Most people say that it couldn't be done without NOS and S/C. Well not true! It was done with a 355cu and 368cu. And it was done in So. California and all the EMISSIONS was hook up and working A/C. Check it out!
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/sout...o-results.html

 

Damn everyone putting out some good numbers

Can anyone post up a dyno sheet of the results, hard to see what's going on with the camera moving around that much.

Also is there going to be a track day for all of you in the near future? I keep hearing something about a LA invasion or something.

 

Here is the data sheet from my run. It gives more information. I will probably shift around 6650 or 6700 rpm to get the most power under the curve. Yes we will be going to the Los Angeles Invasion so the you can see the track numbers and compare them to the dyno numbers.

 

Thanks!

Just a refresher, your intake was composed of a FIRST lower and modified SLP runners was it not?

What was your cam I kind of forgot?

 

"Just a refresher, your intake was composed of a FIRST lower and modified SLP runners was it not?"

That is correct. Cam is a Mike Jones 233/233 @ .050" on a 113 LSA. However the First intake manifold was designed for my other motor and the cross sectional area where it meets the head is 2.2 square inches. It should be about 2.61 square inches for the current motor. I believe this is holding me back up top but is doing the job for now.

I aim to take care of that with my "large" long tube runner project that I have another thread going. If things go according to plan it should fatten up the mid-range even more and fatten up the top end as well. We shall find out later in the year. I am getting virtually no wave tuning with the current intake system outside of the 4th harmonic. With the long tube project I should pick up the 3rd and 2nd harmonic waves plus greater ram air with the proper size runners for this motor and rpm range.

 

Good stuff......subscribing....

 

Here is my graph:

 

Here is my intake system:
Filter on the bottom.

 

Looks good! I read somewhere that people are using the stock ecm's and converting to speed density. Is that to eliminate the MAF restriction? I assume the stock Camaro airbox is a restriction too.

My car is all stock and I need to do mods slow at first as I have some other projects I am working on. Not looking to make 400 RWHP but just make a car thats a little more fun to drive.

 

Nvm found what I was looking for.

 

Wow,, 420rwhp and 417rwtq - KUDOS!!! That's better than the simulations projected and since I'm off the mark a good bit more than normal,, I must have at least one,,, or a combination of parameters off somewhere. Plus,,, there had to be something wrong with that carb on the dyno run,, that or the intake (or the headers) overlapped the ports or something.

Was the only change from the last chassis dyno run the terminator boxes? Seems like I remember you saying something about a converter change?? If something was wrong with the last converter,,, or this one is "tighter" that could be where some of the increase is coming from. Also,, is this a "lock-able" converter? Just trying to get a grasp on where the majority of the increase might have come from.

 

Yes, the TB's are new and a tighter converter.

 

That's f'n awsome! If I wasn't on the wrong coast, I woulda put my 355 together and taken it out there for those guys to tune! Isn't there ANYBODY on the east coast that can tune these cars like they can out there?!?!Gonna step up to 383 now tho...