Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2005, 04:12 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 21
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: Auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Need info on testing a MAF sensor

I'm having a problem finding information on testing a MAF sensor on a 1989 IROC-Z. Due to the cost of them I would like to test it before purchasing a new one. Would sure appreciate some info on the matter! The car I'm working on has no error codes stored in the ECM but won't start unless I prime it with gas then it runs terrible but it will run. I know better then to dump gas accross the MAF sensor so I know I have'nt ruined it yet this way. But the car has been worked on by other people and who knows what they have done. I bought this car from my little brother and it quit running around 3 years ago. He spent over $1200.00 having it worked on by other people (PROFESIONAL MECHANICS) and nobody could get it to run. They all said it needed a new wiring harness or it was shorted out in several locations and they would have alot of time and money invested ect... Well I've been working on cars for over 25 years and enjoy doing it so I bought it and decided I'm going to fix it myself. Well I took it home and after about 2 hours of trying to get it to run or do anything but give me erratic codes I decided to get back to the basics since the PROS couldn't seem to get it fixed with all the high tech stuff they had. Well long story short I checked the timing and they had it in 180 degrees off. As soon as I installed it properly all the erratic stuff corrected itself "who would figure". Well now after I put all the car back together after the last so called mechanic worked on it (it sat at his shop for over 3 months after which we had to go get it and haul it home all tore apart, wiring out of the harnesses, computer hanging by the wires ect... ) P.S he only charged $450.00 for his services!!! I think you all get the point. Anyway I have the car where it will start but it has to be helped to do so by priming it with gas. I have good fuel to it 43 LBS in the fuel rails, my noid lights flash properly when running. I've checked all the pinouts on the ECM for voltage and everything tests out. I,ve checked the TPS voltage is fine, Ect... Basically I've tested about everything and all tests fine but I can't find the info on how to test the MAF sensor with my volt tester, and I'm not the type of person to just throw parts at this car. Heck!!! thats what everyone else has been doing and it didn't work for my Brother. This car only has 60,200 miles on it and ran great before it quit 3 years ago. He was going down the Hiway and it just shut off. I believe that the ignition module is what actually was what went out that day. I had the old one that the original mechanic took out tested and it was bad. But I'm affraid that after the mechanic put the distributor back in 180 off he started probing and guessing and probully ruined some of the sensors. I've seen a MAF sensor go out before by people squirting fluid accross them and I'm thinking the PRO Mechanic did this. I can see what looks like squirt marks inside the intake. I would sure take any help I can get to figure this one out. When I prime it with fuel it will start right up, run good excellerate properly for about 7 or 8 seconds till the extra fuel in the runners is used up, Then it will just idle roughly. If I open the throttle it will start to rev up then run out of fuel and die and it will have to be primmed again to get it to start back up. If I don't touch the throttle it will stay running rough but not die. I've let it run for over 20 minutes and During this time the injectors are pulsing properly, the fuel rail is holding around 40 lbs of fuel pressure, no error codes are being created????? Please Help!!!!
cabsales1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2005, 03:51 AM   #2
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,657
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 2.77's

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to dimented24x7
Can you datalog? That would be the easiest way. You could then see the maf voltage.

Heres something that might help. This is the calibration table from the 'vette ARAP prom. Shows the output voltage vs. flow. You should see around 7 or 8 grams/sec at idle with around 40-50 g/s when you blip the throttle. If it can do that then Id look elsewhere for the problem for now. One thing that can help is to gently clean the wires with a light solvent, althogh the stock mafs have screens at both ends, which woudl make getting to the wires hard.

Code:
LC5B3   FCB  23     ; TABLE SCALAR
		   			;
LC5B4   FCB  8      ; 8 + 1 LINE TABLE
           			;
	  	    ; g/Sec	 BIN	    VDC     #/HR
           	    ;----------------------------------
LC5B5   FCB  93     ;  8.4        0    	    0.00        0
LC5B6   FCB  36     ;  3.2       64	    0.18       25
LC5B7   FCB  50     ;  4.5      128	    0.37       35
LC5B8   FCB  69     ;  6.2      192	    0.55       48
LC5B9   FCB  93     ;  8.4      256	    0.73       65
LC5BA   FCB  121    ; 10.9      320	    0.91       84
LC5BB   FCB  155    ; 14.0      384	    1.10      108
LC5BC   FCB  197    ; 17.7      448	    1.28      137
LC5BD   FCB  248    ; 22.3      511	    1.46      172
        ;----------------------------------------------


        ;----------------------------------------------
        ; MASS AIR FLOW TABLE #2
        ;
        ;  ARG = GMS/SEC  + (256/SCALAR)
        ;
        ;----------------------------------------------
LC5BE   FCB  48     ; TABLE SCALAR
					;
LC5BF:  FCB  8      ; 8 + 1 LINE TABLE
        			;
		    ; gms/SeC    BIN      VDC     #/HR
        	    ;----------------------------------
LC5C0   FCB  119    ;  22.3      512     1.46      172
LC5C1   FCB  133    ;  25.0      544     1.55      193
LC5C2   FCB  147    ;  27.6      576     1.65      213
LC5C3   FCB  163    ;  30.6      608     1.74      236
LC5C4   FCB  180    ;  34.1      640     1.83      264
LC5C5   FCB  198    ;  37.1      672     1.92      287
LC5C6   FCB  217    ;  40.7      704     2.01      314
LC5C7   FCB  237    ;  44.5      736     2.10      343
LC5C8   FCB  254    ;  47.7      768     2.19      368
        ;----------------------------------------------


  
        ;----------------------------------------------
        ; MASS AIR FLOW TABLE #3
        ;
        ;  ARG = GMS/SEC  + (256/SCALAR)
        ;----------------------------------------------
LC5C9   FCB  83     ; TABLE SCALAR
					;
LC5CA   FCB 8       ; 8 + 1 LINE TABLE
           			;
		    ;  gms/SeC    BIN      VDC     #/HR
           	    ;----------------------------------
LC5CB   FCB 147     ;  47.7      768     2.19      368
LC5CC   FCB 158     ;  51.2      800     2.29      395
LC5CD   FCB 170     ;  55.1      832     2.38      425
LC5CE   FCB 182     ;  59.0      864     2.47      455
LC5CF   FCB 195     ;  63.2      896     2.56      488
LC5D0   FCB 209     ;  67.8      928     2.65      523
LC5D1   FCB 223     ;  72.3      960     2.74      558
LC5D2   FCB 238     ;  77.2      992     2.83      596
LC5D3   FCB 253     ;  82.0     1024     2.93      633
        ;----------------------------------------------

 
        ;----------------------------------------------
        ; MASS AIR FLOW TABLE #4
        ;
        ;  ARG = GMS/SEC  + (256/SCALAR)
        ;----------------------------------------------
LC5D4   FCB  135    ; TABLE SCALAR
                    ;
LC5D5:  FCB  8      ; 8 + 1 LINE TABLE
        			;
		    ;  gms/sec    BIN      VDC     #/HR
        	    ;----------------------------------
LC5D6   FCB  156    ;  82.3     1024     2.93      635 
LC5D7   FCB  166    ;  87.5     1056     3.02      676
LC5D8   FCB  176    ;  92.8     1088     3.11      716
LC5D9   FCB  187    ;  98.6     1120     3.20      761
LC5DA   FCB  198    ; 104.4     1152     3.29      806
LC5DB   FCB  210    ; 110.7     1184     3.38      855
LC5DC   FCB  222    ; 117.1     1216     3.47      903
LC5DD   FCB  237    ; 125.0     1248     3.57      965
LC5DE   FCB  255    ; 134.5     1280     3.66     1038
        ;----------------------------------------------


        ;----------------------------------------------
        ; MASS AIR FLOW TABLE #5
        ;
        ;  ARG = GMS/SEC  + (256/SCALAR)
        ;----------------------------------------------
LC5DF:  FCB 207     ; TABLE SCALAR
                    ;
LC5E0:  FCB 8       ; 8 + 1 LINE TABLE
        			;
		    ;  gms/sec    BIN      VDC     #/HR
        	    ;----------------------------------
LC5E1   FCB 166     ; 134.2     1280     3.66     1036
LC5E2   FCB 176     ; 142.3     1312     3.75     1098
LC5E3   FCB 186     ; 150.4     1344     3.84     1161
LC5E4   FCB 196     ; 158.5     1376     3.93     1223
LC5E5   FCB 207     ; 167.4     1408     4.02     1292
LC5E6   FCB 219     ; 177.1     1440     4.11     1367
LC5E7   FCB 230     ; 186.0     1472     4.21     1435
LC5E8   FCB 242     ; 195.7     1504     4.30     1510
LC5E9   FCB 255     ; 206.2     1536     4.39     1591
        ;----------------------------------------------


        ;----------------------------------------------
        ; MASS AIR FLOW TABLE #6
        ;
        ;  ARG = GMS/SEC  + (256/SCALAR)
        ;
        ;----------------------------------------------
        FCB  255    ; TABLE SCALAR
                    ;
LC5EB:  FCB  16     ;       16 = 1 LINES IN TABLE
        			;
		    ; gms/SeC    BIN      VDC     #/HR
        	    ;----------------------------------
 LC5EC   FCB  207   ; 206.2     1536     4.39     1591
 LC5ED   FCB  213   ; 212.2     1552     4.43     1637
 LC5EE   FCB  219   ; 218.1     1568     4.48     1684
 LC5EF   FCB  226   ; 225.1     1584     4.53     1737
 LC5F0   FCB  233   ; 232.1     1600     4.57     1791
 LC5F1   FCB  240   ; 239.1     1616     4.62     1845
 LC5F2   FCB  248   ; 247.0     1632     4.66     1906
 LC5F3   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1648     4.71     1960
 LC5F4   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1664     4.75     1960
 LC5F5   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1680     4.80     1960
 LC5F6   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1696     4.85     1960
 LC5F7   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1712     4.89     1960
 LC5F8   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1728     4.94     1960
 LC5F9   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1744     4.98     1960
 LC5FA   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1760     5.03     1960
 LC5FB   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1776     5.07     1960
 LC5FC   FCB  255   ; 254.0     1792     5.12     1960

Last edited by dimented24x7; 09-10-2005 at 03:54 AM.
dimented24x7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2005, 06:26 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 17,679

Classifieds Rating: (0)
If you cannot datalog, you can test the ACTUAL output of the MAF (not what the ECM thinks it is doing) with a voltmeter.

Back-probe the dark green and black wires at the MAF connector, start teh engine, and read the voltage at idle.



Datalogging is all good and great, but it doesn't differnetiate between a failing MAF and failing connection between the MAF and ECM.
__________________
Later,
Vader
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, and not one step simpler."
Vader is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2005, 06:39 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Oakdale, Ca
Posts: 4,311
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Disconnect the electrical connector on the underside of the MAF. Should run fairly well, although a bit rich...if your problem appears to go away, look at the MAF, MAF relays, poor connections, etc. If it runs the same/has the same issue, MAF (and circuitry/components) probably isn't at fault.

Also, MAF cars are a bear to start and run properly with any leaks between it and the TB, like a cracked MAF hose, poor seal, etc.
8Mike9 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2005, 09:57 PM   #5
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,657
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 2.77's

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to dimented24x7
Quote:
Originally posted by Vader
Datalogging is all good and great, but it doesn't differnetiate between a failing MAF and failing connection between the MAF and ECM.
Thats why I was asking if he could datalog. If the computers A/D is seeing the MAFs output, then you definatly know that the system is reading in a signal. Alternativly, you can test the output right at the ECM connectors to make sure its getting a signal.
dimented24x7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2005, 10:48 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 348
Car: 1991 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The only thing I can say is from my own experience. This may or may not do you any good. I had a 350 ZZ1 motor installed with an accel computer. About... a few months after that, I was driving down the road and... the car shut off. Dead as a doornail. I came to find out the accel dfi computer was fried.

The... <insert terribly offensive word of choice here> shop I had the original and repair work done at claimed accel said I jump started the car backwards, fried the computer and wouldn't cover the replacement and made me pay 500 for a new computer. This being back in 1994. Anyway, that last bit won't help anyone, I just wanted to complain, lol.

You might wanna look at the computer, especially if you have any aftermarket computer eq attached to it or some such.
Elthesh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 07:36 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 21
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: Auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
First of all I want to Thank You guys for the info it is well appreciated. I've been working on this for a few days and haven't been getting very far. And as for datalogging dimented24x7 as of the present time I can't but on monday I will be able to. I'm making up a patch cable to solder into the wiring under the dash so I can hook my laptop up to it and watch the computer. I have a 1995 Corvette that I run CAT software on and know how to write spread sheets and input it into my Prom ect.... I haven't gotten it done on this car yet because I thought I would have it running before now and didn't have the info to compare it to anyway. Thanks alot for the charts it gives me what I've been needing. My brother has my laptop borrowed and lives 50 miles from me and I'll get it back from him on monday. He has a 1994 Firebird and we have been both writing bin files and trading them back and forth for a couple of years now. Therefore I'm pretty comfortable with the fact that my ECM is good. It isn't acting bad and I can usually tell real quick or not if one is or not. Until monday I'll hook up the car the way Vader suggested and test it. I sure appreciate the pictures and everything you provided it take time and effort to do this and it is appreciated. I'll let you folks know how it tests out in the next day or so. I'm kinda thinking that the MAF is going to test out fine though, but want to be certain before I continue on to the next step. If I find the MAF to be good I'm going to pull the fuel rail and injectors and check them. I've already done all the voltage tests ect... and I have 13.67 volts at the injectors and 43lbs of fuel pressure and they have a good visual pulse when i hook up my Noid lights on them. I'll wait till after I run the laptop on it though so I can see the pulse in action. A little more accurate than looking at my Noid lights flash. Anyway "Thanks Again" for all the info folks. I've been working on cars for 25 to 30 years and really enjoy doing it as a hobby. I just became a member of thirdgen a couple of days ago and think this is a great site!!!! I never knew it even existed. A friend of mine told me about it and I've spent several hours so far this weekend just browsing around it and have even tried to help a few others out with what I know. It sure is neat to have found this site!!!! I see that there area several divisions around the country you guys ever get together for events and stuff????? Best Regards: cabsales1
cabsales1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 11:42 AM   #8
Moderator
 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 17,679

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yes, for a relatively broad sample of 35,000 or so members worldwide, we're a fairly close-knit group.
__________________
Later,
Vader
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, and not one step simpler."
Vader is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 11:42 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
backprobe, firebird, iroc, maf, runs, sensor, test, testing, voltmeter
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details