Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Clark, NJ, exit 135
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 CID
Transmission: Beefed up 700R4
Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?
subject pretty much explains it....would you rather drop the car (mean eibach sportlines drop, no slammed camaros) or slightly raise the rear to give it a somewhat drag-ish look, like most second gens and first gens have?
hickish?? looks mean as hell high like that lol no joke
i think i would rather get new gm springs if mine were sagging.. i wouldnt want lower or higher... i just like the stock stance since it is a little higher than some camaros, but i think it depends on the car. cars with 15/16" wheels and fat tires i like stockish height, but if u have 17"+ wheels with lower profiles i would rather have it slammed
personal opinion, of course
:lala:
i think i would rather get new gm springs if mine were sagging.. i wouldnt want lower or higher... i just like the stock stance since it is a little higher than some camaros, but i think it depends on the car. cars with 15/16" wheels and fat tires i like stockish height, but if u have 17"+ wheels with lower profiles i would rather have it slammed
personal opinion, of course:lala:
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
86 street....i really like your car the way it looks
do you not like your own car?
do you not like your own car?
Trending Topics
i'd say lower, but i like that "hickish" car as well. my buddy has a jacked up 2nd gen, looks pretty mean but i'm not big on the wide *** tires stickin out, but i'm all about tubbin' it out so they don't
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
No question, lower it. Don't raise the rear end unless you plan on drag racing on a regular basis because drag cars do not handle well on street and on curves.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
From: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by 86Street
here is mine...but it is "hickish"
here is mine...but it is "hickish"
OH yeah, he has an unnessisary true dual exhauset setup.
That's the reasoning for his car sitting 14 inches off the ground.
ya i do like my car...but i am just goin with what people say...thats why "hickish" in quotes...for people like kj rocks...and maybe it is unnessisary. but i like it. sounds nice and mean with the flows. and thats that. but yea i love my car. and as my friends say it looks high in pictures but in real life it is different.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by 86Street
ya i do like my car...but i am just goin with what people say...thats why "hickish" in quotes...for people like kj rocks...and maybe it is unnessisary. but i like it. sounds nice and mean with the flows. and thats that. but yea i love my car. and as my friends say it looks high in pictures but in real life it is different.
ya i do like my car...but i am just goin with what people say...thats why "hickish" in quotes...for people like kj rocks...and maybe it is unnessisary. but i like it. sounds nice and mean with the flows. and thats that. but yea i love my car. and as my friends say it looks high in pictures but in real life it is different.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1
From: Here and There, Kansas
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L V-6
Transmission: T-5
Drop that sucker
What does a drop run for 3rd gen camaros anyways? say a 2" drop, that would put it 6" of the ground if my memory serves me correctly.
What does a drop run for 3rd gen camaros anyways? say a 2" drop, that would put it 6" of the ground if my memory serves me correctly. Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Clark, NJ, exit 135
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 CID
Transmission: Beefed up 700R4
i have eibach sportlines on the car right now and i think theyre gonna stay on...i love how it makes the car look but i also like the look of a car with a somewhat jacked up rear....and disturb - the springs are about 230 and my cars rocker panel gfx are about 6-7 inches off the ground.
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: 84 T/A,84 Bird,85 T/A Knight Automated Roving Robot
Engine: 305 HO many mods, 151C.I.D-stock,305 TPI stock for now
Transmission: 700-R4 Turbo Hydro-Matic
raise the rear if you want a pro street look. drop the front end an inch if you want killer cornering. pontiac was going to lower the Birds an inch for better aerodynamics and cornering , but saftey standards didn't allow it.
Drop it. These cars aren't running leaf springs, which means raising the rear end throws the suspension off. Our torque arm suspension wasn't desginged to have the front end so much lower than the rear, the angle of the torque arm makes a difference on traction for our cars.
86Street, your car looks good except that you are pushing the wheels out a little more than they need for the same amount of tire. I'm running 275/40's with no need for additional clearancing, so I can't imagine you having much more tread width with those wheels/tires. But that's just my opinion
86Street, your car looks good except that you are pushing the wheels out a little more than they need for the same amount of tire. I'm running 275/40's with no need for additional clearancing, so I can't imagine you having much more tread width with those wheels/tires. But that's just my opinion
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by devianb
I don't think your car has the distinguishing features that make a car a ******* car. For one, all of your wheels match, there is not a primered fender or door, and there is no confederate flag on there either. The rear wheels are definately wide, but they don't stick out past the fender well. ******* cars I see usually have the widest tire on the smallest diameter wheel possible.
I don't think your car has the distinguishing features that make a car a ******* car. For one, all of your wheels match, there is not a primered fender or door, and there is no confederate flag on there either. The rear wheels are definately wide, but they don't stick out past the fender well. ******* cars I see usually have the widest tire on the smallest diameter wheel possible.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
From: Dixon, IL
Car: RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
in person allens car doesn't look as bad as the pic would have you thinking as far as height is concerned. it barely higher in front than stock, rear is altough rear is about 3-4 inches higher than stock
here is my plan: lower the rs
tub the 86, try to keep it the stock height or slightly taller
here is my plan: lower the rs
tub the 86, try to keep it the stock height or slightly taller
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
Originally posted by Gunny Highway
Confederate Flag does not equal *******:nono:
Confederate Flag does not equal *******:nono:
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
From: Wall Township, NJ
Car: 1987 "1991 Z" Sport Coupe
Engine: LG4
Transmission: TH700R4
raise it up
i dont know if its the same for all of u but all of my wheels and tires are the same size. and the rear of my car is raised 1 1/2 inches, is that stock or is there like a lift on the back?
i dont know if its the same for all of u but all of my wheels and tires are the same size. and the rear of my car is raised 1 1/2 inches, is that stock or is there like a lift on the back?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
From: northeast ohio
Car: 2000 astro
Engine: 4.3
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 with 3.42 gears
i agree with brad, the coil springs weren't really designed for having the back higher than the front.
i still have the v6 spring under the front of my car, which explains how it sits. i get a lot of comments around here locally, but the handling sucks.
when i do my suspension, i may go with eibach and lower it maybe an inch at most. i have enough of a fun time getting into these cars. i don't want to make it any harder.
i still have the v6 spring under the front of my car, which explains how it sits. i get a lot of comments around here locally, but the handling sucks.
when i do my suspension, i may go with eibach and lower it maybe an inch at most. i have enough of a fun time getting into these cars. i don't want to make it any harder.
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Central Texas
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 383 Miniram
Transmission: T56
Man here is a pix of my other ride. This is what I used to skate around on in High School, Thats my cousins car in the back(a$$ up).
Last edited by rocc4u; Oct 10, 2002 at 01:02 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ghettobird52
Tech / General Engine
16
Jul 5, 2024 11:18 PM





