Firehawk Questions
#51
Member
Re: Firehawk Questions
I tried posted a pic of 92 #13 but I can't figure this out lol
#52
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Firehawk Questions
At the bottom of the page click "Go Advanced"
(This will bring up a new window)
Below the new window in the advanced section there are "Additional Options"
Click on "Manage Attachments"
Find the picture by clicking "Browse", (remember it cannot be too big or it will not upload it) And click on "Upload" when you are done.
Close Manage attachments window.
You should be done.
(This will bring up a new window)
Below the new window in the advanced section there are "Additional Options"
Click on "Manage Attachments"
Find the picture by clicking "Browse", (remember it cannot be too big or it will not upload it) And click on "Upload" when you are done.
Close Manage attachments window.
You should be done.
#55
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Firehawk Questions
ebay around $35000 seems to be where it stops... In private trades as much as $50,000 to $75,000 depending on which one. BTW you cannot count the convertible because I do not think it has ever sold... he was asking north of $100,000 for it...
#57
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Firehawk Questions
Purely PMD,
What number is that one in the pix?
What number is that one in the pix?
#58
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,731
Received 782 Likes
on
527 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Firehawk Questions
Yeah, what number? I haven't ever seen that one. Need to add it to my list.
I do think the vert has changed hands.....
I do think the vert has changed hands.....
#59
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Firehawk Questions
He never told me & never quoted me a price. Was a bit of a recluse if you ask me, would send one picture at a time, weeks apart and kept asking for me to make him an offer. The couple of times I tried to schedule to go see it & talk to him in person he went mute. I finally got an e-mail back & he said it had been sold.
#60
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,731
Received 782 Likes
on
527 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Firehawk Questions
Bummer, its to fuzzy to read the map pocket too.
#61
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
#62
Member
#63
Member
#71
Member
Re: Firehawk Questions
I tried to group them in one post but it'd only upload one pic at a time
#73
Member
#74
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Firehawk Questions
Tony has a ton of information on the Firehawks, and some of the nuances of changes.
When I looked at #26 in 1999 at SLP, it did not even have a T-ram, it had a something that looked a lot like a Miniram sitting on top, It has since gone back to a T-ram... They were always trying to get a little more out of these cars...
#75
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Firehawk Questions
Here is #2's intake...
The only special thing I see is the cold air tubes are sheet metal instead of ABS
The only special thing I see is the cold air tubes are sheet metal instead of ABS
#76
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Firehawk Questions
I know in 2009 at the Trans Am Nationals there was a 91 or 92 Firehawk that had a different plenum... it was still a T-ram but on top it was opened up and re-welded... I don't have pictures, but if anyone was there, they might have one of the actual T-ram itself...
John
John
#78
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,731
Received 782 Likes
on
527 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Firehawk Questions
#008 is the one that has the cut and raised throttle body mount. Guessing It was to try and help internal airflow.
Last edited by TTOP350; 01-13-2021 at 09:25 AM.
#79
Member
Re: Firehawk Questions
#26 did get a miniram. Something about not being able to tune the t-ram properly.
#80
Member
#81
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,731
Received 782 Likes
on
527 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Firehawk Questions
Maybe,kinda (just lucky enough to get to baby sit the car for a bit)
That's why I said it was probably a pic I took, was just guessing you got it from the net
That was a 1st date (as friends) for my (future) wife and myself.
This look like the same car ?
Me feeling at home in #013
That's why I said it was probably a pic I took, was just guessing you got it from the net
That was a 1st date (as friends) for my (future) wife and myself.
This look like the same car ?
Me feeling at home in #013
Last edited by TTOP350; 01-13-2021 at 09:26 AM.
#82
Senior Member
Re: Firehawk Questions
fyi- # 2 was indeed something special. I knew the guy who owned it. Sold it several years ago. I had pics of it long time ago but unfortunately lost it because my old computer hard drive crashed. The cold air intake was indeed hand made with the dual intake set up. It did have the brake bias adjusting valve. The rear seats was deleted and also had roll cage installed with (i believe) recaro racing seats and 5 point safety harness. Battery was in the truck. I always wanted to ride it but never got the chance
#83
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,731
Received 782 Likes
on
527 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Firehawk Questions
The 1st (atleast) 6 cars possible had the dual aluminum air intakes. I know 006 has a metal one. Its the farthest up I've seen with a metal one but the cars were built out of order VIN vs build number.
All the cars had the batteries in the trunk because of the dual cold air kits
All the cars had the batteries in the trunk because of the dual cold air kits
Last edited by TTOP350; 03-08-2015 at 07:50 PM.
#85
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: Firehawk Questions
Not sure on this, but I believe the 25th anniversary cars were going to go toe to toe with the Firehawk for performance. I think the idea was canned when they realized that the Firehawk had way lower than expected production figures. They wanted to sell 250, but only sold 25...
Chevy did testing on two High performance Camaros in 1991, they had the black cross lace rims, one was white with Black rims and black stripes, not sure on the other car...
Of course this is an educated guess, by no means science.
Chevy did testing on two High performance Camaros in 1991, they had the black cross lace rims, one was white with Black rims and black stripes, not sure on the other car...
Of course this is an educated guess, by no means science.
The TTA is probably the closest, but the Firehawk would edge it out. They are likely close, as even though the Firehawk was 350hp, and the TTA "250hp", they probably closer to 300hp. But the Firehawk was heavier.
However the Firehawk still had larger advantages in terms of suspension, and braking performance.
To the long gone OP and the guy who Necro'd it?
The Firehawk in $50,000 of 1991's money would cost about $87,000. The closest modern day representation of the 91-92 Firehawks is the current 5th gen Camaro Z28. Both have very much the same design goals. Un-compromised performance
#86
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Firehawk Questions
I would have to say there is no way any of the Factory thirdgens were competing in any performance category against the Firehawks. They were just too modified. Nothing GM had in the parts bin would allow the factory thirdgens to compete in handling, braking, and the like.
Although I will agree that GM had nothing in their parts bin, I would think that they could pull something off... All they would have needed is find a performance supplier to make a combination of parts for a factory special car. Cam, Heads, Pistons, maybe an intake... It would not have been a stretch. The LT1 was pretty potent back in the day, I imagine between the lackluster sales of the Firehawk, and the fact that if they did do anything special they would have had to done all sorts of testing, just because of the Government.
I still think they should have used the 4.3 Turbo designed around 1983 and put it in a Z28 they would have had one heck of a car.
Also I am not sure what they changed on the Suspension of a Firehawk...
John
#87
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,731
Received 782 Likes
on
527 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Firehawk Questions
Only thing changed on any of them (that I have seen) was the front springs on the aluminum engine cars. They used a spring from a certain TA w a V6 Other than that, 100% stock WS6 Formula suspension.
Last edited by TTOP350; 02-23-2015 at 07:52 PM.
#89
Senior Member
Re: Firehawk Questions
about the question on the suspension on the firehawks...what i was able to observe on a couple of them. They looked practically stock! If anything they may have changed the spring rates for the front and/or rear. But that i'm not sure of. I couldn't determine if the ride height was anywhere different from the stock birds if that. Unfortunately, those 17" Ronal wheels throws it off a bit, visually.
I do recall seeing the rear lower control arms being stock productions pieces, as is the torque arm as well, attaching to that dana 44 rear end. Other observations: I didn't see any "wonder bar" being mounted on the front, nor did i see any subframe connectors or even a strut tower brace...
With the power and torque of these cars, you would think it would be necessary to upgrade the suspension as well. But then again i'm sure that would up the price (even more) on an already costly vehicle.
It reminds of my uncle's GMMG Blackbird. When i had that car on the lift and doing the brakes...looking at the suspension, it was practically bone stock! I mean a car with a stage 2A LS engine making 475 HP and over 500lbs of torque...why on earth would you keep the stock suspension! If your going to build a beast, go all out!!!
I do recall seeing the rear lower control arms being stock productions pieces, as is the torque arm as well, attaching to that dana 44 rear end. Other observations: I didn't see any "wonder bar" being mounted on the front, nor did i see any subframe connectors or even a strut tower brace...
With the power and torque of these cars, you would think it would be necessary to upgrade the suspension as well. But then again i'm sure that would up the price (even more) on an already costly vehicle.
It reminds of my uncle's GMMG Blackbird. When i had that car on the lift and doing the brakes...looking at the suspension, it was practically bone stock! I mean a car with a stage 2A LS engine making 475 HP and over 500lbs of torque...why on earth would you keep the stock suspension! If your going to build a beast, go all out!!!
#90
Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Vancouver Washington
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Firebird SS group A
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: PosiTrac / 273
Re: Firehawk Questions
"Boldly highlighted on the cover of the October 1991 High Performance Pontiac magazine was a red coupe under the banner "Quickest Street Pontiac Ever!"
According to the road test, the Formula Firebird did 0-60 miles per hour in 4.6 seconds and had a top speed of 160 miles per hour. The standing quarter mile took 13.20 seconds to travel, with the car going 107 miles per hour by the time it was finished"
Quote from The Firebird Collector's Guide by John Gunnel.
I read elsewhere that roughly 1/2 of the 25 actually converted were 91 models.
According to the road test, the Formula Firebird did 0-60 miles per hour in 4.6 seconds and had a top speed of 160 miles per hour. The standing quarter mile took 13.20 seconds to travel, with the car going 107 miles per hour by the time it was finished"
Quote from The Firebird Collector's Guide by John Gunnel.
I read elsewhere that roughly 1/2 of the 25 actually converted were 91 models.
#91
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,731
Received 782 Likes
on
527 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Firehawk Questions
The 1st 8 Hawks were 91 model cars.
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Overland Park Kansas
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 Firbird Formula
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Firehawk Questions
[QUOTE First I think I should clarify, technically IIRC all of the 1992's were 25th anniversary cars. What I meant and should have said was the Heritage Edition. John[/QUOTE]
I thought all 25th anniversary cars were Heritage Editions. What are the differences?
I thought all 25th anniversary cars were Heritage Editions. What are the differences?
#96
Re: Firehawk Questions
Actually, #3 is in Canada unless it's changed hands again. And it was a little closer to six figures. That was way back when $50k for a Hawk was stupid money.
The vert also traded hands. I offered six figures for the vert and was turned down....
The vert also traded hands. I offered six figures for the vert and was turned down....
#99
Member
Re: Firehawk Questions
sure the cars a huge step up from normal Firebirds, but did these guys go "Damn i just bought a piece of American history right here" Lets face it these cars were modified street cars and factory backed. its one thing to buy a new car and soup it up and completely different to buy a car GM gave the authority to be souped up before you buy it. id love to drive one one day.