TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

XE256H10 vs XE256H12

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #1  
whitess's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, CO
Car: 85 SS
Engine: 305 L69
Transmission: 2004R
Axle/Gears: 7.625, 3.73
XE256H10 vs XE256H12

I currently have the XE256H10 in my L69 w/3.73 gears. At some point later on I'd like to go with TPI with either the 3.73's or 3.42's. Will the H10 version work well with the TPI or is the H12 a better match? The specs aren't that different from one to the other other than the LSA:
Lift Duration @ 0.05 Lobe separation
H10 0.447/0.454 212/218 110
H12 0.449/0.456 212/218 112

The TPI would just be a stock setup.
Thanks, Larry.

Last edited by whitess; Nov 25, 2007 at 05:39 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 06:41 PM
  #2  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: XE256H10 vs XE256H12

TPI would probably like the increase in vacuum from the wider LSA.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
1991 RS 305's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 386
Likes: 2
From: Blaine, MN
Re: XE256H10 vs XE256H12

I'm looking at the XE256H-12 myself for my 85 TPI shown in sig. The Comp catalog recomends this to work well with 305/350 TPI's. I'm asuming stock chip, since it makes no mention of aftermarket chips or mods at all. Mine is a auto, I was told by a reliable source that this cam in a 305 with auto "might" need to have the idle speed raised in the chip, but that it also could be fine as is. He also told me since its an 85 that the stock fuel and spark tables would work well with this cam. I don't know if this is true for the 86+ programs, but I do know the 85 are their own animal. What year ECM and TPI unit are you planning to use?

If I were you, I'd "almost" be tempted to leave the cam you have in there since its there and they are close, and see how it runs as is. You could change it later if it runs bad, but that would be lots of extra hassle. BTW, how do you like the H-10 cam, and how much difference did you notice between it and the stock "L69" cam? Is the idle 'noticeable', and did you have to mess with the carb to get it to idle well? This would be a good indication . If it idled lumpy/rich with a Q-Jet, it probably would idle horrible with the TPI, unless you got chip work.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #4  
whitess's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, CO
Car: 85 SS
Engine: 305 L69
Transmission: 2004R
Axle/Gears: 7.625, 3.73
Re: XE256H10 vs XE256H12

I like the cam there's a noteable difference from the stock L69 cam. It's not a lot but I can feel more HP and Torque with it, when I get on it it'll chirp 2nd gear. It only did that when the weather was just right and then not always. I still need to take it to the mountains here to see how much it really changed the power. The engine's still tight (about 500 miles on the rebuild) but it gets a little better as I put on more miles. The throttle response is better. I had my mechanic set the engine up due to the guy who reinstalled the motor not doing it right but as far as I know there weren't any idle problems other than having to raise it up about 100 RPM's. It's got a little more "lumpy" idle but not by much. You can tell it more listening to the exhaust at idle. I'd recommend it. When / if I do go to TPI I'll use the '87 version (less wiring )
Thanks all for the feedback.
Larry.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 AM.