05 Silverado Vs. 89 iroc
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Modesto, Killmefornia
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: peg leg
05 Silverado Vs. 89 iroc
The first street night at new england drag way is coming up in a few weeks and my car isn't registered right now. So the only thing i'll have to race is my reg. cab short bed 5.3 silverado. A buddy of mine might be bringing his 89 tpi 350 iroc. Completely stock minus k&n filters and some ram air ducts he had some guy make for him. I have a CAI, exhaust, electric fans, and a set of msd superconductors. my truck stock is rated at 295 horse and 335 ft. lbs. torque with a locking 3.42 rear, i was told my truck is in the weight range of 4800-5000. He has the 2.77 rear end in his, i think its posi. Simple question, him or me?
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
If his car is in good tune, I think he MIGHT win. Your truck prolly isnt a slouch by any means though. Those 5.3s can be fast as hell with a few mods. I think you will be right behind him.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
are u serious? a 5.3 truck is not a mid 14's truck....
i have killed all kinds of trucks.. ram's f150's, silverados... etc etc. the Iroc will kill the truck
i have killed all kinds of trucks.. ram's f150's, silverados... etc etc. the Iroc will kill the truck
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Modesto, Killmefornia
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: peg leg
F150=big ugly and slow, ram=pwn'ed hemis with mine. ive got a friend with a 4.8 and 5 speed that ran 14.98 with a flowmaster muffler and a K&N filter. The 4.8 has significantly less torque than a 5.3. So take it easy, for a truck dude mine hauls ***. I guess all i can do is see.
Last edited by 90Formula305; 03-27-2006 at 01:34 PM.
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Originally Posted by 90Formula305
F150=big ugly and slow, ram=pwn'ed hemis with mine. ive got a friend with a 4.8 and 5 speed that ran 14.98 with a flowmaster muffler and a K&N filter. The 4.8 has significantly less torque than a 5.3. So take it easy, for a truck dude mine hauls ***. I guess i'll i can do is see.
slap a radix on that bad boy and listen to the whine!
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Modesto, Killmefornia
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: peg leg
I was thinking cam, stage 2 5.3 heads from afr and a procharger.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Originally Posted by 90Formula305
I was thinking cam, stage 2 5.3 heads from afr and a procharger.
#15
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes
on
298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally Posted by 90Formula305
oh well, be fun to run anyways.
Yes it will and anything can happen when racing. You never know. The car that "should" win doesn't always cross the line first.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally Posted by ShiftyCapone
13.9 to 14.5 depending on the year and driver.
Id say 87-89 models are in the 14.5-14.8 range, and 90-92 sd cars are in the 14.2-14.4 range.
btw- Have you ever seen a stock L98 run a 13.9? Seems far fetched to me beacuse thats what the stock LT1's run around here.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
under the right conditions, it could be possible for a stock L98 to go 13.9. trap speed is there on some models. with solid tires like drag radials i definately can see one go that fast.
i raced a blown silverado SS at the track. he got a 1.80 60 foot to my spinning 2.07 LOL and his reaction time killed me too so naturally he jumped way out in front of me. he ran 13.19 but only at 101mph. i trap about 100 on good conditions. he ran a 8.34 1/8 at 81mph. where i usually go about 8.8 at 80mph. after his initial 4-5 car lead, he never pulled much after that.
from the right roll speed, i would hang well. he just murdered me off the line with gearing and low end power. this truck was supercharged. a stock or nearly stock 5.3 n/a wouldnt hang anywear near as well. but again, i got full ehxaust and 2800 stall. most L98's now have exhaust mods like mine. in good condtion they should go high 90's mph in the traps. which should be more than those chevy trucks
thats just my experience with these trucks. my neighbor has a 5.3, my dads friend had silverados all his life, my best friends dad had a 4.8 one and now a 5.3 one. i never driven it but been in it many times... they are quick down low but after that its allll L98 Irocz
i raced a blown silverado SS at the track. he got a 1.80 60 foot to my spinning 2.07 LOL and his reaction time killed me too so naturally he jumped way out in front of me. he ran 13.19 but only at 101mph. i trap about 100 on good conditions. he ran a 8.34 1/8 at 81mph. where i usually go about 8.8 at 80mph. after his initial 4-5 car lead, he never pulled much after that.
from the right roll speed, i would hang well. he just murdered me off the line with gearing and low end power. this truck was supercharged. a stock or nearly stock 5.3 n/a wouldnt hang anywear near as well. but again, i got full ehxaust and 2800 stall. most L98's now have exhaust mods like mine. in good condtion they should go high 90's mph in the traps. which should be more than those chevy trucks
thats just my experience with these trucks. my neighbor has a 5.3, my dads friend had silverados all his life, my best friends dad had a 4.8 one and now a 5.3 one. i never driven it but been in it many times... they are quick down low but after that its allll L98 Irocz
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
under the right conditions, it could be possible for a stock L98 to go 13.9. trap speed is there on some models. with solid tires like drag radials i definately can see one go that fast.
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Modesto, Killmefornia
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: peg leg
The 5.3 peaks out around 5200, mines got alot of nut up high, it pegs 100 like nothing......then stops dead cause it doesnt want me to go any faster.
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
Always root for the underdog. Truck will win.
#22
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Modesto, Killmefornia
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: peg leg
ummmmm.......heh heh heh heh....He's going to take his 97 Z28 now. ****. It's bone stock though. damn it.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally Posted by 90Formula305
ummmmm.......heh heh heh heh....He's going to take his 97 Z28 now. ****. It's bone stock though. damn it.
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
under the right conditions, it could be possible for a stock L98 to go 13.9. trap speed is there on some models. with solid tires like drag radials i definately can see one go that fast.
I don't think it's possible for a stock L98 fbody to hit a 13.9. With tires - yes.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
eh its all in your definition of stock... i guess tires isnt stock... but you cant run the stock tires that actually came from the factory with forever you know. so if you do buy drag radials, thats street legal and just a tire. so yes and no, its stock and its not stock all at the same time... power wise and gear wise, stock no mods with tires only it would be interestin to see how she moves
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Some where in illinois
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: T5
well silverados are no dogs by any sort, my dad has an 04 extnd cab with the 5.3 with an intake it hauls *** for a truck. I you want to get close to that IROC, Id go with a powerprogramer, exhaust, and an intake and take it from there. check out this site for some info about some fast silverados http://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/
#27
Moderator
My buddys 1991 B4C ran a 13.9 stock. Paper filters too. No slicks or drag radials.
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
i'd need to see slips or a vid to believe it. What was his trap? What was his 60? What was the 1/8th mile et/trap?
Ive heard alot of fish storys of 13 second stock L98s, but have NEVER seen proof. If someone can prove me wrong, I'd love to be wrong because that would be awesome.. but I doubt anyone has proof.
not saying I don't believe you, just saying I want some proof
Ive heard alot of fish storys of 13 second stock L98s, but have NEVER seen proof. If someone can prove me wrong, I'd love to be wrong because that would be awesome.. but I doubt anyone has proof.
not saying I don't believe you, just saying I want some proof
#30
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Modesto, Killmefornia
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: peg leg
Naw, im gonna get a custom tune. Much better than a handheld and a hell of alot cheaper. Going to have it retuned to run 89 and 50% of the torque management taken out.
#31
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes
on
298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally Posted by 90Formula305
Naw, im gonna get a custom tune. Much better than a handheld and a hell of alot cheaper. Going to have it retuned to run 89 and 50% of the torque management taken out.
Your car doesn't have torque management. That is only seen on the new LS2 vettes. Custom chips are the way to go but unless you have any mods GM already did the legwork for you. You won't see any gains by changing timing to run 89 octane.
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
yeah I don't think traction control was even an option in thirdgen years. My '97 has it, however I don't know when it became an option, had to have been 93+
#33
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes
on
298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
yeah I don't think traction control was even an option in thirdgen years. My '97 has it, however I don't know when it became an option, had to have been 93+
Torque management is actually different though. When you go WOT it backs timing and fuel the last 100 or so RPM before you shift. This greatly reduces driveline shock in efforts to maximize half shaft life. GM encourages its C6 owners to take their car to the track. Because they do this they had to prevent warranty issues with this feature. With it removed a stock C6 will reduce it's ET by over a half second (IIRC).
#35
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Ah I see. Thanks for explaining that, I hadn't heard of torque management. How exactly does GM encourage C6 buyers to go to the track? Hand them a brochure or something? lol
#36
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes
on
298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
Ah I see. Thanks for explaining that, I hadn't heard of torque management. How exactly does GM encourage C6 buyers to go to the track? Hand them a brochure or something? lol
This I am not sure and what I have been told has been though magazines and word of mouth. GMHTP mag could only muster a 13.0 with a stock C6 and by the time they were able yo hack into the TM system they could run a 12.2. That is a HUGE difference with no mods added.
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
If the 5.3 pulls anything like the old vortec 350 did, it should haul.
#38
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern IN
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC Z-28
Engine: Rebuilt Vortec Headded 358SB 9.5:1
Transmission: 700r4, corvette servo, Transgo kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23 POSI
The only trucks ive ever been beaten by were a 400 hp ford lightening and a dodge Ram RT V10, and a very beefed up Dodge Cummins...
And i was in a 4 cyl automatic Eagle talon.. the chevy ss 496 didnt even stand a chance.... neither did the 88 chevy SS..
but as far as the 5.3- i think the IROC would take it..
And i was in a 4 cyl automatic Eagle talon.. the chevy ss 496 didnt even stand a chance.... neither did the 88 chevy SS..
but as far as the 5.3- i think the IROC would take it..
#40
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Modesto, Killmefornia
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: peg leg
www.gmfullsize.com tell these guys that the 99 and up trucks dont have torque management. Everyone on there runs a custom tune to run either a more aggresive tune for 87 or advance the timing to run 89 or higher. They also have torque managment taken out. Trust me on this one, it has it and i know what it feels like when it's in operation.
Edit: Did you think i have traction control? The torque management in the trucks retards the timing between shifts so it doesnt have as much power shifting into another gear to extend the life of the tranny. Thats what i meant.
Edit again: and i just noticed someone else already explained it....
Edit: Did you think i have traction control? The torque management in the trucks retards the timing between shifts so it doesnt have as much power shifting into another gear to extend the life of the tranny. Thats what i meant.
Edit again: and i just noticed someone else already explained it....
Last edited by 90Formula305; 03-30-2006 at 10:28 AM.
#42
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Modesto, Killmefornia
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: peg leg
Oh no, i think fuel injection is the most technologically advanced equipment on my firebird. Not like its going to saty that way though.
#43
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Yeah thirds never really had much in the way of technology so to speak, except for fully optioned GTAs.
The really neat stuff came in '95 (maybe '96) with the introduction of the BCM Automatic headlights, daytime running lights, factory alarm, retained accessory power (actually in 94s as well), inside lights that dim out slowly (oooohhh)! Wonder how much work it would be to put all of that crap in a thirdgen?
I know retained accessory power isn't hard to wire in a thirdgen, someone on fbody.com did it.
The really neat stuff came in '95 (maybe '96) with the introduction of the BCM Automatic headlights, daytime running lights, factory alarm, retained accessory power (actually in 94s as well), inside lights that dim out slowly (oooohhh)! Wonder how much work it would be to put all of that crap in a thirdgen?
I know retained accessory power isn't hard to wire in a thirdgen, someone on fbody.com did it.
#44
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: north carolina
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 04 Dodge SRT-4, 91 formula firebird
Engine: 2.4 L4, 305 tbi
Transmission: 5-speed, 700 r4
the camaro should win. My LO3 firebird is stock besides a msd coil blaster and it will outrun my brother in laws 99 f-150. not smoke it, but a good car length or so. I rember him telling me about him racing a newer silverado and beating it so him running the 350 tpi he should smoke you. But who cares, its a truck right? there not made for speed so there is nothing to get mad about if you loose.
#45
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally Posted by banditfirebird
there not made for speed so there is nothing to get mad about if you loose.
#46
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Huntington, Wv
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it just me or is everybody else getting sick of the "corvette with a bed" chevy trucks. I cant even drive my car without a full size chevy truck trying to race me. Every freakin day. Ive never been beat by one neither. Its always the same excuse when they get beat too. Its just a truck. If its just a truck how come your racing in it. Its run what you got, no excuses. I guess "Its just a truck" is how they sleep at night. I guess that makes it like a poker game, going all in with a bag of dirt against their $50,000. If you lose you think its alright to not care cause you dont think you lost anything. I'm really not trying to **** anybody off. This is just my opinion of those trucks. I guess all the mustangs around here traded them in for chevy trucks so they can lose with their dignity. I personally know 3 people who traded mustangs for these trucks.
Also, GM should have them come with duel exhaust as an option also, they'd make millions, cause 90% of them ive seen have it. Enough of my rant.
Also, GM should have them come with duel exhaust as an option also, they'd make millions, cause 90% of them ive seen have it. Enough of my rant.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
5.3s aren't bad mills, but i think you'll lose by a few tenths
I think the 5.3s are pretty freakin awesome. I don't really get the comment about only pulling to 5200 that was made by someone else. The one in my parent's Suburban seems to pull pretty well to 6000. Seems very similar to an LT1. I would LOVE to get one and a T-56 and put it in either my G-body or an F-body. I think it could be pretty fast. As cheap as you can find em at SOME salvage yards, I'm surprised I don't see more people swapping them.
However, why they were chosen for a truck absolutely confounds me. Maybe it's the Stabilitrak in my parent's Suburban, but it doesn't seem to have any low end punch to it whatsoever, compared to a Vortec 350.
#48
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
why swap a 5.3 when you can swap a 5.7 for the same cost? Or screw that, get an LQ9 my moms vortec 350 burban is actually pretty quick lol im sure it's in the 15s somewhere, i'd love to take it to the track.
What annoys the **** out of me is EVERYONE taking their trucks and SUVs and putting damn flowmasters on them
What annoys the **** out of me is EVERYONE taking their trucks and SUVs and putting damn flowmasters on them
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
why swap a 5.3 when you can swap a 5.7 for the same cost? Or screw that, get an LQ9
Gen III > Gen I
Unless the 5.7 you're talking about an LS1.
I think as common as the 5.3 is, I think it will probably become the next 350 in terms of popular swap. There are only so many LS1s out there, and there are bazillions of 5.3 equipped GMT-700s, not to mention the new Monte Carlo SS/Impala SS and Gran Prix GXP cars. MUCH more common than the 4.8 and 6.0, it will be much cheaper at the JY.
#50
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Originally Posted by Formula350Scott
Is it just me or is everybody else getting sick of the "corvette with a bed" chevy trucks. I cant even drive my car without a full size chevy truck trying to race me. Every freakin day. Ive never been beat by one neither. Its always the same excuse when they get beat too. Its just a truck. If its just a truck how come your racing in it. Its run what you got, no excuses. I guess "Its just a truck" is how they sleep at night. I guess that makes it like a poker game, going all in with a bag of dirt against their $50,000. If you lose you think its alright to not care cause you dont think you lost anything. I'm really not trying to **** anybody off. This is just my opinion of those trucks. I guess all the mustangs around here traded them in for chevy trucks so they can lose with their dignity. I personally know 3 people who traded mustangs for these trucks.
Also, GM should have them come with duel exhaust as an option also, they'd make millions, cause 90% of them ive seen have it. Enough of my rant.
Also, GM should have them come with duel exhaust as an option also, they'd make millions, cause 90% of them ive seen have it. Enough of my rant.
Ever see a modded diesel run? Full size, and some are in the 11s, and drive it home.
Also, You need to make a trip to michigan, I know of a handful of full size trucks that will put lengths on ya lol.
This is the future, whether you like it or not. Suvs, and trucks are getting fast. Look at the SRT8 Jeep....425 hp with AWD.
And No im not mad.