what should i use 6 inch or 5.7 rods?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 330
Likes: 1
From: Duluth, Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Auburn Pro / 3.42
what should i use 6 inch or 5.7 rods?
not sure what to use on my 383 do you get more power with longer rods? i would think the longer rods would be heavyer and wouldnt rev as well?
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 574
Likes: 1
From: San Lorenzo, California
Car: 1987 Firebird Trans AM
Engine: 383 TPI...very soon
Transmission: TH700R4
I heard that when building a 383, if you use 6" rods it puts the wrist pin pretty close or in the bottom ring grove. I have also heard that the difference between the two rods is so minimal, that you're better off going with a 5.7" rod and not having the wrist pin so high up on the piston.
Makes sense to me, I went with 5.7" rods.
I could understand if you want to get a crank that will balance internally, I believe they all need 6" rods. Then your engine would appear as a regular internal balance 350 from the outside. If that matters to you at all.
I'm interested to see if anyone else has anything to say about it also...
Makes sense to me, I went with 5.7" rods.
I could understand if you want to get a crank that will balance internally, I believe they all need 6" rods. Then your engine would appear as a regular internal balance 350 from the outside. If that matters to you at all.
I'm interested to see if anyone else has anything to say about it also...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 4
From: Houston, Texas
Car: 88' IROCZ
Engine: 388 TPI Motown 350 Race block
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
I used the 6" because the rod/crank ratio is closer to stock than the 5.7s.
5.7"/3.48" = 1.6379 stock 350
6.0"/3.75" = 1.6000 stroked 383
5.7"/3.75" = 1.5200 " "
5.7"/3.48" = 1.6379 stock 350
6.0"/3.75" = 1.6000 stroked 383
5.7"/3.75" = 1.5200 " "
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: TX
Car: 68
Engine: 383
Transmission: homebuilt 4l60
you can internally balance with either rod but its easier and cost less to balance internally with 6" rods because it generaly wont require heavy metal balancing. There is negilble difference powerwise between the 2.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
I would use what costs the least. Like was said above powerwise there won't be any difference.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 4
From: Mims, Florida
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s
You do have a third option, several rod companies have 5.85" rods which work with 383s or 395s. I used this rod in my 395 because I did not want the wrist pin so high up in the piston (in the ring grooves). Trick Flow and Eagle have these rods.
BTW: it is not the rod length that anything to do with power. You should be talking about crank throw instead, AKA, long stroke VS short stroke.
BTW: it is not the rod length that anything to do with power. You should be talking about crank throw instead, AKA, long stroke VS short stroke.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM





