Which is better?? What one gives the better performance and sound for the buck? Does anyone have either matched to Edelbrock headers? What is the performance and sound like??

------------------
88 GTA
L98 350
700R4
3:27 axle
MODS,
Edelbrock TES headers, 3" straight pipe, Flowmaster 80 series, K&N filter, Accel 8.8mm wires, Bosch Platinum plugs, Wells cap and rotor button, Wells ignition module, MAF screens removed, Hypertech TB air foil, Thermomaster stage II chip, 180* Powerstat, Hypertech cool fan switch, B&M shift kit, B&M power clutch pack, B&M servo, GM fuel filter.

 

i have the TES's and edelbrock cat back and when anytime somebody takes it for a drive and i hear the car. It puts a big ol grin on my face

------------------
89 FORMULA 350 Edelbrock Cat-Back ,March Pulleys,Super Coil,MSD 6AL ,Edelbrock TES's, AFPR ,Shiftkit, Edelbrock Base

 

I have a set of TES and the Hooker cat-back. It sounds and perfroms great, I like it a lot. The Hooker, Edebrock and Flowmaster systems all flow within like 3 or 4 cfm of eachother, so, its really what style and sound you like the best. I choose Hooker because I like the 4 3 inch chrome tips.

------------------
1987 Chevy Camaro IROC-Z
L98 TPI 350 (5.7L)
TH 700R-4 Transmission with 2.77:1 Rear End

Current Mods: Edelbrock TES 1 5/8" Headers, Hooker Aerochamber Cat-Back System, Performance Resource Chip with 160* Thermostat, Accel Ignition Components, K&N Filters, All Free Mods, Falken ZIEX Z-Rated Tires.

Best ET : 14.32 @ 97.7mph
(corrected for elevation)