What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Not the best pictures but you get the idea, these are the American Racing Torq Thrust II's. At first I thought the back tires stuck out too far but now I think I like it. Before anyone says anything I know my car is filthy, its been washed since these were taken.




Last edited by white1991rs; Feb 10, 2013 at 12:07 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 6
From: Houson
Car: 86 Firebird
Engine: 305 SBC
Transmission: 700 R4 TCI
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
I like it. What rear end do you have?
Last edited by mmadden55; Nov 2, 2012 at 03:51 PM.
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 586
Likes: 2
From: Romney, WV
Car: 89 IROC Z/88 IROC Vert
Engine: 350c.i./305c.i.
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42/4.10
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
I usually don't care for them but on your white car they look damn nice! What size tire are you running?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Thanks! They're 275/40 in the back and 245/45 in the front, I went with 17's because you couldn't get 275's for 16's
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Baldwinsville,NY USA
Car: 1984 z28
Engine: 5.0 HO
Transmission: T5
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Are those the wheel and tire combos I see on eBay? Are they the 17"? I want them for my '84Z and I plan on dropping an inch or two.
Bob
Bob
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
I got them through Belle Tire because they carry American Racing products I had them special ordered. They are 17's though.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 6
From: Houson
Car: 86 Firebird
Engine: 305 SBC
Transmission: 700 R4 TCI
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Sorry el phone typo, I meant what rear end do you have? Stock 4th gen or other?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Its cool I figured thats what happened but I still have the stock 3rd gen rear end
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Baldwinsville,NY USA
Car: 1984 z28
Engine: 5.0 HO
Transmission: T5
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
AM. Racing 17x8/17x9 Chrome Wheels Rims Tires 245/45ZR17-275/40ZR17
$1500 shipped
Nice ride you have. I love clean Camaros.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Thank you! Those rims look chrome and mine are actually polished aluminum but they're two very similar finishes, also different brand of tires but this would give you the same look. I believe mine are offset -10 so check that before you buy because they come in a few different offsets.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Haha I know, I'm just hoping the tires don't hit my paint with rocks because they're out so wide.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 9
From: Northern, CA
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Very nice indeed . I Like the slight rake with those wheels.IMO a car set up in this manner should not be lowered.If there was any more space between the tires and well than I would say yes to a little drop to get them just where they are now.Would you tell us how wide the wheels are.(7",8",10" ??)
Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; Nov 2, 2012 at 11:22 PM.
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore MD area
Car: 82 El Camino
Engine: built 355
Transmission: T-56 upgraded internal
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42
Nice looking camaro.
Drop it......I had the same Torque Thrust IIs (now for sale) 17x8 as im betting yours are with both Eagle F1s and Nitto NT555s at 275-40-17 in the rear, dropped mine an inch all around with vogtland springs and never had any problems with rocks chipping the paint outside of the fender wells. It also kept the slightly raked look that I liked.
Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Drop it......I had the same Torque Thrust IIs (now for sale) 17x8 as im betting yours are with both Eagle F1s and Nitto NT555s at 275-40-17 in the rear, dropped mine an inch all around with vogtland springs and never had any problems with rocks chipping the paint outside of the fender wells. It also kept the slightly raked look that I liked.
Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Very Nice... Have u had thoughts about raising it a few inches? ive been thing about raising mine but i like how it handles now. but with the wider tires i feel like i should raise it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Car: 83 camaro berlinetta
Engine: 40 over 350
Transmission: 86 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Man, the stance, and look of the wheels are nice but the rears stick out way too far. I would definitely return them and get the correct backspacing. Your first reaction is the give away. You don't want to get used to the look, you want to see your car and automatically say "SWEET". Don't let the dudes with bad taste sway you.
P.S. when someday if you want to lower your car, they'll look even worse, not to mention there is no possible way to achieve decent suspension travel when your quarter panels are hitting/rubbing on the top of your tire.
P.S. when someday if you want to lower your car, they'll look even worse, not to mention there is no possible way to achieve decent suspension travel when your quarter panels are hitting/rubbing on the top of your tire.
Last edited by rybread11; Nov 3, 2012 at 08:05 AM. Reason: added the P.S.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Man, the stance, and look of the wheels are nice but the rears stick out way too far. I would definitely return them and get the correct backspacing. Your first reaction is the give away. You don't want to get used to the look, you want to see your car and automatically say "SWEET". Don't let the dudes with bad taste sway you.
P.S. when someday if you want to lower your car, they'll look even worse, not to mention there is no possible way to achieve decent suspension travel when your quarter panels are hitting/rubbing on the top of your tire.
P.S. when someday if you want to lower your car, they'll look even worse, not to mention there is no possible way to achieve decent suspension travel when your quarter panels are hitting/rubbing on the top of your tire.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
From: chicago IL
Car: 91 formula
Engine: 350 tuned port. bolt ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
i love the wheels. in fact got them on my formula with a 373 rear. it sticks out alittle but looks good. Mine are from american racing first gen ones. the look diffrent then yours.
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore MD area
Car: 82 El Camino
Engine: built 355
Transmission: T-56 upgraded internal
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42
Originally Posted by rybread11
Man, the stance, and look of the wheels are nice but the rears stick out way too far. I would definitely return them and get the correct backspacing. Your first reaction is the give away. You don't want to get used to the look, you want to see your car and automatically say "SWEET". Don't let the dudes with bad taste sway you.
P.S. when someday if you want to lower your car, they'll look even worse, not to mention there is no possible way to achieve decent suspension travel when your quarter panels are hitting/rubbing on the top of your tire.
P.S. when someday if you want to lower your car, they'll look even worse, not to mention there is no possible way to achieve decent suspension travel when your quarter panels are hitting/rubbing on the top of your tire.
Rybread11
I suggest doing a search on suspensions before posting erroneous information that is merely your opinion.
With the tires and rims he is running which look F'N SWEET lowering would not be a problem, nor would suspension travel........ Out of the 13 3rd gens i've owned 11 have been lowered between 1"-2.5" with the widest tires in the rear I could fit.
Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
White1991rs......think it looks great. Are your tires sitting outside the wheel well by about an inch in the rear? I have the American Racing Daytona 18's with 255/40 Z18 Bridgestones. I am just at the lip with a "0" offset. I am thinking of dropping it for sure. I would double check with clearance with a +10 offset and a 275/40-18 tire. Good Luck. We have the same car, however mine is soon to be a long way from white.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
From: Fallston, Maryland
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3.70
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Looks good, lower it a bit and it'll be perfect. However, your tires are on backwards, you should fix that.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1989 SS
Engine: LT1+1500$ hooker exhaust
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 bogger
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
The backspacing is a non issue considering we are sporting a 4th gen 10bolt. It has a drag stance that 90% of people like.
Lol i just reread and you still have the stock 3rd gen rearend? That's to much man. Never think about going 4th gen rear with those wheels. Granted it looks good but my wheels tucked with my 3rdgen rear stock.
Lol i just reread and you still have the stock 3rd gen rearend? That's to much man. Never think about going 4th gen rear with those wheels. Granted it looks good but my wheels tucked with my 3rdgen rear stock.
Last edited by 89rs454; Nov 4, 2012 at 01:52 AM.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 18
From: Lincolnton, NC
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 97 5.7 Vortec LT4 hotcam
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Car looks good. Wheels look good. Id rather see the rears tucked in more. Im not a fan of how far they set out either.
Tires do look a little backwards at first glance, but IDK.
Tires do look a little backwards at first glance, but IDK.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Car: 89 IROC Z28
Engine: 357 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Car: 83 camaro berlinetta
Engine: 40 over 350
Transmission: 86 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Rybread11
I suggest doing a search on suspensions before posting erroneous information that is merely your opinion.
With the tires and rims he is running which look F'N SWEET lowering would not be a problem, nor would suspension travel........ Out of the 13 3rd gens i've owned 11 have been lowered between 1"-2.5" with the widest tires in the rear I could fit.
Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
I suggest doing a search on suspensions before posting erroneous information that is merely your opinion.
With the tires and rims he is running which look F'N SWEET lowering would not be a problem, nor would suspension travel........ Out of the 13 3rd gens i've owned 11 have been lowered between 1"-2.5" with the widest tires in the rear I could fit.
Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Disregarding the above, after looking at it again, is it possible your rims are mounted incorrectly? It looks like they may be switched front to back and side to side, with the front tires mounted on the rear wheels and the rear tires mounted on the front wheels. That is if you have a different offset on two of the rims (which it looks like you do in your pics). If your rims are all the same size you could swap them around and see if it looks right. You would have to turn the tires around on the rims though to have the tread pattern going in the right direction.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
You need to read my post again. First, he is specifically asking for our opinion's in the title he created for this thread. Second, "Don't let the dudes with bad taste influence you" is a statement I made regarding his choice in rims, and speaks to the question of backspacing, which he infers (according to his taste) is the questionable aspect of the wheels.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
I dont lke it. Looks like someone put 3rd gen wheels on a 4th gen rear. Not really a good look. The fact that it's 275 width tires helps it a little, but still its a little too much. Drag stance... most drag racers are trying to tuck huge meats as far as possible, so they may stick out a bit, but they're very wide. They also generally use 15 inch wheels. Youre mixing a modern pro-tour look and a cheesy rendition of the 70's-80's pro stock look into the same car. If you like it thats all that matters, but I agree with the other guy, if your first impression is that it doesnt look right, then it doesnt look right. None of us here are seeing the car in person - you are. There's a chance the look might fix itself if you lowered the car... but Im not sure. If you want a rake and rear tires that stick out, then run 15 inch wheels.
Also, your tires are on backwards in the first picture. Im guessing you noticed since its fixed in the rest of them?
BTW, you have a gorgeous car.
Also, your tires are on backwards in the first picture. Im guessing you noticed since its fixed in the rest of them?
BTW, you have a gorgeous car.
Last edited by InfernalVortex; Nov 5, 2012 at 11:13 PM.
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Car: 83 camaro berlinetta
Engine: 40 over 350
Transmission: 86 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
I wrote what I did, to offer advice to the person who started this thread, not to tell other people what I think of them. If you want to take it that way, I think you are being too sensitive.
Last edited by rybread11; Nov 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM. Reason: fixed spelling
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
I dont lke it. Looks like someone put 3rd gen wheels on a 4th gen rear. Not really a good look. The fact that it's 275 width tires helps it a little, but still its a little too much. Drag stance... most drag racers are trying to tuck huge meats as far as possible, so they may stick out a bit, but they're very wide. They also generally use 15 inch wheels. Youre mixing a modern pro-tour look and a cheesy rendition of the 70's-80's pro stock look into the same car. If you like it thats all that matters, but I agree with the other guy, if your first impression is that it doesnt look right, then it doesnt look right. None of us here are seeing the car in person - you are. There's a chance the look might fix itself if you lowered the car... but Im not sure. If you want a rake and rear tires that stick out, then run 15 inch wheels.
Also, your tires are on backwards in the first picture. Im guessing you noticed since its fixed in the rest of them?
BTW, you have a gorgeous car.
Also, your tires are on backwards in the first picture. Im guessing you noticed since its fixed in the rest of them?
BTW, you have a gorgeous car.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
I haven't put much thought into raising it, I'm not sure about that look, if you end up doing it you should post pictures
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
White1991rs......think it looks great. Are your tires sitting outside the wheel well by about an inch in the rear? I have the American Racing Daytona 18's with 255/40 Z18 Bridgestones. I am just at the lip with a "0" offset. I am thinking of dropping it for sure. I would double check with clearance with a +10 offset and a 275/40-18 tire. Good Luck. We have the same car, however mine is soon to be a long way from white.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
The backspacing is a non issue considering we are sporting a 4th gen 10bolt. It has a drag stance that 90% of people like.
Lol i just reread and you still have the stock 3rd gen rearend? That's to much man. Never think about going 4th gen rear with those wheels. Granted it looks good but my wheels tucked with my 3rdgen rear stock.
Lol i just reread and you still have the stock 3rd gen rearend? That's to much man. Never think about going 4th gen rear with those wheels. Granted it looks good but my wheels tucked with my 3rdgen rear stock.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Rybread11
I suggest doing a search on suspensions before posting erroneous information that is merely your opinion.
With the tires and rims he is running which look F'N SWEET lowering would not be a problem, nor would suspension travel........ Out of the 13 3rd gens i've owned 11 have been lowered between 1"-2.5" with the widest tires in the rear I could fit.
Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
I suggest doing a search on suspensions before posting erroneous information that is merely your opinion.
With the tires and rims he is running which look F'N SWEET lowering would not be a problem, nor would suspension travel........ Out of the 13 3rd gens i've owned 11 have been lowered between 1"-2.5" with the widest tires in the rear I could fit.
Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1989 SS
Engine: LT1+1500$ hooker exhaust
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 bogger
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: Australian 9 bolt 3.27 posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
I am not a big fan of the offset on the rears but I always say if you like it then that's ultimately what matters. Enjoy the new rims and stance.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1989 SS
Engine: LT1+1500$ hooker exhaust
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 bogger
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Your right, everyone want's to know why 4gh gen fbody's are heavier, well there you go.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Thanks! Im pretty happy with it now but Im a little bummed because I dont know what Im going to do about beefing up the rear end with out pushing the wheels out more :/
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
Anyway, you can always have a narrower rear end made by Moser etc.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?
I didnt know that. I dont need anymore width but I'd like a little more strength because Im not going to be running the 305 forever.





