Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Is it possible to be too much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 05:27 PM
  #1  
92RS shearn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Car: 92' RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9-bolt
Is it possible to be too much?

I was looking at the different caarbs out there and there are 600CFM and 750 CFM, I know what they all men but if you only needed 600CFM carb and you used a 750 would it be too much? In so much that you would actually lose power? Or would proper tuning just give you a wider birth of things you could do with it?

------------------
1 5/8 Hooker Competetion Headers, custom y-pipe,no cat, Flowmaster,Edelbrock open filliment filter ,K&N ,
160 stat, BF G-Force w-rated tires
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 05:58 PM
  #2  
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
It's all relative to what you are putting under that carb. A wimpy 305 or a fire breathin' 350 or 383. The smaller carb will always have better throttle response, and the bigger one will usually make a little more peak horsepower. If I was going to go out and buy a carb for a motor I planned to build up as I could afford it. I would by the 750. If it has some kind of auto/secondary action it will not be too big 'cause it will size it self to the motor. Check out the Holley #3310 750 Vac sec, the edelbrock performer #1407 even a rebuilt Q-jet will work well. the early ones (pre '74 were 750 cfm. Later ones M4M type are 795 cfm. I think the Edelbrock performer is probibily the easiest to work on and most trouble free. They are a very smooth carb out of the box, and can be tweeked to a sharp tune with edelbrock parts.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2001 | 01:26 PM
  #3  
Big454blockchevy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
From: El Paso Texas
Car: 86 z28
Engine: Hyd. roller 498
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.90 gears
Yep, a 750 cfm Holley would be a good choice. I've had it on my 305 back when it wasn't a 383 and it worked well with a little bit of tuning. Now if I had no plans for the 305 I would have gone with a smaller cfm carb.

------------------
383 86 Camaro Z28 ---1/4 mile e.t>12.89@108.8mph,,
10.5:1compression Dart Pro 1 Aluminum heads 215cc>2.05/1.60 valves,400 steel crank,cam specs:224/234 at 050 525/525 lift,3500 stall converter,shift kit,4.10 gears,770 Holley Avenger,Victor Jr. Intake,true dual exh,Hooker headers with 40 series Flowmasters,MSD Coil and Module.ALSO SECOND GEN Z28---mods:454 BBC,.546 max lift(doug herbert cam ) 750 Holley vac sec. ,Edelbrock Performer manifold,Holley electric fuel pump,Hooker headers,Flowmaster mufflers,beefed up 700r4 tranny, 3.90 gears, powertrax unit, B&M console shifter.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2001 | 05:01 PM
  #4  
82camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 3
From: NE
Car: 82 camaro SC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
It depends on the whole car. If you have high gears(2.73 or something), a stock 305, and a 750 holley squarebore--off the line acceleration will probably suffer compared to a 600 holley, without any upper rpm gain. With a spreadbore(like a q-jet) off the line acceration will be fine with a 750--smaller primaries.


------------------
350 with stealth intake, holley carb, 470 lift cam. 700r4 with .5 boost valve, vette servo, tci lock-up kit, B&M megashifter. Richmond 3.73 gears, powertrax locker, timkin bearings, synthetic lube. Custom 3 inch single into 2 2.5 pipes. 1 1/2 drop springs, 1 5/16 solid front sway bar, 1 inch rear bar, custom subframe connectors, custom LCA relocation brackets. Kobel ground FX, currant red metallic paint. Lots of other stuff...
82camaro
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.