V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

My 3400 T '88 camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 04:51 PM
  #51  
bl85c's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Man you need to do something about that exhaust note! Maybe it was just the internet but that sounded like a lawnmower! Mine isn't much better though.

Otherwise kick ***!
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 04:55 PM
  #52  
fst64_v8pwr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Very nice.. looks like a fun project
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 05:01 PM
  #53  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

i was holding back but ill say it anyways, while it is impressive, it still isnt that impressive.
he edged out my 1/8th mile run by a small margin and it took more boost from a larger turbo and a bigger motor along with the magical 3x00 top end. doesent look like it was tuned near as bad as mine either hell i left a cloud of black smoke for half the lenght of the track the car was so rich.

no doubt it will get faster as it gets tuned but ......

anyways once again congrats and nice run mars
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 05:05 PM
  #54  
bl85c's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro



All I got out of my iron head 2.8 on 6psi and no n2o was a 15.1. That was all turbo though no work on the motor itself.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #55  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Originally Posted by bl85c


All I got out of my iron head 2.8 on 6psi and no n2o was a 15.1.
u should have been much faster for what u were pushing, 3.1 on 6 psi with my daughters mom driving went 14.0, and she cant drive to save her life

my junkyard under k setup went 15.0 with her driving at 5 psi on a bone stock 2.8 motor with the stock ecm

ill have to see if street lethal still has the videos he recorded of those runs the 15.0 was vs a 3800 alero or boneville, she just beat that damn car

edit

correction she can drive and handle a car she just cant drag race to save her life lmao

Last edited by project89; Oct 12, 2010 at 05:37 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 05:26 PM
  #56  
jensen73110's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Very nice!
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 05:32 PM
  #57  
bl85c's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

That was at 5800ft. Sealevel would be 13.97.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 05:34 PM
  #58  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Originally Posted by bl85c
That was at 5800ft. Sealevel would be 13.97.

still say u would have went faster then that at sealevel unless u were only using a full t3 turbo. but u did have a hybrid turbo on it right
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #59  
bl85c's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

No, just a junkyard t3 off a mercedes. I only put about $150 into the whole project not counting the other 2 turbos I experimented with lol.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #60  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

ahh ok so yesy then ur low low 13 times would be correct with a t3/t4 at the same boost levels u could have pushed low 12's high 11's
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 07:02 PM
  #61  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Originally Posted by project89
very nice

should put u more like 12.5-12.6 in the 1/4 ur only going to gain 20-22 mph tops after the 1/8th
u need around a 7.80 in the 1/8th to go mid to low 12's

heres my run @ 9 psi with the ebay t3/t4 which was also pig rich u can see big clouds of black smoke as my car goes down the track in the video

what were afrs on the run ? how much total timming?


congrats though its going to be a solid running car once u get it tuned a lil better
I guess you forget who Mars is? He is no noob to the track, or 660's Have you seen his Cavalier run?

Originally Posted by project89
i was holding back but ill say it anyways, while it is impressive, it still isnt that impressive.
he edged out my 1/8th mile run by a small margin and it took more boost from a larger turbo and a bigger motor along with the magical 3x00 top end. doesent look like it was tuned near as bad as mine either hell i left a cloud of black smoke for half the lenght of the track the car was so rich.

no doubt it will get faster as it gets tuned but ......

anyways once again congrats and nice run mars
You mean the 400hp "daves12secv6" that made 275hp, just as I predicted and Ben paid for the dyno session to prove?

Mars' car is still in testing with stock JY parts/motor, how can you compare to the highly modified (and cammed) iron head motor you had at the time of that slip?

Don't mean to come off as a jerk, but apparently no-one on this board is going to be as good as you. Should I clutter up someone's thread with the 2.5liter/Holset turbo car that just ran a 12.3@117mph with stiff-wall circle track Hoosiers, 2.0 60', fresh off the auto-cross track? Maybe post my slips and vids in his thread too?


Mars, I think it's awesome what you did (especially in the time frame finished)! Keep up the good work man!
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #62  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Originally Posted by firstfirebird
I guess you forget who Mars is? He is no noob to the track, or 660's Have you seen his Cavalier run?



You mean the 400hp "daves12secv6" that made 275hp, just as I predicted and Ben paid for the dyno session to prove?

Mars' car is still in testing with stock JY parts/motor, how can you compare to the highly modified (and cammed) iron head motor you had at the time of that slip?

Don't mean to come off as a jerk, but apparently no-one on this board is going to be as good as you. Should I clutter up someone's thread with the 2.5liter/Holset turbo car that just ran a 12.3@117mph with stiff-wall circle track Hoosiers, 2.0 60', fresh off the auto-cross track? Maybe post my slips and vids in his thread too?


Mars, I think it's awesome what you did (especially in the time frame finished)! Keep up the good work man!
cammed lol hardley cammed cam yes but it was a penut actually regardless for heads that flow oh so much more, quess ported irons flow just as much as the 3x00 stuff then huh

the slip was posted just for a comparason to see how it held upto another run that was only what .200's diff from his , wanted to see if his car was picking up better then mine off the line or if hes picking up down track.

quess the post came off the wrong way

and if u really belive the cars only puttin down 270 whp ur kidding urself do i have to bring up the fact that the entire pull timing was locked to 10* bdtc , hmm we all know what that does power wise it kills it.

granted the car went threw a cam change and some other mods when the 60-1 went on and was dynoed so no it wasnt the same combo that went 13.0 @ 9psi

and know what when i see somone do better then i have with something that isnt larger displacement wise or with more boost or a bigger turbo or the combination of all of the above like most that have gone faster ill be the first person to step back say wow really nice job, and see were improvements cam be made on my own stuff .

like i said 2 times already nice job mars get that thing tuned and rip off some more passes .if its tunned as bad as u say im willing to bet u pick up another .600's
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 08:57 PM
  #63  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Just because people don't post here doesn't mean it didn't happen. A bored over 3.1l Gen1 block has been well over 400hp for years now in a Chevette. We bid on the job of making him 4-bolt mains, but he decided to keep buying blocks instead of investing the $$. A local Midget car I sold a 3500 block to has made well over 300hp N/A with a 3.4/3400 (guess that's not your class since the displacement is more). And again, we just missed the 11's with our 2.5l Holset car on circle track tires, and I know my friends Pure Stock Class Firebird is going 12.3's with a cam only at 275whp.

Anyways, I am very interested to see what Mars' car is going to do as I was watching streaming video of his Cavi last year (maybe yr before?) and know what he's all about...

/hyjack, back to Mars' station...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #64  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 19
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Man, we need to line up at Cayuga and run, once i can get some traction that is....

Two, 6 cylinder $59 cars.

I finally have the IC installed now, so I can finally dial up the boost to where it should be. lol

This will likely have to wait for next year though, being back in school full time and working slightly more than part time hours, leaves little time and money to play at the track.

Why were you only running 1/8'. I know St. Thomas sucks and all, but I ran the full 1/4' there in my truck, when I went 13s, with it bucking and farting in high gear. 1/8' times should have been high 12.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 08:37 PM
  #65  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

they were only racing 1/8 mile for the turkey nationals.

The night before I went 13.5 @ 107 with street tires, with a 2.6X 60' time. hahaha it was fun.

About 15* of timing and lower than 10:1 AFR cause my WB was reading max rich bottomed out.

CHRIS, when we going racing some of us might go down south one last time Oct 23... You should bring the Z car...

There's a kid running C$59 in a beretta same turbo as me, he gave me his starter bin and it ran very well. He went mid 12's at 14 psi I think That was at the last event @ cayuga. So there are 3 of us out there...
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 08:46 PM
  #66  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 19
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Originally Posted by mars061
they were only racing 1/8 mile for the turkey nationals.

The night before I went 13.5 @ 107 with street tires, with a 2.6X 60' time. hahaha it was fun.

About 15* of timing and lower than 10:1 AFR cause my WB was reading max rich bottomed out.

CHRIS, when we going racing some of us might go down south one last time Oct 23... You should bring the Z car...

There's a kid running C$59 in a beretta same turbo as me, he gave me his starter bin and it ran very well. He went mid 12's at 14 psi I think That was at the last event @ cayuga. So there are 3 of us out there...

Sweet let me know if you do decide to leave your Northern abode for some racing.

I'll have to see how the wallet is looking by then too, I REALLY need to watch what I spend at least until I'm working full time again.


--==EDIT==--

Crap, I just looked at the calender, I think I have a wedding to be at on the 23rd.

Last edited by Six_Shooter; Oct 13, 2010 at 10:36 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #67  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

My other 3400 car (supercharged) - now this thing is fun to drive on the street and pick on just about anyone. haha :





I hope the Camaro will beat it in 2011... I guess we shall see.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 04:11 PM
  #68  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

If all else is equal as far as motor work, the Camaro should beat the Cavi - you know how hard it is to launch a FWD car lol, the Camaro has a 4' long traction bar!
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 10:53 AM
  #69  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

I dunno, I think there's alot more weight there with the Fbody... I want to weight both of them one of these days.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #70  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 19
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Being light isn't everything, especially with a turbo.

I know of a few cars that have gone quicker with more weight added to the car than when they were lighter.

Seems the added weight, puts more load on the engine and turbo, which causes it to spooler quicker, and stay spooled.

The biggest advantage with the F-body is RWD.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 11:04 AM
  #71  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Originally Posted by mars061
I dunno, I think there's alot more weight there with the Fbody... I want to weight both of them one of these days.
Originally Posted by Six_Shooter
Being light isn't everything, especially with a turbo.

I know of a few cars that have gone quicker with more weight added to the car than when they were lighter.

Seems the added weight, puts more load on the engine and turbo, which causes it to spooler quicker, and stay spooled.

The biggest advantage with the F-body is RWD.
This. I was able to pull a 2.0 60' with 100whp and dry-rotted street tires in the 'bird lol.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 10:33 PM
  #72  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

a stock Jbody can pull 2.0 60' times on street tires, once you start adding power it gets harder and harder.. iirc my best was like a 1.8 with the old engine.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #73  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Ahh crap, some MAJOR bottom end knock coming from the motor. Noticed it on my way home from work.

Pistons are all fine I think as the plugs were nice and had nothing on them.

Rockers and pushrods are all good, as I removed the valve covers and saw nothing out of the ordinary...

The car has been running rich for a while so maybe that did a number on the bearings. Also, this was a VERY sludged up motor when I got it. (still is)

Carnage pics to follow.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #74  
bl85c's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Aww that's no fun! Hardly got any use out of it.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 06:19 PM
  #75  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Well it was a VERY VERY worn out 3400. I mean it was bad. The sludge inside the motor was nuts. I think I'm lucky I got that much out of it to be honest.

Im throwing the idea around of just putting my cavalier engine in it. Its ported and cam as well as the 70mm TB and 3500 UIM... I don't know yet.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 07:35 PM
  #76  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 19
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

I would go that route, personally.

Then if you wanted to sell the Cav a running car, just grab a stock 3.1, drop it in and go.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 08:50 PM
  #77  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

FTMFW!

That Cavi motor in the Maro would rape the field!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 12:29 AM
  #78  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

im just curious but im starting to notice a pattern on some of the fwd block builds
is the oil pump between the fwd/rwd blocks the same ?
mars if its diff when u tear down the motor think u can snap a couple picks of the oil pump internals , just remove the bottom plate and take picks of whats under it.

also what is the usual rpm that thing turned ?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 06:44 AM
  #79  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 19
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Oil pumps are basically the same. I believe the genIII oil pumps would be closer to the "High volume" RWD pump though.

What pattern are you seeing?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 08:13 AM
  #80  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

seems alot of the guys i see turning high rpm spin or catch a bearing on the rod journal with the fwd blocks.i doubt his tune being really rich had anything to do with it.it could just be like he said the motor was sludgy as hell. but its still something worth looking into

was thinking maybe its a cavitation issue if the pump differs in design from the rwd pump.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 02:11 PM
  #81  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Originally Posted by project89
seems alot of the guys i see turning high rpm spin or catch a bearing on the rod journal with the fwd blocks.i doubt his tune being really rich had anything to do with it.it could just be like he said the motor was sludgy as hell. but its still something worth looking into

was thinking maybe its a cavitation issue if the pump differs in design from the rwd pump.

Well seeing the cranks and rods are identical in the 3400 as the RWD 3.1 and 3.4 I don't know what pattern you are seeing. Only thing I saw was when Dave was spinning his 3500 to 7k+ the rod bearings spun, but that's because the 3500 rods have the tangs machined on the caps and rods since the rod caps are snapped off (same issue the Modular motors have with the same design). Loner had no problem with rod bearing on his car, we never got a proper dyno of it, but it was well over 300whp when the trans spilled it's guts on the all over the rollers at less than 4k.

Last edited by firstfirebird; Oct 18, 2010 at 02:18 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:08 PM
  #82  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

spun #4 rod bearing. Not any real carnange, just a loose rod and some alum. coloured oil... So no pics.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #83  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

good 'ol #4... that's the one that went in my old 3400. It was #1 in my 3500 though IIRC.


the engine from the Z would be fun for sure in the Camaro, i'm sure you could find a stock 3400 to throw in your Z like i did.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:15 PM
  #84  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Plan is already made

low mileage 3500. Cam. good valve springs and a good tune.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:37 PM
  #85  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro




the Comp 26986's seem to work well and fit with all stock parts. the 26915's have a better spring rate but are pretty snug on the stock seats, i've got 4K on mine w/o problems though.


Should be worth 400+ HP easy, can't wait to see the times.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 03:37 PM
  #86  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Yeah I have the 26986 ones in my 3400 now, I'll Xfer them over to the 3500. Im getting the 3500 this saturday.

20,000 miles 2006 for 250$. haha

and also going to order :

WOT TECH CAM : street/strip turbo

•265/273 adv duration
•216/224 .050" duration
•.506"/.506" lift @ 1.6:1 Rocker Ratio
•109 Intake Center Line
•113 Lobe Seperation Angle

I dunno about the specs, I am almost thinking a split pattern cam 220/220 or something along the lines would be better, but Ben seems to think that this turbo cam is the ticket.

I'll trust him.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 09:04 PM
  #87  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 19
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

You'll also need a crank trigger, since the 3500 uses that 56x split reluctor wheel.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 06:04 PM
  #88  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Originally Posted by Six_Shooter
You'll also need a crank trigger, since the 3500 uses that 56x split reluctor wheel.
YeaH I'll just order the WOT one and slap it between my dampner and crank pulley. easy enough.

I just question whether or not I should get them stock sized forged 3500 pistons or just skip that and keep it stock.

I'd like to know what's the next likely thing to fail on the 3500 when being pushed to the limits, and fix that...

Looks like I'm getting a GT4088R turbo as well now too... so I can make some real power.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 09:23 PM
  #89  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 19
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

You'll likely need to do a bit more than "just slap it between the pulley and dampner.

The pulley has an offset tang that locates it in center of the damper. The 3500 crank trigger kit does not appear to have provisions for this.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 12:25 AM
  #90  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

I have an older version of the trigger wheel that i just cut the center hub out of, then drilled/tapped the dampener and bolted the ring to it. That way there is no bracket offsetting to worry about.


TCE is also making internal 7x rings, we haven't tested to see if the ICM will read the perfect square wave output from the 3500's CPS but you can always space out a stock CPS.

The 58x trigger wheel on the 3500 crank has the marks on it for the 7x firing, just have the machine shop transfer those to the crank so they can line up the new internal wheel.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 12:41 PM
  #91  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Originally Posted by Purple82TA
I have an older version of the trigger wheel that i just cut the center hub out of, then drilled/tapped the dampener and bolted the ring to it. That way there is no bracket offsetting to worry about.
Yeah I may even hog out the center and spot weld it to the back of the pulley. we shall see ? I'll have a good look once the parts come in. is it alum though ? haha

Note my 3500 is home now.

Not sure wheter or not re-use my 3400 UIM or use this new 3500 one. I'd just have to re-do the fuel lines slightly. Which ones better ?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #92  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 19
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

The trigger wheel wouldn't work if it was aluminium.

"Better" is debatable. Depends on what you want.

The 3500 UIM has a larger plenum, that also reduces the length of the runners, this should provide a better transition off idle and rev a little better due to the shorter runners.

I would try both and see which works better for you.

being turbocharged, I'd lean towards the 3400 UIM, get the nice low end torque with the longer runner, and the forcing of air will help in the top end.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 05:53 PM
  #93  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

I feel the 3500 plenum is better for boost since it's closer to the 150% plenum to engine displacement ratio, that's supposedly optimum for boost. It's been researched that 100-150% plenum to displacement for N/A is best and 150%-200% is best for boosted engines, of course this isn't taking the runner length-change being made.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #94  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

So, new motor is here 2006 Pontiac G6 mill. only 29,000 km's. (and it shows the motor is clean) It was only 250$ so if it blows up again, not a huge deal.

Super cool oil squirters for the bottom of the 5&6 pistons :

Name:  P1030123.jpg
Views: 630
Size:  56.5 KB

It has the Forged Steel "7484" crank :

Name:  P1030122.jpg
Views: 610
Size:  64.9 KB

I've already installed the 26986 valve springs that were in my old motor. I'm just waiting for some random parts to show up and I'll clean it up and paint it all nice nice. I have to install a #10 turbo drain fitting in the oil pan (I can't install my 3400 pan on this motor, one of the bolt holes are different.) Install a cam and a new intake gasket set and go.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2010 | 11:26 PM
  #95  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

that's the first '06 i've seen with the 7484 crank, before i'd only seen them in the '04 cars. Have fun trying to break that beast.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 07:56 PM
  #96  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

I went with the 3500 upper and 65mm Olds TB with a custom adapter plate that I made out of 1/4 steel. Ported the upper and lowers as well as worked on the 3500 heads a bit.

I just removed some casting junk on the intake side, polished (most) of the combustion chambers, the exhaust ports and de-shrouded the valves a bit. I was careful not to change the shapes of the ports as they look like they flow very well except the barf spots in the intake bowl area that I removed.

Name:  P1030136.jpg
Views: 617
Size:  181.7 KB

Not sure how to mount the trigger wheel yet. Dave you got pics ?

My CPS don't physically fit between the dampner and the pulley. It would need to be spaced out... I want to avoid spacing out the accesories. If only my trigger wheel was about 3/4" larger in diameter it would be money, but there's just no room for the CPS to "get in between" both pullies to get to the right distance away from the trigger wheel. The ATS underdrive pulley would be nice, but I wouldn't have enough wrap around my water pump...

Name:  cps.jpg
Views: 613
Size:  31.4 KB

Name:  cps2.jpg
Views: 644
Size:  40.3 KB

so that's where I'm at. I have a long time to figure out the best way. I think I'll end up welding it to the outside of the pulley and space the CPS mount WAY out there... I'm very surprised no one has a RWD 3500 trigger wheel setup yet... would be real easy to do with a new crank pulley.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 11:22 PM
  #97  
bl85c's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Kinda late, but you do know there's marks to machine the 3500 crank for a 7x signal right?
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #98  
mars061's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 2
From: Sudbury, ON, CAN
Car: 87 IROCZ Z28
Engine: 3900V6 GT4088 intecooled
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.45 MSF Spool
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

Are you boosted guys running 4" exhaust ?

I was thinking of going 4" with a bullet muffler and dumping before the axle, but a little worried about gnd. clearance....

It should be significantly quieter than what I have now... (3" sidepipe with no muffler)
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #99  
Project 3.4 Camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

4" exhaust is complete overkill, even 3" is overkill for most cars
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 01:51 PM
  #100  
Pillsbry10's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
Re: My 3400 T '88 camaro

I'm running 2.5" down pipe that dumps into a 2 3/4 under the car all the way back to muffler. On a lowered car we had to tuck it up pretty high for clearence
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.