Those using 1408 9496 1LE PROP VALVE

Subscribe
Jan 3, 2007 | 03:36 PM
  #1  
This is the 82-early 89 version FYI. It looks like gmpartdirect is the way to go by the way. About 72 dollars shipped to me.

Anyway a lot of threads have been devoted to this.
Many people saying GM finally got it right with the late 89-up version because this was the only one for all F-bodys starting 90. So I know a few of you have used the late 89 up version with success.

What about this 82-early 89 version 14089496...anyone noticed a difference ? I mean I hope it has the better proporioning that the late 89 up version supposedly has ?

Thx for patience and replies.
Reply 0
Jan 4, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #2  
anybody ?
Reply 0
Jan 4, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #3  
i had it on my LS1 setup. never had anything else on there to compare it with, but it worked good
Reply 0
Jan 4, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #4  
I dont think the valving is different between the two. My understanding is that pre mid 89 used a course pitch fitting(M 1.0?) at the inlet of the prop valve, while mid 89 on used a finer pitch fitting (M 1.5 or 1.25 cant remember). My 14089496 works great on my 85 with stock fronts and 1le rears. I did have to bend one line, however, no biggle.
Reply 0
Jan 4, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #5  
Quote: i had it on my LS1 setup. never had anything else on there to compare it with, but it worked good
What year car and are you sure you had the 82-early 89 version...14089496 ? Thx
Reply 0
Jan 5, 2007 | 05:45 AM
  #6  
I believe the brake lines were changed mid-89 from M1.0 to M1.5 flare threads. The M1.0 lines are the first design and the M1.5 lines are the second. I used 14089496 for my front 1LE conversion and later for the 1LE rears. Mine was a direct fit.

JamesC
Reply 0
Jan 5, 2007 | 12:24 PM
  #7  
Quote: I dont think the valving is different between the two.
That is what I am interested in ? Anybody verify this ?

I undertstand the thread pitch was different. Thx
Reply 0
Subscribe