1986 Irock 5.0 HO
#1
1986 Irock 5.0 HO
I just bought an 86 Irock 5.0 HO. I've been looking into the car and it seems there were 74 made with the 5.0 HO. Only 11 available to the public. The rest were "race cars". So did I just end up with a super rare car? Is it worth putting back to a more stock forum? This car is beat up. It needs some work, I was thinking of making a stip car out of it, but need to know if this is a car that should be returned to stock forum? Thanks for you help and opinions!!!
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,117
Received 1,688 Likes
on
1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
What's an "Irock"? Never heard of such. I DO know about the "IROC" cars, so named because Chevrolet licensed the use of the name of the International Race Of Champions series; but that other is a new one on me.
The 85 L69 cars were not anywhere near that "rare". I could be wrong but I seem to recall a couple thousand of them being made. By that time the L69 wasn't "top of the line" any more, since TPI was introduced that year, and consequently wasn't popular as an added-cost option.
None of these cars (well, VERY few, anyway) have ever had, have now, or will ever have, the kind of value that older cars have. People are so used to watching the price of 60s muscle cars go through the roof that they just sort of automatically assume that if they wait long enough, these will do the same thing. They won't. Has nothing directly to do with "these cars" as such; the same is true of the Mustangs, Vettes, and whatever else, from the same time frame. The reason is that the entire "car culture" had already vanished during the 70s, and NO car from about 73 or 74 on will EVER occupy the same "romantic" place in people's minds as the pre-oil-embargo ones. I would leave that notion COMPLETELY OUT OF your considerations about this car. Do what YOU want with it, for YOU. Above all, DO NOT spend a whole bunch of money "restoring" it, on the hallucination that you'll recover it by selling the car; YOU WON'T. You might as well throw that money in the trash, you have just as good a chance of ever seeing it again. Spend whatever money it takes to make the car what YOU WANT FOR YOURSELF, but leave "resale value" out of it because that it the road to a rude, VERY EXPENSIVE disappointment.
The 85 L69 cars were not anywhere near that "rare". I could be wrong but I seem to recall a couple thousand of them being made. By that time the L69 wasn't "top of the line" any more, since TPI was introduced that year, and consequently wasn't popular as an added-cost option.
None of these cars (well, VERY few, anyway) have ever had, have now, or will ever have, the kind of value that older cars have. People are so used to watching the price of 60s muscle cars go through the roof that they just sort of automatically assume that if they wait long enough, these will do the same thing. They won't. Has nothing directly to do with "these cars" as such; the same is true of the Mustangs, Vettes, and whatever else, from the same time frame. The reason is that the entire "car culture" had already vanished during the 70s, and NO car from about 73 or 74 on will EVER occupy the same "romantic" place in people's minds as the pre-oil-embargo ones. I would leave that notion COMPLETELY OUT OF your considerations about this car. Do what YOU want with it, for YOU. Above all, DO NOT spend a whole bunch of money "restoring" it, on the hallucination that you'll recover it by selling the car; YOU WON'T. You might as well throw that money in the trash, you have just as good a chance of ever seeing it again. Spend whatever money it takes to make the car what YOU WANT FOR YOURSELF, but leave "resale value" out of it because that it the road to a rude, VERY EXPENSIVE disappointment.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Salt Lake
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '86 Camaro, '94 Camaro, 3 others
Engine: LG4 ->L29, L32->LR4, L36, LG4, L31
Transmission: 700R-4, T5WC, 4L80E, SM465, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23, WTB/WTT 2.93
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
I thought all the '86 L69s were for the Players' Challenge racing series.
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,117
Received 1,688 Likes
on
1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
Sorry, I saw "85"... don't know #s for 86. Can't be too many, but that doesn't change the basic premise of the situation.
If in fact it WAS a Players' Challenge spec car, then it's REALLY been rode hard and put up wet... not a good resto candidate AT ALL, at least not if you intend to drive it. Basically every functional part on it has been stressed to the max and then some, and now has about 3 complete normal lifetimes of aging on it.
That said, I have a hard time believing (though my "knowledge" of the Players series is pretty thin) that one racing series would spec a car with another racing series' badge on the side. But I could always be wrong. (just watch me for awhile... I'll be "wrong" quite a bit)
Still would like to know about this "Irock" thing.
If in fact it WAS a Players' Challenge spec car, then it's REALLY been rode hard and put up wet... not a good resto candidate AT ALL, at least not if you intend to drive it. Basically every functional part on it has been stressed to the max and then some, and now has about 3 complete normal lifetimes of aging on it.
That said, I have a hard time believing (though my "knowledge" of the Players series is pretty thin) that one racing series would spec a car with another racing series' badge on the side. But I could always be wrong. (just watch me for awhile... I'll be "wrong" quite a bit)
Still would like to know about this "Irock" thing.
#6
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Panhandle of Florida
Posts: 386
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC / 92 Z28 Vert / 57 210
Engine: L69 / LB9 / LQ4
Transmission: T5 / T56 / 4L65E
Axle/Gears: 3:73 / 3.73 / ?.??
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
I just bought an 86 Irock 5.0 HO. I've been looking into the car and it seems there were 74 made with the 5.0 HO. Only 11 available to the public. The rest were "race cars". So did I just end up with a super rare car? Is it worth putting back to a more stock forum? This car is beat up. It needs some work, I was thinking of making a stip car out of it, but need to know if this is a car that should be returned to stock forum? Thanks for you help and opinions!!!
That being said I agree with the point of don't get focused on trying to make money out of the car. Chances are you won't as proper restorations are expensive, and some parts near impossible to find. I would say if you want to keep it original, do so, if not then don't worry about it. If it turns out the car becomes valuable then restore it to original at that point if that's what your into. I have tossed up restoring mine to original, but then have also tossed up the idea of doing a carbed LSX with a 6 speed....
In either case, enjoy your ride while you have it.
Last edited by Da Spudro; 08-30-2013 at 06:27 PM. Reason: stupid android auto correct......
#7
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
Ok, I know it's an Iroc. I got excited when I read that there were only 11 available it the public on Wikipedia. Now after a little more digging, the 8th digit is an H, not a G. So there has benn an engine swap or intake swap or something. But this thing has 5.0 HO badging all over it? Any ideas on that? Thanks for all the advice, and the ribbing on my mis-spelling!
Last edited by bigblackyj; 08-30-2013 at 09:25 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2003 BMW E46 M3 Vert
Engine: 3.2 I6 M power 333 h.p.
Transmission: SMG 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.62 posi
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
Ok, I know it's an Iroc. I got excited when I read that there were only 11 available it the public on Wikipedia. Now after a little more digging, the 8th digit is an H, not a G. So there has been an engine swap or intake swap or something. But this thing has 5.0 HO badge all over it? Any ideas on that? Thanks for all the advice, and the ribbing on my misspelling!
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,117
Received 1,688 Likes
on
1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
8th digit H = LG4 Base model. DEFINITELY NOT the L69 aka HO.
What makes you think something has been swapped?
Sounds like somebody bought a bunch of stickers and slapped em on it. Typical poseur behavior. NBD.
WORRY about the spelling. It matters. Learn what the car's real name is, and why. At the very least, copy the stickers on the door accurately.
What makes you think something has been swapped?
Sounds like somebody bought a bunch of stickers and slapped em on it. Typical poseur behavior. NBD.
WORRY about the spelling. It matters. Learn what the car's real name is, and why. At the very least, copy the stickers on the door accurately.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2003 BMW E46 M3 Vert
Engine: 3.2 I6 M power 333 h.p.
Transmission: SMG 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.62 posi
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
I thought there was only one perfect man on this earth "JC" but I guess there were two.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,117
Received 1,688 Likes
on
1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
I thought there was only one perfect man on this earth "JC" but I guess there were two.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2003 BMW E46 M3 Vert
Engine: 3.2 I6 M power 333 h.p.
Transmission: SMG 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.62 posi
#13
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Salt Lake
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '86 Camaro, '94 Camaro, 3 others
Engine: LG4 ->L29, L32->LR4, L36, LG4, L31
Transmission: 700R-4, T5WC, 4L80E, SM465, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23, WTB/WTT 2.93
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
If I could get a legit Players car, I'd restore it to pre-race condition, with all the stickers and stuff, then not drive it. Much. But the VIN H is all that matters, not the H.O. stickers. And stickers are no guarantee of H.O. engine swap. A stock LG4 is done by 4500 RPM, a true L69 will pull 6000. Unless someone attached an L69 to the LG4 1.87" exhaust manifolds and single 2.25" cat.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,117
Received 1,688 Likes
on
1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1986 Irock 5.0 HO
The "H" motor by definition comes with a carb. It's the LG4. It was available in these cars up through 87, and even later in some others.
Having a carb does not, by itself, indicate swappage in any manner way shape or form.
Having a carb does not, by itself, indicate swappage in any manner way shape or form.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Springster
Tech / General Engine
2
09-13-2015 01:38 PM