Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

PRO TOURING f-bodys.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2004, 04:46 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
PRO TOURING f-bodys.....

ok... i have been reading and hearing all this buzz on this pro touring thing from car craft and hourse power tv... i was wondering if anyone has a third gen f-body set up this way with fat tires all the way around with tubing all the way around with all chassi work and suspention work you can do... i am lookin to do this to mine

any one have a car set up like this or any pics of one....

Old 08-01-2004, 07:27 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
also i would like to know if anyone eles is in to this pro touring thing... any opinions on this subject...:lala:
Old 08-01-2004, 07:56 PM
  #3  
Administrator

iTrader: (1)
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,386
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Third Gens were pro-touring cars from the factory! Where do you think all these way back musclecar owners got the idea to set up their cars for not only straight line, but for handling and braking too? Hmmmm? Wide, approx. 50 series, Z/VR rated tires, disc brakes, suspension for turning, and bigger rims. Sounds like an IROC-Z to me! (and in the 80's, this stuff on an IROC or any other top Third was breakthrough)
Old 08-01-2004, 08:36 PM
  #4  
TGO Supporter

 
deadbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: So.west IN
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Car: 87 Formula/ 00 Xtreme
Engine: TPI 305/ v6
Transmission: struggling t-5/ 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 3.08/ 3.23
Like this one from Car Crafts RSE ?...
Attached Thumbnails PRO TOURING f-bodys.....-image3.jpg  
Old 08-01-2004, 09:03 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
67 Camaro 88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hliðskjálf / Pensacola, FL
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 3800
Transmission: T5
I'm going that way with my 67, but it's a ways away. Money is a nice thing to have... and I'm fixing up my 88 Camaro (beater car) so it's comfy to drive and nice to cruise in (another paint job, sfc/stb, x4amp, sub, 97+ console, etc). It'll be nice to drive a 1st gen period.. muchless with a 6 speed and stiff suspension


-Bud
Old 08-01-2004, 10:22 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
Third Gens were pro-touring cars from the factory! Where do you think all these way back musclecar owners got the idea to set up their cars for not only straight line, but for handling and braking too? Hmmmm? Wide, approx. 50 series, Z/VR rated tires, disc brakes, suspension for turning, and bigger rims. Sounds like an IROC-Z to me! (and in the 80's, this stuff on an IROC or any other top Third was breakthrough)
i didn't even look at my IROC that way... :werd:

but i am lookin for cars that can hold a ''g'' in the skidpad and +++66mph in the 600 ft slalom... just like in the new car craft...

THAT BLUT T?A ROCKS:rockon: :rockon: :rockon:
Old 08-01-2004, 10:23 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
edit: THAT BLUE T/A ROCKS :rockon: :rockon: :rockon:
Old 08-02-2004, 01:39 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Zepher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Norfolk, VA. USA
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
I am setting mine up for road racing,
LT1 with T56 and a bunch of suspension mods.


Old 08-02-2004, 02:01 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Kandied91z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: michigan
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mine was that way...ditched the rediculously wide wheels in the front and the hard to use coilovers and i'm much happier.

Old 08-02-2004, 02:03 AM
  #10  
Administrator

iTrader: (1)
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,386
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Hold g's? IROC-Z's had a best of .92 g while getting some other high .8's-low .9's through the years. They commonly had a slalom of about 63.3MPH. That's handling. Especially then! (and now too )
Old 08-02-2004, 02:14 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Kandied91z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: michigan
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
leave well enough alone and add a good suspension. meaning no lower then a pro-kit height and some other good essentials like proper spring/strut combos and these cars are outstanding. loose some of the heavy front end weight and they really move. the v6's sometimes are more fun to drive then the v8's.
Old 08-02-2004, 11:56 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
Hold g's? IROC-Z's had a best of .92 g while getting some other high .8's-low .9's through the years. They commonly had a slalom of about 63.3MPH. That's handling. Especially then! (and now too )
really???? i didn't reallize how impresive the stock f-body was in holding the "g's".....

i'm lookin to do a 327c.i. sbc with a IRS from a vett (so i think that is one unit, tranny bolted to the rear end????) for weight balance, and fiberglass body parts wouldn't hurt... lol
Old 08-02-2004, 09:33 PM
  #13  
Member

 
Souseless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 WS6
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt T2R w/ 3:23
These cars all sound like autocross cars to me??? I am running my car in SCCA Solo 2 ESP class. 11" tires all around for next year. Koni Sport shocks, WS6 package, Torsen T2R differential, 1LE brakes, 2055 headers. More to come. Corner speed is where its at.
Old 08-02-2004, 11:01 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
auto x, road course, and street driven third gen f-bodys is what i am talkin about
Old 08-03-2004, 02:33 AM
  #15  
Member
 
LaxStreetRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by F-Body Tim
ibut i am lookin for cars that can hold a ''g'' in the skidpad and +++66mph in the 600 ft slalom... just like in the new car craft...
I have a CHP from sept. 99 that has an article in it called zig zag part 1 where they do a suspension build on a 91z. In part 1 all they do is refresh the steering components, but in part 2 (wich i cant find but is probably in the oct. 99 CHP if anyone keeps them) they test it out to see what it does stock, right around .92 or so like IROCZTWENTYGREAT said. They then build the suspension using all off the shelf hotchkis components and retest. With the fresh steering gear and all the Hotckis goodies it pulled 1.0g on the skidpad. I really wish i could find that article and get all the part numbers, It was sweet too cause they listed like 10 top of the line cars and the onlything that did better than the Z was a Viper at 1.02g. Anyways long story short, good tires and about 2000 bucks worth of parts depending on what your starting out with and youve got your 1g skidpad.
Old 08-03-2004, 05:57 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member

 
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you could do even better if you used spohn parts they used hotchkis. Hotchkis springs,sfc's,stb,lca's,panhard. I think they added a new steering box too and hopefully a wonderbar.
Old 08-03-2004, 06:05 AM
  #17  
Member
 
LaxStreetRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by Spdfrk1990
I think you could do even better if you used spohn parts they used hotchkis. Hotchkis springs,sfc's,stb,lca's,panhard. I think they added a new steering box too and hopefully a wonderbar.
Yup. I think they might have done the sway bars too. Like he said you dont have to go with the hotchkis parts and you can probably save some cash by getting something else.

Has anyone ever used one of the polygraphite front end kits, if so do they work well?
Old 08-03-2004, 06:07 AM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think they kept the stock 36mm and went with a 1" hotchkis rear bar.
Old 08-03-2004, 07:48 AM
  #19  
Member
iTrader: (7)
 
colonboy14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: T56
How did that Trans Am get 30MPG on a TPI engine?!?
Old 08-03-2004, 08:26 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

 
bnoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Originally posted by colonboy14
How did that Trans Am get 30MPG on a TPI engine?!?
A 6 speed with 3.08 rear gears, custom tuning, and a highway test drive.
Old 08-03-2004, 10:36 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
When it comes to pro-touring. I think this car would take the cake.





Twin Turbo big block, the car was built to run at SilverState.
Old 08-03-2004, 10:42 AM
  #22  
Member
 
JR92z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 5.7 LT1
Transmission: T56
Wow!

More pics? Website?
That thing looks sweet!:hail:
Old 08-03-2004, 11:19 AM
  #23  
Supreme Member

 
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree dewey
Old 08-03-2004, 12:26 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Kandied91z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: michigan
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
always loved that picture..
Old 08-03-2004, 02:32 PM
  #25  
Member
iTrader: (7)
 
colonboy14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by bnoon
A 6 speed with 3.08 rear gears, custom tuning, and a highway test drive.
Until Monday, my 6 speed has 2.73 gears and I run 2000 RPM going 75-80 in FIFTH. I should run the same RPM's with the 3.73's in 6th.

How could you even get into 6th on the highway with the 3.08's- wouldn't the revs be too low?
Old 08-04-2004, 03:13 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
do any of you have the front end rebuild kit from spohn... cuz i am tired of my stock front end with all the stock cracks and creeks comeing from it when i turn the wheels lock to lock...
Old 08-04-2004, 03:46 PM
  #27  
Member

 
92lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91z
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 373
im not saying im doing this, but has anyone, on a tight budget just cut a little off the spring coil to lower the car? and if so how much did you cut off and did it affect the handeling?
Old 08-04-2004, 03:59 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
GTA-SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Parrish, Florida (Glad it ain't Vegas)
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 94 Corvette
Engine: LT-1
Transmission: Freakin Automatic---For Now
Here is my brother's car. Pro-Touring or not, it is nasty. Nasty in a good way mind you. C4 IRS + LS1 + T-56 + adjustable coil-over front + 17X9 & 17X11 + STB + SFC's + Roll bar = VIPER KILLER. P.S. the bling wing is gone, and in its place is a 91 Z high rise.
Attached Thumbnails PRO TOURING f-bodys.....-46_1.jpeg  
Old 08-04-2004, 04:19 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by GTA-SPD
Here is my brother's car. Pro-Touring or not, it is nasty. Nasty in a good way mind you. C4 IRS + LS1 + T-56 + adjustable coil-over front + 17X9 & 17X11 + STB + SFC's + Roll bar = VIPER KILLER. P.S. the bling wing is gone, and in its place is a 91 Z high rise.
lol.... i guess thats close enough to a pro touring f-body as anyone wants to get... that thing rocks :rockon:
Old 08-04-2004, 05:00 PM
  #30  
Supreme Member

 
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow that thing does look pretty damn neat. Lets see some more pix of it.
Old 08-05-2004, 03:55 AM
  #31  
Member
 
LaxStreetRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by 92lt1
im not saying im doing this, but has anyone, on a tight budget just cut a little off the spring coil to lower the car? and if so how much did you cut off and did it affect the handeling?
There are a couple different techniques to get the stock springs down, but they are deffinately half-assed ways to go about it. Just shell out the bux for a spring kit.
Old 08-05-2004, 10:23 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
GTA-SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Parrish, Florida (Glad it ain't Vegas)
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 94 Corvette
Engine: LT-1
Transmission: Freakin Automatic---For Now
Originally posted by Spdfrk1990
Wow that thing does look pretty damn neat. Lets see some more pix of it.
All I've got are up close, very specific shots of the suspension and engine installation issues. I'll get some more overall pics of it someday. Maybe at my Neice's birthday when he gets it out of the garage. It's a crap shoot if I catch it out of the car hole most of the time, since he doesn't drive it a whole lot and I live like 15 miles from him. I'll catch it when I can. I want to get some pics of his car and my car together, but it never seems like we have our cars in the same place at the same time.
Old 08-05-2004, 11:37 AM
  #33  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
J's T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Idaho Falls
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: LTX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 strengthed 7.5 inch
Pro-Touring for us is a bit strange as the whole concept was to take old iron and make it turn and burn.. we are already fairly good in the handling department and not quite old-iron yet..

I think just about any thirdgen that is set up for handling and horsepower would qualify.. and one that is set up simply for straight line performance would not..

as it sits my car has all the chassis and suspension mods, baer brakes, six speed, 275s all around and puts down 373rwhp/360rwtq.. I would classify that pro-touring..

Though the next mods are stroker or blower or both, and looking at getting black z06 wheels to go wider in the rear..

oh and the ram air hood is gone in favor of a cowl induction hood..
Attached Thumbnails PRO TOURING f-bodys.....-canresize1.jpg  

Last edited by J's T/A; 08-05-2004 at 11:41 AM.
Old 08-05-2004, 01:30 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by J's T/A
Pro-Touring for us is a bit strange as the whole concept was to take old iron and make it turn and burn.. we are already fairly good in the handling department and not quite old-iron yet..

I think just about any thirdgen that is set up for handling and horsepower would qualify.. and one that is set up simply for straight line performance would not..

as it sits my car has all the chassis and suspension mods, baer brakes, six speed, 275s all around and puts down 373rwhp/360rwtq.. I would classify that pro-touring..

Though the next mods are stroker or blower or both, and looking at getting black z06 wheels to go wider in the rear..

oh and the ram air hood is gone in favor of a cowl induction hood..
that thing look f*ckin sick dude... lol
good idea goin to the cowl, but keep it as low as posible like 2.5'' and the ZO6 wheels are gonna look so awesome!!! GOOD JOB

:rockon: :rockon:
Old 08-05-2004, 03:24 PM
  #35  
Member

 
ta84-355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Trans Am -84
Engine: 355, Twin Turbo
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 open
This is a 2nd gen Pontiac but it sure is built with the Pro Touring in mind. The guy is really good, he has retrofritted a T56 to a Pontiac engine, rebuilt the suspension, Corvette brakes etc. He makes his own fiber glass and carbon fiber parts...

http://www.propontiac.com/

/Anders
Old 08-05-2004, 08:06 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
i didn't even know it was posible to make that year birds look so sweet.... wow, dose any one eles think that pro touring cars are the sweetest lookin thing
Old 08-05-2004, 08:36 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
well... don't quote me on this but me and this one dude are workin out a deal for a 383 c.i. stroker and a 5-speed... the motor revs to 7500 RPM all day long! the 5-speed will do for know but i have plans for a 6-speed C-5 IRS, well it's a great start cuz the car the 383 and 5-speed are in, has seen 12.4's all day
Old 08-06-2004, 07:49 AM
  #38  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Mongoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Monroe,NC
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.27
You still got that hood?
Old 08-06-2004, 08:48 AM
  #39  
Supreme Member

 
bnoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Originally posted by colonboy14
Until Monday, my 6 speed has 2.73 gears and I run 2000 RPM going 75-80 in FIFTH. I should run the same RPM's with the 3.73's in 6th.

How could you even get into 6th on the highway with the 3.08's- wouldn't the revs be too low?
If you have enough low speed torque, the lower revs the better. I have a friend with a '92 Mustang with a 6 speed swap and he pulls about 1700 at 75MPH (I don't know his rear gears). He's pulled down 30+ MPG on highway and averages 22-23 MPG and he's supercharged!!!
:hail:
Old 08-07-2004, 10:42 AM
  #40  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
406TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 1,399
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1985 IROC-Z
Engine: Magnacharged LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 4:11's
I have 3.42's and do almost 90mph at 2000rpm in 6th gear....averages out to about 24mpg on the last trip I took
Old 08-07-2004, 12:24 PM
  #41  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (33)
 
FSTFBDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Boosted Land
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
I actually have both Zig Zag articles on that Z. I rem soon as They both hit the stand I ordered a complete Hotckise setup like that but I did Koni Adj. in all 4 corners.

Hopefully with in the next few weeks I get my tubular K member in, diff shocks,struts , C5 breaks and the ford 9inch in.

Just finished my 8point Roll bar 2weeks ago. Next is paint then to finish off the motor. Single Turbo, Big Cubes...Hopefully It will make for a good PRO TOURNING cruiser.
Old 08-07-2004, 01:14 PM
  #42  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
IROCFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MO
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The whole concept is a pretty awesome idea. Anything that can pull almost a 1G stock is pretty amazing. The ultimate would be 1G on the skid and 11's maybe even 10's in the quarter. It would be a somewhat difficult proposal because of suspension setups, but it would be killer.

"Single Turbo, Big Cubes"

that combination of words should be in a song...
Old 08-07-2004, 10:12 PM
  #43  
Member
 
'86Twins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: T-5 NWC
I read in a magizine that there is some kind of challenge of some sort. Pull 1g on the skidpad, 1g accelerating, and 1g stopping. Forget the name of it though.
Old 08-08-2004, 12:09 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by '86Twins
I read in a magizine that there is some kind of challenge of some sort. Pull 1g on the skidpad, 1g accelerating, and 1g stopping. Forget the name of it though.

CAR CRAFT!!! the 3g contest right???? and run 11's in the 1/4 mile
Old 08-08-2004, 10:21 AM
  #45  
Member

 
S!MON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Camaro Z28
Engine: fully loaded 350
Transmission: T5-World Class
check that trans-am

www.trans-am.de

435cui small block with bad attitudes!!!
driving in that car is really an experience!







go to "gallerien" an then the trans-am and detail gallery.
greetings

S!MON

Last edited by S!MON; 08-10-2004 at 12:04 PM.
Old 08-08-2004, 11:38 AM
  #46  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
TTOP350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,737
Received 797 Likes on 529 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Here is a link to pics of my car ...I have been running the crap out of it since i started to build it in 92 ... it has 222,000miles on it i drive it all over the place.....


http://www.team3rdgen.com/modules.ph...view_album.php
Old 08-09-2004, 12:17 PM
  #47  
Member
 
'86Twins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: T-5 NWC
Originally posted by F-Body Tim
CAR CRAFT!!! the 3g contest right???? and run 11's in the 1/4 mile
Heck yeah. I buy pretty much every domestic car magizine I can get, excluding Ford and Mopar only mags. I saw that and thought it was a neat challenge that I plan to test out on my car. Figured it should be pretty damn easy considering the platform I'm starting with is close with a few mods. :-)
Old 08-09-2004, 10:12 PM
  #48  
Supreme Member

 
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heres my fav pro touring camaro
http://www.pro-touring.com/featured_...camaro_z28.htm
Old 08-09-2004, 10:32 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
F-Body Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Round Lake,IL
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Spdfrk1990
Heres my fav pro touring camaro
http://www.pro-touring.com/featured_...camaro_z28.htm
dude thats the maro from the BMR web site!!! i always was lookin for info on it.......... sweet
Old 08-10-2004, 01:36 AM
  #50  
Member
 
Red87SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: silverton/salem, oregon
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans am
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: built 700R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt posi w/ disc
well ive been thinking about a pro-touring look on my car, but i dont want to dish out the 600$ for the friggin GFX. maybe it would look good with a 1" drop on the stock IROCs and maybe a 275 in the back with a 225 in the front? will a 275 fit on a stock rim if its got a bigger sidewall?


Quick Reply: PRO TOURING f-bodys.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.