Photoshop of targa GTA with sweet body mods! LOOK!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 1
From: under the hood
Car: 92 Z28 heritage
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Photoshop of targa GTA with sweet body mods! LOOK!
Personally, I think this car looks sweet, actually it looks super sweet *insert Cartman voice here* Too bad it's not real.
COTM Editor
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 14
From: WINDSOR, CO
Car: 91 Z28, 87 SC, 90 IROC, 92 RS
Engine: LS1, 305 TPI, L98, NADA
Transmission: T56, 700r4's, and NADA
Axle/Gears: 3.89, 3.42, 3.23, NADA
Someone buy a plastic welder, and a couple bumpers - quick! That looks really cool - like a C6 vette. The bumper is a very unique idea that I don't think would be impossible.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 28
From: So.west IN
Car: 87 Formula/ 00 Xtreme
Engine: TPI 305/ v6
Transmission: struggling t-5/ 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 3.08/ 3.23
While that doesn't look awful from the side profile... what does a rear shot look like ?
Probably not as good if the stock tails were to be kept.
Probably not as good if the stock tails were to be kept.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,122
Likes: 1
From: colorado
Car: 1992 Trans/am convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 drum WS6
A dude on this board has already done the flat rear bumper thing.
It can be done really easy I think.
Also, just by looking at the pic, it looks like the car has the predator body kit for the rear end. Other than that, you are all admiring a pretty stock looking firebird. Just think about it, this look is really not hard to achieve. I'd give it 1 whole day, with proper tools, and this can be done. Or cut up your bumper, fiberglass it, sand, paint and there you go.
It can be done really easy I think.
Also, just by looking at the pic, it looks like the car has the predator body kit for the rear end. Other than that, you are all admiring a pretty stock looking firebird. Just think about it, this look is really not hard to achieve. I'd give it 1 whole day, with proper tools, and this can be done. Or cut up your bumper, fiberglass it, sand, paint and there you go.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 1
From: under the hood
Car: 92 Z28 heritage
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Originally Posted by xlwhellraiser
I'd give it 1 whole day, with proper tools, and this can be done.
Last edited by fisherbody86; Jun 9, 2006 at 06:08 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I think it'd look better from a profile shot if you curved the rear bumper up more instead of having that squared off edge on the bottom. Like a trucks rollpan kind of thing.
If money was no object my vert would look similar to this.
If money was no object my vert would look similar to this.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 1
From: under the hood
Car: 92 Z28 heritage
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Originally Posted by iansane
I think it'd look better from a profile shot if you curved the rear bumper up more instead of having that squared off edge on the bottom. Like a trucks rollpan kind of thing.
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: bryan tx usa
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: a Big one
Transmission: I dont keep them long.
Man as soon as mine gets out of paint im starting on a new rear clip like that.
My other buddy really wants to start on the targa top for his in about 2 weeks when we have more time.....
My other buddy really wants to start on the targa top for his in about 2 weeks when we have more time.....
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally Posted by fisherbody86
I personaly don't care for the look of truck rollpans, so I would have to say that I perfer the squared off look of the rear ground effects. But to each his own, right?
I'm confused...You kind of have to think about what deadbird mentioned and how the back end of the car will look from the rear...
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 1
From: under the hood
Car: 92 Z28 heritage
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Originally Posted by iansane
If you don't like truck rollpans then why would you be doing this? It's the same exact thing. Except it seems like you want to blend it in even less, making it look more like a truck with no bumper.
I'm confused...
I'm confused...----------
Originally Posted by AudioDEO
Man as soon as mine gets out of paint im starting on a new rear clip like that. My other buddy really wants to start on the targa top for his in about 2 weeks when we have more time.....
Targa top=sweet!
Last edited by fisherbody86; Jun 10, 2006 at 06:51 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally Posted by fisherbody86
That GTA looks nothing like a truck. Theres no cab, or bed, or tailgate anywhere in that pic. I was trying to make it look more like a C4, or something Italian exotic. Thats what I like. Low slung pointy cars with targa tops and vertical rear valances are what appeals to me, so I decided to photoshop those charastics onto a thirdgen. And although I own a camaro, I think that the GTA lends itself to that style alot better. I have no idea what it should look like from the back, but with some effort it could be made to look sweet. So to sum up what I just said: get off my nizo's about the rollpans.
Okay man, sorry. That rear looks pretty close to a tailgate to me.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Morganton, NC
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
If money was no object my vert would look similar to this.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally Posted by gcgarner
If you were going for that look, wouldn't it be a hella lot easier starting with a hardtop?
Didn't think I had to say that I'd do a convertible version.
Originally Posted by gcgarner
If you were going for that look, wouldn't it be a hella lot easier starting with a hardtop?
sure you could re use the peice that you cut out but a t-top car is more structurally sound because of no rigidity from the roof. just like a convertable would. either way u would need to re-enforce the windshield, have a rollcage, and definatly some subframe connecters to stop it from bending the frame if you were going to do some racing or even some spirited driving.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 1
From: under the hood
Car: 92 Z28 heritage
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Originally Posted by TylerM
u would need to re-enforce the windshield, have a rollcage, and definatly some subframe connecters to stop it from bending the frame if you were going to do some racing or even some spirited driving.
So basically if you want to targa a third gen, you will need to massivly reinforce the structure of the car first.
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: stafford conn.
Car: 2002 ranger(showtruck) 90 firebird
Engine: 3.1l
Transmission: 700r4
to do the targa might be easier to start with a convertible and add on the back half of a t top roof and pillars. cause in my thinking a drop tops frame is already strengthened to handle having the top down. right?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally Posted by 91 v6
to do the targa might be easier to start with a convertible and add on the back half of a t top roof and pillars. cause in my thinking a drop tops frame is already strengthened to handle having the top down. right?
Have you ever looked at the side of a house and seen the gutters at the bottom of the roof? Picture one of those running down the bottom side of the door and thats about all the "reinforcement" 'verts are getting stock.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 20
From: Tomball, TX
Car: 89 TTA
Engine: Turbo 3.8
Transmission: 200R4
I really like it but with something like that you would lose the honeycomb that sits behind the bumper. Could be important for some people that are prone to backing into trashcans or mailboxes lol.
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: bryan tx usa
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: a Big one
Transmission: I dont keep them long.
my honey combs already gone. BUt as far as makeing a targe were going to weld braces in the a pillars to help the windshield. Where else is it going to be weak. We could also reinforce the underside of the car.
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 377
From: Las Vegas
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
It's a TransVette!
I'm not fond of that big, 'Vette-like butt. I know a lot of guys love big butts, but not me... at least, not on cars. And I think those wheels should stay on 'Vettes too. But the other 'Vette feature, the targa, looks nice, though.
I found the real pic of that car on another thirgden website and posted it in thread about 'raked stance' a couple of months ago. It's not my car, but I really liked its stance... just about perfect, IMO. And other than the owner's choice of wheels, I think the real car looks as good as any thirdgen can--and much better than that p'shop'd pic above.
I'm not fond of that big, 'Vette-like butt. I know a lot of guys love big butts, but not me... at least, not on cars. And I think those wheels should stay on 'Vettes too. But the other 'Vette feature, the targa, looks nice, though.
I found the real pic of that car on another thirgden website and posted it in thread about 'raked stance' a couple of months ago. It's not my car, but I really liked its stance... just about perfect, IMO. And other than the owner's choice of wheels, I think the real car looks as good as any thirdgen can--and much better than that p'shop'd pic above.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally Posted by AudioDEO
my honey combs already gone. BUt as far as makeing a targe were going to weld braces in the a pillars to help the windshield. Where else is it going to be weak. We could also reinforce the underside of the car.
You're wasting time, metal, money, and effort if you reinforce the a-pillar. The only way that would help would be with a 10 pt cage or something similar to tie it to at the b-pillar. You'd be fine with a halo bar, rear bars and forward bars for "reinforcement".
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: bryan tx usa
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: a Big one
Transmission: I dont keep them long.
Originally Posted by iansane
You're wasting time, metal, money, and effort if you reinforce the a-pillar. The only way that would help would be with a 10 pt cage or something similar to tie it to at the b-pillar. You'd be fine with a halo bar, rear bars and forward bars for "reinforcement".
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
The a-pillars? No. The way to strengthen the car is to tie the wet noodle together. Not just add metal to a random area.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






