'92 rs vs 92 stang GT

Subscribe
Apr 28, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #1  
LB9, 700R4, 3.23's Vs 302w/ ebelbrock 600cfm, T5, 3.73's whos your money on??????
Reply 0
Apr 28, 2008 | 07:49 PM
  #2  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Sorry kiddo, I gotta go with the GT
Reply 0
Apr 28, 2008 | 08:40 PM
  #3  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
GT wins. Youd need a L98 car to give it a run.
Reply 0
Apr 28, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #4  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
The GT easy.
Reply 0
Apr 29, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #5  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Yeah, definitely the GT. Is your car an LB9 or L03? Your info on the left says is a 305 TBI, which makes sense for it being an RS. Did you swap in then 305 TPI motor? Either way, money is on the GT, but you'll get absolutely obliterated if you're still 305 TBI.
Reply 0
Apr 30, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #6  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
my car is an LO3, The qeustion was theoretical between a buddy and myself we both already figured He would take me if I was t o swap to an LB9 but We anted 2nd opinions
Reply 0
May 8, 2008 | 06:28 AM
  #7  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Mustang... whether LB9 or L03.
Reply 0
May 13, 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #8  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
my stock formy seems faster than my 88 gt (both autos)...soo..if its a 5sp deff
Reply 0
May 13, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #9  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
gotta say Mustang
Reply 0
May 13, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #10  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
To many variables, he has you on a good tune. His car on paper destroys yours by at least a full second but hey some people don't know what the screws on the carb are for and some people can't shift.
Reply 0
May 14, 2008 | 05:49 PM
  #11  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Quote: my stock formy seems faster than my 88 gt (both autos)...soo..if its a 5sp deff
Might be, my stocker went low 15s @ low 90 mph as an auto. Same motor went 13.0 @ 103 with a few bolt ons, 5-speed and tires.
Reply 0
May 14, 2008 | 05:52 PM
  #12  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Quote: Might be, my stocker went low 15s @ low 90 mph as an auto. Same motor went 13.0 @ 103 with a few bolt ons, 5-speed and tires.


lol...thats about the formy runs lol
Reply 0
Jun 23, 2008 | 08:03 PM
  #13  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Well here it is proof and all!!!!!! I BEAT A 5.0 WITH MY LO3!!!!

http://s271.photobucket.com/albums/j...nt=video-1.flv
Reply 0
Jun 23, 2008 | 08:06 PM
  #14  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
he had the weight reduction mod. half a back bumper
Reply 0
Jun 23, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #15  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
behind every sh7t eating grin, there's a sh7t eating !!!!!!
Reply 0
Jun 23, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #16  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
good job beating that ugly pos rustang the only reason why there fast because they have a lower first gear better efi set up and weight a lil bit less but change the tpi intake and rear gears and put a t56 in and gameover
Reply 0
Jun 25, 2008 | 03:37 AM
  #17  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Quote: Might be, my stocker went low 15s @ low 90 mph as an auto. Same motor went 13.0 @ 103 with a few bolt ons, 5-speed and tires.
Don't laugh, but my stock 1989 GT M5 went 15.003 when I picked it up with 70K-ish miles. After just doing "the tune", it went 14.6x and eventually was running 12s on a mild H/C/I before I sold it.
Reply 0
Jun 25, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #18  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
LOL that's priceless, he must've fell into the group I mentioned earlier.
Reply 0
Jun 27, 2008 | 11:14 AM
  #19  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Quote: Well here it is proof and all!!!!!! I BEAT A 5.0 WITH MY LO3!!!!

http://s271.photobucket.com/albums/j...nt=video-1.flv
wow, i think this is the first time, ive ever seen proof of a race on here..
GREAT JOB!!! anyone notice how ugly the rustang looked compared to a nice thirdgen.
Reply 0
Jun 28, 2008 | 12:35 AM
  #20  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
wow, thats pretty cool... I think both cars looked pretty good. Good ol' old school race...
Reply 0
Jul 2, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #21  
Re: '92 rs vs 92 stang GT
Congrats on the win... can't knock a video with proof. Those auto Mustangs suck, ask me how I know .
Reply 0
Subscribe