V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #1  
forkvoid's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: '87 Camaro / '87 Chevy K10
Engine: 3.4L MPFI (soon) / 5.7L TBI
Transmission: 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.73
Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Starting my first engine rebuild. I've got a 2.8 out of an '88. Looking for suggestions for parts for ultimate reliability and economy.

1) Is the OE spec cam best for my application, or is there a better one that will not hurt mileage?
2) If the pistons appear fine, is there any need to replace them?
3) The typical wear parts will be replaced(ie, pushrods, rockers, springs, etc). Is there any reason to replace them with something other than OE spec that isn't going to hurt mileage?
4) Any specifics on the best gaskets?
5) If there is no damage, I'm only going to hone the block and heads. Is there a good reason to have a valve job done if the valves do not appear to be bad?

Any other things I should take a deeper look at?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #2  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Sayreville NJ
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

u could go with the towing cam for the s10 blazer application.

if the cyls do not need to be bored u can reuse the stock pistons assuming they arent cracked or damaged in anyway.

pushrods and rockers are questionable depending on how much wear they have.though if ur going to change rockers a set of roller/rollertip rockers wont hurt.valve springs and se3als should be replaced.

use a set of victor reinz or felpro gaskets

a valve job is deff a good idea. the valve seat is what makes the valve seal when it is closed,though depending on the condition of valves and seats u can lap tyhem in by hand, but a valve job is a better idea, and typically in exspensive.

on a side note if u look on ebay u can buy reman iron heads very cheap, cheaper then u can get the valve job.springs etc
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #3  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

depending on how/what use you plan to use this motor for really depends on the cam.

If the car is mainly in-town, the truck/blazer cam wouldnt be to bad. More low end torque for stop light to stop light. Will do ok for some highway trips.

If your going to be doing a lot of highway trips, Id suggest staying with camaro cam.

roller rockers for sure.
3.1 crank for the extra torque? But then that would also require new 3.1 pistons.
have a better y-pipe made rather then the "t-pipe".
crank pulley
Main thing is going to be tweaking the prom chip to max efficiency.
msd or hypertech coil, good wires, delco plugs gapped right, brass cap/rotor.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #4  
forkvoid's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: '87 Camaro / '87 Chevy K10
Engine: 3.4L MPFI (soon) / 5.7L TBI
Transmission: 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.73
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Originally Posted by Dale
depending on how/what use you plan to use this motor for really depends on the cam.

If the car is mainly in-town, the truck/blazer cam wouldnt be to bad. More low end torque for stop light to stop light. Will do ok for some highway trips.

If your going to be doing a lot of highway trips, Id suggest staying with camaro cam.
Mainly in town, with periodic long(200+ miles) highway trips.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #5  
2.8RS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Originally Posted by Dale
have a better y-pipe made rather then the "t-pipe".
What would the Y-pipe look like? Would is give the passenger cyl a longer tube before it met with the driver exhaust?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #6  
forkvoid's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: '87 Camaro / '87 Chevy K10
Engine: 3.4L MPFI (soon) / 5.7L TBI
Transmission: 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.73
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Originally Posted by daves12secV6
u could go with the towing cam for the s10 blazer application.
What are the specs on this cam? I can't seem to find much reference to it.

Originally Posted by daves12secV6
valve springs and se3als should be replaced.
The standard OE spec will do fine?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 07:48 PM
  #7  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Originally Posted by 2.8RS
What would the Y-pipe look like? Would is give the passenger cyl a longer tube before it met with the driver exhaust?
it would look more like the one that comes with the headers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sleprock
Interior Parts Wanted
2
Oct 3, 2015 11:01 PM
hartsmike
Engine Swap
11
Oct 2, 2015 07:11 AM
Derrick86
Transmissions and Drivetrain
7
Oct 1, 2015 05:12 AM
Aaronv808
Members Firebirds
9
Sep 30, 2015 12:55 PM
3.8TransAM
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
1
Sep 27, 2015 08:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.