LB9, 700R4, 3.23's Vs 302w/ ebelbrock 600cfm, T5, 3.73's whos your money on??????
Member
Sorry kiddo, I gotta go with the GT
Senior Member
GT wins. Youd need a L98 car to give it a run.Supreme Member
Yeah, definitely the GT. Is your car an LB9 or L03? Your info on the left says is a 305 TBI, which makes sense for it being an RS. Did you swap in then 305 TPI motor? Either way, money is on the GT, but you'll get absolutely obliterated if you're still 305 TBI.
my car is an LO3, The qeustion was theoretical between a buddy and myself we both already figured He would take me if I was t o swap to an LB9 but We anted 2nd opinions
Supreme Member
Mustang... whether LB9 or L03.
Member
my stock formy seems faster than my 88 gt (both autos)...soo..if its a 5sp deff
Senior Member
gotta say Mustang
Supreme Member
1991CamaroRslow
Supreme Member
close
- Join DateOct 2005
- LocationCincinatti OH
- Posts:1,833
- iTrader Positive Feedback100
- iTrader Feedback Score(3)
- Car1991 L03 700r4 RS
- Engine1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
- TransmissionTh350 red neck Performance 3k stall
- Axle/Gears95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
- Likes:0
- Liked:0 Times in 0 Posts
To many variables, he has you on a good tune. His car on paper destroys yours by at least a full second but hey some people don't know what the screws on the carb are for and some people can't shift.
Supreme Member
Quote:
Might be, my stocker went low 15s @ low 90 mph as an auto. Same motor went 13.0 @ 103 with a few bolt ons, 5-speed and tires.Originally Posted by billybird
my stock formy seems faster than my 88 gt (both autos)...soo..if its a 5sp deff Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by 25thmustang
Might be, my stocker went low 15s @ low 90 mph as an auto. Same motor went 13.0 @ 103 with a few bolt ons, 5-speed and tires. lol...thats about the formy runs lol
Well here it is proof and all!!!!!! I BEAT A 5.0 WITH MY LO3!!!!
http://s271.photobucket.com/albums/j...nt=video-1.flv
http://s271.photobucket.com/albums/j...nt=video-1.flv
Supreme Member
he had the weight reduction mod. half a back bumper 

behind every sh7t eating grin, there's a sh7t eating
!!!!!!
!!!!!!Member
good job beating that ugly pos rustang the only reason why there fast because they have a lower first gear better efi set up and weight a lil bit less but change the tpi intake and rear gears and put a t56 in and gameover
Member
Quote:
Don't laugh, but my stock 1989 GT M5 went 15.003 when I picked it up with 70K-ish miles. After just doing "the tune", it went 14.6x and eventually was running 12s on a mild H/C/I before I sold it.Originally Posted by 25thmustang
Might be, my stocker went low 15s @ low 90 mph as an auto. Same motor went 13.0 @ 103 with a few bolt ons, 5-speed and tires. Supreme Member
1991CamaroRslow
Supreme Member
close
- Join DateOct 2005
- LocationCincinatti OH
- Posts:1,833
- iTrader Positive Feedback100
- iTrader Feedback Score(3)
- Car1991 L03 700r4 RS
- Engine1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
- TransmissionTh350 red neck Performance 3k stall
- Axle/Gears95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
- Likes:0
- Liked:0 Times in 0 Posts
LOL that's priceless, he must've fell into the group I mentioned earlier.
Banned
Quote:
http://s271.photobucket.com/albums/j...nt=video-1.flv
wow, i think this is the first time, ive ever seen proof of a race on here..Originally Posted by jeepboy180
Well here it is proof and all!!!!!! I BEAT A 5.0 WITH MY LO3!!!!http://s271.photobucket.com/albums/j...nt=video-1.flv
GREAT JOB!!! anyone notice how ugly the rustang looked compared to a nice thirdgen.
Senior Member
wow, thats pretty cool... I think both cars looked pretty good. Good ol' old school race...
Supreme Member
Congrats on the win... can't knock a video with proof. Those auto Mustangs suck, ask me how I know
.
.