So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
#101
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Round Rock
Posts: 438
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula 350 LSX
Engine: 5.3, 234/228 cam
Transmission: Stage II 4L60e, Vigilante 3200
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Dang it, trade your TBI for my Q-Jet? I think I am going to have to put a LQ9 or something in my van, this old 350 is dog tired, how it lasted 30 years without a single rebuild, in a 5,000 vehicle is beyond me. Maybe because it only produces about 170hp on 8.5:1 compression? lol
#102
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Why did the moderators lock Mikey’s thread? Last I read a very knowledgeable TPI Cult member was giving automotive advice based on his “Masterpiece TPI” build making a whooping 360rwhp that he paid DynoDon to build(aftermarket heads, cam, intake, plenum, with extensive porting). He didn’t reveal how much he spent on it and ironically he didn’t turn a wrench himself.
SoCal Thirdgen is a great car club for 3rd gen enthusiast. They recently organized a meet with almost 100 3rd gen Fbodys!!!!
SoCal Thirdgen is a great car club for 3rd gen enthusiast. They recently organized a meet with almost 100 3rd gen Fbodys!!!!
#103
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89 GTA/93 S13/91 Si
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
1. TPI is better than LSX...Really? so thats why GM still builds cars with TPI then?
2. It’s cheaper to make power with a TPI build vs. LSX build...no its not
3. LSX in 3rd gen is “bastardizing” your 3rd gen...you owning a 3rd is bastardizing ever 3rd gen out there
4. Only TPI motors belong in 3rd gens...thats why some came factory with carb and TBI?
5. LSX in 3rd gens look ugly...so does your girlfriend
6. LSX swap cannot be done in your driveway...oh man really? i guess i didnt do mine in my driveway after all! it must be some kind of new open air shop idea i came up with
7. TPI can get comparable MPG’s to a LSX and even better...i would like to see that.
2. It’s cheaper to make power with a TPI build vs. LSX build...no its not
3. LSX in 3rd gen is “bastardizing” your 3rd gen...you owning a 3rd is bastardizing ever 3rd gen out there
4. Only TPI motors belong in 3rd gens...thats why some came factory with carb and TBI?
5. LSX in 3rd gens look ugly...so does your girlfriend
6. LSX swap cannot be done in your driveway...oh man really? i guess i didnt do mine in my driveway after all! it must be some kind of new open air shop idea i came up with
7. TPI can get comparable MPG’s to a LSX and even better...i would like to see that.
awsome...
and so true...
#104
Supreme Member
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
PLEASE do not confuse the two as we don’t want people to think that ACTIVE SC3G members are against any engine swap as far as a third gen is concerned. Because when the hood is closed, we’re all 3rd gens.
#105
Supreme Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Man I wish there were that many active members in our local 3rd gen club. That would be AWESOME!
#106
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
"So Cal TPI is a club that is open to any vehicle that has a TPI unit on it"
Not entirely true. We have people attending our meetings with motors other than TPI including the LS1 motor. They are welcome. Our club is about "hot rodding" the TPI intake system and expanding our knowledge about other facets of the thirdgen for increased performance. One of these items is the exhaust system. In fact we are in the process of doing some experiments in the exhaust area as well.
It seems that every time I am thinking of going to a SoCal third gen event such as the up coming Christmas Party some clown makes asinine comments about our club members as a whole that are based on no facts. I am speaking specifically about this LSx-TPI thread.
Not entirely true. We have people attending our meetings with motors other than TPI including the LS1 motor. They are welcome. Our club is about "hot rodding" the TPI intake system and expanding our knowledge about other facets of the thirdgen for increased performance. One of these items is the exhaust system. In fact we are in the process of doing some experiments in the exhaust area as well.
It seems that every time I am thinking of going to a SoCal third gen event such as the up coming Christmas Party some clown makes asinine comments about our club members as a whole that are based on no facts. I am speaking specifically about this LSx-TPI thread.
#107
Supreme Member
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Not entirely true. We have people attending our meetings with motors other than TPI including the LS1 motor. They are welcome. Our club is about "hot rodding" the TPI intake system and expanding our knowledge about other facets of the thirdgen for increased performance. One of these items is the exhaust system. In fact we are in the process of doing some experiments in the exhaust area as well.
It seems that every time I am thinking of going to a SoCal third gen event such as the up coming Christmas Party some clown makes asinine comments about our club members as a whole that are based on no facts. I am speaking specifically about this LSx-TPI thread.
It seems that every time I am thinking of going to a SoCal third gen event such as the up coming Christmas Party some clown makes asinine comments about our club members as a whole that are based on no facts. I am speaking specifically about this LSx-TPI thread.
Allen, as I’ve said a million times… I have a huge amount of respect for you and the fact that you aren’t afraid to take the road less traveled. You are an absolute wealth of knowledge as you have invested in the time to educate yourself on the fundamentals & theories of performance fuel injection specifically tuned port injection. However you are on your third or fourth engine (sorry lost count) and have a minimum of 15-20K invested in your vehicle and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. However the people that read this board don’t know that. If it wasn’t for your financial fortitude combined with Jerry’s master fabrication, there would still be legions of ‘So Cal’ TPI cars running 12.60’s @ 111. You’re a hardcore TPI guy that is extremely passionate about the performance you’ve been able to achieve through a highly modified TPI unit. Only no one knows that you’ve had your car since day one, it was a factory prepared SLP car, or about the years of trial and error it took to get the TPI to flow numbers that would support a high horsepower application. All they see is a militant “LSX hater” that is pro TPI period. Take it down a couple of notches and take the time to educate people on your personal trials and tribulations of molding the TPI into something workable and I have a feeling it would produce a wealth of information in these forums that will can be referenced by future generations of 3rd gen owners that are contemplating on a conversion or taking the time to modify their existing TPI.
As far as the SC3G Christmas Party goes… As always, you and any other So Cal TPI members are welcome to participate in any event/meeting we’ve got going. If you or anyone else chooses not to participate in our events please know that you will be missed however the event/meeting will go on
#108
Supreme Member
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
It’s not easy keeping everyone motivated. However we took a different approach this year and it’s paid off better than we could ever have expected. Organization is a huge part of it followed by venue & event selection. Getting everyone to an event is one thing. Knowing what to do with them when they get there is a whole different ball game.
#109
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
"All they see is a militant “LSX hater” that is pro TPI period."
...and I have no idea where they think I am a "LSX hater". I have never said anything negative about the LSX and I think a friendly rivalry is good. Its that some here have made accusations not based on the facts that riles me.
One more thing, one of our members who has been thrashed in this thread owns a 4th gen Camaro with an LS1 motor. Obviously not a "LSX hater".
...and I have no idea where they think I am a "LSX hater". I have never said anything negative about the LSX and I think a friendly rivalry is good. Its that some here have made accusations not based on the facts that riles me.
One more thing, one of our members who has been thrashed in this thread owns a 4th gen Camaro with an LS1 motor. Obviously not a "LSX hater".
#110
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89 GTA/93 S13/91 Si
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
I just want to make sure that everyone is on the same page about the ‘So Cal Clubs’ SC3G (Southern California 3rd Generation F Body Club) is a 3rd gen only club with over 300 members that is open to ANY 3rd gen with ANY power plant. So Cal TPI is a club that is open to any vehicle that has a TPI unit on it and has a close to 40 members.
PLEASE do not confuse the two as we don’t want people to think that ACTIVE SC3G members are against any engine swap as far as a third gen is concerned. Because when the hood is closed, we’re all 3rd gens.
PLEASE do not confuse the two as we don’t want people to think that ACTIVE SC3G members are against any engine swap as far as a third gen is concerned. Because when the hood is closed, we’re all 3rd gens.
not to mention my guys that are also "affiliated" with SC3G, from F-Body Empire.
(just realized, the way i said that sounds kind of funny. im second-ing the fact that SC3G is supportive)
#111
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SanAntonio,TX
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 CAMARO RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: AUTOMATIC
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
This is like reading responses on yahoo, for a automotive article. The foreiners bash the hell out of american muscle, and we bash the hell out of there overpriced HP rated cars. Both sides sound stupid in the end but both have good and bad points. But being american I still side with american HP. If I want luxury I pay for that, if I want speed I pay for that. But dollar for dollar you get more power per dollar with american cars. corvette/ferrari. But anyways if your a TPI enthusiast than do your thing, but dont hate on the swappers because they might out perform you dollar for dollar. IDK just a thought, I would like to have a LSX swap or a built TPI. I have a L03 throw me your scraps. hahahha.
#112
Supreme Member
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
...and I have no idea where they think I am a "LSX hater". I have never said anything negative about the LSX and I think a friendly rivalry is good. Its that some here have made accusations not based on the facts that riles me.
One more thing, one of our members who has been thrashed in this thread owns a 4th gen Camaro with an LS1 motor. Obviously not a "LSX hater".
One more thing, one of our members who has been thrashed in this thread owns a 4th gen Camaro with an LS1 motor. Obviously not a "LSX hater".
Now there’s a different breed of 3rd gen out there with a nasty little small block in it putting down some serious power. The rivalry is definitely there; as a matter of fact it’s the classic case of old school vs. new school. However there needs to be a mutual respect of the capabilities of each before a ‘friendly rivalry’ can ensue.
Now we both know that there are several members that belong to both clubs have 4th gens either as daily drivers or toys. We also both know that a 4th gen powered 3rd gen would never be allowed in the ranks of SoCalTPI because it would defeat the clubs purpose through the eyes of its founders. Just as we (SC3G) would never allow a 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 5th gen into ours Now allowing other f body’s to participate in certain events like super cruises, absolutely. However into the core 3rd gen membership, not going to happen
#113
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
"All they see is a militant “LSX hater” that is pro TPI period."
...and I have no idea where they think I am a "LSX hater". I have never said anything negative about the LSX and I think a friendly rivalry is good. Its that some here have made accusations not based on the facts that riles me.
One more thing, one of our members who has been thrashed in this thread owns a 4th gen Camaro with an LS1 motor. Obviously not a "LSX hater".
...and I have no idea where they think I am a "LSX hater". I have never said anything negative about the LSX and I think a friendly rivalry is good. Its that some here have made accusations not based on the facts that riles me.
One more thing, one of our members who has been thrashed in this thread owns a 4th gen Camaro with an LS1 motor. Obviously not a "LSX hater".
I mean come on, your buddy Paradise (with the self proclaimed "Masterpiece") was ******* the entire SoCal 3rd gen car club by stating that a club bar-b-q to help Mikey wrench on his swap was a bad idea.
Originally Posted by Paradise7
Likewise, anybody that thinks this swap is going to take place over a weekend with the benefit of 10 pounds of carne asada is mistaken.
You mean I should have put it in my driveway on jack stands, bought 10 pounds of carne asada and let a bunch of guys attack it with wrenches?
You mean I should have put it in my driveway on jack stands, bought 10 pounds of carne asada and let a bunch of guys attack it with wrenches?
Oh and I remember the guy with a 4th gen, he is adamant in his position that an LS1 belongs in a 4th gen and a TPI in a 3rd gen. I believe he was the first person to call my 3rd gen "bastardized" lol!!!
#114
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Now there’s a different breed of 3rd gen out there with a nasty little small block in it putting down some serious power. The rivalry is definitely there; as a matter of fact it’s the classic case of old school vs. new school. However there needs to be a mutual respect of the capabilities of each before a ‘friendly rivalry’ can ensue.
#116
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Round Rock
Posts: 438
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula 350 LSX
Engine: 5.3, 234/228 cam
Transmission: Stage II 4L60e, Vigilante 3200
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Glad to see everyone has settled down now. Maybe we can get some constructive information about the LSX and tolerate the bastardizing (even though the thread was locked because of the flame war).
I too have a 4th gen with a LS1, and could care less if some one swapped BBC/SBC/LT1 into theirs, it is still a 4th gen, and one of the brethren.
Now you go stickin' a 2jz into a '69 Camaro (been done), I probably won't be happy with it, but you are still part of the club.
I too have a 4th gen with a LS1, and could care less if some one swapped BBC/SBC/LT1 into theirs, it is still a 4th gen, and one of the brethren.
Now you go stickin' a 2jz into a '69 Camaro (been done), I probably won't be happy with it, but you are still part of the club.
#118
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LSX (swapping)
Transmission: 4L60E (swapping)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi 10 Bolt
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Stick and LSx in a Supra though, and then you are cool
#119
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Moline, IL
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 6.0L LQ4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 9 inch, 3.50
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Doing anything to a tpi is like beating a dead horse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is all.
That is all.
#121
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Moline, IL
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 6.0L LQ4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 9 inch, 3.50
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Yeah i know but the tpi only has so much potential based upon its design just the same as everything else. It just so happens the LS has a better design so from a power aspect there isnt much left on the table for the tpi. Once the next bigger better design comes out, modifying an LS will have the same fate. Thats just the way it is.
I just love all the people that persistently enjoy living in the past.
Not saying that it wouldnt be cool to have a fast tpi but there is a limit, a limit that is lower than that of an LS due to design.
Nothing like having stock LS cylinder heads that perform better than many aftermarket gen1 heads
I just love all the people that persistently enjoy living in the past.
Not saying that it wouldnt be cool to have a fast tpi but there is a limit, a limit that is lower than that of an LS due to design.
Nothing like having stock LS cylinder heads that perform better than many aftermarket gen1 heads
#122
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
This argument comes up so much and I have to laugh every time I see it. Back when I had my cammed 305 in my car I stuck up for the 305 like no other, because it's what I had at the time and it was all I knew. Everyone and thier mother said it was a boat anchor and that a 350 was a much better choice. I refused to believe it. Well my bro swapped a stock 5.7 TBI into his camaro one day and it ran right with my cammed 305. 350 better than 305? YES I learned. I still appreciate a well built 305 which can be made into a screamer but at what budget?
Thats where this argument goes too. Sure, a TPI can be built to beat an LS1 but not for the same price, and not without gobs of know-how and TPI tuning knowledge. With an LS1, your average joe can throw it in, cam it, and take it down the street to the nearest HP tuners shop and boom...instant driveability and power. With the internet these days, there is NO reason someone that has a little experience couldn't swap in an LS1 in thier garage and get it running. I tell people all the time, take a chevy 5.3 LSx and throw a turbo on it and then throw a turbo on a 5.7 TPI. Bet I can guess which is going to scream. Instant 10's on the 5.3, and your lucky to get a low 12 on the turbo TPI.
I say do what makes you happy. I love the way a nice clean TPI looks and the torque makes them amazingly fun on the street. If you are competing with fellow car buddies and have a need for speed without sinking your life savings into an engine though, the LSx is where it's at, hands down. Nobodys going to change anyones mind here. We all like different things and some people prefer LSx, some prefer TPI. Thats what makes the car game so fun. Thats why some guys drive mustangs, and others drive F-bodies.
Thats where this argument goes too. Sure, a TPI can be built to beat an LS1 but not for the same price, and not without gobs of know-how and TPI tuning knowledge. With an LS1, your average joe can throw it in, cam it, and take it down the street to the nearest HP tuners shop and boom...instant driveability and power. With the internet these days, there is NO reason someone that has a little experience couldn't swap in an LS1 in thier garage and get it running. I tell people all the time, take a chevy 5.3 LSx and throw a turbo on it and then throw a turbo on a 5.7 TPI. Bet I can guess which is going to scream. Instant 10's on the 5.3, and your lucky to get a low 12 on the turbo TPI.
I say do what makes you happy. I love the way a nice clean TPI looks and the torque makes them amazingly fun on the street. If you are competing with fellow car buddies and have a need for speed without sinking your life savings into an engine though, the LSx is where it's at, hands down. Nobodys going to change anyones mind here. We all like different things and some people prefer LSx, some prefer TPI. Thats what makes the car game so fun. Thats why some guys drive mustangs, and others drive F-bodies.
#123
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
We are seeking friendly, performance-oriented people who have TPI engines in their vehicles.
Sorry, this is a SoCal TPI event and is only for members with TPI engines.
We are a fun, friendly group of people who want to get together and share our love for the 85-92 Camaro, Trans Am, and Corvette, as well as other vehicles of all years who have been converted to Tuned Port Injection.
Sorry, this is a SoCal TPI event and is only for members with TPI engines.
We are a fun, friendly group of people who want to get together and share our love for the 85-92 Camaro, Trans Am, and Corvette, as well as other vehicles of all years who have been converted to Tuned Port Injection.
At least it looks like the true colors are beginning to show, still a whole lot of sour grapes being consumed over a bunch of dumb nonsense and lifetime personal grudges and petty hatred. And to think those were throwing stones...
Mikey if you need any help, let us know. I'm sure ANYONE around here would be more than willing to lend a hand with your project.
#124
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Madmax Madmax, Madmax, Somehow you cannot seem to let things die down. It is really a shame. I would not normally have responded as I am trying to let things go and die down. However you called me out so the response.
I believe it was a person in your club who started this thread. Reading through this thread it is members of your club who are throwing stones and accusations against members of our club. Going back in time( 1 year) it was member(s) of your club making threats and name calling against members of our club. In this thread I noticed that it was people from you club who had posts deleted by the administrators because of the vitriol.
Again we have people other than TPI motors who show up at our events and are welcome. If you don't want to believe it to be true so be it. I myself would love to bury the hatchet but threads like this prove it will won't happen. To much pent up anger in certain members of your club proven by the post you just made. You are just throwing gasoline on the fire. To bad. Lets see who else joins in on this nonsence.
I believe it was a person in your club who started this thread. Reading through this thread it is members of your club who are throwing stones and accusations against members of our club. Going back in time( 1 year) it was member(s) of your club making threats and name calling against members of our club. In this thread I noticed that it was people from you club who had posts deleted by the administrators because of the vitriol.
Again we have people other than TPI motors who show up at our events and are welcome. If you don't want to believe it to be true so be it. I myself would love to bury the hatchet but threads like this prove it will won't happen. To much pent up anger in certain members of your club proven by the post you just made. You are just throwing gasoline on the fire. To bad. Lets see who else joins in on this nonsence.
#125
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SanAntonio,TX
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 CAMARO RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: AUTOMATIC
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Just pointing out something. People can enjoy there cars the way they want. The people or group "the keep it oringinal but maximize its potental club" has its priorities in doing just that. Maximizing the engine that came in the car originally, thats were they get there inspiration. On the flip side theres "the do whatever to maximize the quickness club" these guys get there inspiration by acheiving maximum hp/per dollar, or just over all more hp potental. One cant argue one over the other its apple and oranges. The swappers need to realize were the "keep it original guys" priorities are, and the keep it original guys shouldnt talk about hp ratings or cost of getting there to the "do what ever guys". I think if the engines are some form of GM/Chevy then what does it matter. Now if people were swapping forein engines now I think there might be a argument. But I sure do want to swap a chevy engine in my montero sport because that thing a P.O.S., you guys shouldnt be racing agianst each other WTF drop the egos I hope I dont here of that crap around here, I would be pissed.
#126
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Me? Sure. Go do a search to see who's been saying what and when. Go look at the 3rd reply (or the 39th) to the post in question that this whole thread is about. There are two threads now with I dont know (or care) how many views and replies now on thirdgen.org because of the hate of 1 person and it aint me. As for me, I have said exactly nothing starting anything until the post above at 3:40 and what I offered was simply advice. From where I am, all I see is cant cant cant, and now apparently its... thats ok with us. Quite a change of tune if you ask me, especially LS1's being ok when all I see is a lot of people recommending against the idea. Maybe ya'll should get together, figure out what path you're on, and tell others about it including a few people who obviously want nothing to do with LS motors. If I'm in the dark about it, what do you think others who are lurking around and see your posts thinks? Surely not even as clear as mud. Beyond that, I could really care less what any of you do or plan or anything else. You have a club of 10 people? Swell. 10,000 people? Swell. Dont matter to me, do whatever floats your boat. Just suggesting you figure it out and stop arguing with people who are just looking for some free and helpful advice rather than a bunch of misguided hate.
Going to add, because people must insist on slinging mud but insist they are not doing so:
Does it matter? Obviously it must, to you. Are you right about a person in "our" club, or are you wrong? Again, does it matter?
A quote:
If you're always looking for trouble... you will always find it.
Going to add, because people must insist on slinging mud but insist they are not doing so:
I believe it was a person in your club who started this thread.
A quote:
If you're always looking for trouble... you will always find it.
Last edited by madmax; 11-10-2010 at 08:49 PM.
#127
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
"Just suggesting you figure it out and stop arguing with people who are just looking for some free and helpful advice rather than a bunch of misguided hate."
One more time. I am not arguing about the LSx swap for or against. In this thread I have been wrongly accused of stating things I have never said. You can start with the list of seven items the original poster listed in post 1. I never said anything remotely resembling what he stated in those seven items in post 1. I am not arguing. I am defending myself from false accusations and statements.
As to someone looking for some free and helpful advice, this not what this thread was all about. I think you are confusing this thread with the one that was closed that Mikey started. The original poster has people jumping in from all across the nation bashing away based of false pretenses, statements and assumptions that I supposedly made. This thread should have been locked from the start. I guess the moderators thought otherwise.
By the way posts 3 and 39 have nothing to do with any of my posts in this thread or any thread for that matter any that I have participated in.
One more time. I am not arguing about the LSx swap for or against. In this thread I have been wrongly accused of stating things I have never said. You can start with the list of seven items the original poster listed in post 1. I never said anything remotely resembling what he stated in those seven items in post 1. I am not arguing. I am defending myself from false accusations and statements.
As to someone looking for some free and helpful advice, this not what this thread was all about. I think you are confusing this thread with the one that was closed that Mikey started. The original poster has people jumping in from all across the nation bashing away based of false pretenses, statements and assumptions that I supposedly made. This thread should have been locked from the start. I guess the moderators thought otherwise.
By the way posts 3 and 39 have nothing to do with any of my posts in this thread or any thread for that matter any that I have participated in.
#128
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: I won't tell either
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1986 Grand Prix TPI
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 200 4R
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
This thread or the other one, doesn't matter, if die hard TPI guys had kept their criticism to themselves this thread would not exist.
I was so shocked at that statement I almost needed CPR. Of course I have not paid any attention to "you guys" and "your club". Guess you changed the initial purpose/direction of your club.
Alan, you have put lots of money and research into your car to achieve "King of the 3rd gen" status, but from what little I know about your latest drivetrain there is very little GM on it. I respect your tenacity, i disagree with your vehicles purity.
Not entirely true. We have people attending our meetings with motors other than TPI including the LS1 motor. They are welcome.
Alan, you have put lots of money and research into your car to achieve "King of the 3rd gen" status, but from what little I know about your latest drivetrain there is very little GM on it. I respect your tenacity, i disagree with your vehicles purity.
#131
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Lt1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 auburn pro 9"
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
I have a question. If I walked in off the street with a thirdgen and told you TPI guys that I wanted to run 10's all day any day all motor and get 20+ mpg while stuck in LA traffic would you tell me the best choice would be to build a TPI?
#133
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
I've seen the opposite, the arrogance from the LS Crowd, but at the end of the day. Who cares. Really.
You can build an LSX to run fast, you can build a TPI to run fast. Money will work wonders.
Personally, I like the sound of a gen 1 small block, but we have to be honest, the LS is a nice engine...lots of power, nice and smooth...
Why does anyone care what someone wants to put in their car?
#134
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 5,674
Likes: 0
Received 106 Likes
on
65 Posts
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Look people, I never called anybody "stupid, ignorant, dumb" or any other such
expletives.
I simply stated my opinion and suggested the the guy think about the outcome.
We all have opinions and we are intitled to them.
If I stepped on anyones toes, I'm sorry.
As far as TPI goes, you guys with the LSX stuff got the benefit of factory parts
that are good from the gitgo, we are just bringing the TPI parts up to where you
are ie. better heads, better intake, better cams etc.
If you don't like my opinion, that's fine, just don't lower yourselves
to calling me or anyone else names.
We're all here to enjoy our cars, so lets do it and stow
all the bashing and trashing of each other.
expletives.
I simply stated my opinion and suggested the the guy think about the outcome.
We all have opinions and we are intitled to them.
If I stepped on anyones toes, I'm sorry.
As far as TPI goes, you guys with the LSX stuff got the benefit of factory parts
that are good from the gitgo, we are just bringing the TPI parts up to where you
are ie. better heads, better intake, better cams etc.
If you don't like my opinion, that's fine, just don't lower yourselves
to calling me or anyone else names.
We're all here to enjoy our cars, so lets do it and stow
all the bashing and trashing of each other.
#135
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: I won't tell either
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1986 Grand Prix TPI
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 200 4R
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Hmmm, my GTA motor has some miles on it and needs valve stem seals, I have this 68 ford 428 in the shed.................
#136
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Lt1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 auburn pro 9"
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Im 100% ok with you guys loving on the TPI like its the best thing on the planet just dont go spreading false information.... talking about your setup like anyone can duplicate it and that drivability and gas mileage are the same if not better than an LSx is just absurd...
#137
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: FL
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: V6 - LS Swap Incoming
Transmission: 700R4 - T56 Mag F Incoming
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Well it all comes down to personal preference like so many people have already said.
The reason I would chose an LS design over a TPI is purely due to the efforts taken to tune the car.
With LS vehicles I plug my handy HP Tuners in and monitor the plethora of data presented and adjust the tune's parameter accordingly.
TPI I can do the same thing but instead of on the fly tuning I have to burn prom chips to make changes. Also the amount of data I can monitor is limited along with the refresh rate of the data provided meaning I'm missing information from inbetween read slots and on a engine where events happen so quickly (that piston is going up and down the cylider wall at 12.5 times a second (at 6000 rpms)) every bit of data is critical.
So just from the tuning stand point alone an LS makes the logical choice before one even considers the engine's superior engineered design. As so many have already said LS is the new advanced tech and the strides made in engineering shows with the capability of the engine platform.
Now that being said I understand nostaligia and other resaons to run other engines and setups.
I tune LS engines but for my third gen I built a 383 stroker with a carb setup.
Why?
I like to try new things. Never built a carb system before so why not?
To each thier own.
The reason I would chose an LS design over a TPI is purely due to the efforts taken to tune the car.
With LS vehicles I plug my handy HP Tuners in and monitor the plethora of data presented and adjust the tune's parameter accordingly.
TPI I can do the same thing but instead of on the fly tuning I have to burn prom chips to make changes. Also the amount of data I can monitor is limited along with the refresh rate of the data provided meaning I'm missing information from inbetween read slots and on a engine where events happen so quickly (that piston is going up and down the cylider wall at 12.5 times a second (at 6000 rpms)) every bit of data is critical.
So just from the tuning stand point alone an LS makes the logical choice before one even considers the engine's superior engineered design. As so many have already said LS is the new advanced tech and the strides made in engineering shows with the capability of the engine platform.
Now that being said I understand nostaligia and other resaons to run other engines and setups.
I tune LS engines but for my third gen I built a 383 stroker with a carb setup.
Why?
I like to try new things. Never built a carb system before so why not?
To each thier own.
#138
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
You TPI guys need BOOST to make up the difference with the LSX children.
And to "WhiteDevilTA" A tubro L98 car also goes 10's. Look for the white 91/92 formy in here and GMHT. Pretty much a stock thirdgen with a small turbo and tuning.
Anyway, You guys bikering is really silly. Some of the "LSX" crowd has the Fox body mentality of the mid 90's.. Its the "I have one too" crowd. Most wont own a Thirdgen in a few Yr's from now anyways. The TPI guys in here, are for the most part true Thirdgengen enthusiasts. and keep there cars period correct. I luv my little TPI motor, boost makes up all its shortcomings. Next cars a 4thgen with LSX, And it will stay LSX.
And to "WhiteDevilTA" A tubro L98 car also goes 10's. Look for the white 91/92 formy in here and GMHT. Pretty much a stock thirdgen with a small turbo and tuning.
Anyway, You guys bikering is really silly. Some of the "LSX" crowd has the Fox body mentality of the mid 90's.. Its the "I have one too" crowd. Most wont own a Thirdgen in a few Yr's from now anyways. The TPI guys in here, are for the most part true Thirdgengen enthusiasts. and keep there cars period correct. I luv my little TPI motor, boost makes up all its shortcomings. Next cars a 4thgen with LSX, And it will stay LSX.
#139
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
#140
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: '89 Formula, Black w/ gray interior
Engine: LB9, 230 HP, 305 ci, TPI
Transmission: 5 sp manual
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 3.45 limited slip
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Really?!
I can’t believe there are 3 pages of this. What is wrong with you guys?
OP, it’s your car, put in it whatever you want.
Everyone else: if you can’t post something nice or helpful, don’t post at all.
Can we all go back to hating 5.0 Mustangs now?
I can’t believe there are 3 pages of this. What is wrong with you guys?
OP, it’s your car, put in it whatever you want.
Everyone else: if you can’t post something nice or helpful, don’t post at all.
Can we all go back to hating 5.0 Mustangs now?
#141
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
Such a bandwagon of hate going on in this thread, people puting words in peoples mouths this really should be locked. InjectorsPlus is right about the arrogance from the LS Crowd, no **** it's going to run better then TPI it's multiple generations of engineering above it, like what is there to prove? Course with that said doesn't mean a guy with some money can't make the TPI engine work well to, I believe that was the whole point they were trying to make on SO CAL thread tell it got bent out of shape. From an outsider's point of view all this is started over one mans strong "OPINION" to keep the TPI engine and I don't see anyone of them calling a LS engine a piece of **** so I'am not understanding why the hostility level from some of the LS owners or supporters. This thread is 3 pages long and there is no one disagreeing with the LS engine so where is the fight?
#142
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
#143
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
autox huh? ok, let me slap my front sway bar back on and some full sized street tires and we'll go. mine is not that far in one direction that i can't easily go back in the other...it'd take 45mins to set mine up for autox...much like i'd hope it'd take you 45 mins to get ready for the drag strip.
just cause i don't have ac doesn't mean i'm not a street car. hell, i just got back from driving it 10 mins ago...i've driven my car more this week then half of you stock purist have...sitting in the garage collecting dust, scared to get miles on your car.
for the record, my car has power steering, power brakes, power door locks/trunk, windows, mirrors, and ALL my seats still fit, even with my roll bar. the only thing i don't have that's "street equipment" is hvac and a radio...too busy worried about going fast to listen to tunes, and i don't need hvac where i live, so i free'd up the space to make way for more go-fast goodies.
i'll grab a lane anywhere you will
#144
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
"From an outsider's point of view all this is started over one mans strong "OPINION" to keep the TPI engine and I don't see anyone of them calling a LS engine a piece of **** so I'am not understanding why the hostility level from some of the LS owners or supporters. This thread is 3 pages long and there is no one disagreeing with the LS engine so where is the fight?"
Thank You. Finally someone who has read through the threads and understands it. Makes me wonder about the reading comprehension of a lot of members in this forum. The premise of the whole thread is bogus but the LSx crowd and others keep piling on anyways.
To answer some from above. We are working within the designs of the basic L98 architecture as laid out by GM. The primary impetus for this is to pass California smog without having to go to a referee and put up with all the bureaucratic BS. We are hot-rodding our motors within these confines. Some people from out of state may not understand this. Others do.
Now some truth in advertising about my motor. Yes, I do have some LSx parts in my L-98. I am running LS-7 roller lifters. I have aftermarket Scat connecting rods that are also used in the LSx motors. My Mahle ring package is the same as used in LSx motors. They are 1.5mm 1.5mm x 3.0mm rings. Last, my motor is not all GM. I use a lot of aftermarket parts.
These are primarily street cars that we take on cruises which in Southern California includes high mountains(8000' passes) and the hot low desert. My car with driver likely weighs around 3650 with driver based on a previous weighing. It is not stripped down but a fully optioned GTA with air conditioning that works along with everything else the car was equipped with when it left the factory.
Thank You. Finally someone who has read through the threads and understands it. Makes me wonder about the reading comprehension of a lot of members in this forum. The premise of the whole thread is bogus but the LSx crowd and others keep piling on anyways.
To answer some from above. We are working within the designs of the basic L98 architecture as laid out by GM. The primary impetus for this is to pass California smog without having to go to a referee and put up with all the bureaucratic BS. We are hot-rodding our motors within these confines. Some people from out of state may not understand this. Others do.
Now some truth in advertising about my motor. Yes, I do have some LSx parts in my L-98. I am running LS-7 roller lifters. I have aftermarket Scat connecting rods that are also used in the LSx motors. My Mahle ring package is the same as used in LSx motors. They are 1.5mm 1.5mm x 3.0mm rings. Last, my motor is not all GM. I use a lot of aftermarket parts.
These are primarily street cars that we take on cruises which in Southern California includes high mountains(8000' passes) and the hot low desert. My car with driver likely weighs around 3650 with driver based on a previous weighing. It is not stripped down but a fully optioned GTA with air conditioning that works along with everything else the car was equipped with when it left the factory.
#145
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
One more time. I am not arguing about the LSx swap for or against. In this thread I have been wrongly accused of stating things I have never said. You can start with the list of seven items the original poster listed in post 1. I never said anything remotely resembling what he stated in those seven items in post 1. I am not arguing. I am defending myself from false accusations and statements.
About my post #1, members of your club repeatedly argue that:
1. TPI is better than LSX: Your club members have taken the liberty to go onto various LSX swaps and post “I prefer my TPI dyno numbers” (DynoDon referring to TPI TERR’s LSX dyno numbers thread) and “I don’t know why you guys go through all the trouble…my TPI makes 350rwhp…etc.” (DynDon referring to BlueZee’s build thread). The TPI Cult has gone out of their way to criticize LSX swaps. They have brought this thread upon themselves.
2. It’s cheaper to make power with a TPI build vs. LSX build: Your club members have discouraged members from going the LSX route claiming it’s cheaper to build one of these “TPI Masterpieces.” I questioned how much these TPI builds costs but nobody wants to give figures but I’m guessing it’s $5K plus. LSX swaps have been done for less and made more power.
3. LSX in 3rd gen is “bastardizing” your 3rd gen: Your club member went off to my suggestion of an LSX swap in a thread where a neutral member was looking for opinions on how to build a motor with 400hp and good street manners with a $4k budget.
Originally Posted by Burnout91
If I was going to build an LS1 motor, it would be one that came in an LS1 car, like my '98 TA. Why do you talk about how your ThirdGen is so badass, when it really isn't a ThirdGen at all? Oh, how about bringing that badass LS1 bastardized ThirdGen out to Fontana on May 30? Then you MIGHT have a reason to stick my logic in my ear. 400 RWHP isn't going to make very much of a difference against some of SoCal's REAL ThirdGens.
Bill
Bill
4. Only TPI motors belong in 3rd gens: Cult members...
Originally Posted by Kevin91Z
Its my opinion, and Don's too, that thirdgens that came with TPI engines should stay that way. LSx engines came in 4th gens and C5+ Corvettes, and they belong there.
Originally Posted by DynoDon
I am a true thirdgen lover and I will always keep mine that way. I had just hoped he would too.
5. LSX in 3rd gens look ugly?
Originally Posted by DynoDon
Why would you want to hack up a nice car like that with a cobble job ugly motor?
Originally Posted by DynoDon
As far as the under hood appeal of the LSX combo, yes I think it is an "ugly ****"
Originally Posted by Paradise 7
I would be embarrassed to open the hood and show off something cobbled together….
If you are willing to settle for less, that is your choice. Good luck with your swap. You are going to need it
If you are willing to settle for less, that is your choice. Good luck with your swap. You are going to need it
Originally Posted by DynoDon
Write on a piece of paper, I got an LS1 for free and everybody says it's a piece of cake to install in my car in my driveway. Put it away in a drawer somewhere.
Then someday when you need a good laugh dig it out and read it.
Then someday when you need a good laugh dig it out and read it.
Originally Posted by Paradise 7
You mean I should have put it in my driveway on jack stands, bought 10 pounds of carne asada and let a bunch of guys attack it with wrenches?
Funny you bring up Moderators since the only 2 Moderators in the So Cal section are both members of the TPI Cult!!! One of them is DynoDon’s son if I am not mistaken.
#146
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
You sound like a J/A using the word "cult" and "****" in every other sentance. Seems like the lsX guys are more of a "cult" type following, Seems that way just by the way there attacking everyone that has a different opinion.
#147
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
You seem pretty "silly" to me too by to contradicting yourself and "bickering" as well. At least you know you need boost to keep up, you're not that irrational. Carry on
#148
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
O, and i also beleieve there are guys that do a great job of swapping in a LSX into a 3rdGen. But theres also alot that do a REALLY BAD, sloppy job. They just want to get the LSX in. And go out and run there cars. Alot of those are real POS, IMO.. Anyways, yea, I dont discriminate. I love all types of muscle cars, and drivetrains. LSX is great. So is SBC, Skys the limit on a GEN1.
#149
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Mystery Firebird
Engine: 350 FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Re: So Cal member gets “attacked” for planning LS1 swap
lets be realistic people....
why install a SBC over a BBC is the same argument as TPI350 vs LSx....
my opinion... put what YOU want in YOUR car...
why install a SBC over a BBC is the same argument as TPI350 vs LSx....
my opinion... put what YOU want in YOUR car...
#150
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259