Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Convertibles
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Convertibles Discussed here are problems and solutions to convertible specific questions, including difficult to find part numbers and other convertible tech help.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-25-2009, 10:05 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Warren, Mi
Posts: 20

Classifieds Rating: (1)
New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

They did great work on the Sub Frame Connectors and Torque install.

I was looking at the Spohn (outside) and the Alston (inside) apx 400+ freight then need to get them welded in. quote for that was over $250. Then would have had to had Toque arm installed. They did a custom set and installed it all for under $800. to them. Everything is painted capped, and Finished.

Thanks Guys for the awesome job,
Fred

Gautz Enterprises
Website:
http://www.gautzenterprises.com/
Location: 10823 Plaza Dr. Whitmore Lake, MI 48189
Phone: (734) 449-2566[/color]
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Picture 001.jpg (112.8 KB, 153 views)
File Type: jpg Picture 002.jpg (122.6 KB, 113 views)
File Type: jpg Picture 003.jpg (116.4 KB, 106 views)
Braile is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 10:06 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Warren, Mi
Posts: 20

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

A few more pics.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Picture 004.jpg (58.8 KB, 72 views)
File Type: jpg Picture 005.jpg (92.0 KB, 84 views)
File Type: jpg Picture 007.jpg (59.0 KB, 52 views)
Braile is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 08:42 AM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 1,025
Car: 88 Camaro 'vert
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (25)
Send a message via ICQ to Jaysz28 Send a message via AIM to Jaysz28
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

looks good man!

-jason
Jaysz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 12:23 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Iroctopless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Killam, AB
Posts: 1,669
Car: 1989 IrocZ Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 - 5 Speed Standard
Axle/Gears: 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

What's your experience with the "before & after" regards to the ride and handling?
Iroctopless is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 05:31 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
webeeZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 595
Car: 1992 Z28 L98 G92
Engine: 5.7 350 B2L
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

.........come on, tell us how your baby rides
webeeZ28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 09:36 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
BlueZee28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St Charles, MO
Posts: 5,454
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears

Classifieds Rating: (20)
Send a message via AIM to BlueZee28
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

I'm thinking about getting another set of sfc's like you did. I already have the Alstons, maybe I'll look into getting the Spohn's as well. Did you have to do any trimming to the frame to get those Spohn's to fit?
__________________
2nd Place Modified Camaro - ThirdGen Fest '11
LSX / T56 combo, 420rwhp 407 ft./lbs. custom Ford 8.8" with 9" axle tubes, 4.10's and Ford Racing Cobra diff, Moser axles, LS1 brake swap front and rear, Hawks 1 3/4" longtubes, forged internals, TSP MS4, LS6 intake, Spohn LCA's/torque arm/cross member/k member/subframe connectors, Alston subframe connectors, Hotchkis springs, poly motor/trans mounts & sway bar bushings/end links, Memphis Audio / Pioneer audio system, etc etc et
BlueZee28 is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 09:38 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Warren, Mi
Posts: 20

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iroctopless View Post
What's your experience with the "before & after" regards to the ride and handling?
It makes a ton of difference. It cut down on a lot of the rattling in the car, which is strange cause I thought it would get worse. The car goes where I point it. It rides like a Hard top. I did lose a little Ground Clearance. but over all I'm very Satisfied. only Negative I would say is the torque arm. Currently the car does make enough power to take advantage of it.. but when I put the car in gear. you have feel the Torque arm Loading up. and also a mild bump feeling. not bad I think it has to do with the Torque arm crossmember being tied to the Subframe now and not to the Transmission tail shaft.
Braile is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 11:07 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
tomclayborn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: south of sa tx
Posts: 79
Car: 88 iroc vert undergoing resto
Engine: 5.0 tpi
Transmission: beefy 700r4 rdeglcltch vetserv t/go
Axle/Gears: g92 b/w

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

no iterfcerence whatsoever with the alstons how much ground clearance did u lose? was it do to the alstons the sphon's ar the tourque arm setup u have? have my car jack up really high right now sure would be easy for me to put in the spohns
tomclayborn is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 11:18 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
New2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,257
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: LT1 383 Soon
Transmission: Built T-56 Soon
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 Bolt Tru Trac 4.10 Soon

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Send a message via MSN to New2Chevy
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

Cool, I'm getting the Spohn SFC's welded onto my car next Wednesday. I tore out the carpet and stuff today.....that was fun. Next, I'm putting an Auburn posi and 28 splines in the rear. I hate open diff.
New2Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 04:07 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
ThePain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thunderbird falls Alaska
Posts: 406
Car: 1992 RS
Transmission: Automatic

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

Are SFC's really worth it? I've heard a lot of great things about them, improving handling a lot, but i've also heard they make the car ride a lot rougher. I've thought about getting SFC's, but im not going to be racing my RS, so if they'd hurt the ride cruising down the highway, I'd rather skip them.


What are you're experiences regarding this?
ThePain is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 09:39 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Warren, Mi
Posts: 20

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueZee28 View Post
I'm thinking about getting another set of sfc's like you did. I already have the Alstons, maybe I'll look into getting the Spohn's as well. Did you have to do any trimming to the frame to get those Spohn's to fit?

My set is completely custom Modeled after the Spohn and the Alston Set with an S&W torque arm.
Spohn's has a set specifically designed for the convertible so they should just go in.


As for the torque arm... not sure... does anyone else have experience with these. Just is strange the hear it bump and feel it lifting against the Car. I'm assuming it will get used to it, After the Suspension rebuild and the LQ4/t56 drop in.

Last edited by Braile; 09-28-2009 at 09:48 AM.
Braile is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 09:45 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Warren, Mi
Posts: 20

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePain View Post
Are SFC's really worth it? I've heard a lot of great things about them, improving handling a lot, but i've also heard they make the car ride a lot rougher. I've thought about getting SFC's, but im not going to be racing my RS, so if they'd hurt the ride cruising down the highway, I'd rather skip them.


What are you're experiences regarding this?
It is a little stiffer but not to bad. the biggest benifit is that the car will not sag in the middle and mess with the door opening.
To my understanding, the Camaro is a Unibody so by design The Strength of the car is built into the Roof line if the car. The reason chevy put the factory connector in was the compensate the roof being removed on our convertibles. The factory ones are good but they are rivited in and those rivits strech and break over time. It is cheaper to have aftermarket ones installed rather then have the factory one re-rivited or welded in... and they will not be as strong.
But this how I understand this to function.

Last edited by Braile; 09-28-2009 at 09:47 AM. Reason: inserted quote
Braile is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 03:21 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
ThePain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thunderbird falls Alaska
Posts: 406
Car: 1992 RS
Transmission: Automatic

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Braile View Post
It is a little stiffer but not to bad. the biggest benifit is that the car will not sag in the middle and mess with the door opening.
To my understanding, the Camaro is a Unibody so by design The Strength of the car is built into the Roof line if the car. The reason chevy put the factory connector in was the compensate the roof being removed on our convertibles. The factory ones are good but they are rivited in and those rivits strech and break over time. It is cheaper to have aftermarket ones installed rather then have the factory one re-rivited or welded in... and they will not be as strong.
But this how I understand this to function.
Hmm... I've noticed my driver door does have the LITTLEST sag. My passenger maybe too. I guess I'd really like to know if it's inevitable i'd need these (I plan to keep it forever!) And if I would need them, if it would be best for the car to get them on relatively asap. Maybe i'll post this question in the suspension board.

Last edited by ThePain; 09-28-2009 at 03:22 PM. Reason: edit
ThePain is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 05:17 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Iroctopless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Killam, AB
Posts: 1,669
Car: 1989 IrocZ Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 - 5 Speed Standard
Axle/Gears: 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: New SubFrame connectors on my 91 Vert.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePain View Post
Hmm... I've noticed my driver door does have the LITTLEST sag.
Besides door sag or misalignment (both could also be caused by shifted/worn hinges and/or hinge bushings), another place to look for frame stress from flex is the bottom corners of the door frames. These are high stress areas that can cause visible results such as cracking the paint or in extreme cases cracked paint and minor metal fatigue cracking.
More good reasons for subframe reinforcment.

Last edited by Iroctopless; 09-28-2009 at 05:20 PM. Reason: spelling
Iroctopless is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 05:17 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Convertibles

Tags
91, alstons, body, chevy, connectors, convertible, crossmember, enterprises, fbody, gautz, gen, kb, problem, spohn, subframe, z28
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details