Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-05-2007, 11:20 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Saigon_Bob Send a message via MSN to Saigon_Bob Send a message via Yahoo to Saigon_Bob
Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

I've been wondering for a while, should my dizzy's vac advance be on the ported vacuum source or on manifold vacuum??

Its an MSD pro billet and im running 10* advanced at idle should be 36* maxed around 3k i think.


IIRC it's supposed to be on the ported vacuum which has no vacuum at idle nor at WOT but has vacuum at part throttle
__________________
-Alex
"It's a Chevy... If it ain't smokin, you're walkin." -----------
My Cardomain site

Engine:.040 overbore, Hugger Orange Paint Mod(lol), Moroso Deep Sump 7 qt oil pan w/ crank scraper and windage tray, 2 piece timing cover
Tranny:Factory T5 grenade ( pin pulled )
Ignition:MSD Pro-Billet
Air/Fuel:Dual Plane Manifold, Proform Carb, Holley Systemaxx II heads, Cam motion custom grind (224, 234 duration) cam
Headers:Hooker supercomp 1 3/4"
Exhaust:custom 2.5in true dual exhaust, Flowmaster 40s, 3" Tips
Exterior Styling:Stock, cowl hood
Suspension:Eibach Sportline lowering springs
A/V:Pioneer AVIC-N3 DVD/Navi
Misc:hidden starter switch
Saigon_Bob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 11:26 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,941
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

which ever floats your boat...
SpitotRs305 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 11:28 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Saigon_Bob Send a message via MSN to Saigon_Bob Send a message via Yahoo to Saigon_Bob
Re: Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

um well are there any wadvantages to using either way??
Saigon_Bob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 11:46 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,941
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

well i dont think they are really advantages... but with the ported you arent getting any vacuum at idle by design... therefore no vacuum advance... which is okay with manifold you are getting vacuum so you are getting that vac advance at idle.... which can also be ok it will still go away under WOT like ported... there really isnt a better one maybe on paper but try it both ways and use which ever you like best
SpitotRs305 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 11:59 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Saigon_Bob Send a message via MSN to Saigon_Bob Send a message via Yahoo to Saigon_Bob
Re: Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpitotRs305 View Post
well i dont think they are really advantages... but with the ported you arent getting any vacuum at idle by design... therefore no vacuum advance... which is okay with manifold you are getting vacuum so you are getting that vac advance at idle.... which can also be ok it will still go away under WOT like ported... there really isnt a better one maybe on paper but try it both ways and use which ever you like best
well my question mostly roots around whether its more beneficial to have a ton of advance that bleeds off when when im cruising or having little advance the increase when cruising...

isnt there better MPG to be had by having alot of advance while cruising
Saigon_Bob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 02:41 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,325
Car: buick century
Engine: 3.1L buick goodness
Transmission: automatic WWD
Axle/Gears: I don't know

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to rx7speed Send a message via AIM to rx7speed Send a message via MSN to rx7speed
Re: Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

eitherway the advance will be there when cruising. or atleast it should be there. the port is located right above the throttle blad so the moment you crack the throttle it now has vacuum. so it's more of does the car handle the extra vacuum advance at idle or not
rx7speed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 09:04 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
SteelTownMadDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Port Colborne, ON CA
Posts: 324

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

You should have full vacuum at idle, some at part throttle, and none at WOT. That should give you better mileage, and also better throttle response. But if your engine is heavily modified (above 400HP), you won't really see any benefit from the vacuum advance setup.
SteelTownMadDog is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 09:49 AM   #8
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 5,803

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

Try it both ways and see what it likes. Different combos like different things. Just remember that from about 5-10% throttle on up, they both work the same.

Some (big) cams don't pull enough vacuum to bring the vacuum advance "all in" at idle. That leaves the timing to sort of "float around" at idle- and that will definitely cause an unstable idle. That's one situation where I always go with a ported vacuum source. Also, some engines with a lot of cylinder pressure (small cam, high static compression ratio) can have light-throttle detonation problems and problems with "run-on/dieseling" at shut-down if hooked up to a full manifold vacuum source.
Damon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 05:07 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

If you've got the MSD vacuum can you can set the amount of vacuum it takes to pull all the timing in. That might help get around that first issue damon mentioned.

I don't think you have enough duration on your cam to need more timing at idle (ie manifold vacuum advance), so you're probably better off with ported. But give each a shot, it's quite easy to change. Listen for detonation. Hopefully you have one of the vacuum advance limiting tabs so you can choose how much timing the vacuum can gives too.
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:29 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Saigon_Bob Send a message via MSN to Saigon_Bob Send a message via Yahoo to Saigon_Bob
Re: Timing Questions... specifically Vac advance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonix View Post
If you've got the MSD vacuum can you can set the amount of vacuum it takes to pull all the timing in. That might help get around that first issue damon mentioned.

I don't think you have enough duration on your cam to need more timing at idle (ie manifold vacuum advance), so you're probably better off with ported. But give each a shot, it's quite easy to change. Listen for detonation. Hopefully you have one of the vacuum advance limiting tabs so you can choose how much timing the vacuum can gives too.
lol i miss my lunati cam... even though it scrapped within a month...

It was way more aggresive... really lopey but no PBrakes.... doh..

this cam is a torque monster but no lope... not at all..

i'll see which she likes more... runs fine now so prolly run fine the other way too....

i was playing with the idle mixture screws today adn screwed my idle up ( too fast ). Lean best mixture method used, but it was idle too low b4 so i put it up It started raining so i couldnt set the idle down.
Saigon_Bob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:29 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details