Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:23 PM
  #1  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Not the best pictures but you get the idea, these are the American Racing Torq Thrust II's. At first I thought the back tires stuck out too far but now I think I like it. Before anyone says anything I know my car is filthy, its been washed since these were taken.

Name:  IMG_5523.jpg
Views: 369
Size:  198.4 KB

Name:  IMG_5329.jpg
Views: 382
Size:  149.0 KB



Name:  image.jpg
Views: 987
Size:  266.6 KB

Last edited by white1991rs; Feb 10, 2013 at 12:07 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:29 PM
  #2  
mmadden55's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 6
From: Houson
Car: 86 Firebird
Engine: 305 SBC
Transmission: 700 R4 TCI
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

I like it. What rear end do you have?

Last edited by mmadden55; Nov 2, 2012 at 03:51 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:32 PM
  #3  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Sorry I'm not sure what you mean
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:38 PM
  #4  
jas2730's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 586
Likes: 2
From: Romney, WV
Car: 89 IROC Z/88 IROC Vert
Engine: 350c.i./305c.i.
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42/4.10
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

I usually don't care for them but on your white car they look damn nice! What size tire are you running?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:45 PM
  #5  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Thanks! They're 275/40 in the back and 245/45 in the front, I went with 17's because you couldn't get 275's for 16's
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:47 PM
  #6  
Bob Hayes's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Baldwinsville,NY USA
Car: 1984 z28
Engine: 5.0 HO
Transmission: T5
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Are those the wheel and tire combos I see on eBay? Are they the 17"? I want them for my '84Z and I plan on dropping an inch or two.
Bob
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:50 PM
  #7  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

I got them through Belle Tire because they carry American Racing products I had them special ordered. They are 17's though.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:53 PM
  #8  
mmadden55's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 6
From: Houson
Car: 86 Firebird
Engine: 305 SBC
Transmission: 700 R4 TCI
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Sorry el phone typo, I meant what rear end do you have? Stock 4th gen or other?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:56 PM
  #9  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Its cool I figured thats what happened but I still have the stock 3rd gen rear end
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 03:56 PM
  #10  
Bob Hayes's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Baldwinsville,NY USA
Car: 1984 z28
Engine: 5.0 HO
Transmission: T5
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by white1991rs
I got them through Belle Tire because they carry American Racing products I had them special ordered. They are 17's though.
They look like these that are on eBay.
AM. Racing 17x8/17x9 Chrome Wheels Rims Tires 245/45ZR17-275/40ZR17
$1500 shipped
Nice ride you have. I love clean Camaros.
Attached Thumbnails What do you think of the new rims/stance?-b-q51vqcwk-kgrhqz-leey  
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 04:02 PM
  #11  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Thank you! Those rims look chrome and mine are actually polished aluminum but they're two very similar finishes, also different brand of tires but this would give you the same look. I believe mine are offset -10 so check that before you buy because they come in a few different offsets.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 04:04 PM
  #12  
Dakota W.'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

4x4 status! Nice wheels.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 04:28 PM
  #13  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Haha I know, I'm just hoping the tires don't hit my paint with rocks because they're out so wide.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 06:19 PM
  #14  
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 9
From: Northern, CA
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Very nice indeed . I Like the slight rake with those wheels.IMO a car set up in this manner should not be lowered.If there was any more space between the tires and well than I would say yes to a little drop to get them just where they are now.Would you tell us how wide the wheels are.(7",8",10" ??)

Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; Nov 2, 2012 at 11:22 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 06:30 PM
  #15  
redneckjoe's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 34
From: Spring Hill, Fl.
Car: 87 iroc-z
Engine: 454
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

very nice fit and stance. i like the look.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 08:52 PM
  #16  
Darryls1992RS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Looks awesome!!:-)
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 09:43 PM
  #17  
t-top havoc's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 3
From: Mid West
Car: '87 Camaro
Engine: '92 Carb'd 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: factory stock
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Nice ride!
Now polish those exhaust tips!! : )
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2012 | 12:29 AM
  #18  
deadhead1882's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore MD area
Car: 82 El Camino
Engine: built 355
Transmission: T-56 upgraded internal
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42
Nice looking camaro.

Drop it......I had the same Torque Thrust IIs (now for sale) 17x8 as im betting yours are with both Eagle F1s and Nitto NT555s at 275-40-17 in the rear, dropped mine an inch all around with vogtland springs and never had any problems with rocks chipping the paint outside of the fender wells. It also kept the slightly raked look that I liked.


Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2012 | 02:30 AM
  #19  
Z28'83's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Car: 1983 z28 Crossfire
Engine: V8
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Very Nice... Have u had thoughts about raising it a few inches? ive been thing about raising mine but i like how it handles now. but with the wider tires i feel like i should raise it.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2012 | 07:08 AM
  #20  
Dakota W.'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by t-top havoc
Nice ride!
Now polish those exhaust tips!! : )
I looked again and just noticed how big the tips are, WOW!
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2012 | 07:57 AM
  #21  
rybread11's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Car: 83 camaro berlinetta
Engine: 40 over 350
Transmission: 86 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Man, the stance, and look of the wheels are nice but the rears stick out way too far. I would definitely return them and get the correct backspacing. Your first reaction is the give away. You don't want to get used to the look, you want to see your car and automatically say "SWEET". Don't let the dudes with bad taste sway you.

P.S. when someday if you want to lower your car, they'll look even worse, not to mention there is no possible way to achieve decent suspension travel when your quarter panels are hitting/rubbing on the top of your tire.

Last edited by rybread11; Nov 3, 2012 at 08:05 AM. Reason: added the P.S.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2012 | 08:44 AM
  #22  
neeb_usmc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Car: 1985 Trans AM
Engine: 350 ATK Performance
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Eaton 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

look great man. i like how they stick out a little
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2012 | 08:59 AM
  #23  
Dakota W.'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by rybread11
Man, the stance, and look of the wheels are nice but the rears stick out way too far. I would definitely return them and get the correct backspacing. Your first reaction is the give away. You don't want to get used to the look, you want to see your car and automatically say "SWEET". Don't let the dudes with bad taste sway you.

P.S. when someday if you want to lower your car, they'll look even worse, not to mention there is no possible way to achieve decent suspension travel when your quarter panels are hitting/rubbing on the top of your tire.
You're the one with bad taste. Keep your opinions of others to yourself.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2012 | 11:55 AM
  #24  
formula forever's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
From: chicago IL
Car: 91 formula
Engine: 350 tuned port. bolt ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

i love the wheels. in fact got them on my formula with a 373 rear. it sticks out alittle but looks good. Mine are from american racing first gen ones. the look diffrent then yours.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2012 | 01:36 PM
  #25  
deadhead1882's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore MD area
Car: 82 El Camino
Engine: built 355
Transmission: T-56 upgraded internal
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42
Originally Posted by rybread11
Man, the stance, and look of the wheels are nice but the rears stick out way too far. I would definitely return them and get the correct backspacing. Your first reaction is the give away. You don't want to get used to the look, you want to see your car and automatically say "SWEET". Don't let the dudes with bad taste sway you.

P.S. when someday if you want to lower your car, they'll look even worse, not to mention there is no possible way to achieve decent suspension travel when your quarter panels are hitting/rubbing on the top of your tire.

Rybread11

I suggest doing a search on suspensions before posting erroneous information that is merely your opinion.

With the tires and rims he is running which look F'N SWEET lowering would not be a problem, nor would suspension travel........ Out of the 13 3rd gens i've owned 11 have been lowered between 1"-2.5" with the widest tires in the rear I could fit.



Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2012 | 10:18 PM
  #26  
white_ghost's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: iowa
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

White1991rs......think it looks great. Are your tires sitting outside the wheel well by about an inch in the rear? I have the American Racing Daytona 18's with 255/40 Z18 Bridgestones. I am just at the lip with a "0" offset. I am thinking of dropping it for sure. I would double check with clearance with a +10 offset and a 275/40-18 tire. Good Luck. We have the same car, however mine is soon to be a long way from white.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2012 | 12:05 AM
  #27  
mike_c's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
From: Fallston, Maryland
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3.70
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Looks good, lower it a bit and it'll be perfect. However, your tires are on backwards, you should fix that.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2012 | 01:13 AM
  #28  
89rs454's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1989 SS
Engine: LT1+1500$ hooker exhaust
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 bogger
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Looks like mine except i have CraggerSS wheels. Looks good.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2012 | 01:17 AM
  #29  
neeb_usmc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Car: 1985 Trans AM
Engine: 350 ATK Performance
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Eaton 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

I'm on my phone but are they backwards?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2012 | 01:27 AM
  #30  
89rs454's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1989 SS
Engine: LT1+1500$ hooker exhaust
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 bogger
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

The backspacing is a non issue considering we are sporting a 4th gen 10bolt. It has a drag stance that 90% of people like.

Lol i just reread and you still have the stock 3rd gen rearend? That's to much man. Never think about going 4th gen rear with those wheels. Granted it looks good but my wheels tucked with my 3rdgen rear stock.

Last edited by 89rs454; Nov 4, 2012 at 01:52 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2012 | 04:53 AM
  #31  
3rdgenmaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 18
From: Lincolnton, NC
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 97 5.7 Vortec LT4 hotcam
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Car looks good. Wheels look good. Id rather see the rears tucked in more. Im not a fan of how far they set out either.

Tires do look a little backwards at first glance, but IDK.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2012 | 12:21 PM
  #32  
ringo234's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Car: 89 IROC Z28
Engine: 357 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by neeb_usmc
I'm on my phone but are they backwards?
Yes your tires are directional. They look like BF Goodrich Gsport tires.
If you look on the sidewall they should have an arrow showing the
rotation of the tire. The treads should be pointing forward, hope this makes sense.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2012 | 03:17 AM
  #33  
rybread11's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Car: 83 camaro berlinetta
Engine: 40 over 350
Transmission: 86 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by Dakota W.
You're the one with bad taste. Keep your opinions of others to yourself.
You need to read my post again. First, he is specifically asking for our opinion's in the title he created for this thread. Second, "Don't let the dudes with bad taste influence you" is a statement I made regarding his choice in rims, and speaks to the question of backspacing, which he infers (according to his taste) is the questionable aspect of the wheels.


Originally Posted by deadhead1882
Rybread11

I suggest doing a search on suspensions before posting erroneous information that is merely your opinion.

With the tires and rims he is running which look F'N SWEET lowering would not be a problem, nor would suspension travel........ Out of the 13 3rd gens i've owned 11 have been lowered between 1"-2.5" with the widest tires in the rear I could fit.


Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
How could what I wrote be erroneous if its "merely my opinion"? That doesn't even make sense.


Disregarding the above, after looking at it again, is it possible your rims are mounted incorrectly? It looks like they may be switched front to back and side to side, with the front tires mounted on the rear wheels and the rear tires mounted on the front wheels. That is if you have a different offset on two of the rims (which it looks like you do in your pics). If your rims are all the same size you could swap them around and see if it looks right. You would have to turn the tires around on the rims though to have the tread pattern going in the right direction.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2012 | 07:13 AM
  #34  
Dakota W.'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by rybread11
You need to read my post again. First, he is specifically asking for our opinion's in the title he created for this thread. Second, "Don't let the dudes with bad taste influence you" is a statement I made regarding his choice in rims, and speaks to the question of backspacing, which he infers (according to his taste) is the questionable aspect of the wheels.
You need to read my post again. Saying someone else has bad taste is your opinion of someone else, not the wheels. He asked for opinions on his wheels, not other people.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2012 | 11:09 PM
  #35  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

I dont lke it. Looks like someone put 3rd gen wheels on a 4th gen rear. Not really a good look. The fact that it's 275 width tires helps it a little, but still its a little too much. Drag stance... most drag racers are trying to tuck huge meats as far as possible, so they may stick out a bit, but they're very wide. They also generally use 15 inch wheels. Youre mixing a modern pro-tour look and a cheesy rendition of the 70's-80's pro stock look into the same car. If you like it thats all that matters, but I agree with the other guy, if your first impression is that it doesnt look right, then it doesnt look right. None of us here are seeing the car in person - you are. There's a chance the look might fix itself if you lowered the car... but Im not sure. If you want a rake and rear tires that stick out, then run 15 inch wheels.

Also, your tires are on backwards in the first picture. Im guessing you noticed since its fixed in the rest of them?

BTW, you have a gorgeous car.

Last edited by InfernalVortex; Nov 5, 2012 at 11:13 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2012 | 11:46 PM
  #36  
rybread11's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Car: 83 camaro berlinetta
Engine: 40 over 350
Transmission: 86 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by Dakota W.
You need to read my post again. Saying someone else has bad taste is your opinion of someone else, not the wheels. He asked for opinions on his wheels, not other people.
I wrote what I did, to offer advice to the person who started this thread, not to tell other people what I think of them. If you want to take it that way, I think you are being too sensitive.

Last edited by rybread11; Nov 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM. Reason: fixed spelling
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2012 | 01:37 PM
  #37  
TheMonster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Forged 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

They don't look too bad, almost look like 18's though
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 09:59 AM
  #38  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by InfernalVortex
I dont lke it. Looks like someone put 3rd gen wheels on a 4th gen rear. Not really a good look. The fact that it's 275 width tires helps it a little, but still its a little too much. Drag stance... most drag racers are trying to tuck huge meats as far as possible, so they may stick out a bit, but they're very wide. They also generally use 15 inch wheels. Youre mixing a modern pro-tour look and a cheesy rendition of the 70's-80's pro stock look into the same car. If you like it thats all that matters, but I agree with the other guy, if your first impression is that it doesnt look right, then it doesnt look right. None of us here are seeing the car in person - you are. There's a chance the look might fix itself if you lowered the car... but Im not sure. If you want a rake and rear tires that stick out, then run 15 inch wheels.

Also, your tires are on backwards in the first picture. Im guessing you noticed since its fixed in the rest of them?

BTW, you have a gorgeous car.
Im not a big fan of the 15's I think I might drop it an inch and see how it looks then. About the tires I don't believe they were on backwards but it is possible that I switched them when I took them off to paint the brake drums. And thank you for the compliment
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 10:00 AM
  #39  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by Z28'83
Very Nice... Have u had thoughts about raising it a few inches? ive been thing about raising mine but i like how it handles now. but with the wider tires i feel like i should raise it.
I haven't put much thought into raising it, I'm not sure about that look, if you end up doing it you should post pictures
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 10:07 AM
  #40  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by white_ghost
White1991rs......think it looks great. Are your tires sitting outside the wheel well by about an inch in the rear? I have the American Racing Daytona 18's with 255/40 Z18 Bridgestones. I am just at the lip with a "0" offset. I am thinking of dropping it for sure. I would double check with clearance with a +10 offset and a 275/40-18 tire. Good Luck. We have the same car, however mine is soon to be a long way from white.
Thanks man .Yeah they do stick out about an inch. Post some pictures when you paint it I wanna check it out
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 10:09 AM
  #41  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by 89rs454
The backspacing is a non issue considering we are sporting a 4th gen 10bolt. It has a drag stance that 90% of people like.

Lol i just reread and you still have the stock 3rd gen rearend? That's to much man. Never think about going 4th gen rear with those wheels. Granted it looks good but my wheels tucked with my 3rdgen rear stock.
Would the 4th gen rear make them stick out further? I'm going to be changing the stock one eventually but I dont want to push the wheels out any more.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 10:18 AM
  #42  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by deadhead1882
Rybread11

I suggest doing a search on suspensions before posting erroneous information that is merely your opinion.

With the tires and rims he is running which look F'N SWEET lowering would not be a problem, nor would suspension travel........ Out of the 13 3rd gens i've owned 11 have been lowered between 1"-2.5" with the widest tires in the rear I could fit.



Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Thanks dude I'm glad you like it. Just wondering what spring would you recommend to drop it just an inch? and in the past have you had many ground clearance problem with all those lowered cars? I love the look but Im scared to lower mine because I ripped the muffler off mine the first week I owned it riding at stock height.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 05:34 PM
  #43  
89rs454's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1989 SS
Engine: LT1+1500$ hooker exhaust
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 bogger
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by white1991rs
Would the 4th gen rear make them stick out further? I'm going to be changing the stock one eventually but I dont want to push the wheels out any more.
Yes, about 1/2inch on each side.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 09:50 PM
  #44  
hdavis2005's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 50
Likes: 1
From: Eastern NC
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 MPFI to 305 carb
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 323
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Nice!!
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 10:19 PM
  #45  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by 89rs454
Yes, about 1/2inch on each side.
Try 2 inches per side. A half inch per side is about the difference in offsets from front to rear with the stock axle. A fourth gen axle is about 2 inches wider per side, but the 93-97 ones are slightly different than the 98-02 ones.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 08:50 PM
  #46  
onthedownlow's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: Australian 9 bolt 3.27 posi
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

I am not a big fan of the offset on the rears but I always say if you like it then that's ultimately what matters. Enjoy the new rims and stance.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 03:21 AM
  #47  
89rs454's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1989 SS
Engine: LT1+1500$ hooker exhaust
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 bogger
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by InfernalVortex
Try 2 inches per side. A half inch per side is about the difference in offsets from front to rear with the stock axle. A fourth gen axle is about 2 inches wider per side, but the 93-97 ones are slightly different than the 98-02 ones.
Your right, everyone want's to know why 4gh gen fbody's are heavier, well there you go.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 05:16 PM
  #48  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by onthedownlow
I am not a big fan of the offset on the rears but I always say if you like it then that's ultimately what matters. Enjoy the new rims and stance.
Thanks! Im pretty happy with it now but Im a little bummed because I dont know what Im going to do about beefing up the rear end with out pushing the wheels out more :/
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 08:55 AM
  #49  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

Originally Posted by white1991rs
Thanks! Im pretty happy with it now but Im a little bummed because I dont know what Im going to do about beefing up the rear end with out pushing the wheels out more :/
4th gen rears are no stronger. You know that, right? Most of the parts interchange, even. You have a 91 RS, so you already have the 28 spline axles that the 4th gens have. The only difference is the width.

Anyway, you can always have a narrower rear end made by Moser etc.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 10:27 AM
  #50  
white1991rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: What do you think of the new rims/stance?

I didnt know that. I dont need anymore width but I'd like a little more strength because Im not going to be running the 305 forever.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.