Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

t56 and driveshaft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 12:13 AM
  #1  
n8sz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Michigan U.S.A
Car: 85 camaro z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.27 borg warner 9 bolt
t56 and driveshaft

does anyone know if they used the same driveshaft in a 85 camaro and a 96 firebird? if so is one better than the other?

also are the parts from a 96 firebird the same as the parts for a 96 camaro if you were to do a t56 swap?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 02:55 AM
  #2  
1981LT1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Car: 1981 Camaro; 1986 Z28
Engine: LT1; LT1
Transmission: 6 speed; 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73; 3.42
I know my driveshaft from my 81 camaro fit the output shaft of the T56 from the 97 T/A it came out of. I know the 4th gen uses a larger aluminum unit but the slip yoke should be the same spline. If i had to choose, I would use the 3rd gen simply because aluminum driveshafts are expensive to modify and every time you change ujoints, you are removing a little bit of the aluminum with it.

The 96 camaro and firebird will have the same trans, hydraulics, clutch, flywheel and pedals.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 06:10 AM
  #3  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,893
Likes: 2,436
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Yes, and yes.

As far as "better", that depends on what condition your current one is in. I don't think there's any significant difference in the part design or anything. 98-up, yes they're arguably better, because those may be aluminum; but not 93-97. Those are about the same.

I've changed U-joints in aluminum driveshafts before, haven't noticed any problem with removing aluminum. An atom or 2 maybe, but nothing to get excited about. No modification is required (for most of us anyway) so I wouldn't worry so much about that either.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 06:47 AM
  #4  
84 Z-28 350's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 699
Likes: 1
From: Houston TX
Car: 84 Z-28 Camaro, 2022 2500 silverado
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: richmond 3.73, eaton posi
93 & up are all more presision ballanced, and yes they did make allumnium ones from 93-97, it was an option...I don't remember the RPO code though, they have a special dampener on them that really gets rid of vibration
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
bigjay89gta
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
12
Oct 15, 2015 08:04 AM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
Oct 1, 2015 03:46 PM
Vincent135
Transmissions and Drivetrain
9
Sep 28, 2015 10:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.