Car Audio Car audio related questions and helpful hints for building the best sound system for your car or getting the most out of what you have.

Best low buck audio quality?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 03:02 PM
  #1  
broke91firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: pardeeville, wi
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird convertible
Engine: 3.1 soon to be 3.4/3100
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: original gears, for now
Best low buck audio quality?

Hey guys, I am planning on doing a small audio build when I do the custom interior in my '91 convertible. My thought was a set of 4" speakers in the dash and kick panels, a set of tweeters somewhere in the dash or build into the windshield pillars, 6.5" subs in the back of the door, and 6X9's in the stock rear speaker positions. Thoughts?
What brands would be good for a nice sounding budget build?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 04:26 PM
  #2  
Darren.s's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Alberta canada
Car: 1982 Recaro Trans Am
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: Turbo 200
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

decently cheap audio would be Alpine, Pioneer, and Kicker Audio. But if I were you I wouldn't waste my money on cheap audio. In the end you get what you pay for. Keep in mind when you purchase speakers that dependant on the deck you may need to run a amp for them. I would save my money and wait until there's enough dough together to pick up high quality audio(I am running Memphis audio all around(Minus Deck and sub Amp)
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 04:42 PM
  #3  
broke91firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: pardeeville, wi
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird convertible
Engine: 3.1 soon to be 3.4/3100
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: original gears, for now
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

OK. Ya maybe low buck isn't the best description for my wants. My goal is just hood sound. Doesn't need to be perfect sound or super loud. My friend suggested Kicker for the speakers and Memphis for the subs.
Do I need to add a 10" or 12" sub or are the 6.5"'s enough?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 06:01 PM
  #4  
broke91firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: pardeeville, wi
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird convertible
Engine: 3.1 soon to be 3.4/3100
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: original gears, for now
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

If you have a 10" sub do you need an amplifier?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 10:50 PM
  #5  
92RS_Ttop's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 5
From: Pennsylvania
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Rebuilt 350 going in after paint
Transmission: WCT5, 7k & counting behind the 350
Axle/Gears: 4thgen disc rear w/ 3.73 Posi
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Originally Posted by broke91firebird
If you have a 10" sub do you need an amplifier?
Yes.

For that matter, for the number of speakers you're suggesting, your gonna need a couple amps. The dash speakers won't be heard much, if at all, if you have Ttops and take them off running off just the head unit.

I've always had good luck with Pioneer head units. In fact, I'm still running the first one I ever bought, back in 97, in my camaro. It's been in 4 different cars through the years and still sounds like it did when I first bought it.

For now, I have stock size Fosgate speakers in the dash, and a pair of Pioneer 6x9s in the sail panels. The Pioneers are running off a smaller amp,200 or 250 watts per channel IIRC. They sound good, even with the tops off. The dash speakers are running off the head unit and like I mentioned, I can barely hear them with the tops off. I just recently picked up an amp for them, but haven't wired it in yet.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 10:56 PM
  #6  
broke91firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: pardeeville, wi
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird convertible
Engine: 3.1 soon to be 3.4/3100
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: original gears, for now
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Worse than t-tops. Its a 1991 Firebird Convertible. So if I were to run everything through a 500w would that be good? Doesn't have to be loud just a nice sounding set up.

I'd like to use my head unit that I already have but I'm not sure how well a 9 year old Sony xplode would run everything.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 10:53 AM
  #7  
jwfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 1
From: Western NY State
Car: 87 bird
Engine: enough to break stuff
Transmission: manual th400
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

if i had a limited budget with a convertible you are certainly going to need the amp most of all, it provides volume and clarity at higher volumes. so i would just get a good quality set of 6x9s and what ever amp the power level requires. properly powered 6x9s will provide a good but of bass by themselves, then down the road if you dont like it you can put another amp in and a single 10 or 12 in the trunk. which in my opinion would sound better than two 6.5s with very limited airspace and power.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 11:04 AM
  #8  
jwfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 1
From: Western NY State
Car: 87 bird
Engine: enough to break stuff
Transmission: manual th400
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

this is what i have not the cheapest but sounds good and will last a while. you can just run the fronts off the HU

http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_...dio-db691.html
http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_...-GM-A5602.html
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 11:15 AM
  #9  
broke91firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: pardeeville, wi
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird convertible
Engine: 3.1 soon to be 3.4/3100
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: original gears, for now
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Originally Posted by jwfirebird
this is what i have not the cheapest but sounds good and will last a while. you can just run the fronts off the HU

http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_...dio-db691.html
http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_...-GM-A5602.html
Just to make sure I understand since this is my first audio build, you are suggesting the amped 6X9's in the back and just the 4" rounds in the dash and kick panels? Or just the dash?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:55 PM
  #10  
Darren.s's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Alberta canada
Car: 1982 Recaro Trans Am
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: Turbo 200
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Originally Posted by broke91firebird
Just to make sure I understand since this is my first audio build, you are suggesting the amped 6X9's in the back and just the 4" rounds in the dash and kick panels? Or just the dash?
I wouldn't run just a couple speakers on a amp. Run them all, if you run say two on a amp those will be clearer than the ones running off deck power. You will be able to hear the difference and so will others. It is best to run all the speakers off the same amp if possible. But you also need to keep in mind with amps you need to looks at the ohms as well as them RMS(Peak power doesn't messng anything) as for the subs, it would be better if you were to get a two channel(if you're going to run two subs) and be sure to not underpower or overpower them. I also have a pioneer deck and a absolutely love it, in my eyes that is the only thing pioneer makes that is good/higher quality
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:00 PM
  #11  
Darren.s's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Alberta canada
Car: 1982 Recaro Trans Am
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: Turbo 200
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Also for speakers. Don't make the speakers handle the bass, that is what the subs are for. Let the subs handle all the bass and the speakers to handle the treble. If your speakers have bass going through them they will distort. This is just my experience I am basing this all off of as well as my buddy who is a Memphis Audio dealer
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:08 PM
  #12  
broke91firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: pardeeville, wi
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird convertible
Engine: 3.1 soon to be 3.4/3100
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: original gears, for now
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

OK. How do you keep the speakers from running bass?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:58 PM
  #13  
Darren.s's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Alberta canada
Car: 1982 Recaro Trans Am
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: Turbo 200
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Originally Posted by broke91firebird
OK. How do you keep the speakers from running bass?
Tune your amp, you can also pick up decks that allow you to set which frequencies you don't want your speakers to play. I currently don't have a amp for my speakers so a little bit still comes through, but on my deck I have it set up so that only frequencies higher than 200Hz play through my speakers and anything lower plays through my sub.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 03:25 PM
  #14  
92RS_Ttop's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 5
From: Pennsylvania
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Rebuilt 350 going in after paint
Transmission: WCT5, 7k & counting behind the 350
Axle/Gears: 4thgen disc rear w/ 3.73 Posi
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Originally Posted by broke91firebird
Just to make sure I understand since this is my first audio build, you are suggesting the amped 6X9's in the back and just the 4" rounds in the dash and kick panels? Or just the dash?
The dash speakers are not round. They are 4x6 or 4x7, I can't remember which. I'd run 1 amp for all 4 speakers as well if possible. Easier wiring and easier to mount/hide.

I'd put 6" or 6.5" speakers in the kick panels, they'll sound better than 4" speakers.

6x9 can give decent sounding bass, as long as you don't expect them to thump hard enough to rattle stuff and they have enough airspace.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2015 | 12:56 AM
  #15  
broke91firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: pardeeville, wi
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird convertible
Engine: 3.1 soon to be 3.4/3100
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: original gears, for now
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Originally Posted by 92RS_Ttop
The dash speakers are not round. They are 4x6 or 4x7, I can't remember which. I'd run 1 amp for all 4 speakers as well if possible. Easier wiring and easier to mount/hide.

I'd put 6" or 6.5" speakers in the kick panels, they'll sound better than 4" speakers.

6x9 can give decent sounding bass, as long as you don't expect them to thump hard enough to rattle stuff and they have enough airspace.
Stocks are 4X6 in the dash I believe. I have been told the 4" rounds sound better though. I'm only worried about having a nice sound. I do not want a heavy thup so I wouldn't be pushing the 6X9s for that.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2015 | 10:03 AM
  #16  
jwfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 1
From: Western NY State
Car: 87 bird
Engine: enough to break stuff
Transmission: manual th400
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

just some decent 4x6s are fine, and they dont need amped if you have a aftermarket HU like you do. because they only require a little bit of power, they will be balanced by the gain control on the amp for the 6x9s. and if you dont want the thump all you need is a stereo amp that has approximately the same rms power per channel as the 6x9s. good 6x9s require alot of power and wont sound right if not powered properly,aftermarket HU's only put out 12-18rms which is fine for 4x6 but the 6x9s need amped.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2015 | 12:42 PM
  #17  
Darren.s's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Alberta canada
Car: 1982 Recaro Trans Am
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: Turbo 200
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Originally Posted by jwfirebird
just some decent 4x6s are fine, and they dont need amped if you have a aftermarket HU like you do. because they only require a little bit of power, they will be balanced by the gain control on the amp for the 6x9s. and if you dont want the thump all you need is a stereo amp that has approximately the same rms power per channel as the 6x9s. good 6x9s require alot of power and wont sound right if not powered properly,aftermarket HU's only put out 12-18rms which is fine for 4x6 but the 6x9s need amped.
It all depends on which Head Unit he's running. It could be that it's not the powerful enough to run. But even if you run the backs off of an amp and the fronts not, you will be able to hear the difference. My buddy has done it before with his alpine system. But in the end it all boils down to personal preference.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2015 | 07:15 PM
  #18  
92RS_Ttop's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 5
From: Pennsylvania
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Rebuilt 350 going in after paint
Transmission: WCT5, 7k & counting behind the 350
Axle/Gears: 4thgen disc rear w/ 3.73 Posi
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Originally Posted by jwfirebird
just some decent 4x6s are fine, and they dont need amped if you have a aftermarket HU like you do. because they only require a little bit of power, they will be balanced by the gain control on the amp for the 6x9s. and if you dont want the thump all you need is a stereo amp that has approximately the same rms power per channel as the 6x9s. good 6x9s require alot of power and wont sound right if not powered properly,aftermarket HU's only put out 12-18rms which is fine for 4x6 but the 6x9s need amped.
The front speakers may sound fine in a hardtop when run off the HU(mine do with the tops on), but when I take my tops off, I can't hear them above 35-40MPH. With the OP having a convertible, it's going to be even worse when he puts the top down.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2015 | 08:59 AM
  #19  
jwfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 1
From: Western NY State
Car: 87 bird
Engine: enough to break stuff
Transmission: manual th400
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

there is way more than just power involved, you have distance, and each speaker can make or less sound at a given power level. but for a new person that doesnt seem interested in perfect sound, and range i am sure it will be fine.

i just have polk 4x6s off the Clarion HU in my firebird and i have ttops and most always have them off. also until last year or two i ran open headers on my big cam crate engine. its good enough for what it is. obviously not going to be an audiophile setup but its a million times better than the stock crap
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2015 | 03:12 PM
  #20  
Ed1LE's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 19
From: Westminster, MD USA
Car: 91 Firebird 'vert, 91 Formula
Engine: 5.7, 5.0
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: Auburn w/ 3.73's, 3.42
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

I have a '91 Firebird convertible as well and recently installed Polk's front and rear with an Alpine head unit. Fronts are 4x6 Polk DB461, rears are 6.5 Polk DB651 (not 6x9). The biggest issue with installing aftermarket 4x6's in the Firebirds is dash interference on the drivers side due to the larger speaker magnet. After doing research, one of the reasons I went with the Polks was that I had read on here that they would fit without issue. That wasn't the case and I still had to pull the gauges and cut some of the inner dash for the magnet to clear. It wasn't a big deal and I like Polks anyway so it was worth the effort. I also purchased them through Amazon and only paid $55 & $59 for them (about half what you'd pay through Crutchfield or local stereo shop). They sound decent now but all reviews say the Polks prefer an amp which is next on my list along with a sub. I'm not looking to rattle windows of cars around me, just some good sound and think I'm on the right track. Eventually, I'd like to add kickpanel components or door speakers (but not looking to give up my door pockets/cup holders yet!).
My biggest concern now is adding a sub and sub location. Was looking at the trunk enclsures sold on here and adding a 10" or something like the sound ordnance B-8PTD powered 8" and placing under dash on passenger side.
Sorry, not trying to hi-jack OP's post but since we have same cars, hoping maybe it can help us both!
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2015 | 03:18 PM
  #21  
broke91firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: pardeeville, wi
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird convertible
Engine: 3.1 soon to be 3.4/3100
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: original gears, for now
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

Thank you for the input. How does that set-up sound in your car? I already have a set of Alpine 6X9's out of my hardtop that i will be figuring out how to put into the rear. And I read on here that the 4" rounds sound better than the stock 4X6's so that's where the sizes came from. I'll probably just end up pulling all the speakers out of the hardtop and put them into the convertible. That would probably be best for the time/money restraints I have.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2015 | 03:26 PM
  #22  
Ed1LE's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 19
From: Westminster, MD USA
Car: 91 Firebird 'vert, 91 Formula
Engine: 5.7, 5.0
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: Auburn w/ 3.73's, 3.42
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

6x9's can be done but need to be surface mounted vs behind the factory grills. 4" will work up front, you just need toget a little creative mounting them but nothing major. I had an Iroc with 4" in dash by prior owner. Honestly, b/c both the 4" and 4x6 are so small, I don't know how much of a difference there really is as neither will put our a tremendous amount of sound compared to 6.5 or 6x9s. Regarding budget, using what you already have is definitely most cost effective!
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2015 | 03:56 PM
  #23  
jwfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 1
From: Western NY State
Car: 87 bird
Engine: enough to break stuff
Transmission: manual th400
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

i think there are clearance issues with the different years, which i am not sure what years work and what doesnt but the db461's fit my 87 bird without any sort of mods
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2015 | 04:09 PM
  #24  
cdoyle's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 37
Re: Best low buck audio quality?

What type of sound are you going for?

I would focus more on your front stage, have you considered kickpods?
Not that hard to do (see my sig on how to build some). You could go with a 6.5 and tweeter setup. You should end up with a pretty good sound.

Do people sit in the back seats much? I personally don't run any rear speakers. Most of the time when you add rear speakers, you end up pulling the sound behind you. Unless you have time alignment settings. Save the money on better equipment for the front stage and subs.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
db057
TBI
14
Apr 28, 2019 07:45 AM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
26
Sep 21, 2015 01:08 PM
3rdgenkindagal
Tech / General Engine
15
Sep 13, 2015 02:02 PM
adelane
Electronics
1
Sep 9, 2015 08:51 PM
Street Lethal
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
0
Sep 7, 2015 01:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 PM.