My 82' Trans Am
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Long Island NY
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 4 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23
My '82 Trans Am
I just got a new camera so I thought I'd show off my car. I'd love to hear your opinons.
Last edited by Tripper511; Jul 31, 2005 at 08:58 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Is it photoshopped? Hood and GFX look wierd to me.
Other than that, some good wheels and tires and a bit of lowering would do wonders for the car.
Other than that, some good wheels and tires and a bit of lowering would do wonders for the car.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Long Island NY
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 4 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Im not sure what GFX means but the hood is a fiberglass cowl. Im not sure if I want to lower the car more or just add a body kit.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
GFX = GRound Effects. The piece under your door. What kind of hood is that? Looks kinda like an L88 . Any other pics?
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Im not too fond of 82-84s. Yours looks alright. Car has a van appeal with the lower sideskirts with nothing on the front or rear.
Any pics of the front to see the cowl hood some more?
Any pics of the front to see the cowl hood some more?
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Clearfield,Utah
Car: 1987 IROC, 1989 IROC
Engine: built 305, stock 305 tpi
Transmission: Corvette 700r4, t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 posi, 3.08 posi
Good heck. either take the ground effects off the side or but ground effects on the bumpers.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3
From: Amsterdam , NY
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: vee eight
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 4.10 gears
how about a better pic, and then get rid of the door gfx they looks too low without other gfx , and lower it . And is that a dare i say it , rustang wing .
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Maine
Car: 1988 GTA TRANS AM, 1986 TRANS AM
Engine: L98, 5.7 TPI reborn, comp cam/heads maybe HSR this spring 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
looks good. But I was expecting to see an 82 foot car..
looks good. But I was expecting to see an 82 foot car..
Those look like some old people rims you got there. A nice set of GTA rims would do well for that car.
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 348
Likes: 1
From: Post Falls, ID
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: 350 HO
Transmission: TH350 to go in next week
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by Wind Charger
BWAHAHAHAHA!!
Those look like some old people rims you got there. A nice set of GTA rims would do well for that car.
BWAHAHAHAHA!!
Those look like some old people rims you got there. A nice set of GTA rims would do well for that car.
Hey, I think your car looks good in the pic. It might look different closer up, but from this distance it looks ok. It's black too and the photo looks alright. As far as your ground effects below the door are concerned. It was 1982, the body was a major change from firebirds of the past, music was going from the disco screaming chicken era to glam rock. Rear spoiler looks good. And the hood, whatever floats your boat. Chrome wheels always look good on black cars. Spoked ones too.From this distance it does look like an L88 hood. It looks nicer than most of it's vintage. Don't listen to the dissers, thiers are pobably up on wood with grass growing up from where the console used to be,...Enjoy.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 3
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '91 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI (LO3)
Transmission: 700r4, Vette Servo
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt, PBR disks
Originally posted by 18inchboyds
how about a better pic, and then get rid of the door gfx they looks too low without other gfx , and lower it . And is that a dare i say it , rustang wing .
how about a better pic, and then get rid of the door gfx they looks too low without other gfx , and lower it . And is that a dare i say it , rustang wing .

I think it looks great. However, if that is a mustang wing, I'd have to frown as well.
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Hilo, HI
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: Pro Flo Injected 355
Transmission: BW Super T10 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/3.50
The car does look good with those wheels and i like the hood
...but the rear spoiler...ehh...its allright i guess. I think the factory 82 rear spoiler looks better.
I think if you get the rest of the GFX it would look a lot better.
Overall though nice '82.
I think if you get the rest of the GFX it would look a lot better.
Overall though nice '82.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Long Island NY
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 4 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23
The rear wing is a corvette spoiler. I just bought the car 6 weeks ago. The only thing I've done to it so far is put on new perille (sp?) tires in the front. I would like to put on ground effects for the front and back but can't find a place to buy one. I don't want to lower the car in case it needs to get towed. I have no idea what the hood is, just that it's a non-functional fiberglass cowl hood (one that I've never seen before). I think my favorite part of the car is the notch hatch and if you look at the window you can see a pegasus thats been acid etched into the windows (I bought the car from an old hippy). I want to get some center line wheels, those spokes are a bitch to clean. O by the way, what the hell is a foot car?
82' vs '82
'= feet, like "= inches
the apostrophe was on the wrong side of the 82
They were just "ribbing" it a little. To many acronyms in the world today anyway. Before all that we decided to shorten a unit of measurement??? What were we thinking. Maybe not such a wise move after all. Now that the tecnology age has come and gone.
'= feet, like "= inches
the apostrophe was on the wrong side of the 82
They were just "ribbing" it a little. To many acronyms in the world today anyway. Before all that we decided to shorten a unit of measurement??? What were we thinking. Maybe not such a wise move after all. Now that the tecnology age has come and gone.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Originally posted by <u>THE GRAMMAR POLICE</u>
82' vs '82
'= feet, like "= inches
the apostrophe was on the wrong side of the 82
They were just "ribbing" it a little. To many acronyms in the world today anyway. Before all that we decided to shorten a unit of measurement??? What were we thinking. Maybe not such a wise move after all. Now that the tecnology age has come and gone.
82' vs '82
'= feet, like "= inches
the apostrophe was on the wrong side of the 82
They were just "ribbing" it a little. To many acronyms in the world today anyway. Before all that we decided to shorten a unit of measurement??? What were we thinking. Maybe not such a wise move after all. Now that the tecnology age has come and gone.
And you said 'to' when you should have said 'too'.
Just playing, of course.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Originally posted by Tripper511
How would I go about lowering the car? Is it difficult?
How would I go about lowering the car? Is it difficult?
Or you could be ghetto, unsafe, and possibly illegal, and cut one full coil off the bottom of the spring in teh front and the top in the back.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
Hawk312
Firebirds for Sale
36
Aug 22, 2017 08:55 PM
Hello, Michael
Engine Swap
8
Aug 20, 2015 03:19 PM




