Nother worthless Question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
Nother worthless Question
The cast iron driveshaft on the 1989 Iroc with a 5spd, how many rpms can it spin to before overload. I have heard people say 135mph, but that doesn't help if you dont say tire size, gearing and transmission. Most of the guys are running 2.73, i have the borg warner 3.45's i just wanna know the car's top speed
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Re: Nother worthless Question
Originally posted by Mcdamit
The cast iron driveshaft on the 1989 Iroc with a 5spd, how many rpms can it spin to before overload. I have heard people say 135mph, but that doesn't help if you dont say tire size, gearing and transmission. Most of the guys are running 2.73, i have the borg warner 3.45's i just wanna know the car's top speed
The cast iron driveshaft on the 1989 Iroc with a 5spd, how many rpms can it spin to before overload. I have heard people say 135mph, but that doesn't help if you dont say tire size, gearing and transmission. Most of the guys are running 2.73, i have the borg warner 3.45's i just wanna know the car's top speed
With a 305 you can't hit the critical speed anyway so don't worry about it.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
yeah you can the car "down a cylinder" has seen 130mph, either way its a pos drive shaft, whats the rpm, it has just has much horse as the 350 and 300lbs. of torque, what's the rpm top out
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
If you've realized it's a POS why bother researching it? Just score a used aluminum LT1 or LS1 shaft for a hundred bux or so and you're a happy camper.
And I have no doubt whatsoever about the 305's capabilities...
Never ran across a single one back when I had my TPI 350 or now that I have an LS1 that posed a credible threat. I sailed past them like they were...well...305's.
And I have no doubt whatsoever about the 305's capabilities...
Never ran across a single one back when I had my TPI 350 or now that I have an LS1 that posed a credible threat. I sailed past them like they were...well...305's.
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
it has just has much horse as the 350 and 300lbs. of torque,
it has just has much horse as the 350 and 300lbs. of torque,
Until that happens, it's monkey spank.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
check the tech data, car has 3.45's
check the tech data, car has 3.45's
230<245. How exactly did you arrive at "same horse as 350?" If GM "always underrates their cars" then the L98 is also underrated.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Was there a question in there somewhere?
Are you under the impression gears add hp or tq?
And to paraphrase...if you ever race this car its gettin a butt whooping.
Are you under the impression gears add hp or tq?
And to paraphrase...if you ever race this car its gettin a butt whooping.
Originally posted by Mcdamit
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
#11
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Winnebago - 871' ASL
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Mcdamit
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
89 IROC-Z Formula T/A
A4
L98 V8 9.3:1 5.7 (350)
230@4400 330@3200 TPI 2.77*
230=230
300<330
I never stated that gears =equal power
gears equal acceleration
Also remeber the auto eats a lot more torque than the manual tranny, and so do the 2.73's
You quoted the G92 350 which is rare and far between .
Question was prove that they have equal horse. Personally if you had a G92 350 dual cat car w/ 3.27's then props to you. But they are a hard find especially in stock form.
And i would like to see my *** get whopped by the stock 350 single cat car.
And gm ended the 305 because it was a small cube v-8 centered around gas mileage not performance
A4
L98 V8 9.3:1 5.7 (350)
230@4400 330@3200 TPI 2.77*
230=230
300<330
I never stated that gears =equal power
gears equal acceleration
Also remeber the auto eats a lot more torque than the manual tranny, and so do the 2.73's
You quoted the G92 350 which is rare and far between .
Question was prove that they have equal horse. Personally if you had a G92 350 dual cat car w/ 3.27's then props to you. But they are a hard find especially in stock form.
And i would like to see my *** get whopped by the stock 350 single cat car.
And gm ended the 305 because it was a small cube v-8 centered around gas mileage not performance
Last edited by Mcdamit; 04-03-2005 at 10:58 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
tell me that im wrong seriously. would it not be a head to head race or am i just another tard without a paddle, if your car was a single cat with minor tuning those are your numbers.
Then tell me that it had a gazillion horse and torque and how the 302 is the best block in the world even though its the bore, stroke, heads and cam that make a difference. Not friggin lifters and stock "super tiny" headers
Then tell me that it had a gazillion horse and torque and how the 302 is the best block in the world even though its the bore, stroke, heads and cam that make a difference. Not friggin lifters and stock "super tiny" headers
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
sorry bout the drive shaft comment, steel and cast parts both equal worthless, and either way it is worthless as far as balancing goes. Now may someone answer my question and close the thread all i wanted was top out rpm. Im not the one who made a comment about someone else's car and or cheaping out and buying a crate engine
Last edited by Mcdamit; 04-03-2005 at 11:19 AM.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Originally posted by Mcdamit
...And i would like to see my *** get whopped by the stock 350 single cat car. ...
...And i would like to see my *** get whopped by the stock 350 single cat car. ...
Idiot. Cast iron? Overload?!? What is it an electrical circuit? You have no problem wasting time posting drivel, why not spend some of that time getting off your *** and looking up some online calculators? Since you apparently know what your car runs at the track, I'm sure you can extrapolate. If you haven't run it then why are you posturing?
And 240>230. I havn't seen too many L98s with the 2.77, but if you are going to compare the better layouts, keep it apples to apples, don't play statistician and pick and choose your numbers. To put it into perspective, RPO figures for the GTAs of 1989...
GM3 -- Rear Axle Ratio (3.45) -- 366
GW6 -- Rear Axle Ratio (3.27) -- 8,104
G80 -- Axle, Rear Limited-Slip -- A
LC2 -- Engine, 3.8L V6 Turbocharged -- 1,550
LB9 -- Engine, 5.0L V8 TPI -- 366
L98 -- Engine, 5.7L V8 TPI -- 6,554
Now go spank a monkey somewhere else.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
sorry bro my english skillz tend to suck especially when i am working on other things, as far as the 350's i have yet to see a 3.27/G92 car around here, either way dont dis the 305 because if you really think about it what is 10 horsepower. the torque i will give in to yes 45ft lbs. is a large difference but so is the 45 cubes.
I am gonna guess and say the ending numbers are production numbers.
The whole reason i have asked is everywhere i see the STEEL driveshaft, it is rated at mph and without the specs of the car it is no help.
I am gonna guess and say the ending numbers are production numbers.
The whole reason i have asked is everywhere i see the STEEL driveshaft, it is rated at mph and without the specs of the car it is no help.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
I contextually discount the 305 b/c mod for mod the 350 will outperform it -and the 305 has other issues, not the least of which is the shrouding issue.
With the mph you can reverse calculate for each gear. Or you could maybe just write an email to a drive shaft company and creatively ask their opinion. They seem to know what they are talking about generally.
With the mph you can reverse calculate for each gear. Or you could maybe just write an email to a drive shaft company and creatively ask their opinion. They seem to know what they are talking about generally.
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
tell me that im wrong seriously.
...am i just another tard without a paddle,
tell me that im wrong seriously.
...am i just another tard without a paddle,
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
i completely understand that and hence why i stated stock, a 305 will generally get itself ripped a new hole when running against the modded 350, i understand that it is not capable of running with a 350 in a modded race especially when higher horsepower comes into play. as of now my stock 305 has a rough almost lopey idle and that is from the factory...... I have one more question and anyone can give me an answer, i am building a 305, i was told it was a 350 and found out the hard way. I was given an offer from a ri cer to who wants it for his pickup. My question is how much should i ask. it has 416 heads, aluminum single plane intake manifold, a q-jet and probably a peanut cam, the internals are cast, it is extremely clean and has 10,000 miles on it. ? the engine is a 1980-85 202block. i'll give it too him completely running he needs new gaskets and hoses as i have thrown them all out
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
sorry bout the drive shaft comment, steel and cast parts both equal worthless, and either way it is worthless as far as balancing goes.
sorry bout the drive shaft comment, steel and cast parts both equal worthless, and either way it is worthless as far as balancing goes.
And...steel driveshafts are worthless and cant' be balanced? Better call the <10sec drag racers, they aren't aware of this.
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
#23
As for your original question, you've already been given the correct answer. Get an aluminum or MMC driveshaft from a 4th gen or 1LE car (or even a later truck) and have it modified to fit your yoke and spline.
Funny how the old steel driveshafts used to be good for a few thousand blown HP and 300 MPH, but only 1/4 mile at a time. I guess the steel metallurgy just isn't as good as it used to be.
Funny how the old steel driveshafts used to be good for a few thousand blown HP and 300 MPH, but only 1/4 mile at a time. I guess the steel metallurgy just isn't as good as it used to be.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
wasn't stating balancing though the concept of balancing is involved in both. I was refering to torque and the ability of the crank to handle power and an poorly balanced rotating assembly, plus would you really wanna put a blower or nitrous in a cast rotating assembly?
As far as the driveshaft you ever break a u joint?
As far as the driveshaft you ever break a u joint?
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
Originally posted by Vader
Funny how the old steel driveshafts used to be good for a few thousand blown HP and 300 MPH, but only 1/4 mile at a time. I guess the steel metallurgy just isn't as good as it used to be.
Funny how the old steel driveshafts used to be good for a few thousand blown HP and 300 MPH, but only 1/4 mile at a time. I guess the steel metallurgy just isn't as good as it used to be.
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
wasn't stating balancing though the concept of balancing is involved in both.
wasn't stating balancing though the concept of balancing is involved in both.
That sounds like you were trying to state something about balancing, albeit incorrectly.
Every time you post, you leave another bread-crumb trail of wrong info to follow...this is entertaining!
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
glad you enjoy but it did have to do with balancing, because this kid expects to rev the motor like its a 4 banger. Right now his truck has a four banger and a A4, and the 305 should mount into the tranny right, its a chevy i dont know what year, but i know there is a enough clearance for the engine.
I gotta go to work and do my english nite.
I gotta go to work and do my english nite.
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
oh yeah Nick if you wanna laugh your *** off for hours, go to 3go and look up my name. The read car pics and more car pics, there is a reason they hate me
#30
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: California
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Z28HO/TA/Alfa Romeo
Engine: 305-350-502
Transmission: 700R4-5speed
Originally posted by kevinc
This is an interesting statement. If you can bring objective and empirical proof that a 305 "has just as much horse as the 350" it will make the difference between you speaking truth and you posting monkey-spank.
Until that happens, it's monkey spank.
This is an interesting statement. If you can bring objective and empirical proof that a 305 "has just as much horse as the 350" it will make the difference between you speaking truth and you posting monkey-spank.
Until that happens, it's monkey spank.
Well, he did say "horse..." . He didn't say horse- " ?????"
#31
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: California
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Z28HO/TA/Alfa Romeo
Engine: 305-350-502
Transmission: 700R4-5speed
Originally posted by Merlin
Werd, dude. The real reason GM had to stop making the 305s is because they made too much power and used too little gas. The oil companies and politicians called GM and said "Stop that."
Werd, dude. The real reason GM had to stop making the 305s is because they made too much power and used too little gas. The oil companies and politicians called GM and said "Stop that."
Economy of scale?
#32
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: California
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Z28HO/TA/Alfa Romeo
Engine: 305-350-502
Transmission: 700R4-5speed
Originally posted by kevinc
Gawd, it just became clear what IQ level I'm up against...I surrender.
Gawd, it just became clear what IQ level I'm up against...I surrender.
Air Cav Does NOT, I repeat NOT surrender!!!!!!
#33
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Originally posted by Mcdamit
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
Man LS1 cars are putting 300 to the wheels... You may have a little over half of that... Why don't you kindly remove your foot from your mouth and just say you are wrong.
as of now my stock 305 has a rough almost lopey idle and that is from the factory......
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Originally posted by Mcdamit
glad you enjoy but it did have to do with balancing, because this kid expects to rev the motor like its a 4 banger. Right now his truck has a four banger and a A4, and the 305 should mount into the tranny right, its a chevy i dont know what year, but i know there is a enough clearance for the engine.
I gotta go to work and do my english nite.
glad you enjoy but it did have to do with balancing, because this kid expects to rev the motor like its a 4 banger. Right now his truck has a four banger and a A4, and the 305 should mount into the tranny right, its a chevy i dont know what year, but i know there is a enough clearance for the engine.
I gotta go to work and do my english nite.
#36
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
Bwahahaha... Wow buddy. Wow. Yeah they may underrate these cars... by a few HP... LOL... I had a 89 305 TPI dude... dynoed 175 hp to the wheels!!! WTF are you thinking that these 305 cars can run w/ LS1s
Man LS1 cars are putting 300 to the wheels... You may have a little over half of that... Why don't you kindly remove your foot from your mouth and just say you are wrong.
LOL... yeah b/c the cam has a 109 LSA from the factory!!! LOL... yeah that combined w/ the 179/184 duration and the .350/.384 lift make it a HUGE cam that will lope like a SOB!!!
Bwahahaha... Wow buddy. Wow. Yeah they may underrate these cars... by a few HP... LOL... I had a 89 305 TPI dude... dynoed 175 hp to the wheels!!! WTF are you thinking that these 305 cars can run w/ LS1s
Man LS1 cars are putting 300 to the wheels... You may have a little over half of that... Why don't you kindly remove your foot from your mouth and just say you are wrong.
LOL... yeah b/c the cam has a 109 LSA from the factory!!! LOL... yeah that combined w/ the 179/184 duration and the .350/.384 lift make it a HUGE cam that will lope like a SOB!!!
Revving Like a 4 banger, i was refering to the carbed 305 first of all secondly i wouldn't take it above 5000
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1972 Corvette
Originally posted by Mcdamit
and dont doubt the 305's i have seen them whip past ls1's like they were non turboed 4 bangers
and dont doubt the 305's i have seen them whip past ls1's like they were non turboed 4 bangers
#40
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Originally posted by Mcdamit
never said mine was faster
never said mine was faster
and dont doubt the 305's i have seen them whip past ls1's like they were non turboed 4 bangers
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
You really have to laugh about this whole thread. I have to agree that if you would just get an aluminum drive shaft it would satisfy your needs. Now if you wanted to go above and beyond...well, drop about $800 and get yourself a carbon fiber driveshaft and you'll never have any troubles.
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
yeah but my point was that i dont wanna really have to buy a new one i just wanna know how fast my car can go before i become a plane
#43
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
yeah but my point was that i dont wanna really have to buy a new one i just wanna know how fast my car can go before i become a plane
yeah but my point was that i dont wanna really have to buy a new one i just wanna know how fast my car can go before i become a plane
#45
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia/Delaware
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Mcdamit
yeah but my point was that i dont wanna really have to buy a new one i just wanna know how fast my car can go before i become a plane
yeah but my point was that i dont wanna really have to buy a new one i just wanna know how fast my car can go before i become a plane
You are not approaching any critical material strength properties in your car. You have no need to know at what speed the driveshaft will go into uncontrolled vibration, as you CANNOT reach that speed. Cheers.
EDIT: Because I expect more argument from you, the aerodynamic top speed of most stock thirdgens is approximately 145 mph. They do not "become planes" at this point, this is the speed at which their stock power levels cannot overcome the gearing and wind resistance to accelerate the car any more.
Also, if your response is something along the lines of "well my cast Iron POS vibrates and sucks so they must all suck" my only response to you then is your car has had ****house for maintenance. The stock steel driveshaft is fine at speed, albeit a disadvantage if considering only rotational weight. If you have high speed vibration problems, replace your engine mounts, tranny mounts, and u-joints. Have your driveshaft balanced (it only costs 20 bucks). And have an alignment done on your car and your wheels balanced. It will then happily carry you to any unsafe speed you desire. I call first dibs on parts from the wreck.
Last edited by DakotaSLT; 04-07-2005 at 08:38 PM.
#47
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Readington, NJ
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt w/ 3.73
Originally posted by Mcdamit
... and try somewhere's around 210hp, car has 36,000miles so i assuming very little driveline loss.
... and try somewhere's around 210hp, car has 36,000miles so i assuming very little driveline loss.
I'm all for defending what you have, just don't run around making out to more/better than it actually is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post