Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Nother worthless Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2005, 07:19 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
Nother worthless Question

The cast iron driveshaft on the 1989 Iroc with a 5spd, how many rpms can it spin to before overload. I have heard people say 135mph, but that doesn't help if you dont say tire size, gearing and transmission. Most of the guys are running 2.73, i have the borg warner 3.45's i just wanna know the car's top speed
Old 04-03-2005, 07:33 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Re: Nother worthless Question

Originally posted by Mcdamit
The cast iron driveshaft on the 1989 Iroc with a 5spd, how many rpms can it spin to before overload. I have heard people say 135mph, but that doesn't help if you dont say tire size, gearing and transmission. Most of the guys are running 2.73, i have the borg warner 3.45's i just wanna know the car's top speed
There is no cast iron driveshaft for the 1989 IROC. It's steel.

With a 305 you can't hit the critical speed anyway so don't worry about it.
Old 04-03-2005, 07:46 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
yeah you can the car "down a cylinder" has seen 130mph, either way its a pos drive shaft, whats the rpm, it has just has much horse as the 350 and 300lbs. of torque, what's the rpm top out
Old 04-03-2005, 07:48 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
and dont doubt the 305's i have seen them whip past ls1's like they were non turboed 4 bangers
Old 04-03-2005, 08:57 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
If you've realized it's a POS why bother researching it? Just score a used aluminum LT1 or LS1 shaft for a hundred bux or so and you're a happy camper.

And I have no doubt whatsoever about the 305's capabilities...

Never ran across a single one back when I had my TPI 350 or now that I have an LS1 that posed a credible threat. I sailed past them like they were...well...305's.
Old 04-03-2005, 09:02 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
it has just has much horse as the 350 and 300lbs. of torque,
This is an interesting statement. If you can bring objective and empirical proof that a 305 "has just as much horse as the 350" it will make the difference between you speaking truth and you posting monkey-spank.

Until that happens, it's monkey spank.
Old 04-03-2005, 09:17 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
check the tech data, car has 3.45's
Old 04-03-2005, 09:26 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
Old 04-03-2005, 10:38 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
check the tech data, car has 3.45's
I did. Yours is rated at 230hp/300tq...the L98 same year is rated at 240/345...and it grew to 245/345 in subsequent years.

230<245. How exactly did you arrive at "same horse as 350?" If GM "always underrates their cars" then the L98 is also underrated.
Old 04-03-2005, 10:41 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Was there a question in there somewhere?

Are you under the impression gears add hp or tq?

And to paraphrase...if you ever race this car its gettin a butt whooping.


Originally posted by Mcdamit
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
Old 04-03-2005, 10:41 AM
  #11  
Member

 
Merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Winnebago - 871' ASL
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Mcdamit
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
Werd, dude. The real reason GM had to stop making the 305s is because they made too much power and used too little gas. The oil companies and politicians called GM and said "Stop that."
Old 04-03-2005, 10:50 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
89 IROC-Z Formula T/A
A4
L98 V8 9.3:1 5.7 (350)
230@4400 330@3200 TPI 2.77*

230=230
300<330

I never stated that gears =equal power
gears equal acceleration
Also remeber the auto eats a lot more torque than the manual tranny, and so do the 2.73's

You quoted the G92 350 which is rare and far between .

Question was prove that they have equal horse. Personally if you had a G92 350 dual cat car w/ 3.27's then props to you. But they are a hard find especially in stock form.

And i would like to see my *** get whopped by the stock 350 single cat car.

And gm ended the 305 because it was a small cube v-8 centered around gas mileage not performance

Last edited by Mcdamit; 04-03-2005 at 10:58 AM.
Old 04-03-2005, 10:58 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Gawd, it just became clear what IQ level I'm up against...I surrender.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:04 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
tell me that im wrong seriously. would it not be a head to head race or am i just another tard without a paddle, if your car was a single cat with minor tuning those are your numbers.
Then tell me that it had a gazillion horse and torque and how the 302 is the best block in the world even though its the bore, stroke, heads and cam that make a difference. Not friggin lifters and stock "super tiny" headers
Old 04-03-2005, 11:05 AM
  #15  
ede
TGO Supporter

 
ede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Jackson County
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
kevin it took you a while to cathc on didn't it? i knew where we were and what we were dealing with when i read "cast iron drive shaft" werd
Old 04-03-2005, 11:12 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
sorry bout the drive shaft comment, steel and cast parts both equal worthless, and either way it is worthless as far as balancing goes. Now may someone answer my question and close the thread all i wanted was top out rpm. Im not the one who made a comment about someone else's car and or cheaping out and buying a crate engine

Last edited by Mcdamit; 04-03-2005 at 11:19 AM.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:19 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member

 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Originally posted by Mcdamit
...And i would like to see my *** get whopped by the stock 350 single cat car. ...
Mine's 'stock'.

Idiot. Cast iron? Overload?!? What is it an electrical circuit? You have no problem wasting time posting drivel, why not spend some of that time getting off your *** and looking up some online calculators? Since you apparently know what your car runs at the track, I'm sure you can extrapolate. If you haven't run it then why are you posturing?

And 240>230. I havn't seen too many L98s with the 2.77, but if you are going to compare the better layouts, keep it apples to apples, don't play statistician and pick and choose your numbers. To put it into perspective, RPO figures for the GTAs of 1989...

GM3 -- Rear Axle Ratio (3.45) -- 366
GW6 -- Rear Axle Ratio (3.27) -- 8,104
G80 -- Axle, Rear Limited-Slip -- A
LC2 -- Engine, 3.8L V6 Turbocharged -- 1,550
LB9 -- Engine, 5.0L V8 TPI -- 366
L98 -- Engine, 5.7L V8 TPI -- 6,554

Now go spank a monkey somewhere else.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:25 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
sorry bro my english skillz tend to suck especially when i am working on other things, as far as the 350's i have yet to see a 3.27/G92 car around here, either way dont dis the 305 because if you really think about it what is 10 horsepower. the torque i will give in to yes 45ft lbs. is a large difference but so is the 45 cubes.

I am gonna guess and say the ending numbers are production numbers.

The whole reason i have asked is everywhere i see the STEEL driveshaft, it is rated at mph and without the specs of the car it is no help.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:39 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
I contextually discount the 305 b/c mod for mod the 350 will outperform it -and the 305 has other issues, not the least of which is the shrouding issue.
With the mph you can reverse calculate for each gear. Or you could maybe just write an email to a drive shaft company and creatively ask their opinion. They seem to know what they are talking about generally.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:59 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
tell me that im wrong seriously.

...am i just another tard without a paddle,
You're seriously wrong. And you've done an excellent job of clarifying that last point.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:59 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
i completely understand that and hence why i stated stock, a 305 will generally get itself ripped a new hole when running against the modded 350, i understand that it is not capable of running with a 350 in a modded race especially when higher horsepower comes into play. as of now my stock 305 has a rough almost lopey idle and that is from the factory...... I have one more question and anyone can give me an answer, i am building a 305, i was told it was a 350 and found out the hard way. I was given an offer from a ri cer to who wants it for his pickup. My question is how much should i ask. it has 416 heads, aluminum single plane intake manifold, a q-jet and probably a peanut cam, the internals are cast, it is extremely clean and has 10,000 miles on it. ? the engine is a 1980-85 202block. i'll give it too him completely running he needs new gaskets and hoses as i have thrown them all out
Old 04-03-2005, 12:11 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
sorry bout the drive shaft comment, steel and cast parts both equal worthless, and either way it is worthless as far as balancing goes.
So...every cast iron crankshaft in every engine can't be balanced? You should call the automakers, they aren't aware of this.

And...steel driveshafts are worthless and cant' be balanced? Better call the <10sec drag racers, they aren't aware of this.

BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Old 04-03-2005, 12:16 PM
  #23  
Moderator

 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,369
Received 219 Likes on 179 Posts
As for your original question, you've already been given the correct answer. Get an aluminum or MMC driveshaft from a 4th gen or 1LE car (or even a later truck) and have it modified to fit your yoke and spline.

Funny how the old steel driveshafts used to be good for a few thousand blown HP and 300 MPH, but only 1/4 mile at a time. I guess the steel metallurgy just isn't as good as it used to be.
Old 04-03-2005, 12:17 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
wasn't stating balancing though the concept of balancing is involved in both. I was refering to torque and the ability of the crank to handle power and an poorly balanced rotating assembly, plus would you really wanna put a blower or nitrous in a cast rotating assembly?

As far as the driveshaft you ever break a u joint?
Old 04-03-2005, 12:21 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
Originally posted by Vader

Funny how the old steel driveshafts used to be good for a few thousand blown HP and 300 MPH, but only 1/4 mile at a time. I guess the steel metallurgy just isn't as good as it used to be.
It was made cheaply thats all, if it was just a regular steel shaft i wouldn't care but one of my friends did snap his but he was lucky, He didn't turn into a catapult.
Old 04-03-2005, 12:28 PM
  #26  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
wasn't stating balancing though the concept of balancing is involved in both.
Your original quote was "and either way it is worthless as far as balancing goes. "

That sounds like you were trying to state something about balancing, albeit incorrectly.

Every time you post, you leave another bread-crumb trail of wrong info to follow...this is entertaining!
Old 04-03-2005, 12:37 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
glad you enjoy but it did have to do with balancing, because this kid expects to rev the motor like its a 4 banger. Right now his truck has a four banger and a A4, and the 305 should mount into the tranny right, its a chevy i dont know what year, but i know there is a enough clearance for the engine.

I gotta go to work and do my english nite.
Old 04-03-2005, 12:38 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
oh yeah Nick if you wanna laugh your *** off for hours, go to 3go and look up my name. The read car pics and more car pics, there is a reason they hate me
Old 04-03-2005, 12:43 PM
  #29  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
SLP IROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Salem, NH
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: 9" 4.11 Truetrac
check TPIS, they have somethin on the stock driveshaft and its capabilities for speed.
Old 04-03-2005, 12:51 PM
  #30  
Junior Member
 
88tatpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: California
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Z28HO/TA/Alfa Romeo
Engine: 305-350-502
Transmission: 700R4-5speed
Originally posted by kevinc
This is an interesting statement. If you can bring objective and empirical proof that a 305 "has just as much horse as the 350" it will make the difference between you speaking truth and you posting monkey-spank.

Until that happens, it's monkey spank.

Well, he did say "horse..." . He didn't say horse- " ?????"
Old 04-03-2005, 12:57 PM
  #31  
Junior Member
 
88tatpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: California
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Z28HO/TA/Alfa Romeo
Engine: 305-350-502
Transmission: 700R4-5speed
Originally posted by Merlin
Werd, dude. The real reason GM had to stop making the 305s is because they made too much power and used too little gas. The oil companies and politicians called GM and said "Stop that."
Maybe GM didn't want to make small bore blocks anymore?

Economy of scale?
Old 04-03-2005, 12:59 PM
  #32  
Junior Member
 
88tatpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: California
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Z28HO/TA/Alfa Romeo
Engine: 305-350-502
Transmission: 700R4-5speed
Originally posted by kevinc
Gawd, it just became clear what IQ level I'm up against...I surrender.

Air Cav Does NOT, I repeat NOT surrender!!!!!!
Old 04-03-2005, 01:07 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Chris89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Originally posted by Mcdamit
there is your question, now answer mine. by tech data i mean the horse power ratings in the cover page of this site it has the most complete listing i can find the manual TPI305 came with the corvette/l98 camshaft, which boosts its rating up to 220hp then with dual cats it brought the rating up to 230, and then remeber gm always underates their cars. Mostly for insurance reasons, same reason why the tta which is rated at 250hp is really around 300hp... Also the 3.45 -9bolt/7.75"rear really gives the car a kick in the *** and most guys who mod their 305's cant even get their hp close to the G92's, if i ever race up this car its gettin a radical cam and ported afr's
Bwahahaha... Wow buddy. Wow. Yeah they may underrate these cars... by a few HP... LOL... I had a 89 305 TPI dude... dynoed 175 hp to the wheels!!! WTF are you thinking that these 305 cars can run w/ LS1s

Man LS1 cars are putting 300 to the wheels... You may have a little over half of that... Why don't you kindly remove your foot from your mouth and just say you are wrong.

as of now my stock 305 has a rough almost lopey idle and that is from the factory......
LOL... yeah b/c the cam has a 109 LSA from the factory!!! LOL... yeah that combined w/ the 179/184 duration and the .350/.384 lift make it a HUGE cam that will lope like a SOB!!!
Old 04-03-2005, 01:09 PM
  #34  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Chris89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Originally posted by Mcdamit
glad you enjoy but it did have to do with balancing, because this kid expects to rev the motor like its a 4 banger. Right now his truck has a four banger and a A4, and the 305 should mount into the tranny right, its a chevy i dont know what year, but i know there is a enough clearance for the engine.

I gotta go to work and do my english nite.
and revving like a 4 banger would mean...??? Good luck taking your 305 TPI motor to 8-9k like the 4 bangers...
Old 04-03-2005, 05:05 PM
  #35  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
EvilCartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Northern CA.
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
You're even more stupid over here Mcdamit.
Old 04-03-2005, 05:10 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
Bwahahaha... Wow buddy. Wow. Yeah they may underrate these cars... by a few HP... LOL... I had a 89 305 TPI dude... dynoed 175 hp to the wheels!!! WTF are you thinking that these 305 cars can run w/ LS1s

Man LS1 cars are putting 300 to the wheels... You may have a little over half of that... Why don't you kindly remove your foot from your mouth and just say you are wrong.



LOL... yeah b/c the cam has a 109 LSA from the factory!!! LOL... yeah that combined w/ the 179/184 duration and the .350/.384 lift make it a HUGE cam that will lope like a SOB!!!
Listen and read, 305 5spd / 350 AT 10066049* .415 .430 207 213 117.0 (116/-118) That will make a 305 slightly rough it is a mild cam for it, and try somewhere's around 210hp, car has 36,000miles so i assuming very little driveline loss. And i never said that those 305's hi-powered were stock.



Revving Like a 4 banger, i was refering to the carbed 305 first of all secondly i wouldn't take it above 5000
Old 04-03-2005, 05:45 PM
  #37  
Senior Member

 
ZBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1972 Corvette
Originally posted by Mcdamit
and dont doubt the 305's i have seen them whip past ls1's like they were non turboed 4 bangers
I happen to have an LS1 in the garage if you care to try to back that up.
Old 04-03-2005, 06:02 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
never said mine was faster
Old 04-03-2005, 06:03 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
and im not going to alabama
Old 04-03-2005, 09:31 PM
  #40  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Chris89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Originally posted by Mcdamit
never said mine was faster
Maybe... but...

and dont doubt the 305's i have seen them whip past ls1's like they were non turboed 4 bangers
... implies that you have seen one fly past an LS1... I would love to see that one!!!
Old 04-04-2005, 05:15 AM
  #41  
Senior Member

 
iroczrockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
You really have to laugh about this whole thread. I have to agree that if you would just get an aluminum drive shaft it would satisfy your needs. Now if you wanted to go above and beyond...well, drop about $800 and get yourself a carbon fiber driveshaft and you'll never have any troubles.
Old 04-06-2005, 07:19 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
yeah but my point was that i dont wanna really have to buy a new one i just wanna know how fast my car can go before i become a plane
Old 04-06-2005, 07:27 PM
  #43  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Mcdamit
yeah but my point was that i dont wanna really have to buy a new one i just wanna know how fast my car can go before i become a plane
Find out and let us know.
Old 04-07-2005, 04:25 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
thanks kevin, i'll do that.
Old 04-07-2005, 08:30 PM
  #45  
Member

 
DakotaSLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia/Delaware
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Mcdamit
yeah but my point was that i dont wanna really have to buy a new one i just wanna know how fast my car can go before i become a plane
I have run my Iroc well into the triple digits without a hint of complaint from either the driveshaft or u-joints. If anything the car settles nicely right around 100 mph.

You are not approaching any critical material strength properties in your car. You have no need to know at what speed the driveshaft will go into uncontrolled vibration, as you CANNOT reach that speed. Cheers.

EDIT: Because I expect more argument from you, the aerodynamic top speed of most stock thirdgens is approximately 145 mph. They do not "become planes" at this point, this is the speed at which their stock power levels cannot overcome the gearing and wind resistance to accelerate the car any more.

Also, if your response is something along the lines of "well my cast Iron POS vibrates and sucks so they must all suck" my only response to you then is your car has had ****house for maintenance. The stock steel driveshaft is fine at speed, albeit a disadvantage if considering only rotational weight. If you have high speed vibration problems, replace your engine mounts, tranny mounts, and u-joints. Have your driveshaft balanced (it only costs 20 bucks). And have an alignment done on your car and your wheels balanced. It will then happily carry you to any unsafe speed you desire. I call first dibs on parts from the wreck.

Last edited by DakotaSLT; 04-07-2005 at 08:38 PM.
Old 10-31-2005, 07:36 PM
  #46  
Member
 
rjt76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: maine
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 iroc z
Engine: vortec 383
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 moser 12 bolt true trac
can someone say troll
Old 10-31-2005, 11:28 PM
  #47  
Supreme Member
 
Gummie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Readington, NJ
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt w/ 3.73
Originally posted by Mcdamit
... and try somewhere's around 210hp, car has 36,000miles so i assuming very little driveline loss.
It doesn't matter how old your driveline is, you should always be loosing roughly the same amount unless things start binding horribily. A 20 hp, or roughly 10%, loss is pretty unrealistic.

I'm all for defending what you have, just don't run around making out to more/better than it actually is.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
10-29-2022 09:20 PM
fasteddi
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
15
09-10-2015 09:32 AM
Bubbajones_ya
Electronics
4
08-31-2015 12:02 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
08-19-2015 10:29 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
08-16-2015 11:40 PM



Quick Reply: Nother worthless Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.