t56 and driveshaft
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Michigan U.S.A
Car: 85 camaro z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.27 borg warner 9 bolt
t56 and driveshaft
does anyone know if they used the same driveshaft in a 85 camaro and a 96 firebird? if so is one better than the other?
also are the parts from a 96 firebird the same as the parts for a 96 camaro if you were to do a t56 swap?
also are the parts from a 96 firebird the same as the parts for a 96 camaro if you were to do a t56 swap?
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Car: 1981 Camaro; 1986 Z28
Engine: LT1; LT1
Transmission: 6 speed; 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73; 3.42
I know my driveshaft from my 81 camaro fit the output shaft of the T56 from the 97 T/A it came out of. I know the 4th gen uses a larger aluminum unit but the slip yoke should be the same spline. If i had to choose, I would use the 3rd gen simply because aluminum driveshafts are expensive to modify and every time you change ujoints, you are removing a little bit of the aluminum with it.
The 96 camaro and firebird will have the same trans, hydraulics, clutch, flywheel and pedals.
The 96 camaro and firebird will have the same trans, hydraulics, clutch, flywheel and pedals.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,893
Likes: 2,436
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Yes, and yes.
As far as "better", that depends on what condition your current one is in. I don't think there's any significant difference in the part design or anything. 98-up, yes they're arguably better, because those may be aluminum; but not 93-97. Those are about the same.
I've changed U-joints in aluminum driveshafts before, haven't noticed any problem with removing aluminum. An atom or 2 maybe, but nothing to get excited about. No modification is required (for most of us anyway) so I wouldn't worry so much about that either.
As far as "better", that depends on what condition your current one is in. I don't think there's any significant difference in the part design or anything. 98-up, yes they're arguably better, because those may be aluminum; but not 93-97. Those are about the same.
I've changed U-joints in aluminum driveshafts before, haven't noticed any problem with removing aluminum. An atom or 2 maybe, but nothing to get excited about. No modification is required (for most of us anyway) so I wouldn't worry so much about that either.
Senior Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 699
Likes: 1
From: Houston TX
Car: 84 Z-28 Camaro, 2022 2500 silverado
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: richmond 3.73, eaton posi
93 & up are all more presision ballanced, and yes they did make allumnium ones from 93-97, it was an option...I don't remember the RPO code though, they have a special dampener on them that really gets rid of vibration
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigjay89gta
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
12
Oct 15, 2015 08:04 AM





