Car Audio Car audio related questions and helpful hints for building the best sound system for your car or getting the most out of what you have.

12" Subs: Pioneer or Audiobahn?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2002 | 03:53 PM
  #1  
socal85tam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 HSR
Transmission: 4 speed Automatic
Axle/Gears: 4:10
12" Subs: Pioneer or Audiobahn?

I'm going to get a pair of 12" subs, and I would like some opinions on wich to get: This Pioneer TS-W304C

Or this Audiobahn natural sound AW-1251Q

I have used the pioneer model and it is a great sub, but I can get that audiobahn sub cheaper than the pioneer. The fact that has dual voice coil got my atention, and that it handles more power than the pioneer.
I have no experience with audiobahn stuff, but if it is a better sub, I don't mind switching brands.
Is anybody using them or has listened to them?

Last edited by socal85tam; Dec 29, 2002 at 04:04 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2002 | 06:40 PM
  #2  
406project's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
yeah um.... i think pioneer sucks pretty bad especially compared to audiobahn audiobahn sh*t *****n rocks and thats all there is to it a friend has his hooked up to 500 watts(fried the other side of the amp ) and they stilll beat hard
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2002 | 10:54 PM
  #3  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...=audiobahn+sub
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2002 | 11:11 PM
  #4  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
I have a similar model of that Pioneer sub (TS-W33C) except mine doesn't have the metal cover to help disipate heat.

I loved the way it sounded in the store, and I love the way it sounds in my car. I replaced an MTX Thunder 3000 with it, and it made a HUGE difference.

The Thunder 3000 was the entry level MTX sub, but it cost the same as the Pioneer did, and it had nothing on the Pioneer. After installing the Pioneer, I had an entire new sounding system.

I don't have Audiobahn, and I never have, so I can't say that they're good or bad. But I can tell you that I don't think you'll be upset with the Pioneer.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2002 | 05:14 AM
  #5  
biff85ta's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow Kentucky
Car: 04 Vette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
audiobahn if I had to pick between the two
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2002 | 04:44 PM
  #6  
5.0L1992RS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury, MD, USA
:hail: audiobahn:hail:

Reply
Old Dec 31, 2002 | 01:40 PM
  #7  
socal85tam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 HSR
Transmission: 4 speed Automatic
Axle/Gears: 4:10
I went to get the Audiobahn subs yesterday, and gess what, they were sold out . So I got a pair of the TS-W304C pioneer ones, and a Rockford Fosgate 400s Punch amp. I just finished the installation and those things really make my car shake.
I had never used RF amps before, and I'm very impressed of the quality of this stuff. The specs says that is rated 400w RMS, but the actual measurements that their test technicians do, sais that this particular amp delivered 417 watts RMS of total power.
The amp even comes with the ellen wrenches to use for the wire hook ups.
Is'nt it great to get more that what you expect instead of less?

IMO Great amp. :hail: RF
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nick Locking
Car Audio
8
Sep 30, 2015 04:24 PM
zayne0
Camaros for Sale
0
Aug 24, 2015 07:22 PM
5.0L1992RS
Aftermarket Product Review
4
Dec 13, 2001 06:26 AM
Pukka
Aftermarket Product Review
3
Nov 25, 2001 07:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 PM.