Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder

Power Adder Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-19-2009, 09:42 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 26

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Getting Rid of Current Compression Options??

Hey guys gotta 355 carb motor and have 10:6:1 Compression and wantin to install D-1 Procharger

Now my question is they gotta make a lil spacer or shim that sits on the deck of the block under the head right? Its gotta be the simplest way to go jus get longer bolts if needed. Jus wantin ur opinion and advice!
Thanks!
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
Drone358 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 06-19-2009, 09:44 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 26

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Getting Rid of Current Compression Options??

And i know they make thicker Headgaskets too but wasn't sure how much a difference it would be
Drone358 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009, 09:54 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 10,393
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: Twin Turbo 401
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42's

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Send a message via AIM to Orr89RocZ
Re: Getting Rid of Current Compression Options??

The last thing you want to do is get a thicker head gasket or spacer. That will destroy your quench and increase detonation.

Best bet is to swap pistons or get a head with a much larger CC chamber. Going from a 64cc or so up to a 75-76 cc will bring you down in the mid 9's to 1 which is better with a blower motor. Just make sure your ring gaps arent too tight like a n/a motor usually is and it should be ok. Make sure the tune is dead nuts and you will be much better off as well
__________________

1989 Twin Turbo IROC-Z
"Twin Turbo 401 Buildup Pics "
"FQuick Garage"
9.86 at 141 mph 14psi, street tune
Orr89RocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009, 10:00 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: moberly, Mo
Posts: 315
Car: 91 rs
Engine: 383 290 cam aed carb
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 4.10 ticking time bomb

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Getting Rid of Current Compression Options??

I am pretty sure they do not make a spacer like that, but you would be suprised how much difference a thick head gasket makes. I have even seen an article where they stacked head gaskets!

One of the many problems you will have with getting rid of compression this way is your intake seal, raising the heads will alter the angles and could pose problems.

Also the wedge type combustion chamber that is used on sbc is designed to use the tight distance between the piston and the closed side of the head to get complete combustion. Whenever you increase this clearance you are actually making the engine more prone to detonation, even with less compression.

Long story short, buy new pistons or larger chamber heads. Any other way that you go about reducing compression will be half***, and probably not even get you close to the 9 to 1 or less you should be shooting for.
bart91406 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 05:02 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,469
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Getting Rid of Current Compression Options??

Better question - what parts do you have now?

Pistons (part number, size, etc)
heads (chamber size, port size)
deck height
camshaft (part number. not "race cam" or some stupid BS like that)
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 02:06 AM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 219
Car: 92 Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (6)
Re: Getting Rid of Current Compression Options??

Just to try and help you out,

Right now i run 10 lbs on my 383 with 10.7-1 CR
ported vortec heads
292 Comp cams "NX express" 274/292, Lift .487/.501 on a 113 LSA
850 Demon blowthrough with alot mods
RPM airgap intake
Summit BTM digital ign.
MSD Probillet Dis.
Baster 2
ect ect just to give you the basics

I run water-meth and pull a lot of timing under boost. I know i am leaving alot on the table but i dont have the cash to pull it back down for new pistons. IT CAN BE DONE! But like stated you have to be spot on with the tune. A wideband is a MUST! watch your AFR really close. at WOT i dont like to see my AFR over 11.5-1. read plugs and make sure you have a good fuel system. everyone told me that it could not be done, and so far its worked great. its all in fuel and timing. i am really conservitive on timing, ran about 34* and pulled between 2-4* for every pound of boost. Just make sure your on top of it and you will be fine.
1983sc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder

Tags
76cc, compression, increase
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.