already being selected... so now it's just the matter of selecting the right heads. I'm more than likely going to go aluminum, but if the LO3's can support the above goal, then hey... I'd save a nice chunk of change.

The throttle body was just recently enlarged to two inches, and now sits on top of a Weiand Stealth manifold (with an adapter plate sandwiched in between). I'll give you my cam specs (Crane Roller) after I get it dynoed, and after I burn a good chip.

Originally posted by ShiftyCapone.For a 400 I would look at the 193's (350 TBI) or 083's unless you have huge power goals. I would go with a larger chamber for a motor that big. What are your power goals? L98 heads (083's) are basically equal with the 193's but they have a flaw on the intake rather than exhaust. Port work will make any head better. There is a limit though and if you have large power goals you will need to go vortec (ported) or aftermarket.

Last edited by Street Lethal; May 12, 2005 at 08:29 PM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 08:29 PM
  #16  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
I wouldn't go with the LO3's on that motor because of potential compression ratio issues. You can get 193 heads for next to free and you can make an easy 400+ lb ft with those heads. You will need to port them though to take full advantage of what little potential these heads do have. There have been some recent combo's with these heads (ported on the intake side) running amazing times. Your other choice would be 083 heads which would need porting on the exhaust side. Your power goals are obtainable with either head.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
SRKLEGIN
Interior Parts Wanted
5
Oct 12, 2015 07:28 AM
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Oct 5, 2015 06:23 PM
bjpotter
History / Originality
17
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 PM
gord327
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
Oct 3, 2015 01:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.