Weird Emmisions results, need help...
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Weird Emmisions results, need help...
while, in the ongoing struggle to pass the sniffer...
the last couple of days i have gone to DEQ, i start honing in on the numbers to pass, and after 3-4 tries, my HC's shoot through the roof. at first i thought that it was me making a bad change, but this week, i went right back to the BIN that was close the try before, HC's were still very high, no matter what i changed from that point, the readings didn't change. could this be something in the computer that might cause it to do this, or should i be looking for some sort of mechanical issues (ignition is all new, new coil, new wires, new plugs, new cap/rotor) i have gotten VERY close to passing, and actualy did pass the test once, but failed for being above the noise limit on that run. since then i cannot pass, i have even put the stock cam back in, and run the stock chip (or what i think is the stocker, my stock chip is lost, so i downloaded a bin, but i have nothing to compare it to. still no luck passing.
the last couple of days i have gone to DEQ, i start honing in on the numbers to pass, and after 3-4 tries, my HC's shoot through the roof. at first i thought that it was me making a bad change, but this week, i went right back to the BIN that was close the try before, HC's were still very high, no matter what i changed from that point, the readings didn't change. could this be something in the computer that might cause it to do this, or should i be looking for some sort of mechanical issues (ignition is all new, new coil, new wires, new plugs, new cap/rotor) i have gotten VERY close to passing, and actualy did pass the test once, but failed for being above the noise limit on that run. since then i cannot pass, i have even put the stock cam back in, and run the stock chip (or what i think is the stocker, my stock chip is lost, so i downloaded a bin, but i have nothing to compare it to. still no luck passing.
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Can you post all of the numbers and the conditions the test were made (MPH, RPM, load. . .), and a little about the engine modifications.
When you say 3-4 tries then HC's shoot up, are these in a row. IE: one run after another?
RBob.
When you say 3-4 tries then HC's shoot up, are these in a row. IE: one run after another?
RBob.
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: Weird Emmisions results, need help...
Originally posted by Dewey316
while, in the ongoing struggle to pass the sniffer...
the last couple of days i have gone to DEQ, i start honing in on the numbers to pass, and after 3-4 tries, my HC's shoot through the roof. at first i thought that it was me making a bad change, but this week, i went right back to the BIN that was close the try before, HC's were still very high, no matter what i changed from that point, the readings didn't change. could this be something in the computer that might cause it to do this, or should i be looking for some sort of mechanical issues (ignition is all new, new coil, new wires, new plugs, new cap/rotor) i have gotten VERY close to passing, and actualy did pass the test once, but failed for being above the noise limit on that run. since then i cannot pass, i have even put the stock cam back in, and run the stock chip (or what i think is the stocker, my stock chip is lost, so i downloaded a bin, but i have nothing to compare it to. still no luck passing.
while, in the ongoing struggle to pass the sniffer...
the last couple of days i have gone to DEQ, i start honing in on the numbers to pass, and after 3-4 tries, my HC's shoot through the roof. at first i thought that it was me making a bad change, but this week, i went right back to the BIN that was close the try before, HC's were still very high, no matter what i changed from that point, the readings didn't change. could this be something in the computer that might cause it to do this, or should i be looking for some sort of mechanical issues (ignition is all new, new coil, new wires, new plugs, new cap/rotor) i have gotten VERY close to passing, and actualy did pass the test once, but failed for being above the noise limit on that run. since then i cannot pass, i have even put the stock cam back in, and run the stock chip (or what i think is the stocker, my stock chip is lost, so i downloaded a bin, but i have nothing to compare it to. still no luck passing.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
You could also try reinstalling the air if its off. My friend got some really low numbers with the AIR on a cammed Vette L98.
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
ok. first off, Rbob, we do a chassis dyno test, the load and RPM vary. since i am TBI, i can post a datalog, but as you know at 160baud, it will be missing alot. i can tell you the BLM readings are good, if i go to open-loop the o2 values vary but never go about .450
cat is less than a year old, air is hooked up. the motor as i tested last week is STOCK, as in, all the mods came off. all the emisions equipment is intacked. it is on a fresh oil change, with new ingitions parts. the o2 has less than 1k miles on it. i have tried with both the old, and new o2, it makes no diffrence.
and Rbob, yes they are back to back to back runs. in Oregon we can keep going around until we pass, there is no limit, and no charge to test.
cat is less than a year old, air is hooked up. the motor as i tested last week is STOCK, as in, all the mods came off. all the emisions equipment is intacked. it is on a fresh oil change, with new ingitions parts. the o2 has less than 1k miles on it. i have tried with both the old, and new o2, it makes no diffrence.
and Rbob, yes they are back to back to back runs. in Oregon we can keep going around until we pass, there is no limit, and no charge to test.
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Hmm, is this a test where the operator gets to drive the car, and if at any time a limit is exceeded it fails? If so, do you have a print out the test over time?
Other wise do you have all of the emission levels your car tested at (HC, Co, Co2, NOX)?
Sometimes one can be traded for the other. And knowing the others can help explain why another one is off.
The HC's just shooting up after a while doesn't make sense. Something is going on. I wonder if maybe something such as the forced knock test is being invoked. Or, do you think the go-pedal is being depessed enough to go into PE mode?
Do they have a large fan in front of the car to keep it cool?
RBob.
Other wise do you have all of the emission levels your car tested at (HC, Co, Co2, NOX)?
Sometimes one can be traded for the other. And knowing the others can help explain why another one is off.
The HC's just shooting up after a while doesn't make sense. Something is going on. I wonder if maybe something such as the forced knock test is being invoked. Or, do you think the go-pedal is being depessed enough to go into PE mode?
Do they have a large fan in front of the car to keep it cool?
RBob.
#7
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
i have a print out, but it is useless, the HCs are a line across the top.
the HC limit is 1.2ppm, i was down in th 1.9ppm area when is tarted, when this happened it jumped to 24ppm. the NOx was a hair high. the limit there is 3.3, i was in the 3.6-3.8 range, when this happens, NOX drops to almost nothing (.6).
CO levels are in range no matter what, the limit is 30, i test very low on these.
Co2 is not tested.
no PE mode, i have disabled that, and the pump shot, it makes no diffrence. and once the HC's jumped, i put the last chip back in (i have 3 chips i burn , so i always have the last 2 configs handy) and the HC stayed up. i have the fan on a switch in the car, temp seems to have little effect. i have run everywhere from 160* - 230* same issues, after a few runs, the HCs peg, and i just head home for the day.
the HC limit is 1.2ppm, i was down in th 1.9ppm area when is tarted, when this happened it jumped to 24ppm. the NOx was a hair high. the limit there is 3.3, i was in the 3.6-3.8 range, when this happens, NOX drops to almost nothing (.6).
CO levels are in range no matter what, the limit is 30, i test very low on these.
Co2 is not tested.
no PE mode, i have disabled that, and the pump shot, it makes no diffrence. and once the HC's jumped, i put the last chip back in (i have 3 chips i burn , so i always have the last 2 configs handy) and the HC stayed up. i have the fan on a switch in the car, temp seems to have little effect. i have run everywhere from 160* - 230* same issues, after a few runs, the HCs peg, and i just head home for the day.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
How old is the oil?.
The PCV can draw alot of what becomes HC fumes thru it.
180dF Thermostat.
210dF fan on
Too lean will drive HCs high.
A year old on a HiPo car, and I'd bet the cat is about dead. It doesn't take long, to kill a cat, at a WOT that makes HP. The newer stuff all has code to deal with converter life at WOT.
The PCV can draw alot of what becomes HC fumes thru it.
180dF Thermostat.
210dF fan on
Too lean will drive HCs high.
A year old on a HiPo car, and I'd bet the cat is about dead. It doesn't take long, to kill a cat, at a WOT that makes HP. The newer stuff all has code to deal with converter life at WOT.
#9
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Grumpy, what has me baffled, is that i am close, and hten all of the sudden, the HCs spike. no matter what i do, i have sat in line with the Tach reading 5k, to try to keep the cat warm, or i can sit at idle, once i get the run with the spike, i can't get that level back down.
any other nice tricks that people know would be helpful..
with the cam in the car, i ran 25% denatured alchohol, had the fuel trimmed down so far, it would hardly run, disabled pump shot and PE, had to make my max TF steps down to 5, set idle to 1100, and backed the timing off 4*, it was still failling for HC's
any other nice tricks that people know would be helpful..
with the cam in the car, i ran 25% denatured alchohol, had the fuel trimmed down so far, it would hardly run, disabled pump shot and PE, had to make my max TF steps down to 5, set idle to 1100, and backed the timing off 4*, it was still failling for HC's
#10
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
With the HC & NOX a tad high and the CO very low, I would back off the timing. Remove 2 - 4 degrees across the board. Easiest would be to just twist the distributor (w/a light) or up the inital timing in the bin by the 2-4 degrees.
Check your data log IAT temperature. See if it starts to increase about the same time the HC's skyrocket. Many TBI cals add a bunch of fuel when the IAT goes up in order to cool the motor and ward off detonation.
Another thing to try is a stock calibration for a '92 f-body (The newer the better).
RBob.
Check your data log IAT temperature. See if it starts to increase about the same time the HC's skyrocket. Many TBI cals add a bunch of fuel when the IAT goes up in order to cool the motor and ward off detonation.
Another thing to try is a stock calibration for a '92 f-body (The newer the better).
RBob.
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 IROC-Z/'82 RX7
Engine: SBC 355/1.1L Rotary
Transmission: T56/5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.33/3.93
Weirdest thing is passing with the aftermarket camshaft.... (failed for noise).... but not getting as close with the stock cam.
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
I just remembered seeing this. In the 8746, as well as in mine, there appears to be a mistake with the code that controls the smog pump. Looks like they used the wrong rpm value for the max allowed speed for the smog pump to be on. They used the rpm/25 value for the 7747 instead of the rpm/25 value for the 8746. In the 8746, that addr stores the scaled rpms. Only remembered this because if it is indeed a mistake, the smog pump stuff is practially worthless because the airflow to the cat will shutoff and the air diverted after the engine passes 2000 rpm. Dont quote me on this, though, im not an expert. But, keep this in mind that above 2000 rpms, there is a possibility that your airflow to the cat is shut down. Could cause HC spikes when the rpms pass 2000 rpm on the dyno.
Edit: Made a mistake in the post
If you want to fix it, go to D49E in the prom and enter something like 224 = 4000 rpm. That should ensure the air stays on during the test, assuming im right and not off in left field somewhere.
Edit: Made a mistake in the post
If you want to fix it, go to D49E in the prom and enter something like 224 = 4000 rpm. That should ensure the air stays on during the test, assuming im right and not off in left field somewhere.
Last edited by dimented24x7; 04-06-2004 at 02:13 AM.
#13
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Is the car a manual by any chance?
-- Joe
-- Joe
#14
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Originally posted by anesthes
Is the car a manual by any chance?
-- Joe
Is the car a manual by any chance?
-- Joe
#15
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Thats why then. WHen you shift the HC's go high. You need to shift quicker on the dyno.
We had similar problems here doing tests.
-- Joe
We had similar problems here doing tests.
-- Joe
#16
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
if only i could drive on the test
#17
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
Possible IAC issue with it closing to soon instead of hanging open a tad bit to burn that slug of fuel?????????
maybe?
LAter
Jeremy
maybe?
LAter
Jeremy
#18
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM
Possible IAC issue with it closing to soon instead of hanging open a tad bit to burn that slug of fuel?????????
maybe?
LAter
Jeremy
Possible IAC issue with it closing to soon instead of hanging open a tad bit to burn that slug of fuel?????????
maybe?
LAter
Jeremy
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by Dewey316
with the cam in the car, i ran 25% denatured alchohol, had the fuel trimmed down so far, it would hardly run, disabled pump shot and PE, had to make my max TF steps down to 5, set idle to 1100, and backed the timing off 4*, it was still failling for HC's
with the cam in the car, i ran 25% denatured alchohol, had the fuel trimmed down so far, it would hardly run, disabled pump shot and PE, had to make my max TF steps down to 5, set idle to 1100, and backed the timing off 4*, it was still failling for HC's
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 IROC-Z/'82 RX7
Engine: SBC 355/1.1L Rotary
Transmission: T56/5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.33/3.93
With a hot cat and a Pyrometer... I've only been able to attain 300ºF before the cat, 400ºF after the cat.
An emission specialist said that was the perfect reading for a cat working properly.
An emission specialist said that was the perfect reading for a cat working properly.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bohemian
Aftermarket Product Review
11
11-25-2015 09:38 PM