Did some tuning, interesting find.
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Did some tuning, interesting find.
OK, well, i am going to hit the dyno on saturday (will have numbers next week for everyone!)
currently for those who don't know, my setup looks like this:
STOCK LO3.
5/8" Spacer
Open Element
Hooker 2055 Headers
Catco 3" Cat
Flowmaster 3" Catback
Other mods that **might Help**
LS1 Driveshaft
3.42 gears
Lightweight Flywheel (weights 14lbs)
SO, the car with everything there, but the headers, ran 15.5@90.2 mph with quite a bit of custom tuning, but i really didn't do much tuning on the spark tables, i added 4* across the board and took 2 out in the WOT adder table, and then just messed with the part throttle VE tables. and changed the commanded WOT AFR from 13.1 and 10.0 to a constant 12.8 across the board.
Last night, i was working on getting my timing refined better, i had lots of chips with me, and all the stuff to tune. i was tuning by using a Tazzo (g-tech), and running 1/8th mile runs, looking at mainly MPH. (didn't do quaters, because well, i like my liscense).
So , the results, and interesting results.
All the chips, have the same VE table, which has been corrected for the headers, after many many hours of datalogging, and work. there was no knock on any of these combo's.
Chip #1 -- 8* of advance in the main spark table, -2* in the WOT adder table (basicly 6* advance over stock), WOT AFR set to 12.5 across the board
10.38 @ 67.8 mph
Chip #2 -- 6* of advance in main table, -2* in WOT -- AFR 12.5
10.42 @ 68.3 mph
Chip #3 -- the exact same chip i ran the 15.5 with, but the VE tables from the header correction. basicly 4* everywhere, but only 2* WOT
9.99 @ 72.1 mph
now, those 2 degree's of timing seemed to have made a HUGE diffrence, we are talking almost 4mph, with just 2*. and note that this is not very much timing change at WOT. i am doing all the timing changes via the chip, the physical timing is set at 0* (stock) there have been alot of posts about timing, generaly telling people to bump timing up, as much 8*. what was VERY interesting is the fastest chip there, FELT slowest (maybe my butt dyno needs to be reconfigured) but it goes to show, feeling fast, and being fast are two diffrent things. the times don't lie, although they are not the actual track, for comparison puproses i think it is pretty accurate, all these were done on flat level ground, same operating temps, ect.
i do plan to dyno a couple of diffrent chip combo's on saturday, and maybe, just maybe, RBob, or someone else will give me some more insight as to another little trick to try (i am willing to dyno test things here, but i need input ). i will likely keep just 2* advance at WOT, and add some more timing everywhere else, just for part throttle response. but the point here is to show how adding timing ISN'T always the answer.
Once again, input on more timing things to try!!!!
currently for those who don't know, my setup looks like this:
STOCK LO3.
5/8" Spacer
Open Element
Hooker 2055 Headers
Catco 3" Cat
Flowmaster 3" Catback
Other mods that **might Help**
LS1 Driveshaft
3.42 gears
Lightweight Flywheel (weights 14lbs)
SO, the car with everything there, but the headers, ran 15.5@90.2 mph with quite a bit of custom tuning, but i really didn't do much tuning on the spark tables, i added 4* across the board and took 2 out in the WOT adder table, and then just messed with the part throttle VE tables. and changed the commanded WOT AFR from 13.1 and 10.0 to a constant 12.8 across the board.
Last night, i was working on getting my timing refined better, i had lots of chips with me, and all the stuff to tune. i was tuning by using a Tazzo (g-tech), and running 1/8th mile runs, looking at mainly MPH. (didn't do quaters, because well, i like my liscense).
So , the results, and interesting results.
All the chips, have the same VE table, which has been corrected for the headers, after many many hours of datalogging, and work. there was no knock on any of these combo's.
Chip #1 -- 8* of advance in the main spark table, -2* in the WOT adder table (basicly 6* advance over stock), WOT AFR set to 12.5 across the board
10.38 @ 67.8 mph
Chip #2 -- 6* of advance in main table, -2* in WOT -- AFR 12.5
10.42 @ 68.3 mph
Chip #3 -- the exact same chip i ran the 15.5 with, but the VE tables from the header correction. basicly 4* everywhere, but only 2* WOT
9.99 @ 72.1 mph
now, those 2 degree's of timing seemed to have made a HUGE diffrence, we are talking almost 4mph, with just 2*. and note that this is not very much timing change at WOT. i am doing all the timing changes via the chip, the physical timing is set at 0* (stock) there have been alot of posts about timing, generaly telling people to bump timing up, as much 8*. what was VERY interesting is the fastest chip there, FELT slowest (maybe my butt dyno needs to be reconfigured) but it goes to show, feeling fast, and being fast are two diffrent things. the times don't lie, although they are not the actual track, for comparison puproses i think it is pretty accurate, all these were done on flat level ground, same operating temps, ect.
i do plan to dyno a couple of diffrent chip combo's on saturday, and maybe, just maybe, RBob, or someone else will give me some more insight as to another little trick to try (i am willing to dyno test things here, but i need input ). i will likely keep just 2* advance at WOT, and add some more timing everywhere else, just for part throttle response. but the point here is to show how adding timing ISN'T always the answer.
Once again, input on more timing things to try!!!!
Last edited by Dewey316; 01-22-2004 at 10:21 AM.
#2
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,249
Likes: 0
Received 393 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
I want the numbers now! Didn't they give you the numbers a soon as you completed your pull? Deffinatelty interesting what you did there. I bet your 15.5 turns into a 15.0 after your headers and a little prom tweak here and there. I can't wait to start messing around with various proms for my ride since the LT1 cam went it. Damn this cold.
#3
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
i don't have number, i run on saturday. as in 2 more days i was trying to get some tweaking done so i have some things to compare on the dyno, i thought i would share that.
#4
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,249
Likes: 0
Received 393 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Dewey316
i don't have number, i run on saturday. as in 2 more days i was trying to get some tweaking done so i have some things to compare on the dyno, i thought i would share that.
i don't have number, i run on saturday. as in 2 more days i was trying to get some tweaking done so i have some things to compare on the dyno, i thought i would share that.
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
yeah, i am figuring between 180-200 at the wheels. all of the HP calcs for my MPH at the track before headers say 210wheels/245flywheel, but i know that is not correct.
#6
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,249
Likes: 0
Received 393 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Dewey316
yeah, i am figuring between 180-200 at the wheels. all of the HP calcs for my MPH at the track before headers say 210wheels/245flywheel, but i know that is not correct.
yeah, i am figuring between 180-200 at the wheels. all of the HP calcs for my MPH at the track before headers say 210wheels/245flywheel, but i know that is not correct.
#7
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
shifty, i should have quite a few good comparison numbers, my good friend has a 91 RS, bone stock LO3, we are going to run that with a stock chip, and a chip i made for him, along with the chip that i ran 15.5 on. how many i can run on my car we will see, since this is the Crew's annual dyno day, we normaly only get 3 pulls, since i cordinate it i am going to try to swing some extra time for myself, to run several chips. and make a custom one while there, to use the WBO2 info i get. i'll be sure to run a stock chip on my car though, just to compare.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: west michigan
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: lo3
Transmission: 700R4 w/ B&M shift improver
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt posi
I cant wait to see what you come back with. I was really thinking about getting into tuning, but because of $ (ive just got way too many things to buy right now) i decided against getting the equipment. I'll be doing the 2055's as soon as they arrive in the mail, and besides your 3.42, we'll have about the same setup (right down to the metallic blue paint!).
Weren't you planning on doing a single plane? or was that someone else... I ask because this was going to be part of my setup, and would obviousally require tuning, i was going to get TBIchips.com to do it for me b/c of $, but maybe you can change my mind.
-chuck
Weren't you planning on doing a single plane? or was that someone else... I ask because this was going to be part of my setup, and would obviousally require tuning, i was going to get TBIchips.com to do it for me b/c of $, but maybe you can change my mind.
-chuck
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fife, Scotland.
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: LO3 5.0 TBI
Transmission: TH700R4
Dewey316 - Your post are always excellent. some Qs
I run 4.5 degs as the initial advance, but 0 actually on the distib.
above 2000 rpm, high map (70-100), i run 20-22degs in the main table.
7 degrees in the PE mode spark correction.
i still have the original 8 degree per 1000 slope adder.
I g-teched 87.5 MPH with just an open element.
off the line i hold 1400 and lite it up, just keep it planted and ride out the axle hop.
the 1-2 shift at <5000rpm is good, but the 2-3 gives me some knock counts and drops back the timing, i can feel it go flat, so some work needed in that area.
I would appreciate it if you could send me your bin for comparison.
I run 4.5 degs as the initial advance, but 0 actually on the distib.
above 2000 rpm, high map (70-100), i run 20-22degs in the main table.
7 degrees in the PE mode spark correction.
i still have the original 8 degree per 1000 slope adder.
I g-teched 87.5 MPH with just an open element.
off the line i hold 1400 and lite it up, just keep it planted and ride out the axle hop.
the 1-2 shift at <5000rpm is good, but the 2-3 gives me some knock counts and drops back the timing, i can feel it go flat, so some work needed in that area.
I would appreciate it if you could send me your bin for comparison.
#10
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
i'll try to get you that bin, it is on my poor little laptop, and i have no internet right now at home. i'll try to find a floppy and bring it to work with me.
BTW, had some serious problems on they dyno, so no number i think i need 1 new injector
although if anyone is interested i have a dyno graph of an L03 with a 15.7:1 AFR and lots of knock
man this sucks, car runs great 3 days before the dyno, then goes to crap.
BTW, had some serious problems on they dyno, so no number i think i need 1 new injector
although if anyone is interested i have a dyno graph of an L03 with a 15.7:1 AFR and lots of knock
man this sucks, car runs great 3 days before the dyno, then goes to crap.
#11
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,249
Likes: 0
Received 393 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Dewey316
i'll try to get you that bin, it is on my poor little laptop, and i have no internet right now at home. i'll try to find a floppy and bring it to work with me.
BTW, had some serious problems on they dyno, so no number i think i need 1 new injector
although if anyone is interested i have a dyno graph of an L03 with a 15.7:1 AFR and lots of knock
man this sucks, car runs great 3 days before the dyno, then goes to crap.
i'll try to get you that bin, it is on my poor little laptop, and i have no internet right now at home. i'll try to find a floppy and bring it to work with me.
BTW, had some serious problems on they dyno, so no number i think i need 1 new injector
although if anyone is interested i have a dyno graph of an L03 with a 15.7:1 AFR and lots of knock
man this sucks, car runs great 3 days before the dyno, then goes to crap.
#12
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
yeah, its going to be hell to track down it has a hesitation at part throttle (probably due to the lean condition) althouth my BLMs are at 128, on they dyno the wideband said 15.7 my o2 voltage on the logs was .950 or so
also, when the car hesitates, the tachometer will jump around by 1k rpm or so, not sure what in the heck would be causing that. i will likely be trying a new iginition modual, a new o2, and likely pulling all my plugs and wires. ohhh well, i will eventualy get it running right.
also, when the car hesitates, the tachometer will jump around by 1k rpm or so, not sure what in the heck would be causing that. i will likely be trying a new iginition modual, a new o2, and likely pulling all my plugs and wires. ohhh well, i will eventualy get it running right.
#13
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,249
Likes: 0
Received 393 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Dewey316
yeah, its going to be hell to track down it has a hesitation at part throttle (probably due to the lean condition) althouth my BLMs are at 128, on they dyno the wideband said 15.7 my o2 voltage on the logs was .950 or so
also, when the car hesitates, the tachometer will jump around by 1k rpm or so, not sure what in the heck would be causing that. i will likely be trying a new iginition modual, a new o2, and likely pulling all my plugs and wires. ohhh well, i will eventualy get it running right.
yeah, its going to be hell to track down it has a hesitation at part throttle (probably due to the lean condition) althouth my BLMs are at 128, on they dyno the wideband said 15.7 my o2 voltage on the logs was .950 or so
also, when the car hesitates, the tachometer will jump around by 1k rpm or so, not sure what in the heck would be causing that. i will likely be trying a new iginition modual, a new o2, and likely pulling all my plugs and wires. ohhh well, i will eventualy get it running right.
#14
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,406
Likes: 0
Received 217 Likes
on
203 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by Dewey316
yeah, its going to be hell to track down it has a hesitation at part throttle (probably due to the lean condition) althouth my BLMs are at 128, on they dyno the wideband said 15.7 my o2 voltage on the logs was .950 or so
also, when the car hesitates, the tachometer will jump around by 1k rpm or so, not sure what in the heck would be causing that. i will likely be trying a new iginition modual, a new o2, and likely pulling all my plugs and wires. ohhh well, i will eventualy get it running right.
yeah, its going to be hell to track down it has a hesitation at part throttle (probably due to the lean condition) althouth my BLMs are at 128, on they dyno the wideband said 15.7 my o2 voltage on the logs was .950 or so
also, when the car hesitates, the tachometer will jump around by 1k rpm or so, not sure what in the heck would be causing that. i will likely be trying a new iginition modual, a new o2, and likely pulling all my plugs and wires. ohhh well, i will eventualy get it running right.
The tach jump & hesitation together point to the igntion system. Could be the pickup coil, ignition module, cap/rotor, coil or even the wires.
Bummer that it went out while doing the dyno.
RBob.
#15
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
yeah, but seeing first hand hte WB vs NB outputs opened my eyes to just how far off they can be. i figured iginition also, but the spray pattern on 1 injector didn't look great, so that might be a factor for the lean condition. since the coil i put on there is fairly new (under 500 miles on it) i am going to put the old stocker back on. after that i have a spare ingition modual, so i'll put that in also. i'll get it figured out, i know that the power is there when it runs right, i'm just pissed it took a dive right before i got up on the rollers.
#16
Supreme Member
As stupid as it sounds, make sure all your plug wires are connected. I spent 2 days chasing down the same problem you're saying you have and it turned out that my #6 wire barely worked its way off the plug somehow. I was pissed but relieved at the same time.
I cant wait to get my car attached to a wb o2.
I cant wait to get my car attached to a wb o2.
#17
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
i checked them, and if i was not firing 1 cyl, i should have had a rich WB reading, not the 15.7:1 reading i got.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post