Stoich Constant vs OL and PE
Stoich Constant vs OL and PE
lol...So just a heads up on this.... another head scratcher trap that I fell into... Definitely the case that the more you modify the more you risk getting burned by "hidden" interactions between various tables and constants...
Going over my data I was noticing that my commanded AFR being reported by the ECM was consistently 1/4 point off from what I programmed into the calibration...
I had that issue before and we fixed it
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...drives-pe.html
So I was scratching my head on why the issue was popping up again...
Ended up back in Traxxion's thread on commanded AFR
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...t-afr-how.html
When the number 14.7 jumped out at me...
I had forgotten that I moved the factory 14.7 stoich value a while ago to 14.5 after reading some of the blended gas threads. In retrospect that probably wasn't necessary since I'm tuning via WB now anyway...
BUT, the stock equations for calculating the %change to AFR in PE and OL are based on 14.7... doh! When I put in my stoich value of 14.5, I get my 1/4 point back.
i.e., 14.5/14.7 = .98
You calculate a desired commanded AFR of 12.50 based on 14.7 stoich via the equations. But the ECM will end up at 12.50 x .98 = 12.25 for a stoich value of 14.5. Thus the 1/4 point richer commanded AFR being reported by Tunerpro.
Any rate, not sure how many people are calculating commanded AFR's and have modified the stoich value. But just a heads up if you modify the stoich value, your commanded AFR's will be off.
Going over my data I was noticing that my commanded AFR being reported by the ECM was consistently 1/4 point off from what I programmed into the calibration...
I had that issue before and we fixed it
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...drives-pe.html
So I was scratching my head on why the issue was popping up again...
Ended up back in Traxxion's thread on commanded AFR
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...t-afr-how.html
When the number 14.7 jumped out at me...
I had forgotten that I moved the factory 14.7 stoich value a while ago to 14.5 after reading some of the blended gas threads. In retrospect that probably wasn't necessary since I'm tuning via WB now anyway...
BUT, the stock equations for calculating the %change to AFR in PE and OL are based on 14.7... doh! When I put in my stoich value of 14.5, I get my 1/4 point back.

i.e., 14.5/14.7 = .98
You calculate a desired commanded AFR of 12.50 based on 14.7 stoich via the equations. But the ECM will end up at 12.50 x .98 = 12.25 for a stoich value of 14.5. Thus the 1/4 point richer commanded AFR being reported by Tunerpro.
Any rate, not sure how many people are calculating commanded AFR's and have modified the stoich value. But just a heads up if you modify the stoich value, your commanded AFR's will be off.
Last edited by ULTM8Z; Apr 7, 2018 at 08:28 PM.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,406
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Stoich Constant vs OL and PE
lol...So just a heads up on this.... another head scratcher trap that I fell into... Definitely the case that the more you modify the more you risk getting burned by "hidden" interactions between various tables and constants...
Going over my data I was noticing that my commanded AFR being reported by the ECM was consistently 1/4 point off from what I programmed into the calibration...
I had that issue before and we fixed it
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...drives-pe.html
So I was scratching my head on why the issue was popping up again...
Ended up back in Traxxion's thread on commanded AFR
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...t-afr-how.html
When the number 14.7 jumped out at me...
I had forgotten that I moved the factory 14.7 stoich value a while ago to 14.5 after reading some of the blended gas threads. In retrospect that probably wasn't necessary since I'm tuning via WB now anyway...
BUT, the stock equations for calculating the %change to AFR in PE and OL are based on 14.7... doh! When I put in my stoich value of 14.5, I get my 1/4 point back.
i.e., 14.5/14.7 = .98
You calculate a desired commanded AFR of 12.50 based on 14.7 stoich via the equations. But the ECM will end up at 12.50 x .98 = 12.25 for a stoich value of 14.5. Thus the 1/4 point richer commanded AFR being reported by Tunerpro.
Any rate, not sure how many people are calculating commanded AFR's and have modified the stoich value. But just a heads up if you modify the stoich value, your commanded AFR's will be off.
Going over my data I was noticing that my commanded AFR being reported by the ECM was consistently 1/4 point off from what I programmed into the calibration...
I had that issue before and we fixed it
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...drives-pe.html
So I was scratching my head on why the issue was popping up again...
Ended up back in Traxxion's thread on commanded AFR
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...t-afr-how.html
When the number 14.7 jumped out at me...
I had forgotten that I moved the factory 14.7 stoich value a while ago to 14.5 after reading some of the blended gas threads. In retrospect that probably wasn't necessary since I'm tuning via WB now anyway...
BUT, the stock equations for calculating the %change to AFR in PE and OL are based on 14.7... doh! When I put in my stoich value of 14.5, I get my 1/4 point back.

i.e., 14.5/14.7 = .98
You calculate a desired commanded AFR of 12.50 based on 14.7 stoich via the equations. But the ECM will end up at 12.50 x .98 = 12.25 for a stoich value of 14.5. Thus the 1/4 point richer commanded AFR being reported by Tunerpro.
Any rate, not sure how many people are calculating commanded AFR's and have modified the stoich value. But just a heads up if you modify the stoich value, your commanded AFR's will be off.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








