Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Raced a Honda

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 04:43 PM
  #51  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by lxcamaroxl
Dont forget Cavalier
My crap *** stock '05 M5 cavalier is faster than a stock LO3 car. it makes the same peak power as an LG4 car as well and weighs about 1000lbs less. The old 2.4 Z24's and even older 3.1 Z24's would easily beat a stock LO3 and LG4 car.

Not all cavaliers are slow when compairing them to 305 cars.

The new Cobalt SS and Redline would work over any stock 305 3rd gen minus a T5 G92 car. I don't have to mention the SRT4's either.

New cars (minus a few exceptions), regardless of their powerplant, aren't really threatened by old 3rd gens.

Last edited by ShiftyCapone; Jan 5, 2006 at 04:56 PM.
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #52  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by hihighost
well done 25thmustang. Good to know you have such an abundant amount of time on your hands.

I dont know whats worse, saying stupid things, or taking the time to acknowledge, analyze, and critique stupid things.

Either way, good show. Almost as good at 305's doing donuts.
Nothing wrong with spending 5 minutes making a post! Afterall its just reading, and typing... things people get paid to do everyday (whose to say I wasnt getting paid to type that at the time)! Good call though!

And I will gladly stick by my side, and say saying stupid things... is worse. But hey, the people who say stupid things have to back their side up as well... so nice work, you tried!
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #53  
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Ya, technology has come a long way. I have a motor trend mag from 2002. They tested supercars and compared the numbers to the "average car". They said in 02 the avg car ran 15.6@90. Well back in the 80's the average car would run around 16.7 i would think. I still have the article if anyone wants to see it....its pretty interesting. So now in 2006 as technology gets better the average car probably runs 15.5's or better i would think. So most new cars on the road today should not be worried about 305 cars. Though 87-92 L98 cars can still hold there own


Here you go
Year Avg. 0-60 (seconds) Avg. 1/4 mile time
1986 8.74 16.50
1987 9.25 16.89
1988 8.39 16.34
1989 8.38 16.28
1990 8.34 16.24
1991 8.02 15.99
1992 8.25 16.19
1993 8.33 16.20
1994 7.86 15.91
1995 7.65 15.72
1996 7.88 15.91
1997 7.95 15.99
1998 8.06 16.08
1999 8.03 16.09
2000 7.92 16.03
2001 7.81 15.85
2002 7.58 15.69
2003 7.62 15.70

These numbers came from Car-Stats.com

Last edited by 89IrocZ350TPI; Jan 5, 2006 at 05:11 PM.
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #54  
hihighost's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA.
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: Carb'd L31 Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen / 3.23
So then you ARE a loser? I think you're finally making me understand how it all works. Thanks.
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 06:43 PM
  #55  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I find it REALLY hard to believe that the average car today runs a 15.7, maybe it's because I'm at altitude.




You might think it's all fun and games to joke around and act like middle school drop out hicks, but what it boils down to is that it still encourages people to be retarded. You have to understand that the internet is full of young, impressionable, and absolutely f|_|cking retarded kids. Even though I'm sure most people are joking, I personally like to nip internet rumors and attitudes in the bud asap. I'll stick by 25thMustangs side.

P.S. I just got a real job out of college and will be making like 6 times what I was scrapeing by with. So it won't long until I start building up another sleeper.
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #56  
PhLaXuS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi w/Disc
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
New cars (minus a few exceptions), regardless of their powerplant, aren't really threatened by old 3rd gens.
Very true...unless the driver is a poser who believes all you have to do is slam on the gas and hope.
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:34 PM
  #57  
hihighost's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA.
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: Carb'd L31 Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen / 3.23
Hey, my posts were never any more harsh than yours. Besides, Stu, remember, I'm the coolest person you'll never hope to meet.

Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:53 PM
  #58  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Stu and 25th summed it up nicely.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
gord327
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
Oct 3, 2015 01:25 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
Oct 1, 2015 03:46 PM
tmork454
Transmissions and Drivetrain
0
Sep 29, 2015 06:33 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.