twin turbo v6 fbody
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: maryland
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
twin turbo v6 fbody
lately ive been kicking around the idea of a ttv6 , has anyone done this before or am i alone here. if anyone has done this could you please let me know how it turned out.
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elk Grove Village, IL
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
You could always try the button. Works great from what I hear.
As to your original question I beleive there someone on these boards fabricating a turbo setup for a 2.8L v6 bird. Not sure of his user name. It would probably help if I searched for it. Not only that, but do you have any idea how much tuning, and prom burning you'd have to do for a setup like this? Do you have welding skills? All the tools nessesary for this? Its a HUGE job, and you don't sound like you know what you need to know. Stick with a 350sbc, its much easier and cheaper for those of us without the skills, money, or time for such an involved project.
As to your original question I beleive there someone on these boards fabricating a turbo setup for a 2.8L v6 bird. Not sure of his user name. It would probably help if I searched for it. Not only that, but do you have any idea how much tuning, and prom burning you'd have to do for a setup like this? Do you have welding skills? All the tools nessesary for this? Its a HUGE job, and you don't sound like you know what you need to know. Stick with a 350sbc, its much easier and cheaper for those of us without the skills, money, or time for such an involved project.
Last edited by FruityOne; 05-03-2003 at 08:27 PM.
#3
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Indianapolis Indiana
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is only one companny that makes them..and he has to custom make them.. so if you want me to hook you up ..i have been in tuch with him for sometime..if you want to know more email me at throop13@AOL.COM
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: maryland
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
to fruity one
fruity one its funny how u say i dont know enough to be capable of installing/tuning for a setup like a ttv6. let me ask you one question, where in my original post did it say anything about my mechanical inclination? ok it didnt so keep your ignorant thoughts to your self. second off, while i may or may not be capable of doing such a project myself im sure between me, my brother and my father we would be more than capable of tackling such a task. you see me i read alot of info about cars (i spend way too much time reading about cars), like many many others, and while at the age of 18 i may not have the expierence to undertake such a project but with the help of my brother, an a.s.e. master mechanic, who also has expierence of working on a race crew (albeit a thunder car, the motor they had in that car was truly bad *** making 600+ horse at close to 7k rpms) and my father who dabbled in mechanics during the great muscle car era of the late 60's, while he may not have the mechanical know-how to handle todays fuel injected cars he can certainly take care of any welding that will need to be done. and on to the 3rd issue: tuning yes i will agree with you there i do not know enough about tinkering with engine perameters to properly tune a car of this kind of setup. but thats why there are people who do prom tuning and things of the sort, and like everything else all it takes is a little time patience and attention and i too could learn how to do such tuning. so instead of giving me a bunch of **** about how i dont know what im doing why dont you just answer the question i had or just not respond, i mean you dindt answer my question and you have no expierence with this setup so i guess fruity one you should of just skipped over this thread.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LMAO @Fruity One. Guys face it. No one is ever going to build a twin turbo 6. Lets see, its cheaper to just do the 8 cylinder route. The idea is constantly thrown around and NO ONE ever follows through on it. I'm willing to bet money it never happens.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
If anyone can make a TTV6 more power to them. I think it's a good idea. For most people however money is a factor. So is time.
It's hard to beat the SBC 350 for HP-$$$$ ratio. Best thing to do is drop in a 350 or 383. Or you can even drop in a 305. Theres enough of them out there that don't get used. Hell if you wait long enough my 305 will be ready to go soon. I won't be needing it when I build a 350 or 383.
I've done the research. I considered a stroker for my 305. And I considered supercharging it.
I can get more HP for less money with a 350. It is as simple as that.
It's hard to beat the SBC 350 for HP-$$$$ ratio. Best thing to do is drop in a 350 or 383. Or you can even drop in a 305. Theres enough of them out there that don't get used. Hell if you wait long enough my 305 will be ready to go soon. I won't be needing it when I build a 350 or 383.
I've done the research. I considered a stroker for my 305. And I considered supercharging it.
I can get more HP for less money with a 350. It is as simple as that.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by 84TAProject
Guys face it. No one is ever going to build a twin turbo 6. Lets see, its cheaper to just do the 8 cylinder route. The idea is constantly thrown around and NO ONE ever follows through on it. I'm willing to bet money it never happens.
Guys face it. No one is ever going to build a twin turbo 6. Lets see, its cheaper to just do the 8 cylinder route. The idea is constantly thrown around and NO ONE ever follows through on it. I'm willing to bet money it never happens.
Agreed.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: maryland
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ttv6
yes while it is certainly cheaper to do a 350, thats not the point of such a project. arent you guys tired of seeing the same setup on 50 different cars? lets face it our cars, the 3rd gen f-body, are a dime a dozen so theres not much we can do to individualize our vehicles as far as appearence goes but one place where we can strike new ground is to build a different engine than what everyone esle has in there. and lets face it you would have to look high and low to find a tt f-body. i know of one such car and it was a heavily modded 69 ss with a 355 tt, wich i read about in one of the car mags, chevy hp i believe.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
We're also tired of hearing people talk about twin turbo v6's in f-bodies, but ... If you do it, good luck, you'll be instantly famous if you put even a SINGLE turbo on it!! And if you do so, take tons of pictures...
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco,Ca area
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey if you have the time and the money go ahead and do it. But I would be willing to bet that when you find out how big of a project it is going to be you will drop the idea. It's just not worth it to build up the engines. Face the music man, this topic has been beat to death on here twenty times over.
#12
individual
I agree, if you think it's a good idea go for it.. I see some cars on here that look some what like mine but I have never been driving and seen one like mine anywhere.. I can't leave the house without getting some coments everywhere I go.. I was also going to build the 335 stroker, which would have been way cheaper than the 350 im building now.. But I wanted the power.. Anyways, if you think it's a good idea, go for it dude.....:rockon:
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
I hate to break it to the nonbelievers, but there's a reason I kept my v6 when I bought my v8.. It's getting boosted. Period. Not twin, mind you, as I really don't see the point in twin, and I already have a single turbo more than capable of pushing the poor 2.8 to its limits (and about 20psi beyond those limits).. The required prom tuning is insane, granted, however it is doable. CATS does have the tuner files required to take care of our V6 ECUs, and it's honestly alot easier to turbo a v6 than a small block.. or have you not tried to change your plugs lately? (much less actually get in there to fabricate a full turbo exhaust system.. yech)
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Oh, blah, blah, blah. I'm so sick of all the smack talking of turbo'in one of these 2.8s. Nobody's done it in an fbody. Will anyone ever do it? Yes, someone will.
#19
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I'm leaning toward the forget-it-unless-you-are-totally-going-to-do-it side. I have seen so many people with hopes and dreams of making a single/twin turbo setup for an f-body, but I don't think I ahve ever seen one; or ever will. The fabrication would be extensive, not to mention the whole mess would have to be designed, engineered, and built from nearly scratch.
If anyone does ever do it, let me know
If anyone does ever do it, let me know
#23
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by AGood2.8
It'll cost you aprox $6,000 + another $1785.95 when your done.
It'll cost you aprox $6,000 + another $1785.95 when your done.
$6000 for customizing everything for the 2.8 TT buildup
And then $1785.95 is the cost of a new 3.4 crate motor that you will be buying after you grenade that piece of crap 2.8 from all the new crank pressure.
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Mmm *pets the turbo sitting in his lap* Anyone got some tubing I can use to make the manifold real quick?
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Well, finally tracked down specs on the turbo.. looks like I won't be using it after all. Poor thing is a Mitsubishi TE-05-12 off a 2.0l saab 900.. however, it will work perfectly on my friend's car of foreign origin, and I may be able to get a straight trade for the turbo he has laying around (KKK-26 off a Porsche 944, designed for a high-rev 2.5l, should be a near-perfect match for the 2.8 ... just needs a friggin wastegate, which is integral on the Mitsu TE-05) ... so yes, I guess I still am blowing smoke for now. Sorry folks
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: LaFayette, NY
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
Originally posted by firechicken_-54
hey fly89gta i was wondering if the tta 3.8's are the same as the 3800 series
hey fly89gta i was wondering if the tta 3.8's are the same as the 3800 series
#27
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Those TTA's are 120 degrees?? Are you serious?? I always thought they used a 90 degree block!!
#28
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
120 Degree?! .... Show me a GM spec sheet. Till then, I argue that they're 90 degree.
My couch is starting to resemble some freakishly scary junkyard.. that TE-05 has a friend over.. the KKK-26#6 will work just fine for what I want at the moment.. and it's here.. along with the mitsu.. .. why do I have a pair of turbos on my couch? =P
Tracking down a stock 944 wastegate.. and a BOV off just about anything... maybe even an intercooler, though I can deal without that for now... getting contacts together for the turbo manifold, which should be ready by the end of the month if things continue as planned.. getting oiling system prepped.. slight work to the turbo.. .. muahahaha.
My couch is starting to resemble some freakishly scary junkyard.. that TE-05 has a friend over.. the KKK-26#6 will work just fine for what I want at the moment.. and it's here.. along with the mitsu.. .. why do I have a pair of turbos on my couch? =P
Tracking down a stock 944 wastegate.. and a BOV off just about anything... maybe even an intercooler, though I can deal without that for now... getting contacts together for the turbo manifold, which should be ready by the end of the month if things continue as planned.. getting oiling system prepped.. slight work to the turbo.. .. muahahaha.
#31
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
If someone did....*** it must be funny looking.
#32
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Florence, KY Y'all state
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 5.7liter v8 (LT1 carb)
Transmission: th-350 rebuilt with a 2400-2800 stall
2.8 liters, twin Garrett T-3's, 3" air to air intercooler...Coming soon...Eventually actually
We wasted the trans in it, so now it's time to start in on our engine while were getting that done. Hardest things to fabricate are going to be the headers. Other than that it's cake Were looking at around $500 for the twin turbo setup due to the fact the turbos, intercooler, BOV, waste gate were purchased at the junkyard for $0
We wasted the trans in it, so now it's time to start in on our engine while were getting that done. Hardest things to fabricate are going to be the headers. Other than that it's cake Were looking at around $500 for the twin turbo setup due to the fact the turbos, intercooler, BOV, waste gate were purchased at the junkyard for $0
#33
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Oh bah. I can't find a free wastegate or bov to save my life =P
#36
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by FastKitteN
2.8 liters, twin Garrett T-3's, 3" air to air intercooler...Coming soon...Eventually actually
We wasted the trans in it, so now it's time to start in on our engine while were getting that done. Hardest things to fabricate are going to be the headers. Other than that it's cake Were looking at around $500 for the twin turbo setup due to the fact the turbos, intercooler, BOV, waste gate were purchased at the junkyard for $0
2.8 liters, twin Garrett T-3's, 3" air to air intercooler...Coming soon...Eventually actually
We wasted the trans in it, so now it's time to start in on our engine while were getting that done. Hardest things to fabricate are going to be the headers. Other than that it's cake Were looking at around $500 for the twin turbo setup due to the fact the turbos, intercooler, BOV, waste gate were purchased at the junkyard for $0
#37
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Doward
You don't need fancy headers, or twin turbos to turbocharge a 2.8, people! It's really not hard to turbo one of these guys, it just takes planning, and time.
You don't need fancy headers, or twin turbos to turbocharge a 2.8, people! It's really not hard to turbo one of these guys, it just takes planning, and time.
#38
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
I'm picking up the turbo and intercooler this weekend, in exchange for some computer work.
I've already got a rough prototype (read, clothes hanger) of the exhaust routing.
I'm ordering the Mandrel bends and tubing next Friday.
I should have the flange/pipes welded up the following Friday.
Only thing left is to locate a BOV, and figure out the intake routing.
I'd say about a month, give or take... why do you ask?
I've already got a rough prototype (read, clothes hanger) of the exhaust routing.
I'm ordering the Mandrel bends and tubing next Friday.
I should have the flange/pipes welded up the following Friday.
Only thing left is to locate a BOV, and figure out the intake routing.
I'd say about a month, give or take... why do you ask?
#39
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Doward
I'd say about a month, give or take... why do you ask?
I'd say about a month, give or take... why do you ask?
I guess we'll see you posting in a month or so. As for the BOV placement put it on the pipe going from the intercool to the TB...that's where the turbobuick guys put theirs normally
#40
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
er.. yeah, that was the idea
Actually, I'm still trying to figure out if the BOV should be before or after the MAF... I'm a touch worried that under boost, when I slam the next gear, if the BOV's release of air is going to screw up the MAF reading horribly, or if it'll be smooth.
Once the hardware is in, its all a matter of tuning her out.
Anyway. Until I actually get some system together, I'm not saying anything else.
Actually, I'm still trying to figure out if the BOV should be before or after the MAF... I'm a touch worried that under boost, when I slam the next gear, if the BOV's release of air is going to screw up the MAF reading horribly, or if it'll be smooth.
Once the hardware is in, its all a matter of tuning her out.
Anyway. Until I actually get some system together, I'm not saying anything else.
#44
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Not going to make headers. Using stock exhaust manifolds.
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
where are the MAF's located on the 2.8, I forget...
and it's going to be a 5-speed eh? I sure hope you don't go with too big of a turbo or else you're gonna lag like a *****
put the BOV AFTER the MAF
and it's going to be a 5-speed eh? I sure hope you don't go with too big of a turbo or else you're gonna lag like a *****
put the BOV AFTER the MAF
#46
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
But then I'm reading air that's not going into the motor..
Well, on 2nd thought, I guess too rich is better than too lean
Well, on 2nd thought, I guess too rich is better than too lean
#48
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Did you guys think I was kidding about that price?
$50 T3
$100 exhaust tubing
$20 chip (till I get my own programmer)
$40 (?) for a DSM 1g BOV
$80 19pph injectors
Intercooler and Mitsu TE04 for free.
$50 T3
$100 exhaust tubing
$20 chip (till I get my own programmer)
$40 (?) for a DSM 1g BOV
$80 19pph injectors
Intercooler and Mitsu TE04 for free.
#49
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Doward
But then I'm reading air that's not going into the motor..
Well, on 2nd thought, I guess too rich is better than too lean
But then I'm reading air that's not going into the motor..
Well, on 2nd thought, I guess too rich is better than too lean
#50
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Oh yes. So does too much boost. Wish I could send you all this video I got... Pretty new turbo Eclipse..he bounces it off the limiter for about 5 seconds and launches it. Hits 3rd gear and rips his block apart. Few big pieces, rips a piston top off the connecting rod, and the connecting rod breaks in half off the crank. The adjacent cylinder blew a hole about an inch and a half wide and 1 inch tall in the cylinder wall.