Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-12-2009, 11:57 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Spohn vs PARacing?

im looking now at chassis upgrades for my 86 camaro, cant decide between PARacing or SPohn...
i mean everything, K-member, Control arms, crossmembers, etc etc... the whole shibang...
i hvae heard very good things about spohn, but have not heard very much about PARacing, the one thing im really digging from PARacing is their K member with their manual rack and pinion kit, 15:1 ratio...
I have seen one that spohn makes but have been unable to find specs on it...
Also PAracings crossmembers are about 100 bucks cheaper than spohns, everything else is about the same price...
would like advice on which way to go... and if anyone has experience with these could share some of them, good or bad...
thank you!
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2009, 02:42 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 21

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Same Want to do LS swap and this at same time
Pwebbz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2009, 08:04 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gap, PA
Posts: 233
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: TH350, 8" Converter
Axle/Gears: S60 with 4:11 and Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

i have all spohn. i do like the paracing k member though.
__________________
1986 Camaro. 383 SBC. Scat forged bottom end, Diamond Pistons, Bullet solid roller, Crower HIPPO Roller lifters, Motown heads that flow 320cfm, Comp Pro Magnum Rockers, Ported Hurricane Intake, TRC 950 Carb.
TH350, RMVB. ATI 8" converter.
Strange S60 With 4:11's and Detroit Locker. Strange Adj Shocks
All Spohn Suspension.
275/60/15 MT ET streets. Sportsman up front.

2000 Camaro SS. M6, SLP. Usual Bolt ons.
1966 Chevelle 427 4 speed.
kens86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 06:38 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

how much lighter is your car with the spohn stuff? do you have their k member? and all their other lightweight stuff?
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 06:53 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gap, PA
Posts: 233
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: TH350, 8" Converter
Axle/Gears: S60 with 4:11 and Locker

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

i have not weighed my car yet. i just go it back on the road last week. No i do not have their k member yet. it's a nice piece. 2 friends of mine have pa racing k members which are also very nice.
__________________
1986 Camaro. 383 SBC. Scat forged bottom end, Diamond Pistons, Bullet solid roller, Crower HIPPO Roller lifters, Motown heads that flow 320cfm, Comp Pro Magnum Rockers, Ported Hurricane Intake, TRC 950 Carb.
TH350, RMVB. ATI 8" converter.
Strange S60 With 4:11's and Detroit Locker. Strange Adj Shocks
All Spohn Suspension.
275/60/15 MT ET streets. Sportsman up front.

2000 Camaro SS. M6, SLP. Usual Bolt ons.
1966 Chevelle 427 4 speed.
kens86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 07:41 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

cool. because i was thinking about the paracing k member with their manual rack kit...
but i really would like to get it all from one place but i read something on here about their crossmembers not fitting right with a t56...
also, what benefits are there from their strut mounts besides the extra inch of travel on a lowered car?
thank you
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 09:28 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 379
Car: 85 Z28, 88IROC, 91Z28 + parts cars
Engine: 305, 355, 408soon
Transmission: stock T56 in 88 and 85 built in 91
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1, 9" w/ 4.56 and spool

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Send a message via AIM to WIll36
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Hey I have the PA racing k member, rack and pinion, a-arms, rear control arms, panhard bar relcoation kit. I went with spohn front and rear coil overs. I tryed to buy a PA torque arm for the 6 speed swap and it didn't work. Jason did try to make a custom mount for me but after 2 attempts I gave up on that. I have to measure the travel on my rack but it is a flaming river piece. Only issue I had is that you have to shim the rack up a little on one side to cut and relocate the mount for the rack to get the steering shaft to clear the motor mount. Over all I really like doing business with PA racing it's a smaller shop. Just make sure you talk to Jason when you make your order. He's the owner and a stand up guy.
WIll36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 02:15 AM   #8
Member
 
Camarslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mt. Juliet, TN
Posts: 122
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: none
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Camarslow
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

I'm trying to decide between PA Racing and racecraft inc. ( http://www.racecraft.com/ ), check out the website and you can see they have very similar products, and in another thread on here it was mentioned racecraft was founded by someone from pa racing.
__________________
Chuck Norris, he doesn't sleep, he just waits.
Camarslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 10:05 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Greater D.C. area.
Posts: 440
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3 TBI
Transmission: 700R4 => WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open Diff

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Wait, they make manual steering racks for a third gen? HOT!
Saabster is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 10:36 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

cool, i heard about the torque arm and crossmember problem, so i fugured id go with spohn for that, but id get their own manual rack and pinion set, its a nice 15:1 ratio.
and the price is really nice too, 350 to spohns 460...
i am anxious to see how much lighter the front end will be, all im runnign is gonna be an alternator and water pump, its gonna be sweet...
thanks for the info guys.
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 05:17 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 379
Car: 85 Z28, 88IROC, 91Z28 + parts cars
Engine: 305, 355, 408soon
Transmission: stock T56 in 88 and 85 built in 91
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1, 9" w/ 4.56 and spool

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Send a message via AIM to WIll36
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

The other thing to remember is that rack has an inch less travel side to side so you will need racecraft spindles if you want to maintain your stock turning radius. Also the spohn transmission crossmember didn't fit my car because I have alston frame connectors the 2 hit eachother. I modified the spohn piece to fit cause I had to get the car moved. I'm going to contact Jason this week to see if I can get some more measurements for him and get another piece made to fit.

Saabster the rack isn't third gen specific at all. My PA kit came with a flaming river pinto rack. It's the crossmember that is made specifically for the 3rd gen.
WIll36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 08:10 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WIll36 View Post
The other thing to remember is that rack has an inch less travel side to side so you will need racecraft spindles if you want to maintain your stock turning radius. Also the spohn transmission crossmember didn't fit my car because I have alston frame connectors the 2 hit eachother. I modified the spohn piece to fit cause I had to get the car moved. I'm going to contact Jason this week to see if I can get some more measurements for him and get another piece made to fit.

Saabster the rack isn't third gen specific at all. My PA kit came with a flaming river pinto rack. It's the crossmember that is made specifically for the 3rd gen.
oh well im gonna use the spohn or paracing sub connectors, just to kinda evade that problem, thats why i was asking because if i get parts from the same place then nothing should really interfere with eachother, but if i ge the paracing spindles will the turn radius also remain the same? or do i need the racecraft spindles specifically?
or, what if i got the rack mounts for a 4th gen rack setup would that work? im mainly looking for a manual form of steering, and cant find a steering box with more than 20:1 ratio... so the rack was the way to go i figured.
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 09:31 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 379
Car: 85 Z28, 88IROC, 91Z28 + parts cars
Engine: 305, 355, 408soon
Transmission: stock T56 in 88 and 85 built in 91
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1, 9" w/ 4.56 and spool

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Send a message via AIM to WIll36
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

I don't know about the Spohn rack and pinion kit. I looked on their website and there is a picture but no listing that I found with any information on their kit. Far as the spindles go yes they are specific to the manual rack setup, because the arm where the outer tierod bolts up is shorter to compensate for the reduced throw length of the rack and pinion. Racecraft is the only I know of that currently offers them. No clue on the 4th gen racks I don't think they have the right throw distance either. There is a particular year ford turbo coupe power rack that has the right throw length. Anyway there are a couple thread already on that mod. The long and short of it is if you want a manual rack you need different spindles to keep stock turning radius.
WIll36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 07:08 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

well besides weight... whats the benefit of a rack type steering vs steering box?
because if i could get a pitman arm to use a manual 12:1 steering box for 70-81 camaros it may end up being cheaper that way...
thanks
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:01 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 1,298
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

just more precise and better feel.
thats about it really.
btw, 12:1 manual will be a absolute PITA to park and drive at low speeds.
unless you have a 15"+ steering wheel, forget it.
__________________
RED_DRAGON_85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 12:28 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

i dont think it will be that bad... my old truck had a manual steering box, it was around 18:1... to me it was as easy to drive as powersteering... powersteering is too sensitive t me... so i imagine a 12:1 shouldnt be too too bad...
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 12:59 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 1,298
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

im just telling you from personal experience, that it will not be fun if you have to parallel park every day
__________________
RED_DRAGON_85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 01:14 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

haha thank you... but i never parallel park... and i understand... but i like the manual steering... the tighter the beter...
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 12:26 AM   #19
Member
 
ScottyRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Catlett, Virginia, 20119,USA
Posts: 252
Car: 92 L98 Z28 Heritage Hard Top
Engine: L98 350 w/ HSR,24lbs inj,AFPR
Transmission: TCI Street Fighter W/3300 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Detriot NoSpin,LPW cover

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to ScottyRock
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by oxrabidus View Post
well besides weight... whats the benefit of a rack type steering vs steering box?
because if i could get a pitman arm to use a manual 12:1 steering box for 70-81 camaros it may end up being cheaper that way...
thanks
Just so you now, you want to use S-10 manual steering parts, they work great and low speed turning is not that bad,still sucks but thats the price, have helped do a 1974 Camaro and a 1986 Iroc and we used Auto Zone S-10 parts to convert to manual steering. Works like stock, used the steering gear box, pitman arm, rag joint and lower steering shaft.
ScottyRock is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 08:45 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

i just checked the spohn rack kit and according to them you dont have to drill out the spindles or anything, so i imagine its a direct fit... its a 3.75 turn from lock to lock... does that mean that from the center it takes 3.75 turns to lock to either sid or from one side all the way to the other it takes 3.75 turns to lock?
and if the same manual steering box fit on a 74 camaro that would technically mean that a box from a 2nd gen camaro would work on a third gen?
thanks
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 04:47 PM   #21
Junior Member
 
88LT1Drop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Car: 1988 Camaro Conv.
Engine: 96 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:73's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WIll36 View Post
The other thing to remember is that rack has an inch less travel side to side so you will need racecraft spindles if you want to maintain your stock turning radius. Also the spohn transmission crossmember didn't fit my car because I have alston frame connectors the 2 hit eachother. I modified the spohn piece to fit cause I had to get the car moved. I'm going to contact Jason this week to see if I can get some more measurements for him and get another piece made to fit.

Saabster the rack isn't third gen specific at all. My PA kit came with a flaming river pinto rack. It's the crossmember that is made specifically for the 3rd gen.
are u talking about the t56 transmission x-member? how much it interfere with the alston frame connectors? did u just have to cut then a little bit? just want know before i order them. also were urs the bolt in style or weld?
88LT1Drop is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 05:52 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 379
Car: 85 Z28, 88IROC, 91Z28 + parts cars
Engine: 305, 355, 408soon
Transmission: stock T56 in 88 and 85 built in 91
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1, 9" w/ 4.56 and spool

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Send a message via AIM to WIll36
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

A spohn crossmember won't work with alston sfcs unless you cut about 3 to 4 inches off the transmission crossmember because of how they design them. I'm not happy with the setup and need to get ahold of Jason since I still have is prototype and now have access to lifts again at work so I could take some measurements for him to fab up a true bolt in one. His style uses tubing and would actually clear the sfcs without any extra modification. The problem was we were trying to colaborate to build the thing over the phone and internet which led to some issues.
WIll36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 07:05 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
89_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 769
Car: 89 RS Camaro
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: GM 10 Bolt/2.73 Open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by oxrabidus View Post
its a 3.75 turn from lock to lock... does that mean that from the center it takes 3.75 turns to lock to either sid or from one side all the way to the other it takes 3.75 turns to lock?

3.75 turns lock to lock is haw many turns it takes to turn the wheels all the way from the left to the right.
89_RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009, 10:11 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 515
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC Z
Engine: L30 Vortec Carb'd
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Im guessing 3.73, it was an L69 car

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

well thats not too bad, 3.75 turns lock to lock then... ill have to call to make sure about it not affecting the turn radius; on the site it said you dont have to anything to the spindles but id wanna make sure that the turn radius will stay the same...
also, spohn has delsphere joints for just about everything they sell whats the difference between that and a regular rod end?
oxrabidus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 06:35 PM   #25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4
Car: 92 camaro
Engine: working on 427 twin turbo
Transmission: richmond 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 9in ford with 3.25 diff. gear

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Well I made the swap on my 92 camaro with the spohn k member with the rack and pinion, but I had a problem with the steering linkage. My rack and pinion brackets were not in the right place so this made the steering rod universals bind up from the steering colluom to the rack. I had to send the rack and pinion back because I would have to relocate the brackets.
Another thing about the Spohn manual rack and pinion set up is that it is not intended for autocrossing or road racing, Its only good for drag racing. The manual rack and pinion from spohn is 3.75 turns of the steering wheel lock to lock. I am currently working on my own set up for power rack and pinion steering for 3 gen camaros because no one else offers it. I should be ready for production in 3 months. But good luck with the upgrades
f body king is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 03:49 AM   #26
Junior Member
 
88LT1Drop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Car: 1988 Camaro Conv.
Engine: 96 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:73's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WIll36 View Post
A spohn crossmember won't work with alston sfcs unless you cut about 3 to 4 inches off the transmission crossmember because of how they design them. I'm not happy with the setup and need to get ahold of Jason since I still have is prototype and now have access to lifts again at work so I could take some measurements for him to fab up a true bolt in one. His style uses tubing and would actually clear the sfcs without any extra modification. The problem was we were trying to colaborate to build the thing over the phone and internet which led to some issues.
u think u can get me pictures of what ur talking about? would i be able to make it work? is there another set of frame connectors similar to the alstons i can get that would work?
88LT1Drop is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 08:53 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 379
Car: 85 Z28, 88IROC, 91Z28 + parts cars
Engine: 305, 355, 408soon
Transmission: stock T56 in 88 and 85 built in 91
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1, 9" w/ 4.56 and spool

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Send a message via AIM to WIll36
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

Ya I can probably put the car on a lift and take some pictures later this week. Far as that style frame connector just bolting and welding in on the car with the Spohn x member I doubt it cause of how far back the spohn mount goes.
WIll36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:17 AM   #28
Junior Member
 
88LT1Drop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Car: 1988 Camaro Conv.
Engine: 96 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:73's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Spohn vs PARacing?

hmmm. ok if you can get me pictures that would be greatly appreciated. i wanted to do both perimiter style and the alston style connectors but if the alstons are gona create a big problem im gona have to figure somthing out so pics would help alot
88LT1Drop is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:17 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
1988, delsphere, flaming, kit, ls1, lt1, manual, pa, paracing, pinion, racing, rack, river, s10, spohn
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details