2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: TX, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 3.4L Swap is done
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
hey I never claimed to be able to spell........ and it was suppost to be site.....
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: TX, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 3.4L Swap is done
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
Ok guys I was taking the chips out of the 730 memcal, and I noticed the white board ckt board (knock sensor board?) is broken. On this board I was wondering if I could still use it just with out the knock sensor feature just to get the car running to check the new ECM, or would I need this board to check the wiring/ repin
Last edited by batsibf; Nov 16, 2010 at 10:28 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
I have no clue what board you are talking about, but in terms of the engine, an 86 shouldn't have a knock sensor(or at least I'm pretty sure) and even if it does shouldn't need it to run, but if you are trying to get a computer to run it, and the computer thinks there is one, and there isn't it might be problematic...but I have a 3.4 in my car and no knock sensor and it runs just fine. But I also have the stock ECM, which isn't setup for one.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: TX, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 3.4L Swap is done
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
I have no clue what board you are talking about, but in terms of the engine, an 86 shouldn't have a knock sensor(or at least I'm pretty sure) and even if it does shouldn't need it to run, but if you are trying to get a computer to run it, and the computer thinks there is one, and there isn't it might be problematic...but I have a 3.4 in my car and no knock sensor and it runs just fine. But I also have the stock ECM, which isn't setup for one.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
It will set a code with a broken knock board (unless you disable it in the calibration) but it will still run fine until you can replace it.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
No, he's using the swap and bins I put together. It needs the '730 memcal with knock board and it will set a code.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: TX, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 3.4L Swap is done
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
thanks guys,
question on cams, one of the guys I work with said I put is an street cam, and I have seen people like differnt cams on here. what lift on intake and exhaust should i be looking at, since I have gotten the car I have been watching where I like to drive at and it between 2 and 3k with a max of 5k......
question on cams, one of the guys I work with said I put is an street cam, and I have seen people like differnt cams on here. what lift on intake and exhaust should i be looking at, since I have gotten the car I have been watching where I like to drive at and it between 2 and 3k with a max of 5k......
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 354
Likes: 1
From: Manchester,PA
Car: 86 Firebird SE
Engine: 2.8L
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
Putting a hot cam into an engine without matching heads and intake will not do anything but possibly make it a dog off the line. The flow has to match the lift and duration of the camshaft or all that work is for nothing. And if you are doing the 165 swap described in bl85's thread, you have to use a 7730 memcal and the white knock board has to be functional. Look in Corsicas, Berettas, 89 and up camaros and firebirds for the 7730. Get another memcal that has a good knock board. I trust that you installed the knock sensor like described in the thread?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: TX, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 3.4L Swap is done
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
I have two memcals one has the board the other the board was damaged when I got it
So if I understand you right just doing the port and polish would be fine with the stock cam but putting in a hotter cam wont do anything but give it a torque boost in the lower ranges?
So if I understand you right just doing the port and polish would be fine with the stock cam but putting in a hotter cam wont do anything but give it a torque boost in the lower ranges?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
What he's saying is you need to look for a cam tailored to what you intend to do with it and how your motor's built. You can put a cam that works well at higher rpm in a torqey motor with long runners and a small throttle and it will be a complete turd everywhere. You can put a cam that works well lower in the powerband in a high flowing motor with short runners and a large throttle and it will still cholke up top and lose out on torq down low. Using a well matched cam will give you the best of everything.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 354
Likes: 1
From: Manchester,PA
Car: 86 Firebird SE
Engine: 2.8L
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird

Thats exactly what I meant. I have seen quite a few cars that people have put in these really high lift cams in stock engines and the cars fall flat on their faces when you romp them and they can't figure out why. If you are going to do mostly daily driving and some strip trips, then a mild street cam should be the ticket. If you are going to use ported heads and intake then you can go slightly higher but make sure the lift and duration matches the cfm of your heads and intake. You should be able to find flow rates for stock heads and intakes if you do a search. When you get heads and intakes ported, you should be given a paper that has the results of a flow test, unless it is somebody doing it on the side. With that sheet, you can pick the right cam for your needs. Its alot of planning not just slapping a lumpy cam in there to try and sound cool. Take your time and PLAN things out and you will have a car that puts a smile on your face when you smash the go pedal.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: TX, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 3.4L Swap is done
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 2.8l to 3.4l in 1986 firebird
ok cool, thats why I'm putting it up now and getting everything together to do this right (as much as I can anyway). I'm building her to be a cruiser, so off the line is not that important to me, but who dose not like spining wheels ever once in while.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PATRIOTIC1911
Northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain
5
Oct 7, 2022 10:38 PM
Pilotrick50
Interior Parts for Sale
1
Sep 2, 2015 12:48 PM






