Quick question, take a look.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cary, North Carolina
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Quick question, take a look.
The only thing that a serpentine system entails that's different is the belts and pulleys. If the accessories from a BBC will connect in such a manner as to allow all the installed serpentine pulleys from such to be all aligned with one another, then it would work.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, depends on the model year of the BBC, whether the heads have accessory holes, and whether the accessories have the pulleys available to make a serpentine system.
And then, regardless of all that, with a fat wallet (the key word being 'fat'), March makes any accessory/pulley/belt system you can imagine for any motor.
If it were me, I'd start by looking at part numbers for accessories for BBC vs. SBC, as I believe most are the same - then I'd look into mounting bracket options that may fit both (like the fact that many aftermarket alternator mounts attach to the water pump and intake, and I'd think that would be exchangable from BBC to SBC.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, depends on the model year of the BBC, whether the heads have accessory holes, and whether the accessories have the pulleys available to make a serpentine system.
And then, regardless of all that, with a fat wallet (the key word being 'fat'), March makes any accessory/pulley/belt system you can imagine for any motor.
If it were me, I'd start by looking at part numbers for accessories for BBC vs. SBC, as I believe most are the same - then I'd look into mounting bracket options that may fit both (like the fact that many aftermarket alternator mounts attach to the water pump and intake, and I'd think that would be exchangable from BBC to SBC.
#4
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: Quick question, take a look.
Cool, thanks for the information. I figured the year of the block it's self would come into play. I'm thinking about converting to a big block, if it's worth it and I can use my alternator, and a couple of the pulleys possibly.
That's basically all I'd be able to use anyway, since my Camaro doesn't have air conditioning.
That's basically all I'd be able to use anyway, since my Camaro doesn't have air conditioning.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Northern CA.
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Re: Quick question, take a look.
11 grand is cheap for a 632. Friend of mine had one built for just over 20k and made 1020 hp on 91 octane. Didn't even put it in his car, put it in his boat instead lol
Trending Topics
#9
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: Quick question, take a look.
I found a place that sells complete 800 horsepower 632 big blocks for that price, but think of the other things you need, Mass-Flo EFI's kit is $3,000, a serpentine system, headers, all that neat stuff.
So in the end it would come close to 20 grand. That's why I came back to my senses and realized a 383 is the right setup for me, plus I'll have cash later on to stick on some turbos.
So in the end it would come close to 20 grand. That's why I came back to my senses and realized a 383 is the right setup for me, plus I'll have cash later on to stick on some turbos.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cary, North Carolina
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Quick question, take a look.
Not 3rd gen related, but....
Biggest bang for the buck I've seen hp/car/cash wise is an early Mazda Miata - there's a kit that allows the drivetrain from a ***stang (it's not legal to say/spell it completely on TGO) - $3k for the kit, $5k for a crate ***stang motor/tranny/rear, and if you pick up an older Miata for $1500 - you've got a $12k car that blows a ZO6 off the road, as well as most Porche, Ferrari, and Lambo's. How much fun would it be to smack a ZO6 off the line in a Miata? That's my little $12k dream (although over the last 5 years I've spent more than that on my 'Maro), so maybe not so far out of reach)
Biggest bang for the buck I've seen hp/car/cash wise is an early Mazda Miata - there's a kit that allows the drivetrain from a ***stang (it's not legal to say/spell it completely on TGO) - $3k for the kit, $5k for a crate ***stang motor/tranny/rear, and if you pick up an older Miata for $1500 - you've got a $12k car that blows a ZO6 off the road, as well as most Porche, Ferrari, and Lambo's. How much fun would it be to smack a ZO6 off the line in a Miata? That's my little $12k dream (although over the last 5 years I've spent more than that on my 'Maro), so maybe not so far out of reach)
#11
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: Quick question, take a look.
Why would you use a Ford drivetrain though? I'm not the typical Ford hater, I love the body styles, but their engines are horrible. A little 281 Ford that can't rev higher than a 427 Chevy is bad. Very bad.
That's an awesome idea for a track car, but if you lighten up a Camaro, it'd be 10 times better. Camaros have less of a drag coefficient, the problem is just overcoming the weight of a full size sports car.
That's an awesome idea for a track car, but if you lighten up a Camaro, it'd be 10 times better. Camaros have less of a drag coefficient, the problem is just overcoming the weight of a full size sports car.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cary, North Carolina
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Quick question, take a look.
But, I don't want to get into a Ford vs. Chevy debate here, they all have their pluses and minuses.
I'm assuming though that the Ford was used due to the fact that Ford and Mazda already have a past relationship (and may still) - the Mazda Navajo and Ford Explorer for example.
OK - I guess I hijacked this thread enough sorry
#13
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: Quick question, take a look.
No, I'm not kidding you.
Camaros have almost always been faster, most of the time with less power, due to them always being more aerodynamic. They're bold straight lined cars, but just slip through the air with ease. Now don't get me wrong, I didn't say quicker, I said faster.
"Top speed of the new Mustang GT has also risen from the mid 130s to just under 150 mph."
https://www.thirdgen.org/rt_october1...s_camaro_irocz
Top speed of the GT - 148 mph. Top speed of the Camaro - 149 mph.
Enough said.
Camaros have almost always been faster, most of the time with less power, due to them always being more aerodynamic. They're bold straight lined cars, but just slip through the air with ease. Now don't get me wrong, I didn't say quicker, I said faster.
"Top speed of the new Mustang GT has also risen from the mid 130s to just under 150 mph."
https://www.thirdgen.org/rt_october1...s_camaro_irocz
Top speed of the GT - 148 mph. Top speed of the Camaro - 149 mph.
Enough said.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1997, 3rd, 700r4, 86, big, block, camaro, car, carbureted, coefficient, drag, gen, lighten, put, transmission