official Camaro Concept with third gen influences?
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1997 S10
Engine: 4-Cyl 2.2 Liter
Transmission: Automatic
official Camaro Concept with third gen influences?
(well i want to keep this third gen related so it will not get closed) what parts of the concept do you think where taken from the third generation camaro? i think they used the fenders.
do you guys see anything else?
heres the link to the web site there a video http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=3124
do you guys see anything else?
heres the link to the web site there a video http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=3124
Last edited by 91rsowner4life; 01-07-2006 at 04:16 PM.
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,075
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 04 Silverado
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: auto
Thanks for sharing that pic 91, I have to look at it and I will let you know. I don't know if I like it yet but it looks pretty darn rad It looks like there is a little of all 3 gens in there.
#5
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Borg Warner
Front fenders are 3rd-gen. Grill is late-model 2nd-gen. Roof line/pillars are pure first-gen, and last (but not least) the rear is a later-model Cobra. Before you all kill me, take a look at the damn thing. Especially the vents in front of the rear tires.
It's hard to tell from that shot, but the very rear-end of the car also seems to have a sort of 'vette look to it.
Overall I have to say I don't like it. DFamn thing rides too high. Looks to much like the 4th and 5th-gen Stangs as far as stance goes. Camaros have always been slung lower and farther back then the Mustang.
All in all though, throw an next-generation 350 in it and I'll drive it and shut up.
It's hard to tell from that shot, but the very rear-end of the car also seems to have a sort of 'vette look to it.
Overall I have to say I don't like it. DFamn thing rides too high. Looks to much like the 4th and 5th-gen Stangs as far as stance goes. Camaros have always been slung lower and farther back then the Mustang.
All in all though, throw an next-generation 350 in it and I'll drive it and shut up.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Northern CA.
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Vents in front of the rear tires, they remind me of the 68 Firebird my friend has. It has some vents in the same area.
btw, looks like the article was taken down.
btw, looks like the article was taken down.
Trending Topics
#9
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Borg Warner
The actual vents themselves are a dirrect usage from the 69 F-bodies:
However it's placement on the car is more where Ford had it. Quick picture I whipped up in MS Paint:
However it's placement on the car is more where Ford had it. Quick picture I whipped up in MS Paint:
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by §teve
whats the tailights look like?
whats the tailights look like?
I see alot of thirdgen in the fender flares obviously, and a little in the front end. I guess you could say the grill is 2ndgen a little, but the overall shape and angle looks more like a mix of the 3rdgen and 1stgen, although obviously with a grill ala the 2ndgen whereas the thirdgen didn't really have a grill at all.
It's badass, looks worlds better than the 4thgen, and I will be getting one if I can in any way do it. That with at least a 400hp LS2 will be so freakin sweet it will be unbelievable.
340-350ish RWHP bone dead factory stock is flat out amazing, I will be all over it....
Last edited by Ray87Z; 01-07-2006 at 07:45 PM.
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Beautiful BC
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 IROC-Z / '91 Z28 / '91 GTA
Engine: LT4 Hot Cam 305 / L98 355 / MR 383
Transmission: 5-spd / 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:45 / 3:23 / 3:23
lots of visual hints there from all gens.. especially the rear tire vents and the front end. to me the front end looks more reminisitic of a first gen firebird.. kinda looks like a shark.
at first glance I don't really like it.. however I'm sure it'll grow on me.. especially it is given a new generation LSx block. However you do realize that no matter what they do with it, the corvette will always be faster because of marketing.
Otherwise Asdfga3 hit the nail on the head!
at first glance I don't really like it.. however I'm sure it'll grow on me.. especially it is given a new generation LSx block. However you do realize that no matter what they do with it, the corvette will always be faster because of marketing.
Otherwise Asdfga3 hit the nail on the head!
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Here's a shot I pulled off the video (still have the window open, eat me Road and Track, lol)
You can see the rear end is rounded quite a bit, really doesn't look that much like a mustang rear to me, I think it was just the angle of the original pic... The roofline screams Camaro, and the quarter shape looks freakin awesome to me and looks a heck alot of more like a Corvette than any mustang...
You can see the rear end is rounded quite a bit, really doesn't look that much like a mustang rear to me, I think it was just the angle of the original pic... The roofline screams Camaro, and the quarter shape looks freakin awesome to me and looks a heck alot of more like a Corvette than any mustang...
Last edited by Ray87Z; 01-07-2006 at 08:21 PM.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
This thing looks awesome to me, these following pics are linked off my webspace, hopefully it doesn't die:
I see alot of new corvette in the quarters/shoulder area:
The profile is more or less awesome IMO:
Rear shot, I'm not too crazy about the exhaust tip shape, easy enough to change though (I'll be getting a catback anywho...):
A lot of people don't like the front/grill, I think it looks badass up close:
The thing is freakin scowling at you, MEAN:
I see alot of new corvette in the quarters/shoulder area:
The profile is more or less awesome IMO:
Rear shot, I'm not too crazy about the exhaust tip shape, easy enough to change though (I'll be getting a catback anywho...):
A lot of people don't like the front/grill, I think it looks badass up close:
The thing is freakin scowling at you, MEAN:
Last edited by Ray87Z; 01-07-2006 at 08:26 PM.
#18
I thought the actual unvieling wasnt until monday 11am?
Glad to see the pics, if the past does anything for us at all, it tells that GM concepts tend to be much more "concept like" than what comes to production. Just thinking back to the 4th Gen "Banshee" like concept.
I like what I see so far, it looks big to me... like not very camaro like. Very high center of gravity.... not sure though, its hard to tell in the pics posted.
I like the front end, looks damn mean. I dont like the back, its to C6 like for my taste. Needs to get toned down and 1 piece tailights on each side... mmm
Glad to see the pics, if the past does anything for us at all, it tells that GM concepts tend to be much more "concept like" than what comes to production. Just thinking back to the 4th Gen "Banshee" like concept.
I like what I see so far, it looks big to me... like not very camaro like. Very high center of gravity.... not sure though, its hard to tell in the pics posted.
I like the front end, looks damn mean. I dont like the back, its to C6 like for my taste. Needs to get toned down and 1 piece tailights on each side... mmm
#19
Originally posted by camarobird25
that doesn't look like a late 2nd gen camaro front end to me. Looks like the 69 camaro nose. The grille just looks more pointed
that doesn't look like a late 2nd gen camaro front end to me. Looks like the 69 camaro nose. The grille just looks more pointed
I think they did a good job with the front end. The back of the car needs to get toned down from how much it looks like a corvette. I think they could have gotten away with it if they hadnt went with the 2 piece tailights...
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: THE LT1 SWAP SHALL BEGIN!!!!
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: LSD! =(
Those rims remind me of the Infiniti G35
rear lights need to go and the front needs a redesign....
rear lights need to go and the front needs a redesign....
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,075
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 04 Silverado
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: auto
I have had a good amount of time to study the entire car now, thanks to everyone who have posted pics, and I l kind of like it. I love 1st gens, hate second gen's and live and breathe third gens, fourth gens are IMO junk I like the rear more than the front but it will grow on me. The car looks pretty mean but with the way cars are built these days I will stick with my third gen. There are a few things I really like about the car at first glance like the contours of the back glass and quarters (screaming first gen) but I cannot be sure if I would buy once unsless it was very limited.
#24
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Yuma, Arizona
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 350,vortech heads,zz4 cam,3:73 posi trac,edelbrock carb,wiend stealth intake,raven mufflers,hooker supercomp shorty headers and y-pipe.
Transmission: th700r4
Looks like a Cross fire to me ....I still like it though
#25
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Borg Warner
Yeah, that rear is all Vette. There's one thing I can't shake, ever since I saw the car: RX-8.
#26
The more I look at it, the more I like it.
If you can find the video, watch it. The guy who designed the C6, designed the 5th Gen Concept.
I think that explains alot about the Rear end.
I would like to see a single tail light on each side, and lower the rear bumper a little and get rid of the 2 cannons. have em point towards the ground 3rd gen style!
If you can find the video, watch it. The guy who designed the C6, designed the 5th Gen Concept.
I think that explains alot about the Rear end.
I would like to see a single tail light on each side, and lower the rear bumper a little and get rid of the 2 cannons. have em point towards the ground 3rd gen style!
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,075
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 04 Silverado
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: auto
Where did you guys get the pics? The more pics I see from different angles the more I am growing fond of it. The pro and front shot look SWEET! I showed my wife the pic today and she thought it was a Cadillac
#28
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
I pulled the shots from the video R&T had up before they pulled the page.
You can still get at the video I think at mms://c9o.earthcache.net/woc-01.media.globix.net/COMP000787MOD1/roadandtrack/2006/0601_camaro_hi.wmv
I'll be surprised if they don't take it down pretty soon though, when they realize the link is out...
Just paste that in your browser and you can view it, may ask you to launch an external application (Media Player or whatever) though depending on your browser. You can't right click/save as though, won't work...
You can try something like this program http://sdp.ppona.com/ to save the streaming video, worked for me.
You can still get at the video I think at mms://c9o.earthcache.net/woc-01.media.globix.net/COMP000787MOD1/roadandtrack/2006/0601_camaro_hi.wmv
I'll be surprised if they don't take it down pretty soon though, when they realize the link is out...
Just paste that in your browser and you can view it, may ask you to launch an external application (Media Player or whatever) though depending on your browser. You can't right click/save as though, won't work...
You can try something like this program http://sdp.ppona.com/ to save the streaming video, worked for me.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro SC (Supercool)
Engine: one composed of various metals
Im glad it's returning, but the thing is following the dodge and ford conept of a big bulky, yet new age model.....its way too damn big and in some shots represents a small suv......and they still need to make better side mirrors, those things will put an eye out
...it needs deep dish rims too....but I can do that myself
...it needs deep dish rims too....but I can do that myself
Last edited by Camaroguy18; 01-07-2006 at 09:59 PM.
#30
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Metter, Ga
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
The car looks to much like it was built for 22"in rims. Sorry but that thing looks big and bulky just like the dodge charger that came out amd I have yet to see one looks sporty. Soon as it hits everybody gonna be throwing big wheels at it.
Overall though Im just glad the mustang is gonna have something to fight with for a parking spot.
Overall though Im just glad the mustang is gonna have something to fight with for a parking spot.
#32
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA.
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: Carb'd L31 Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen / 3.23
At first I didnt like it either. Whoever said it sat too high and forward was right. The back part of the window just looks a little awkward. I also would have loved to see the third gen headlights on it...My favorite part is the slight curve to the hood and fenders that the first gens had. It is, ultimately, mean looking.
Last edited by hihighost; 01-07-2006 at 11:50 PM.
#35
Moderator
Fix the nose a bit. Slightly better rims. And maybe do something to the paint/body to give it more contrast. Not bad at all for a concept.
#36
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Looks alright.... I mean its not to bad. Reminds me of a dodge.. If thats the design it will grow on me, esp the LSx engine. It kinda looks like a Bullet. 3rd gens are still the best looking Fbodies! I like the design that kid made. Its so much better. I think GM is going down hill and running out of designs. Fenders do look similar to a 3rd gen.
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
If GM can mass produce that and price it right, they will have a winner for the first time in who knows how long.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xbmx89
South Central Region
4
10-31-2015 10:59 AM
Zachattack0925
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
08-12-2015 09:52 PM