Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

2000 Impala 3.4 L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2006, 06:21 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Epro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
2000 Impala 3.4 L

I'm currently driving one, and being as young as I am, I find it to be a very quick car! Of course I haven't driven many cars in my lifetime... But compared to other Third-gens of other years, what models/years is this car faster than?
Old 03-12-2006, 06:36 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
maybe the 305 TBI cars... aka the L03 and LG4 motors i believe.

my dad has an 03 impala with the 3.8...200 hp and its a dog to me down low. gearing is way too tall but its faster than late 70's vettes i found out! LOL it gets up kinda well above 60mph tho.

the 3.4 i dont know much about but if its anywhere less than 200hp, then the car will be kinda slow. i would think the 305 TBI cars have about the same power to weight.
Old 03-12-2006, 06:47 PM
  #3  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Epro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
maybe the 305 TBI cars... aka the L03 and LG4 motors i believe.

my dad has an 03 impala with the 3.8...200 hp and its a dog to me down low. gearing is way too tall but its faster than late 70's vettes i found out! LOL it gets up kinda well above 60mph tho.

the 3.4 i dont know much about but if its anywhere less than 200hp, then the car will be kinda slow. i would think the 305 TBI cars have about the same power to weight.
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articl...0-02impala.htm

It's 180...

Engine choices include a base 180-horsepower 3.4-litre V6, while the up-level LS has the 3.8-litre V6 (200 hp). Both are older pushrod engines in GM's lineup, but they do the job. The engine of choice for the smoothest driveability is the 3.8-litre. The ride and handling suspension that comes with the larger engine also makes for better road manners.

Would an LG4 be close competition to it? The LG4 has the torque...
Old 03-12-2006, 07:16 PM
  #4  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
An LO3 and LG4 "should" beat one. The 3.8 SC cars however are much faster and will beat a stock LO3/LG4. It is a heavy car and that 3.4L is lame.
Old 03-12-2006, 07:39 PM
  #5  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Epro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
An LO3 and LG4 "should" beat one. The 3.8 SC cars however are much faster and will beat a stock LO3/LG4. It is a heavy car and that 3.4L is lame.
I have yet to lose against anyone... Of course, the fastest car I've ever gotten into with, was a 94 Golf The rest were Hondas, and other 4 cylinder cars. Not much competition...

EDIT: They were all in fun. Please don't give me the street racing talk. I have enough common sence to know when NOT to race. No lecture, please. I'm not a wreckless driver, nor do I pretend to be.
Old 03-13-2006, 12:14 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
haha well if you think your impala is fast then definately get behind the wheel of a mild L98 thirdgen. hahah opens your eyes

i think the 3.8 vs L03's would be closer. as far as road manners, i think the impala could use 1inch lowering with alot stiffer springs to be a nice road car... it just doesnt feel all that great. we got the Ls1 with some good options and i just not impressed with handling. too much roll
Old 03-13-2006, 10:09 AM
  #7  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Epro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
haha well if you think your impala is fast then definately get behind the wheel of a mild L98 thirdgen. hahah opens your eyes

i think the 3.8 vs L03's would be closer. as far as road manners, i think the impala could use 1inch lowering with alot stiffer springs to be a nice road car... it just doesnt feel all that great. we got the Ls1 with some good options and i just not impressed with handling. too much roll
Here's the funny thing, I find my Impala to be a good handling car. The best I've ever driven actually, lol. Keep in mind, I am only 17.

I hope when I get my third-gen, it throws me back into my seat to the point where I can't breathe
Old 03-13-2006, 10:16 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Won't throw you back quite that hard stock, but get yourself some good tires and slip the clutch at about 3000... oh yeah it'll set you in your seat
Old 03-13-2006, 10:47 AM
  #9  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Epro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by urbanhunter44
Won't throw you back quite that hard stock, but get yourself some good tires and slip the clutch at about 3000... oh yeah it'll set you in your seat
Yes...
Old 03-13-2006, 01:53 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
the impala is nice.. handling is better than our 93 spirit, and our 94 grand am. but its not as good as the 06 mazda 3, or my iroc-z LOL

if you do get a thirdgen get a Z28 or Irocz or GTA trans am with the good suspension. it will be quick feeling but also handle a ton better. i remember my first drives in my L98.. and it scared me. its still the fastest car i ever drove
Old 03-13-2006, 02:20 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
banditfirebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: north carolina
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 04 Dodge SRT-4, 91 formula firebird
Engine: 2.4 L4, 305 tbi
Transmission: 5-speed, 700 r4
My dad is a police officer and he drives an impala for the police car and they are supercharged and have a bigger air filter (the police ones that is) and are fast as heck. It would kill my firebird. but once i get my lt1.........
Old 03-13-2006, 02:46 PM
  #12  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Epro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by banditfirebird
My dad is a police officer and he drives an impala for the police car and they are supercharged and have a bigger air filter (the police ones that is) and are fast as heck. It would kill my firebird. but once i get my lt1.........
Not to mention, their Impalas can take a corner like it's nothing.

Or so I've been told.
Old 03-13-2006, 03:29 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member
 
Nate86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Hmm... I must be missing something. Impalas seem like they would handle like **** compared to a similarly built thirdgen. They sit way higher, weigh a lot more and have an overall longer body than a thirdgen.

I don't really know anything about Impalas or how their suspension works, though... so I very well might be wrong.
Old 03-13-2006, 04:10 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
the brakes on impalas are nice tho.. big rotors on them


anyway.. i seen a police impala for sale... 2001 i believe it was.. this was back in 2002-2003 or so. had 180K miles on it...wanted 9 grand for it. i dont believe it was supercharged.

i have seen a pittsburgh police crown vic step on it and take off up the hill and they do move out pretty well
Old 03-13-2006, 08:26 PM
  #15  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Epro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
the brakes on impalas are nice tho.. big rotors on them


anyway.. i seen a police impala for sale... 2001 i believe it was.. this was back in 2002-2003 or so. had 180K miles on it...wanted 9 grand for it. i dont believe it was supercharged.

i have seen a pittsburgh police crown vic step on it and take off up the hill and they do move out pretty well
I seen one go up a hill like it was nothing, my friend in his torque-less Civic couldn't keep up the least bit, and he was flooring it!

Are police cars faster than they've ever been now?
Old 03-13-2006, 09:48 PM
  #16  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by banditfirebird
My dad is a police officer and he drives an impala for the police car and they are supercharged and have a bigger air filter (the police ones that is) and are fast as heck. It would kill my firebird. but once i get my lt1.........
No police B-body B4C cars were supercharged. They were either an LO5 (pre '96) with larger injectors (220 hp) or the iron LT1 with 260hp.


Originally posted by Nate86

Hmm... I must be missing something. Impalas seem like they would handle like **** compared to a similarly built thirdgen. They sit way higher, weigh a lot more and have an overall longer body than a thirdgen.

No you are right. Any 3rd gen without a worn out suspeion will out do anything an impala can do on the track. I have a fully suspension 3rd gen and drove an SC 3.8 Impy for years. There is no comparison people. lets not get confused with modern suspension norms and proper suspension set-ups.

Police cars be it b-bodies and or crown vics have subtle improvements but are by no means rockets and or corner carvers. They have V8's and tons of other "make last longer" parts added to them (radiators, injectors, sway bars, springs, tires etc).
Old 03-14-2006, 10:15 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
sully91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS, 95 Z28
Engine: 305 tbi, 350 lt1
Transmission: 4l60, 4l60e
Axle/Gears: monsterous 2.73s in both
I drove a 2003 Impalla 3.8 from 16 to 19 years old. I bought the 91 RS (LO3) at 19. The camaro out handles the Impalla. I take exits a lot faster with the maro than the palla. HOWEVER, I think the Impalla is faster. I would still take the camaro hands down. It is a lot more fun to drive, and even tho it would lose in a race, it just feels like a faster car. (Not to mention that girls check out the camaro, not the impalla ).
Old 03-14-2006, 11:43 AM
  #18  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Epro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by sully91rs
I drove a 2003 Impalla 3.8 from 16 to 19 years old. I bought the 91 RS (LO3) at 19. The camaro out handles the Impalla. I take exits a lot faster with the maro than the palla. HOWEVER, I think the Impalla is faster. I would still take the camaro hands down. It is a lot more fun to drive, and even tho it would lose in a race, it just feels like a faster car. (Not to mention that girls check out the camaro, not the impalla ).
This is only the 3.4, so I'm thinking an LG4 is about the same as it?

There is an LG4 car I want, it has the catalytic converter removed, and has an edelbrock intake. I figure if I add Hedman headers and Y-pipe, and a flowmaster muffler, I should have a car faster than my Impala.

I love the Impala for what it is, great reliable car, not to mention it's great on gas for a full sized car. It's not a performance car, but it can still beat any Honda
Old 03-14-2006, 11:59 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
sully91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS, 95 Z28
Engine: 305 tbi, 350 lt1
Transmission: 4l60, 4l60e
Axle/Gears: monsterous 2.73s in both
Originally posted by Epro
This is only the 3.4, so I'm thinking an LG4 is about the same as it?

There is an LG4 car I want, it has the catalytic converter removed, and has an edelbrock intake. I figure if I add Hedman headers and Y-pipe, and a flowmaster muffler, I should have a car faster than my Impala.
This Link shows someone running an LG4 using an Edelbrock Performer intake and gaining 20 hp on the dyno. With full exhaust, it was 217 HP @ 4,200 rpm and 285 ft/lb torque @ 3,300 rpm. Impalla 3.8 is 200hp and 225 ft/lb torque. I'd say the full exhaust you mention will make the LG4 much quicker than the 3.4 impalla .
Old 03-14-2006, 12:30 PM
  #20  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Epro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by sully91rs
This Link shows someone running an LG4 using an Edelbrock Performer intake and gaining 20 hp on the dyno. With full exhaust, it was 217 HP @ 4,200 rpm and 285 ft/lb torque @ 3,300 rpm. Impalla 3.8 is 200hp and 225 ft/lb torque. I'd say the full exhaust you mention will make the LG4 much quicker than the 3.4 impalla .
Wow
Old 03-14-2006, 02:00 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
banditfirebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: north carolina
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 04 Dodge SRT-4, 91 formula firebird
Engine: 2.4 L4, 305 tbi
Transmission: 5-speed, 700 r4
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
No police B-body B4C cars were supercharged. They were either an LO5 (pre '96) with larger injectors (220 hp) or the iron LT1 with 260hp.





No you are right. Any 3rd gen without a worn out suspeion will out do anything an impala can do on the track. I have a fully suspension 3rd gen and drove an SC 3.8 Impy for years. There is no comparison people. lets not get confused with modern suspension norms and proper suspension set-ups.

Police cars be it b-bodies and or crown vics have subtle improvements but are by no means rockets and or corner carvers. They have V8's and tons of other "make last longer" parts added to them (radiators, injectors, sway bars, springs, tires etc).
Im talking about the new v6 ones. Its like a 2001. the old police impalas did not have superchargers.
Old 03-14-2006, 02:49 PM
  #22  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by banditfirebird
Im talking about the new v6 ones. Its like a 2001.
AH I C. You could not get the boosted 3.8 in the impy's until '05. It was only available in the Regals and Grand Prix's. Police cars could have been exempt though. That would be cool if they were.
Old 03-14-2006, 06:22 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member
 
87TPI350KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
Not that the 3.4 is a horrible motor, but if you think that thing is fast, you have something comming for ya. You must drive a peanut cammed car.
Old 03-14-2006, 06:34 PM
  #24  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Epro
It's not a performance car, but it can still beat any Honda
Hahhaha, you wish son.
Old 03-14-2006, 08:58 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,037
Received 394 Likes on 336 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by stu
Hahhaha, you wish son.


I often get handed the keys to a 230 HP 3.2 V6 6spd, 2 dr Acura Legend that would blow his doors off.

http://www.verdad.org/legend/gsrev.html

These are the specs for the GS automatic sedan. The one we have is a Coupe!

On a deserted 3 lane stretch of highway the needle has touched near 145 MPH(really didn't have any time to see for sure)!

Last edited by Fast355; 03-14-2006 at 09:03 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fireslash
Camaros for Sale
3
04-11-2016 06:43 PM
kammi10
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
11-09-2015 08:28 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
10-01-2015 03:46 PM
92projectcamaro
Engine Swap
4
09-29-2015 07:07 PM
challenger71
Interior Parts for Sale
0
09-10-2015 04:58 PM



Quick Reply: 2000 Impala 3.4 L



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.