Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-21-2005, 04:23 AM   #101
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Bedford Ma
Posts: 273
Car: 1988 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to XJOSHX
Quote:
Originally posted by rx7speed
you guys have it easy. nobody wants to touch my car.
I tried getting a header put on. most people wouldn't touch it because it was a rotary. they all told me sorry I don't know anything about those motors. one guy even told me those cars never run right and I don't want to put a header on there when it will prolly just run even worse and die. some refused to do it cause they thought the header was too large (2" primaries).
one time I was having problems with the clutch same thing people didn't want to touch it cause it was a rotary motor. now tell me what the hell does a clutch have to do with the car being a rotary? I was refused a muffler from a shop cause it was a rotary. they don't know anything about rotaries don't want to work on them.


you guys suck


but yeah I Say every car has it's own quirks.
Them cars are actually not that bad to work on at all. Biggest pain in the *** with them cars (and yes it is a big pain in the ***) are all the vaccume lines. There are billions of them!!!
XJOSHX is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 04:43 AM   #102
Senior Member
 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,325
Car: buick century
Engine: 3.1L buick goodness
Transmission: automatic WWD
Axle/Gears: I don't know

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to rx7speed Send a message via AIM to rx7speed Send a message via MSN to rx7speed
Quote:
Originally posted by XJOSHX
Them cars are actually not that bad to work on at all. Biggest pain in the *** with them cars (and yes it is a big pain in the ***) are all the vaccume lines. There are billions of them!!!
actually not that many unless you are thinking thirdgens. that is another story

but yeha I still know what you mean big pain. some of them are in weid akward spots that just don't make sense
rx7speed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 10:01 PM   #103
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: hickcamaro, IL
Posts: 5
Car: 1991 mustang gt
Engine: 302
Transmission: C4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Uh, I'm big into mustangs. But I'm sorry buddy, if that car had a 383 in it.. you wouldn't have even kept up with him. Same with the LT1, they aren't slow cars. You probably wouldn't even hang with one with just 3.73's and full exhaust. Oh and one more thing, that post sounded more like an article out of a porno magazine, ever considered getting a job writing for one? that was pretty damn good.. I got wood just reading that, made me wonder what kind of bull**** the next paragraph was going to have in it. Anyhow, nice runs! go out and kill some ZO6's for us, and some 03-04 cobras while you are at it! you give people that drive mustangs a bad name.
bionic_chronik is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 10:03 PM   #104
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: hickcamaro, IL
Posts: 5
Car: 1991 mustang gt
Engine: 302
Transmission: C4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by rx7speed
I've seen cars with big blocks stripped out not street legal full race cars. guess what they run. I've seen them go into the 9's yeah but have seen quite a few that are in the 12's,13's, hell even seen a few running low 14's


agai nthese cars are stripped interior, big block open headers, steep gears, slicks full out track car. to run a 13 seems sad. even more so for those that still have to break out of the 14's
There are rock stock mustangs with single turbo setups running into the 10's, they would break into the 9's if the stock block wouldn't split.
bionic_chronik is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 10:05 PM   #105
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: hickcamaro, IL
Posts: 5
Car: 1991 mustang gt
Engine: 302
Transmission: C4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by TBI92Camaro
You can make stock heads/cam 5.0's rip 12's easily with bolt ons, no suspension mods...check out 25th's car. I believe the record for stock heads/cam is 11.40's or 11.80's....been awhile since I looked but its damn impressive on an 80's smogger motor.
Any other mods allowed in that "record holder" if not, there are cars out there with stock intakes, stock cam, and stock heads running 10's with a turbo setup. $4k for a turbo kit is worth every penny, and I cannot stress that anymore.
bionic_chronik is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 04:56 AM   #106
Senior Member
 
TBI92Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 657
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to TBI92Camaro Send a message via Yahoo to TBI92Camaro
Quote:
Originally posted by bionic_chronik
Uh, I'm big into mustangs. But I'm sorry buddy, if that car had a 383 in it.. you wouldn't have even kept up with him. Same with the LT1, they aren't slow cars. You probably wouldn't even hang with one with just 3.73's and full exhaust. Oh and one more thing, that post sounded more like an article out of a porno magazine, ever considered getting a job writing for one? that was pretty damn good.. I got wood just reading that, made me wonder what kind of bull**** the next paragraph was going to have in it. Anyhow, nice runs! go out and kill some ZO6's for us, and some 03-04 cobras while you are at it! you give people that drive mustangs a bad name.
Well considering my 1/8th times were with a slipping cluch, blown shocks and fresh 3.73's, theres no telling what it would have run had I taken it to the track....most likely high 8's (1/8th)

And Ive beaten a couple LS1's at the local track, witnesses to prove it. They cant launch worth **** and Id get a BIG holeshot, talking 6 car lengths...granted they'd reel me in fast and were on my tail when we crossed the line but I still beat them nonetheless.

You need to consider the fact that over 75% of a race is in the driver. You dont know how many times Ive seen Z06 Vettes (6 speeds) run high 13's in the 1/4 or something in the 13's period. I actually watched a bone stock 10th annivesary Cobra run a 9.18 as his BEST at the local 1/8th track. So dont get all smartass with me pal, because I know my **** and I cant help it you are some pompous jackass who is so full of himself he cant actually see past his ego to notcie that no matter what a car can do with a good driver, it DOESNT HAPPEN EVERYTIME!!! It takes a good/great driver to pilot a car to its maximum potential, especially a 03/04 Cobra with that ****ty IRS suspension.
TBI92Camaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 06:06 AM   #107
stu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to stu
Sniff sniff, that was touching. It's just the internet. There are better things to get worked up over.
stu is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 11:07 AM   #108
Senior Member
 
TBI92Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 657
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to TBI92Camaro Send a message via Yahoo to TBI92Camaro
Quote:
Originally posted by stu
Sniff sniff, that was touching. It's just the internet. There are better things to get worked up over.
Im not getting worked up Stu, just defending my point of view is all....I could care less if this guy believes my story or not...hell its been so long its unbelieveable...this is when the Stang actualy ran
TBI92Camaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 02:52 PM   #109
Senior Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,833
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by bionic_chronik
Any other mods allowed in that "record holder" if not, there are cars out there with stock intakes, stock cam, and stock heads running 10's with a turbo setup. $4k for a turbo kit is worth every penny, and I cannot stress that anymore.
Those cars have all the bolt ons, and all the suspension, but there have been high 11s for stock untouched heads/intake and stock cammed cars. I know Justin Burcham did it, and Bob Cosby ran mid 12s on a stock motor driven to and from the track, 100% daily driven car! I know a lot of guys doing it as well...

Friend of mine just went 12.60 @ 108 on a stock motor with an Explorer intake, bolt ons (MAF, TB, pulleys) and 4.10s! But this isnt Mustang preaching hour...

Also the cars running 10s with turboes also have fuel systems, supporting bolt ons, probably drivetrain mods, and tires. Its not just $4000 and your running 10s!
__________________
1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s.
Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69
17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69
17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93
18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
25thmustang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 03:45 PM   #110
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: hickcamaro, IL
Posts: 5
Car: 1991 mustang gt
Engine: 302
Transmission: C4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 25thmustang
Those cars have all the bolt ons, and all the suspension, but there have been high 11s for stock untouched heads/intake and stock cammed cars. I know Justin Burcham did it, and Bob Cosby ran mid 12s on a stock motor driven to and from the track, 100% daily driven car! I know a lot of guys doing it as well...

Friend of mine just went 12.60 @ 108 on a stock motor with an Explorer intake, bolt ons (MAF, TB, pulleys) and 4.10s! But this isnt Mustang preaching hour...

Also the cars running 10s with turboes also have fuel systems, supporting bolt ons, probably drivetrain mods, and tires. Its not just $4000 and your running 10s!
Actually yes it is. They have no suspension mods done whatsoever. Of course they're running DR's, and a $4k turbo kit usually includes the fuel pump and most likely the injectors and MAF calibrated for the injectors. Go to turbomustangs.com, many people are packing 450-500 to the wheels with stock motors, from the TB to the oilpan. Also, as you said earlier.. it's mainly about how good of a driver you are. If you can powershift like a mofo, then yeah.. you can pull on some cars completely out of your league. But when you get in 3rd - 4th gear with 3.73's-4.10's you'll be running out of gear and the cars such as an LS1 or LT1 will be right behind you if not passing you. Don't get me wrong though, I'm a mustang guy.. I dislike GM's. With my old bone stock 86 GT with a 5spd, looking back at when I had it compared to my 91 GT automatic car.. I'm almost certain I could have waxed quite a few cars that I couldn't imagine beating. Mainly because I shift pretty good(not saying, omg I'm the leetest shifter in the world or anything) but I can slam some gears. Anyhow, I'm gonna get off here.. gotta goto work in a few. Later.
bionic_chronik is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 04:05 PM   #111
Senior Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,833
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Want to send me a link to the cars that are bone stock short of a turbo kit, gears and DRs? Im not saying it cant happen, things that "cant" happen and do interest me! If you want PM me the link...

As far as taking cars and beating others by driving, I do know all about the driving aspect. I have personally driven 4 cars to their best track passes in less than great conditions (I have yet to have someone drive even their own car better than me ), so what your telling me is something everyone knows! Banging gears is easy with the right technique and practice and can take a quick car and make it a fast car!

Im a fan of doing a lot with a little, and the only way to do that is wring every ounce out of a combo. I personally see this with a lot of Mustang guys I know, and it makes me have to defend them, knowing what they can do!
__________________
1989 Mustang LX 5.0: Stock Heads (valves), cam, Cobra intake. 3.73s.
Slicks ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2 60':1.69
17" ET Streets ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.3 60': 1.69
17" DRs ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5 60': 1.93
18" Radials ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2 60': 1.91
25thmustang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2005, 05:22 AM   #112
Senior Member
 
TBI92Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 657
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to TBI92Camaro Send a message via Yahoo to TBI92Camaro
Im not saying Im the best driver ever. But back when my car was Bone Stock with 228k miles, ****ty 235/40 series Bridestone Eagers that were bald and dry rotted and I had a ghetto'd up stock exhaust that leaked everywhere and I still ran consistant 9.3's on a bone stock car. May not be impressive to you but it was to me from such a tired car. The previous owners best was 9.58 with tons of 9.7's and I let a few people drive it and the best they were getting was 9.45 or worse. When the lcutch started oging I could still pull 9.4's. Ive never said my **** was fast and the clutch was going out when I got the gears and DR's put on but once I installed my new clutch and full exhaust, not only did it osund much better, it pulled ALOT harder than it had with the slipping clutch. Thats why Im sure it could have ran some high 8's with time....but now Ill never know since Ive got a totally new combo in the car and I was really wanting to see how far I could go with a stock block/cam/heads with the supporting suspension and full bolt on's but oh well, I just want it running again.

In any case, like I said, the driver makes the differance. MY friend James went to the track Wednesday and has a video of a LS1 Camaro running a 9.2 in the 1/8.

My buddy only runs 9.3's-9.0's in his 96 Cobra and its because of 2 things....he isnt a good driver and his tires suck. When we lined up before and I was on street tires bone stock, I could pull out of the hole automatically and when we crossed the traps we were side by side or him edging out.....in the 1/4 he would have walked past me easily. Ive told him when he wants a mid 13 pass out of that thing come to me or James and we'd get him one but I think once he gets DR's mid 13's wont be hard for him at all with an exhaust-only Cobra.
TBI92Camaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2005, 05:22 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Tags
44, 4l60e, 700r4, aod, camel, compare, gearing, humps, orting, trans, transmissions
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details