Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-11-2008, 08:40 AM   #1
Member
 
ksith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: bremerton
Posts: 196
Car: 87 trans am
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock open diff

Classifieds Rating: (0)
compression ratio?

ok i've run into a snag in my project. im currently out at sea and im lookin forward to getting back to drop my motor in. its all ready to go all i gotta do is slap on the oilpan heads intake and acces. however the problem is i dont have enough money to buy a set of heads at all. i will eventually get a set world sr torquer heads when i get the chance. 76cc chamber with 2.02 1.60 valves but im wondering if my stock lg4 heads would work under the circumstances. the engine is a 60 over 350 and i calculated to c/r to be around 12/1. i know thats really high but would it work until i can afford the new heads?
ksith is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 09:13 AM   #2
Member
 
mcbchild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 404
Car: 1984 Firebird SE
Engine: 388 sbc, Brodix Track 1s
Transmission: turbo 350 w/4500 stall
Axle/Gears: Strange axles, 4.10 gears

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to mcbchild
Re: compression ratio?

It is impossible for your compression to be 12.0:1 with 76cc heads. First of all, you have to get more info about the pistons adn I assume they must be domed pistons and find out the cr for 64 cc heads and for 76 cc heads. And if compression is high anyway, why would you want sr torquer heads. I would do a little more research fist of all and find out what can be done with your stock heads to head with breathing. Don't mean to sound rude, but I would definitely do more research from the person that built the engine or the manufacture of the pistons.
mcbchild is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 09:27 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

Yeah I dont think you're compression ratio is that high, unles you put a stroked crank in it.
bbecker is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 10:22 AM   #4
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,568
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Read what he said again:

"...im wondering if my stock lg4 heads would work under the circumstances. the engine is a 60 over 350 and i calculated to c/r to be around 12/1." {emphasis added}

ksith, what pistons, deck height, and head gasket thickness (volume) did you assume?
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 01:20 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Glenbeulah, WI
Posts: 518
Car: 1988 Firbird
Engine: 355
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.91

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

12:1 is too high for pump gas and iron heads, you would need around 10:1 to run iron heads.
bjankuski is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 06:02 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: compression ratio?

It's HARD to get to 12:1, even with the little LG4 heads. You'd need massive domed pistons to pull that one off.
Lets see the math, as five7 mentioned, we can correct you.
You can port the LG4 heads, and you'll be off to the races. They can be as good as the SR torquer's at least.
Plus you can port out the chambers to help drop your cr, if need be.
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2008, 07:06 AM   #7
Member
 
ksith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: bremerton
Posts: 196
Car: 87 trans am
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock open diff

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

i didnt figure a dome or dish into the piston when i calculated the c/r. i also figured a .040 gasket thickness, and a gasket bore of 4.100. thats a set of felpro gaskets i can get from summit. i assume the builder is using a standard 4 valve relief piston no dome or dish other then what would be there like a stock piston. thanks guys for your help im trying to figure this out and 12:1 did sound high. this is the site i used numbers i plugged in are as follows http://www.torinocobra.com/Randys_tools.htm
4.060 bore, 3.48 stroke, 8 cyl, .040 gasket thickness, 4.1 gasket bore, 58 cc chamber, didnt figure in the rest cause i dont know it being out to sea in a giant ship. i'll email the guy and see if he can get me the info though

Last edited by ksith; 06-15-2008 at 07:28 AM. Reason: added site i used
ksith is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2008, 08:22 AM   #8
Supreme Member
 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,910

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksith View Post
i didnt figure a dome or dish into the piston when i calculated the c/r. i also figured a .040 gasket thickness, and a gasket bore of 4.100. thats a set of felpro gaskets i can get from summit. i assume the builder is using a standard 4 valve relief piston no dome or dish other then what would be there like a stock piston. thanks guys for your help im trying to figure this out and 12:1 did sound high. this is the site i used numbers i plugged in are as follows http://www.torinocobra.com/Randys_tools.htm
4.060 bore, 3.48 stroke, 8 cyl, .040 gasket thickness, 4.1 gasket bore, 58 cc chamber, didnt figure in the rest cause i dont know it being out to sea in a giant ship. i'll email the guy and see if he can get me the info though
The only data left that you need is the piston relief volume ( or dome ) and the piston deck height. Using standard values, piston relief comes in around -5 to -12 cc and deck height at stock value is about .025" below deck.
Using a 5cc relief you'll get 10.6:1 . Using a 12 cc relief will get you 9.8:1.
Given those values it's really going to depend on the cam you choose. A short duration cam will really jack the cylinder pressure with the relatively high static compression ratio (for iron heads maybe too much) however a longer cam will need the higher static ratio to perform.
I currently run a 9.9:1 static compression ratio with a 218* @ .050" cam that's 4* advanced and Vortec heads. That's as far as I care to go. As it is I require 94 octane fuel and have to keep an eye on engine temperature. It'll ping only occasionally so it's dicey sometimes.
skinny z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 05:57 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,823
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

Yes they will work and no the cr will not be 12:1.

If the pistons are .045" down the bore at TDC use a 4.166"x .041" gasket
If the flat top pistons are .025" down the bore at TDC use a 4.166" x .051" "corvette gasket"

Use a high performance application spark plug like a Champion RV8C or Autolite 144.

If you were to fully home port your LG4 (#416 or #081) 58cc heads for improved airflow and fit them with new larger 1.94x 1.60" valves, and drill and pin the rocker studs, you'll find the performance very good. Rivaling and/or exceeding the airflow and power of a S/R type head at less cost.
The process of fitting larger valves in these heads (relieving the combustion chamber wall around the larger valve diameter) makes the chamber volume larger. 61-62cc finished chamber volume is typical when all done.

Last edited by F-BIRD'88; 06-16-2008 at 06:08 AM.
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 04:09 AM   #10
Member
 
ksith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: bremerton
Posts: 196
Car: 87 trans am
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock open diff

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

this is the cam im using CCA-K12-262-4 off summit

Last edited by ksith; 06-17-2008 at 06:35 AM. Reason: wait a sec wrong part number
ksith is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 03:39 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,910

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksith View Post
this is the cam im using CCA-K12-262-4 off summit
Here's the data used to calculate your static and dynamic compression ratio.
Bore. 4.060"
Gasket 4.1" x .040"
Chamber volume 58cc
Stock rod 5.7"
Deck height (assumed average stock). .025" below deck
Piston volume ( 2 valve reliefs) 5 cc
262 Comp cam adv duration 262 intake (intake closing angle 61 abdc)

Staic C.R. 10.69:1
Dynamic C.R. 8.69:1

With the short cam ( and the values supplied or assumed ) you won't be able to run that engine on anything short of racing fuel. A dynamic compression beyond 8.5:1 appears to be the realm of a racing engine and isn't suitable for the 'street'. The term street is subjective. Works for some but not for all.
skinny z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 03:43 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: compression ratio?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinny z View Post
Deck height (assumed average stock). .025" below deck

dicey. Did he zero deck the block? If not, add another .020" onto that, since they are aftermarket pistons, and most likely have a lowered compression height. Also, a 4.100" gasket is a "305 gasket", most 350 gaskets are 4.150 or 4.166".
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 03:56 PM   #13
Supreme Member
 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,910

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonix View Post
dicey. Did he zero deck the block? If not, add another .020" onto that, since they are aftermarket pistons, and most likely have a lowered compression height. Also, a 4.100" gasket is a "305 gasket", most 350 gaskets are 4.150 or 4.166".

The deck height should be measured to be sure. I'm using Speed Pro H345NCP 4 relief piston to calculate deck height based on my own block which hasn't been decked. That works out .025".
The 4.100" gasket was supplied by ksith.
skinny z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 02:51 AM   #14
Member
 
ksith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: bremerton
Posts: 196
Car: 87 trans am
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock open diff

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

ok so if i was to open up the combustion chamber that would help things out then im guessing right? if thats the case i'll just have the guy open up my heads and install larger valves and open the c/c. might as well port and polish them too if the price is right.
ksith is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 08:05 PM   #15
Supreme Member
 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,910

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonix View Post
Also, a 4.100" gasket is a "305 gasket", most 350 gaskets are 4.150 or 4.166".
Checked my books. Found most 350 gaskets are 4.100". Anything beyond that and you run into sealing problems with the water jacket holes adjacent to the cylinder bore. (source: Kevin McClelland @ Chevy High Performance)
----------
----------
----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksith View Post
ok so if i was to open up the combustion chamber that would help things out then im guessing right? if thats the case i'll just have the guy open up my heads and install larger valves and open the c/c. might as well port and polish them too if the price is right.


If you end up with a chamber volume of around 64 cc then you should be able to run many different combinations. There are lots of 350's with 64cc heads.

Last edited by skinny z; 06-20-2008 at 08:10 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
skinny z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 02:12 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: compression ratio?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinny z View Post
Checked my books. Found most 350 gaskets are 4.100". Anything beyond that and you run into sealing problems with the water jacket holes adjacent to the cylinder bore. (source: Kevin McClelland @ Chevy High Performance)
That's a new one on me. Any gasket set/kit i've bought came with a 4.150" or 4.166" gasket. Unless it's a gasket from a parts store, specifically meant for a 305. oh well, it's small potatoes.
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 10:36 PM   #17
Supreme Member
 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,910

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: compression ratio?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonix View Post
That's a new one on me. Any gasket set/kit i've bought came with a 4.150" or 4.166" gasket. Unless it's a gasket from a parts store, specifically meant for a 305. oh well, it's small potatoes.
Hey Sonix,
I dougled checked my source. Looks like aftermarket gaskets like FelPro ARE 4.166". It's factory gaskets that are 4.100". The same relationship to the water jacket applies however it does make a difference in the c.r. calculation.
I'll have to check on my own Corteco gasket (.028") and double check my own c.r.
Thanks for the heads up.
skinny z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 02:38 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: compression ratio?

ah, yes! Steel shim gaskets would be 4.100", i'll buy that. But I think most of us are using composition style fel-pro type gaskets. Not many people trust the steel shims to seal well, unless block and heads are decked ultra flat.
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 02:38 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
101, 62cc, 64, cc, chambers, compression, h345ncp, head, make, piston, pistons, pro, ratio, sbc, speed, stock
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details