TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

BBK TPI intake setup ($399.00)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #101  
dcs89formula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: K.C.
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: 350
I had a feeling posting that link would stir it up! It's kind of funny how it came about. I traded a buddy of mine a 91 Mustang LX 5.0 for my current 89 Formula 350. He happened to be on BBK's page looking at the new 5.0 intake and saw the projected TPI intake and called me. I too am excited as I haven't been able to decide which intake setup to go with! You see, it took a mustang guy to come up with the good info.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 11:42 AM
  #102  
mystikkal_69's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 (350 TPI)
Transmission: MD8 (700 R4) + 3.42 LS1 Rear
Originally posted by dcs89formula
You see, it took a mustang guy to come up with the good info.
LOL. the irony.....
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 04:23 PM
  #103  
grndprixss's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: nyc
Car: 85 pontiac grand prix
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
i wanna see, whats up i need pics or more info ugggg ahhhhhh im so confused in my decision in what to get i love the runner look of the stock tpi but i want something better but i want the stock look is the bbk gonna look stock????
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #104  
Ray87Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
I don't care if it looks like a baboon's ***, I just want a great performing TPI replacement setup that is affordable, some competition for the HSR... Of course they need to offer it for Vortec heads before too long too.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 05:16 PM
  #105  
formula91's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Car: 92 GTA
Engine: Yes
Transmission: Busted
Will a baboon's *** fit under the stock hood?

Ha!!!!

I can't believe its day 3 of the SEMA show and nobody has pics yet!
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 05:25 PM
  #106  
BLOWN85/TA's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: IL
Originally posted by Ray87Z
I don't care if it looks like a baboon's ***
I'll be having the raped ape under hood here please.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 06:29 PM
  #107  
89 Iroc Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Some info from the SEMA Show!!

My brother was able to talk to the Vice President of BBK, Ken Murphey, at the SEMA show today about the new intake that will be released by his company. He is a really nice guy and has some great ideas and great products. He seems excited about this new intake and it should be a killer setup for our cars. In this post I will list all the information we were able to obtain about the intake. It is important to note that this intake is still in the development stage and all this information is subject to change.

As stated above this intake is still in the prototype stage and only the intake base is complete. They did not have the prototype at SEMA so sorry no pictures available yet. Below are the questions from my previous post and their answers, I have also added and taken away a few questions. It is important to note that the answers are not the exact answers or wording we got from the guys at BBK, I have put them into my own words:

Q) What is the price range of this new intake setup?
A)
The price is targeted around $600.

Q) When is this intake scheduled to be released?
A)
They should have it out for summer 2005 sales.

Q) Will the stock throttle bodywork with this new intake?
A)
Yes

Q) Will there be a vortec head version available?
A)
As of the first release probably no, but it very possible there will be in the future.

Q) Will this intake be 50 state legal?
A)
They are working on CARB legality but are running into problems with the cars that came stock with a 9’th injector. I am not exactly sure what problems are so I can’t say any more.

Q) What is the height of the manifold, for people who want to fit it under stock hood and strut tower braces?
A)
This intake is going to be slightly taller then stock TPI but will still fit under a stock thirdgen and corvette hood.

Q) What comes with the manifold?
A)
This intake will come with a setup for both camaro and corvette EGR, the bolts for the intake, and all gaskets minus the intake manifold gaskets.

Q) Will stock fuel rails work with this intake?
A)
Yes, the stock fuel rail will work with this intake.

Q) What RPM range is this intake designed to make peak power?
A)
This intake is designed for mid to upper RPM’s. It is not going to be a high RPM screamer like the Mini-ram and will not die up top like TPI so it will be in-between.

Q) How does the low-end power of this intake compare to TPI?
A)
It is too early in the development to answer that exactly but it should still have low end grunt.

Q) What is the length of the intake runners?
A)
It is too early to know.

Q) How many piece intake is this (for example TPI is 3 piece; a base, runners and plenum)?
A)
The top end of this intake is not fully complete yet but as planed as of now it will be 10 pieces. A base, 8 individual runners, and a plenum.

They had a question for us. They want to know what color to powder coat the manifold. For example if you look at the mustang manifold it is flat black. I think it would look good silver, black, or no powder coat at all. I gave them the information about this site so hopefully they will come to this site and let us get involved in the design process.

Last edited by 89 Iroc Z; Nov 4, 2004 at 07:58 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #108  
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Eight individual runners is interesting. Thanks for posting the information. We are all waiting for the developements and pictures. Sure sounds interesting. Allen

Almost forgot. I vote for the silver color.

Last edited by 1989GTATransAm; Nov 4, 2004 at 06:53 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 06:50 PM
  #109  
BLOWN85/TA's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: IL
Stock fuel rails and EGR plus 10 pieces. Ok this reminds me of a TPI whipple thing I saw in the late 90's. Pipe for runners, short length then 1 piece plenum where the Whipple went.

Well Maybe I'll keep that extra set of fuel lines around till we see pics.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #110  
ator's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 92 Firebird Formula
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4, 3.73 rear
Re: Some info from the SEMA Show!!

Originally posted by 89 Iroc Z
[B]

Q) What is the price range of this new intake setup?
A)
The price is targeted around $600.
That price is higher than listed on BBK's website and would not be as "Sought after" at that price.

From their website: This clean sheet design manifold will fit the popular 305/350 TPI Camaro,Firebird and Corvette models and is to be priced at a very affordable $399.99 making it the best performance value around.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 06:57 PM
  #111  
BLOWN85/TA's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: IL
How about Black AND Silver?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:04 PM
  #112  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
I vote for black, for obvious reasons Maybe we could get a GP going on this thing if all works out?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:26 PM
  #113  
cali92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: San Pedro, Ca
Car: White KSwisses
Engine: 5.3L Gen III
Originally posted by BLOWN85/TA
How about Black AND Silver?
Thats a color scheme i can get behind
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:34 PM
  #114  
ChevelleFan's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Car: '70 Chevelle, '63 Corvette
Engine: 383, 327
Transmission: B&M 700r4, Muncie M-21
That's some good info, thanks for posting.

Unfortunately, (for BBK) this will pretty much end my interest. 10 pieces?? $600? No vortec version initially?

I applaud their effort for trying to put out a a decent TPI replacement, especially one that makes use of stock pieces like the fuel rails and throttle body, but it falls short, in my eyes. 10 pieces????

Too bad someone can't just copy the LT1 intake, except to add a thermostat housing and the necessary coolant passages. It's 1 piece and has solid performance. All that plumbing is just 'too busy' looking for me to get a converted LT1 intake.

I guess I can feel pretty comfortable ordering a Stealth Ram in the near future.

-Dave

Last edited by ChevelleFan; Nov 4, 2004 at 07:36 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:42 PM
  #115  
TheGreatJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
Car: 91Z, 91RS, '84 Jimmy
Engine: L98, 355, L98
Transmission: 700R, T56, 700R4
Powdercoat the recesses and cast areas black, leave the highlights (i.e. "BBK" logo) and machined surfaces natural aluminum (silver) and it'll look great.


If it has individual runners and takes the stock rails, it has to be somewhat similar in design to the stock TPI. I'm thinking maybe a split plenum, like the SuperRam but with the box chopped in thirds and the center third eliminated, and the fronts of the two sides tapered together to meet the TB flange. How sweet would THAT be?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #116  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Originally posted by TheGreatJ
Powdercoat the recesses and cast areas black, leave the highlights (i.e. "BBK" logo) and machined surfaces natural aluminum (silver) and it'll look great.


If it has individual runners and takes the stock rails, it has to be somewhat similar in design to the stock TPI. I'm thinking maybe a split plenum, like the SuperRam but with the box chopped in thirds and the center third eliminated, and the fronts of the two sides tapered together to meet the TB flange. How sweet would THAT be?
I doubt the runners will go across the intake base like TPI.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:23 PM
  #117  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
vote to leave it plane natural as cast finish so we have option to powder coat it ourselves the color of our choice. Natural aluminum finish looks good enough as is. If it comes powdercoated, does that mean we cant re coat it a different color? Not to familar with power coating but i can imagine you can.

Anyway, if its inbetween tpi and miniram, thats superram territory. At 600 bucks, thats a steal for super ram performance that costs 1200 or so new and 750-800 used.

Dont forget that alot of people have problems installing the superram and i wonder if a 10 piece intake will be difficult to install. Also clearance issues around the base with the bolts.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #118  
89 Iroc Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Originally posted by ChevelleFan

I applaud their effort for trying to put out a a decent TPI replacement, especially one that makes use of stock pieces like the fuel rails and throttle body, but it falls short, in my eyes. 10 pieces????

Too bad someone can't just copy the LT1 intake, except to add a thermostat housing and the necessary coolant passages. It's 1 piece and has solid performance. All that plumbing is just 'too busy' looking for me to get a converted LT1 intake.
I strongly disagree. The LT1 isn’t that great of a performer, the stealth ram is much better in my mind.

As for the people that say $600 is too high it’s a steal for what else is out there:
Miniram: 1 grand+
Superram: around $800
Stealth ram: $475-515 depending on adjustable regulator or not

Also the upper intake is not made yet. So it may turn out to be a one piece upper we will just have to wait and see.

Last edited by 89 Iroc Z; Nov 4, 2004 at 08:40 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:38 PM
  #119  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
Anyway, if its inbetween tpi and miniram, thats superram territory.
Neither superram nor miniram perform optimally in the 5-6k rev range. I'm hoping that this new intake fills that hole.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #120  
89 Iroc Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Originally posted by r3pp3r
Neither superram nor miniram perform optimally in the 5-6k rev range. I'm hoping that this new intake fills that hole.
Exactly!! Thats what I am looking for. Like the T-ram did back in the day.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 09:13 PM
  #121  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Neither superram nor miniram perform optimally in the 5-6k rev range. I'm hoping that this new intake fills that hole.
what do you mean? super ram motors peak in the 5-6 range. making great power mostly at 5500rpm. Alittle porting and you got 6000rpms tops

Hows that not optimal? just asking. LOL

Miniram is way above that at over 6-7grand rpm as optimal.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #122  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
_

Last edited by anondude13; Feb 17, 2009 at 12:00 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 09:30 PM
  #123  
cali92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: San Pedro, Ca
Car: White KSwisses
Engine: 5.3L Gen III
Originally posted by r3pp3r
My car seems to already be over the hill in the mid to high 5 range. Maybe with a good tune it will be better. I just don't think superram can breathe enough for LT4 hotcam.

People are running bigger cams than the hotcam with a superram. It isnt that wild of a cam.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 09:38 PM
  #124  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
_

Last edited by anondude13; Feb 16, 2009 at 11:59 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 09:48 PM
  #125  
89 Iroc Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
what do you mean? super ram motors peak in the 5-6 range. making great power mostly at 5500rpm. Alittle porting and you got 6000rpms tops

Hows that not optimal? just asking. LOL

Miniram is way above that at over 6-7grand rpm as optimal.
Super ram is a nice intake but it dies really fast after 5200-5500. If BBK makes a intake that has about the same down low as the super ram but holds to around 6000 it would be a perfect intake for what most people are looking for.

Last edited by 89 Iroc Z; Nov 4, 2004 at 10:51 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 11:15 PM
  #126  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
i agree with 2000-6000rpm band. that is a great power band but super rams already do that. At least all the ones i see hold power well to 5800rpm or so with just alittle porting. good cam and heads help that out too.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 12:29 AM
  #127  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Wow. 8 runners??? I can't figure out why they'd do that. That's not to say it's bad, I just can't see how. ALL other intakes with runnes at least have 2 adjacent runners together.

hehe...follow the logic, and allow me to hypothesize!!!

We know it uses a seperate base, and STOCK fuel rails, and external runners.

That means, due to runners, LT1 and HSR styles are out.

The base has to accomodate the stock fuel rails, so the runners either need to wrap around to the outside like TPI or LPE-SR, or go up through the middle.

If they go outside, it either has be a long tube set-up, which first is re-inventing the wheel, AND kills upper RPM's. The Super ram style pizza box provide the same RPM range as BBK suggests, but again, re-inventing the wheel, and then there's the thing about the 8 runners. WHY 8 runners?

That leaves going up the middle. The HSR uses runners up the middle, but they're cast as part of the base. What would make the BBK different??? WHY do they need seperate runners?

Here's my thought: The runners form an "X" like pattern if you were looking straingt at the intake. Similar to the Super ram, only from the inside. This would effectively give you a mid to upper RPM potential (like the SR) but without all the bulky crap of the SR. Why individual runners? It would be difficult and costly to cast a big ole single piece "X" runner. You could simply make 8 small ones, all identical, all from the same mold.

Here's a mock up:
Attached Thumbnails BBK TPI intake setup  (9.00)-bbk.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 12:37 AM
  #128  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Doh!!!

...I forgot my BIGGEST point for "my" idea. MARKETING! It's gotta be different. You can buy any one of several different intakes, for different rpm ranges, at the whole spectrum of costs.

If YOU were gonna make a new intake, even if it didn't perform better than others, wouldn't it have to look UNIQUE???????????





...oh, and I vote for NO FINISH. I would have it coated myself.

It's fair to everyone!!!!
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 12:56 AM
  #129  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
nice idea but what about 50 state legal? where the EGR and Fuel pressure regulator gonna fit? If its under the X then that X will be pretty tall.

I am getting excited and think this base will be a whole different style of TPI. not like stock or the aftermarkets bases today. something completely one-off designed piece!! It should be amazing! 8 runners, i hope it looks great. Maybe like a ZR1 LT5 kinda arrangement.!! That be kick azz!!
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 01:28 AM
  #130  
John Millican's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by ChevelleFan
Too bad someone can't just copy the LT1 intake, except to add a thermostat housing and the necessary coolant passages.
There is already a copy, it's called a Miniram made by TPIS Specialities.
$1200.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 01:51 AM
  #131  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
I'm going to throw my .02 in here.

Would it be possible instead of doing an X, to make the stock rails work with some kind of T-Ram spinoff? From what I have seen, it isn't the flow of the runners that choke off the intake, it is the base. What if you made a SuperRam, but moved the runners farther appar. That way they wouldn't be so close in the base and the ports in the base could be opened up?

BTW, did he say it would be 8 runners, base, and plenum or was that just a guess? If it is like stated before, that has got to be a pain to install.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 02:14 AM
  #132  
Ray87Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Surely he mis-spoke or we're misunderstanding him or something, how would they get around having to bolt down 8 seperate runners? There's not really enough room for that and it would be a pain in the *** to assemble with all the gaskets and crap. I think he just meant it would have 8 individual runners instead of siamesed and that kind of stuff, but surely they won't each be seperate pieces that bolt on...

And with the X model thing above I don't see anyway the stock fuel rail would work... It sounds to me like perhaps the guy didn't really know much at all about the intake since it's still so early and he doesn't seem to be one of the engineers/designers...

Either way for $600 it better be one heck of a performer or the HSR (especially once the Vortec one is out) will just run away with all the sales... At least I'd buy a HSR over it...

Actually, I wonder if it won't turn out to be very similar to that Ford 5.0 manifold setup they have on their page, just for GMs... That would make some sense...

Last edited by Ray87Z; Nov 5, 2004 at 02:24 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 07:11 AM
  #133  
doc's Avatar
doc
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 4
From: Mims, Florida
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s
I'd be beyond excited if this thing was a copy version of the LS1 intake but for our 3rdgen cars!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It was said above that it should be different than what is already out there. Agreed.

If this new TPI intake is not very similar to the LS1 intake, I would like to work with a company to get one designed and developed.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #134  
Jim85IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Originally posted by doc
I'd be beyond excited if this thing was a copy version of the LS1 intake but for our 3rdgen cars!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It was said above that it should be different than what is already out there. Agreed.

If this new TPI intake is not very similar to the LS1 intake, I would like to work with a company to get one designed and developed.
I don't believe that it's possible to have an LS1-style intake simply due to the layout of the intake valves. The LS1 intake has staggered intake ports, but on the SBC they are paired. This could make plumbing an issue.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 08:18 AM
  #135  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Surely he mis-spoke or we're misunderstanding him or something, how would they get around having to bolt down 8 seperate runners? There's not really enough room for that and it would be a pain in the *** to assemble with all the gaskets and crap. I think he just meant it would have 8 individual runners instead of siamesed and that kind of stuff, but surely they won't each be seperate pieces that bolt on...
Yeah, I thought about that too....



And with the X model thing above I don't see anyway the stock fuel rail would work...
My pic isn't to scaled or proportional or anything, just use your imagination!
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 08:55 AM
  #136  
Chris89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
I'd like to see what it does, but I need a more RPM friendly intake. Looks like I am stuck w/ the miniram again... This cam I got should peak about 6500-6600 so that BBK piece doens't look like its for me...
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 09:13 AM
  #137  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
So it went from $400 to $600?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 10:40 AM
  #138  
Goumba T's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: Howard Beach, NYC
Car: 1990 TA
Engine: LB9 305
Transmission: 4L60
Originally posted by IROCThe5.7L
So it went from $400 to $600?
Yeah, I think they lost some potential customers before they even got it out of the door.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 11:34 AM
  #139  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
i dont see what you guys are talking about with losing customers already.

If this intake is smog legal, fullfills the powerband of 5500-6000rpm or so, and fits under stock hood, then this is the deal of a lifetime. Similar to superram which is expensive as all hell, and miniram, which is expensive, has too high powerband, and not smog legal.

If you want TPI, then this intake is the good stuff!! for 600 bucks its the cheapest alternative. HSR is good intake but again, its taller creating some clearance issues, and not smog legal. Fully upgraded TPI all hogged out can rev to 5500-5800rpm. But factor in cost of 400 base and 400 runners, and thats 800 right there. Not to mention all the port work your gonna have to do. Even with SLP runners for 250 thats still more than BBK design so far.

If you dont want to spend 600+ on an intake, then go carb or stock TPI cuz thats all your gonna be able to afford.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 01:24 PM
  #140  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
I agree with Orr89RocZ.

$600 is cheap, assuming it comes with the entire manifold set-up. (base/plenum/runners).

.....they do need to make sure the price doesn't keep climbing though. We all need to keep in mind that NOTHING has been set in stone.

I wouldn't have put the $399 on the site until I knew for sure, but oh well, it's still cheap.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 02:31 PM
  #141  
89 Iroc Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
I also agree with Orr89RocZ. $600 is definitely worth it if it can out perform the super ram. I also think it will sell extremely well if it out performs the super ram since it won’t be used on just thirdgens and corvettes it would be used for all types of SBC EFI setups and conversions.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 03:44 PM
  #142  
Jekyll & Hyde's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/Fort-Worth
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI (L98)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.45
Well, today is the last day, I think. Hopefully someone went and took those pictures.

ttt
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 04:43 PM
  #143  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
I beleive someone mentioned that they didn't have a prototype yet. ....I think.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 04:55 PM
  #144  
e-man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Car: 89 formula
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
With new crossover tubes the fuel rails could be spread out more.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #145  
JP86SS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Don't forget, They will read this too!
They need to be market saavy to get the thing to move and maximize profits. This is surely to be something they will investigate.

Therefore, I want it for $400 like the original ad stated !!!

No finish on it as well. Keep cost down and we can do what we want with it.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #146  
89 Iroc Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Originally posted by Maroon-IROC-Z
Well, today is the last day, I think. Hopefully someone went and took those pictures.

ttt
As stated above there are no pictures, they didn't have the prototype at SEMA. Please read my question and answer post.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 11:13 PM
  #147  
Goumba T's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: Howard Beach, NYC
Car: 1990 TA
Engine: LB9 305
Transmission: 4L60
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
i dont see what you guys are talking about with losing customers already.
All I was saying is that the $400 was appealing for someone who was looking for a cheap alternative, and the $200 jump may have put it out of their price range.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #148  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by Goumba T
All I was saying is that the $400 was appealing for someone who was looking for a cheap alternative, and the $200 jump may have put it out of their price range.
Like me LT1 heads and an intake modified by Millican will be my choice for whatever TPI car I get next after this one (want a late 80's vette). For $400, I would've bought one of these as soon as they were available, even just to sit in my garage for a few months (or longer!) to await my next project.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 11:21 PM
  #149  
86IROCTHD's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Car: 88 Trans Am
Engine: lt1 intaked 355 makin 277 on 25 psi of fuel pressure and stock timing :)
Transmission: A4 stock... that moved a mobile dyno a foot shifting into 2nd :)
hey i know yall have talked about the intake DIE off points of the hsr mini ram but what about the lt1 intake? whats the rpm limit on it?i have a xe292 cam and it says its good till 6500 but i dont know if i will need to go that high... but just wondering
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 11:29 PM
  #150  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
That XE292 is going into the 383, not the 305, right?

Either way, that is NOT going to be fun to tune.

Nevertheless, it should breathe to 6500RPM without much trouble. Before installing the intake, the runners can be cleaned up quite a bit, even with just a flat file. The runners are rough and have some unnecessary bumps (one or two per runner) that could stand to be removed.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.