7730 and 808 timing curve?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Richmond, Yorkshire, U.K
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
7730 and 808 timing curve?
Should the timing curves (main spark table) be the same for an 'ideally' tunned car if you were to switch between a 7730 and 808 speed density system?
Its just when you look at a few bins of each that people have posted they look a whole lot different. Especially at low MAP values. 7730 seems to have more advance.
You want quite a lot of advance for low MAP values dont you to reduce backfires and reduce overrun engine brakeing?
I'm finding that if I let off the throttle at 90 mph in overdrive it backfires slightly and the same in drive at a lower speed. ie when there is a lot of vacume in the inlet. Am I correct in thinking that backfires are caused b the ignition being too retarded? Worn valves or piston rings can cause it too cant they?
Simon
Its just when you look at a few bins of each that people have posted they look a whole lot different. Especially at low MAP values. 7730 seems to have more advance.
You want quite a lot of advance for low MAP values dont you to reduce backfires and reduce overrun engine brakeing?
I'm finding that if I let off the throttle at 90 mph in overdrive it backfires slightly and the same in drive at a lower speed. ie when there is a lot of vacume in the inlet. Am I correct in thinking that backfires are caused b the ignition being too retarded? Worn valves or piston rings can cause it too cant they?
Simon
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: 7730 and 808 timing curve?
Originally posted by SIMON HOLTBY
Should the timing curves (main spark table) be the same for an 'ideally' tunned car if you were to switch between a 7730 and 808 speed density system?
Its just when you look at a few bins of each that people have posted they look a whole lot different. Especially at low MAP values. 7730 seems to have more advance.
You want quite a lot of advance for low MAP values dont you to reduce backfires and reduce overrun engine brakeing?
I'm finding that if I let off the throttle at 90 mph in overdrive it backfires slightly and the same in drive at a lower speed. ie when there is a lot of vacume in the inlet. Am I correct in thinking that backfires are caused b the ignition being too retarded? Worn valves or piston rings can cause it too cant they?
Should the timing curves (main spark table) be the same for an 'ideally' tunned car if you were to switch between a 7730 and 808 speed density system?
Its just when you look at a few bins of each that people have posted they look a whole lot different. Especially at low MAP values. 7730 seems to have more advance.
You want quite a lot of advance for low MAP values dont you to reduce backfires and reduce overrun engine brakeing?
I'm finding that if I let off the throttle at 90 mph in overdrive it backfires slightly and the same in drive at a lower speed. ie when there is a lot of vacume in the inlet. Am I correct in thinking that backfires are caused b the ignition being too retarded? Worn valves or piston rings can cause it too cant they?
That said there is some difference from C3 to P4 ecms, the 165/808 is kind of a step child in that league thou, so the difference in fueling might show in timing.
Too lean, too rich, too much advance, too retarded can all cause crackling in the pipes at overrun.
Poorly seating exhaust valve can do it, but gaads, that's rare. I don't see off hand where oil consumption would cause it on overrun.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Richmond, Yorkshire, U.K
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Grumpy. Interesting to read that spark table can be interchanged between codes, maybe VE table also.
I'm finding that if I have timing values of much more than 30 deg at MAP values of 40 and below I get some backfiring. I think the spark must be firing the previous cylinder which may have the exhaust valve open.
Yours,
Simon
I'm finding that if I have timing values of much more than 30 deg at MAP values of 40 and below I get some backfiring. I think the spark must be firing the previous cylinder which may have the exhaust valve open.
Yours,
Simon
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by SIMON HOLTBY
Thanks Grumpy. Interesting to read that spark table can be interchanged between codes, maybe VE table also.
I'm finding that if I have timing values of much more than 30 deg at MAP values of 40 and below I get some backfiring. I think the spark must be firing the previous cylinder which may have the exhaust valve open.
Thanks Grumpy. Interesting to read that spark table can be interchanged between codes, maybe VE table also.
I'm finding that if I have timing values of much more than 30 deg at MAP values of 40 and below I get some backfiring. I think the spark must be firing the previous cylinder which may have the exhaust valve open.
#5
Originally posted by SIMON HOLTBY
...Interesting to read that spark table can be interchanged between codes, maybe VE table also...
...Interesting to read that spark table can be interchanged between codes, maybe VE table also...
From what it looks like to me, the VE table values are set to allow the maximum resolution across fuel and spark, rather than to really represent how much of the cylinder volume is filled as a proportion of the cylinder volume.
I'd be interested to get some feedback on this.
John
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post