Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

performance handling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2008, 08:26 AM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
dasferret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock open 2.73's
performance handling

My 92 has over 200k miles now and has a hard street use alignment on it. I was thinking of getting the tubular k-member along with the usual goodies to help it perform better. What are your thoughts on this product? the car will be mostly street driven and will very rarely see the track. I am looking to give those pesky bikes a good run for their money.
Old 05-23-2008, 10:18 AM
  #2  
Member

 
87 formy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 87 formula
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T5
Re: performance handling

Tubular K-members are more about weight savings and more room in the engine bay than handling. What does the car have on it now? You might be better off replacing worn bushings and getting a nice set of shocks and subframe connectors.
Old 05-24-2008, 06:01 PM
  #3  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
dasferret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock open 2.73's
Re: performance handling

Right now she is dead stock. I plan on adding poly bushings, sub frame connectors, good struts, wonder bar, strut tower brace, and tubular a-arms. I was thinking the K-member would be a drag only item, but have heard of a few on the road.
Old 05-24-2008, 10:24 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High plains of NM
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: performance handling

you can bet at least one of the strut towers are shot.
Old 05-25-2008, 12:23 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: performance handling

You're on the right track with the struts/shocks. You need to spend as much as you can afford to on them. Replace the strut mounts while you are in there. I reccomend going with Spohn or HotPart. Good tires are also a must. Then decide on what springs and then sway bars you want. May have to play with the swaybars to find what you like.
Poly bushings in the rear LCAs isn't them best idea for handling. It causes the LCAs to bind in hard corning...pretty interesting experience. The tubular a-arms are nice, but the bang for buck value isn't really there. SFCs and Wonder Bar are great for stiffening the uni-body and allowing the suspension to function properly.
But the first thing you need to do is replace all the bushings and steering linkages in the car, then get some high performance brake pads.
Old 05-27-2008, 08:33 AM
  #6  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
dasferret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock open 2.73's
Re: performance handling

Cool, I appreciate all the help. I bought the car with the rear shocks out and unknown age on the front struts. I got it from the original owner, who stored the car alot.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
25
09-25-2021 07:55 PM
armybyrd
Carburetors
3
10-20-2015 03:57 AM
SRKLEGIN
Interior Parts Wanted
5
10-12-2015 07:28 AM
Numbah-1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
8
10-02-2015 08:27 AM
ndndndnd
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
09-28-2015 08:00 AM



Quick Reply: performance handling



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.